Adrenal insufficiency among children treated with hormonal therapy for infantile spasms

Adrenocortical Function Recovery from Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency After ACTH Therapy in a Patient with West Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review

We report a 1-year-7-month-old boy with West syndrome who had associated secondary adrenal insufficiency as a side effect of synthetic ACTH therapy. Serial investigation using corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation tests revealed the time course of his hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis recovery after the secondary adrenal insufficiency. Three days after completion of the ACTH therapy, the basal cortisol, peak cortisol, and peak ACTH levels were all low. One month after ACTH therapy, the basal cortisol level exceeded the cutoff level for intact adrenocortical function, and the peak ACTH level had improved. Five months after ACTH therapy, the peak cortisol level exceeded the cutoff level for intact adrenocortical function. The secondary adrenal insufficiency after ACTH therapy and the four months' time lag between the recovery timing of the basal and peak cortisol levels on CRH stimulation tests were notable findings. This follow-up data is valuable information for understanding the timeline for the process of recovery of the HPA axis from secondary adrenal insufficiency, that should lead to appropriate protocols for adrenal testing and adrenocorticosteroid replacement for patients who have undergone ACTH therapy. We also reviewed previous studies on secondary adrenal insufficiency after ACTH therapy in terms of incidence rate, onset risk factors, and recovery from it. Based on our own experience and previous reports, we suggest secondary adrenal insufficiency after ACTH therapy as follows: regarding the total synthetic ACTH dose administered, approximately 0.2 mg/kg of ACTH could cause secondary adrenal insufficiency. As for the required period for convalescence from secondary adrenal insufficiency, it would take from two to five months.

Diagnosis and management of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: Expert consensus statement

Despite the availability of international recommendations for the management of Infantile Epileptic Spasms Syndrome (IESS), there is a lack of recommendations adapted to the local context of clinical practice of pediatric neurology in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. By an initiative from the Saudi Pediatric Neurology Society (SPNS), a literature review was performed and an expert panel comprised of 13 pediatric neurologists from all GCC countries (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates) was subsequently convened to discuss all issues related to the management and diagnosis practices of IESS in the GCC. The overall aim of this consensus document was to develop practical recommendations to support the care of patients with IESS in the GCC and to reflect on how clinical management approaches compare with those adopted internationally.

Fifteen years of real-world data on the use of vigabatrin in individuals with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to evaluate our treatment algorithm for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) used between 2000 and 2018. We initiated vigabatrin (VGB), and steroids were added if the electroclinical response (spasms and electroencephalogram [EEG]) to VGB was not obtained or incomplete.

METHODS

Individuals with IESS treated with VGB were recruited from our hospital clinical data warehouse based on electronic health records (EHRs) generated since 2009 and containing relevant keywords. We confirmed the diagnosis of IESS. Clinical, EEG, imaging, and biological data were extracted from the EHRs. We analyzed factors associated with short-term response, time to response, relapse, time to relapse of spasms, and the presence of spasms at last follow-up.

RESULTS

We collected data from 198 individuals (female: 46.5%, IESS onset: 6 [4.5-10.3] months, follow-up: 4.6 [2.5-7.6] years, median [Q1-Q3]) including 129 (65.2%) with identifiable etiology. VGB was started 17 (5-57.5) days after IESS diagnosis. A total of 113 individuals were responders (57.1% of the cohort), 64 with VGB alone and 38 with VGB further combined with steroids (56.6% and 33.6% of responders, respectively). Among responders, 33 (29%) experienced relapses of spasms, mostly those with later onset of spasms (p = .002) and those who received VGB for <24 months after spasms cessation compared to a longer duration on VGB (45% vs. 12.8%, p = .003). At follow-up, 92 individuals were seizure-free (46.5% of the whole cohort), including 26 free of therapy (13.1%). One hundred twelve individuals (56.6%) were still receiving VGB, with a duration of 3.2 (1.75-5.7) years.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our sequential protocol introducing VGB then adding steroids is an effective alternative to a combined VGB-steroids approach in IESS. It avoids steroid-related adverse events, as well as those from VGB-steroid combination. According to our data, a period of 7 days seems sufficient to assess VGB response and enables the addition of steroids rapidly if needed. Continuing VGB for 2 years may balance the risk of relapse and treatment-induced adverse events.