1
|
Naganur V, Tse J, Muthusamy J, Snell S, Wang S, Seneviratne U. Does the interval between the first unprovoked seizure and EEG influence the diagnostic yield? Epilepsy Behav 2025; 165:110311. [PMID: 39983591 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2025] [Accepted: 02/09/2025] [Indexed: 02/23/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is no consensus on the optimum time for an EEG after the first seizure. We sought to investigate whether the timing of an EEG after a first unprovoked seizure influences its diagnostic yield. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Australia. Adult patients who presented with a first unprovoked seizure were studied. Using multivariable logistic regression, we investigated the association of EEG timing, seizure presentation, and risk factors for epilepsy with the presence of interictal epileptiform discharges (IED) in the EEG as the outcome. The chi-square test compared EEG yields across each week after the seizure. RESULTS Among 452 patients, the time from seizure to EEG did not show a statistically significant impact on the presence of IEDs (OR = 1, 95 % CI 0.99-1, p = 0.095). The yield of epileptiform abnormalities generally declined over time but was not statistically significant across weeks (p = 0.40). A modest but significant relationship was found between age and the likelihood of detecting IEDs, with older age associated with a lower yield of abnormalities (OR = 0.98, 95 % CI 0.973-0.997, p = 0.016). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the timing of the EEG following the first unprovoked seizure does not significantly impact the diagnostic yield.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaidehi Naganur
- Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Tse
- Monash School of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jayan Muthusamy
- Department of Neurology, Concord Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shakira Snell
- Department of Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shuyu Wang
- Department of Medicine (Austin Health), The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Udaya Seneviratne
- Department of Neuroscience, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Department of Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lemoine É, Neves Briard J, Rioux B, Gharbi O, Podbielski R, Nauche B, Toffa D, Keezer M, Lesage F, Nguyen DK, Bou Assi E. Computer-assisted analysis of routine EEG to identify hidden biomarkers of epilepsy: A systematic review. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2024; 24:66-86. [PMID: 38204455 PMCID: PMC10776381 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Computational analysis of routine electroencephalogram (rEEG) could improve the accuracy of epilepsy diagnosis. We aim to systematically assess the diagnostic performances of computed biomarkers for epilepsy in individuals undergoing rEEG. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM reviews, IEEE Explore and the grey literature for studies published between January 1961 and December 2022. We included studies reporting a computational method to diagnose epilepsy based on rEEG without relying on the identification of interictal epileptiform discharges or seizures. Diagnosis of epilepsy as per a treating physician was the reference standard. We assessed the risk of bias using an adapted QUADAS-2 tool. Results We screened 10 166 studies, and 37 were included. The sample size ranged from 8 to 192 (mean=54). The computed biomarkers were based on linear (43%), non-linear (27%), connectivity (38%), and convolutional neural networks (10%) models. The risk of bias was high or unclear in all studies, more commonly from spectrum effect and data leakage. Diagnostic accuracy ranged between 64% and 100%. We observed high methodological heterogeneity, preventing pooling of accuracy measures. Conclusion The current literature provides insufficient evidence to reliably assess the diagnostic yield of computational analysis of rEEG. Significance We provide guidelines regarding patient selection, reference standard, algorithms, and performance validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Émile Lemoine
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Montreal, Canada
- Institute of biomedical engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Center’s Research Center, Canada
| | - Joel Neves Briard
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Montreal, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Center’s Research Center, Canada
| | - Bastien Rioux
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Oumayma Gharbi
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Montreal, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Center’s Research Center, Canada
| | | | - Bénédicte Nauche
- University of Montreal Hospital Center’s Research Center, Canada
| | - Denahin Toffa
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Montreal, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Center’s Research Center, Canada
| | - Mark Keezer
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Montreal, Canada
- School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Canada
- Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, the Netherlands
| | - Frédéric Lesage
- Institute of biomedical engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Canada
| | - Dang K. Nguyen
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Montreal, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Center’s Research Center, Canada
| | - Elie Bou Assi
- Department of Neurosciences, University of Montreal, Canada
- University of Montreal Hospital Center’s Research Center, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang Z, Song X, Chen L, Nan J, Sun Y, Pang M, Zhang K, Liu X, Ming D. Research progress of epileptic seizure prediction methods based on EEG. Cogn Neurodyn 2024; 18:2731-2750. [PMID: 39555266 PMCID: PMC11564528 DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10109-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 11/19/2024] Open
Abstract
At present, at least 30% of refractory epilepsy patients in the world cannot be effectively controlled and treated. The suddenness and unpredictability of seizures greatly affect the physical and mental health and even the life safety of patients, and the realization of early prediction of seizures and the adoption of interventions are of great significance to the improvement of patients' quality of life. In this paper, we firstly introduce the design process of EEG-based seizure prediction methods, introduce several databases commonly used in the research, and summarize the commonly used methods in pre-processing, feature extraction, classification and identification, and post-processing. Then, based on scalp EEG and intracranial EEG respectively, we reviewed the current status of epileptic seizure prediction research from five commonly used feature analysis methods, and make a comprehensive evaluation of both. Finally, this paper describes the reasons why the current algorithms cannot be applied to the clinic, summarizes their limitations, and gives corresponding suggestions, aiming to provide improvement directions for subsequent research. In addition, deep learning algorithms have emerged in recent years, and this paper also compares the advantages and disadvantages of deep learning algorithms with traditional machine learning methods, in the hope of providing researchers with new technologies and new ideas and making significant breakthroughs in the field of epileptic seizure prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongpeng Wang
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
- Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin, 300392 China
| | - Xiaoxin Song
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
| | - Long Chen
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
- Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin, 300392 China
| | - Jinxiang Nan
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
| | - Yulin Sun
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
| | - Meijun Pang
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
- Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin, 300392 China
| | - Kuo Zhang
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
- Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin, 300392 China
| | - Xiuyun Liu
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
- Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin, 300392 China
| | - Dong Ming
- Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
- Haihe Laboratory of Brain-Computer Interaction and Human-Machine Integration, Tianjin, 300392 China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pellinen J, Foster EC, Wilmshurst JM, Zuberi SM, French J. Improving epilepsy diagnosis across the lifespan: approaches and innovations. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:511-521. [PMID: 38631767 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00079-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Epilepsy diagnosis is often delayed or inaccurate, exposing people to ongoing seizures and their substantial consequences until effective treatment is initiated. Important factors contributing to this problem include delayed recognition of seizure symptoms by patients and eyewitnesses; cultural, geographical, and financial barriers to seeking health care; and missed or delayed diagnosis by health-care providers. Epilepsy diagnosis involves several steps. The first step is recognition of epileptic seizures; next is classification of epilepsy type and whether an epilepsy syndrome is present; finally, the underlying epilepsy-associated comorbidities and potential causes must be identified, which differ across the lifespan. Clinical history, elicited from patients and eyewitnesses, is a fundamental component of the diagnostic pathway. Recent technological advances, including smartphone videography and genetic testing, are increasingly used in routine practice. Innovations in technology, such as artificial intelligence, could provide new possibilities for directly and indirectly detecting epilepsy and might make valuable contributions to diagnostic algorithms in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Pellinen
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Emma C Foster
- Department of Neurosciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jo M Wilmshurst
- Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital and University of Cape Town Neuroscience Institute, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sameer M Zuberi
- Royal Hospital for Children and University of Glasgow School of Health & Wellbeing, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jacqueline French
- Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Power L, Friedman A, Bardouille T. Atypical paroxysmal slow cortical activity in healthy adults: Relationship to age and cognitive performance. Neurobiol Aging 2024; 136:44-57. [PMID: 38309051 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
Paroxysmal patterns of slow cortical activity have been detected in EEG recordings from individuals with age-related neuropathology and have been shown to be correlated with cognitive dysfunction and blood-brain barrier disruption in these participants. The prevalence of these events in healthy participants, however, has not been studied. In this work, we inspect MEG recordings from 623 healthy participants from the Cam-CAN dataset for the presence of paroxysmal slow wave events (PSWEs). PSWEs were detected in approximately 20% of healthy participants in the dataset, and participants with PSWEs tended to be older and have lower cognitive performance than those without PSWEs. In addition, event features changed linearly with age and cognitive performance, resulting in longer and slower events in older adults, and more widespread events in those with low cognitive performance. These findings provide the first evidence of PSWEs in a subset of purportedly healthy adults. Going forward, these events may have utility as a diagnostic biomarker for atypical brain activity in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Power
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Alon Friedman
- Department of Medical Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Timothy Bardouille
- Department of Physics & Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lemoine É, Toffa D, Pelletier-Mc Duff G, Xu AQ, Jemel M, Tessier JD, Lesage F, Nguyen DK, Bou Assi E. Machine-learning for the prediction of one-year seizure recurrence based on routine electroencephalography. Sci Rep 2023; 13:12650. [PMID: 37542101 PMCID: PMC10403587 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-39799-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Predicting seizure recurrence risk is critical to the diagnosis and management of epilepsy. Routine electroencephalography (EEG) is a cornerstone of the estimation of seizure recurrence risk. However, EEG interpretation relies on the visual identification of interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) by neurologists, with limited sensitivity. Automated processing of EEG could increase its diagnostic yield and accessibility. The main objective was to develop a prediction model based on automated EEG processing to predict one-year seizure recurrence in patients undergoing routine EEG. We retrospectively selected a consecutive cohort of 517 patients undergoing routine EEG at our institution (training set) and a separate, temporally shifted cohort of 261 patients (testing set). We developed an automated processing pipeline to extract linear and non-linear features from the EEGs. We trained machine learning algorithms on multichannel EEG segments to predict one-year seizure recurrence. We evaluated the impact of IEDs and clinical confounders on performances and validated the performances on the testing set. The receiver operating characteristic area-under-the-curve for seizure recurrence after EEG in the testing set was 0.63 (95% CI 0.55-0.71). Predictions were still significantly above chance in EEGs with no IEDs. Our findings suggest that there are changes other than IEDs in the EEG signal embodying seizure propensity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Émile Lemoine
- Department of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Qc, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Qc, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montréal, Qc, Canada
| | - Denahin Toffa
- Department of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Qc, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montréal, Qc, Canada
| | - Geneviève Pelletier-Mc Duff
- Department of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Qc, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montréal, Qc, Canada
| | - An Qi Xu
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montréal, Qc, Canada
| | - Mezen Jemel
- Department of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Qc, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montréal, Qc, Canada
| | - Jean-Daniel Tessier
- Department of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Qc, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montréal, Qc, Canada
| | - Frédéric Lesage
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Montréal, Qc, Canada
- Centre de Recherche de l'institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Qc, Canada
| | - Dang K Nguyen
- Department of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Qc, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montréal, Qc, Canada
| | - Elie Bou Assi
- Department of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Qc, Canada.
- Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montréal, Qc, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Milikovsky DZ, Sharabi Y, Giladi N, Mirelman A, Sosnik R, Fahoum F, Maidan I. Paroxysmal Slow-Wave Events Are Uncommon in Parkinson's Disease. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:918. [PMID: 36679715 PMCID: PMC9862294 DOI: 10.3390/s23020918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is currently considered to be a multisystem neurodegenerative disease that involves cognitive alterations. EEG slowing has been associated with cognitive decline in various neurological diseases, such as PD, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and epilepsy, indicating cortical involvement. A novel method revealed that this EEG slowing is composed of paroxysmal slow-wave events (PSWE) in AD and epilepsy, but in PD it has not been tested yet. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the presence of PSWE in PD as a biomarker for cortical involvement. Methods: 31 PD patients, 28 healthy controls, and 18 juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) patients (served as positive control), underwent four minutes of resting-state EEG. Spectral analyses were performed to identify PSWEs in nine brain regions. Mixed-model analysis was used to compare between groups and brain regions. The correlation between PSWEs and PD duration was examined using Spearman’s test. Results: No significant differences in the number of PSWEs were observed between PD patients and controls (p > 0.478) in all brain regions. In contrast, JME patients showed a higher number of PSWEs than healthy controls in specific brain regions (p < 0.023). Specifically in the PD group, we found that a higher number of PSWEs correlated with longer disease duration. Conclusions: This study is the first to examine the temporal characteristics of EEG slowing in PD by measuring the occurrence of PSWEs. Our findings indicate that PD patients who are cognitively intact do not have electrographic manifestations of cortical involvement. However, the correlation between PSWEs and disease duration may support future studies of repeated EEG recordings along the disease course to detect early signs of cortical involvement in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Z. Milikovsky
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Yotam Sharabi
- Laboratory of Early Markers of Neurodegeneration (LEMON), Neurological Institute, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Nir Giladi
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Anat Mirelman
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Laboratory of Early Markers of Neurodegeneration (LEMON), Neurological Institute, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
| | - Ronen Sosnik
- Faculty of Engineering, Holon Institute of Technology (HIT), Holon 5810201, Israel
| | - Firas Fahoum
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Epilepsy and EEG Unit, Neurological Institute, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
| | - Inbal Maidan
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Laboratory of Early Markers of Neurodegeneration (LEMON), Neurological Institute, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
- Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6997801, Israel
- Epilepsy and EEG Unit, Neurological Institute, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv 6423906, Israel
| |
Collapse
|