In-hospital and home-based long-term monitoring of focal epilepsy with a wearable electroencephalographic device: Diagnostic yield and user experience

A personalized earbud for non-invasive long-term EEG monitoring

Objective. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability, comfort, and performance of a custom-fit, non-invasive long-term electrophysiologic headphone, known as Aware Hearable, for the ambulatory recording of brain activities. These recordings play a crucial role in diagnosing neurological disorders such as epilepsy and in studying neural dynamics during daily activities.Approach.The study uses commercial manufacturing processes common to the hearing aid industry, such as 3D scanning, computer-aided design modeling, and 3D printing. These processes enable the creation of the Aware Hearable with a personalized, custom-fit, thereby ensuring complete and consistent contact with the inner surfaces of the ear for high-quality data recordings. Additionally, the study employs a machine learning data analysis approach to validate the recordings produced by Aware Hearable, by comparing them to the gold standard intracranial electroencephalography recordings in epilepsy patients.Main results.The results indicate the potential of Aware Hearable to expedite the diagnosis of epilepsy by enabling extended periods of ambulatory recording.Significance.This offers significant reductions in burden to patients and their families. Furthermore, the device's utility may extend to a broader spectrum, making it suitable for other applications involving neurophysiological recordings in real-world settings.

Ambulatory seizure detection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent advances in the field of seizure detection in ambulatory patients with epilepsy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have shown that wrist or arm wearable sensors, using 3D-accelerometry, electrodermal activity or photoplethysmography, in isolation or in combination, can reliably detect focal-to-bilateral and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), with a sensitivity over 90%, and false alarm rates varying from 0.1 to 1.2 per day. A headband EEG has also demonstrated a high sensitivity for detecting and help monitoring generalized absence seizures. In contrast, no appropriate solution is yet available to detect focal seizures, though some promising findings were reported using ECG-based heart rate variability biomarkers and subcutaneous EEG.

SUMMARY

Several FDA and/or EU-certified solutions are available to detect GTCS and trigger an alarm with acceptable rates of false alarms. However, data are still missing regarding the impact of such intervention on patients' safety. Noninvasive solutions to reliably detect focal seizures in ambulatory patients, based on either EEG or non-EEG biosignals, remain to be developed. To this end, a number of challenges need to be addressed, including the performance, but also the transparency and interpretability of machine learning algorithms.

Minimizing artifact-induced false-alarms for seizure detection in wearable EEG devices with gradient-boosted tree classifiers

Electroencephalography (EEG) is widely used to monitor epileptic seizures, and standard clinical practice consists of monitoring patients in dedicated epilepsy monitoring units via video surveillance and cumbersome EEG caps. Such a setting is not compatible with long-term tracking under typical living conditions, thereby motivating the development of unobtrusive wearable solutions. However, wearable EEG devices present the challenges of fewer channels, restricted computational capabilities, and lower signal-to-noise ratio. Moreover, artifacts presenting morphological similarities to seizures act as major noise sources and can be misinterpreted as seizures. This paper presents a combined seizure and artifacts detection framework targeting wearable EEG devices based on Gradient Boosted Trees. The seizure detector achieves nearly zero false alarms with average sensitivity values of [Formula: see text] for 182 seizures from the CHB-MIT dataset and [Formula: see text] for 25 seizures from the private dataset with no preliminary artifact detection or removal. The artifact detector achieves a state-of-the-art accuracy of [Formula: see text] (on the TUH-EEG Artifact Corpus dataset). Integrating artifact and seizure detection significantly reduces false alarms-up to [Formula: see text] compared to standalone seizure detection. Optimized for a Parallel Ultra-Low Power platform, these algorithms enable extended monitoring with a battery lifespan reaching 300 h. These findings highlight the benefits of integrating artifact detection in wearable epilepsy monitoring devices to limit the number of false positives.

Home recording of 3-Hz spike-wave discharges in adults with absence epilepsy using the wearable Sensor Dot

OBJECTIVE

Home monitoring of 3-Hz spike-wave discharges (SWDs) in patients with refractory absence epilepsy could improve clinical care by replacing the inaccurate seizure diary with objective counts. We investigated the use and performance of the Sensor Dot (Byteflies) wearable in persons with absence epilepsy in their home environment.

METHODS

Thirteen participants (median age = 22 years, 11 female) were enrolled at the university hospitals of Leuven and Freiburg. At home, participants had to attach the Sensor Dot and behind-the-ear electrodes to record two-channel electroencephalogram (EEG), accelerometry, and gyroscope data. Ground truth annotations were created during a visual review of the full Sensor Dot recording. Generalized SWDs were annotated if they were 3 Hz and at least 3 s on EEG. Potential 3-Hz SWDs were flagged by an automated seizure detection algorithm, (1) using only EEG and (2) with an additional postprocessing step using accelerometer and gyroscope to discard motion artifacts. Afterward, two readers (W.V.P. and L.S.) reviewed algorithm-labeled segments and annotated true positive detections. Sensitivity, precision, and F1 score were calculated. Patients had to keep a seizure diary and complete questionnaires about their experiences.

RESULTS

Total recording time was 394 h 42 min. Overall, 234 SWDs were captured in 11 of 13 participants. Review of the unimodal algorithm-labeled recordings resulted in a mean sensitivity of .84, precision of .93, and F1 score of .89. Visual review of the multimodal algorithm-labeled segments resulted in a similar F1 score and shorter review time due to fewer false positive labels. Participants reported that the device was comfortable and that they would be willing to wear it on demand of their neurologist, for a maximum of 1 week or with intermediate breaks.

SIGNIFICANCE

The Sensor Dot improved seizure documentation at home, relative to patient self-reporting. Additional benefits were the short review time and the patients' device acceptance due to user-friendliness and comfortability.

Feasibility and acceptability of an ultra-long-term at-home EEG monitoring system (EEG@HOME) for people with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Recent technological advancements offer new ways to monitor and manage epilepsy. The adoption of these devices in routine clinical practice will strongly depend on patient acceptability and usability, with their perspectives being crucial. Previous studies provided feedback from patients, but few explored the experience of them using independently multiple devices independently at home.

PURPOSE

The study, assessed through a mixed methods design, the direct experiences of people with epilepsy independently using a non-invasive monitoring system (EEG@HOME) for an extended duration of 6 months, at home. We aimed to investigate factors affecting engagement, gather qualitative insights, and provide recommendations for future home epilepsy monitoring systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults with epilepsy independently were trained to use a wearable dry EEG system, a wrist-worn device, and a smartphone app for seizure tracking and behaviour monitoring for 6 months at home. Monthly acceptability questionnaires (PSSUQ, SUS) and semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore participant experience. Adherence with the procedure, acceptability scores and systematic thematic analysis of the interviews, focusing on the experience with the procedure, motivation and benefits and opinion about the procedure were assessed.

RESULTS

Twelve people with epilepsy took part into the study for an average of 193.8 days (range 61 to 312) with a likelihood of using the system at six months of 83 %. The e-diary and the smartwatch were highly acceptable and preferred to a wearable EEG system (PSSUQ score of 1.9, 1.9, 2.4). Participants showed an acceptable level of adherence with all solutions (Average usage of 63 %, 66 %, 92 %) reporting more difficulties using the EEG twice a day and remembering to complete the daily behavioural questionnaires. Clear information and training, continuous remote support, perceived direct and indirect benefits and the possibility to have a flexible, tailored to daily routine monitoring were defined as key factors to ensure compliance with long-term monitoring systems.

CONCLUSIONS

EEG@HOME study demonstrated people with epilepsy' interest and ability in active health monitoring using new technologies. Remote training and support enable independent home use of new non-invasive technologies, but to ensure long term acceptability and usability systems will require to be integrated into patients' routines, include healthcare providers, and offer continuous support and personalized feedback.

Review on the current long-term, limited lead electroencephalograms

In the last century, 10-20 lead EEG recordings became the gold standard of surface EEG recordings, and the 10-20 system provided comparability between international studies. With the emergence of advanced EEG sensors, that may be able to record and process signals in much more compact units, this additional sensor technology now opens up opportunities to revisit current ambulatory EEG recording practices and specific patient populations, and even electrodes that are embedded into the head surface. Here, we aim to provide an overview of current limited sensor long-term EEG systems. We performed a literature review using Pubmed as a database and included the relevant articles. The review identified several systems for recording long-term ambulatory EEGs. In general, EEGs recorded with these modalities can be acquired in ambulatory and home settings, achieve good sensitivity with low false detection rates, are used for automatic seizure detection as well as seizure forecasting, and are well tolerated by patients, but each of them has advantages and disadvantages. Subcutaneous, subgaleal, and subscalp electrodes are minimally invasive and provide stable signals that can record ultra--long-term EEG and are in general less noisy than scalp EEG, but they have limited spatial coverage and require anesthesia, a surgical procedure and a trained surgeon to be placed. Behind and in the ear electrodes are discrete, unobtrusive with a good sensitivity mainly for temporal seizures but might miss extratemporal seizures, recordings could be obscured by muscle artifacts and bilateral ictal patterns might be difficult to register. Finally, recording systems using electrodes in a headband can be easily and quickly placed by the patient or caregiver, but have less spatial coverage and are more prone to movement because electrodes are not attached. Overall, limited EEG recording systems offer a promising opportunity to potentially record targeted EEG with focused indications for prolonged periods, but further validation work is needed.

Wearable detection of tonic seizures in childhood epilepsy: An exploratory cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the performance of a multimodal wearable device for the offline detection of tonic seizures (TS) in a pediatric childhood epilepsy cohort, with a focus on patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

METHODS

Parallel with prolonged video-electroencephalography (EEG), the Plug 'n Patch system, a multimodal wearable device using the Sensor Dot and replaceable electrode adhesives, was used to detect TS. Multiple biosignals were recorded: behind-the-ear EEG, surface electromyography, electrocardiography, and accelerometer/gyroscope. Biosignals were annotated blindly by a neurologist. Seizure characteristics were described, and performance was assessed by sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), F1 score, and false alarm rate (FAR) per hour. Performance was compared to seizure diaries kept by the caretaker.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine TS were detected in 13 patients. Seven patients (54%) had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and six patients (46%) had other forms of (developmental) epileptic encephalopathies or drug-resistant epilepsy. All but one patient had intellectual disability. Overall sensitivity was 41%, with a PPV of 9%, an F1 score of 14%, and a median FAR per hour of 0.75. Performance increased to an F1 score of 66% for nightly seizures lasting at least 10 s (sensitivity 66%, PPV 66%) and 71% for nightly seizures lasting at least 20 s (sensitivity 62%, PPV 82%). For these seizures there were no false alarms in 10 of 13 patients. Sensitivity of seizure diaries reached a maximum of 52% for prolonged (≥20 s) nightly seizures, even though caretakers slept in the same room.

SIGNIFICANCE

We showed that it is feasible to use a multimodal wearable device with multiple adhesive sites in children with epilepsy and intellectual disability. For prolonged nightly seizures, offline manual detection of TS outperformed seizure diaries. The recognition of seizure-specific signatures using multiple modalities can help in the development of automated TS detection algorithms.

Non-electroencephalogram-based seizure detection devices: State of the art and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

The continuously expanding research and development of wearable devices for automated seizure detection in epilepsy uses mostly non-invasive technology. Real-time alarms, triggered by seizure detection devices, are needed for safety and prevention to decrease seizure-related morbidity and mortality, as well as objective quantification of seizure frequency and severity. Our review strives to provide a state-of-the-art on automated seizure detection using non-invasive wearable devices in an ambulatory (home) environment and to highlight the prospects for future research.

METHODS

A joint working group of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) recently published a clinical practice guideline on automated seizure detection using wearable devices. We updated the systematic literature search for the period since the last search by the joint working group. We selected studies qualifying minimally as phase-2 clinical validation trials, in accordance with standards for testing and validation of seizure detection devices.

RESULTS

High-level evidence (phases 3 and 4) is available only for the detection of tonic-clonic seizures and major motor seizures when using wearable devices based on accelerometry, surface electromyography (EMG), or a multimodal device combining accelerometry and heart rate. The reported sensitivity of these devices is 79.4-96%, with a false alarm rate of 0.20-1.92 per 24 hours (0-0.03 per night). A single phase-3 study validated the detection of absence seizures using a single-channel wearable EEG device. Two phase-4 studies showed overall user satisfaction with wearable seizure detection devices, which helped decrease injuries related to tonic-clonic seizures. Overall satisfaction, perceived sensitivity, and improvement in quality-of-life were significantly higher for validated devices.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the vast number of studies published on seizure detection devices, most are strongly affected by potential bias, providing a too-optimistic perspective. By applying the standards for clinical validation studies, potential bias can be reduced, and the quality of a continuously growing number of studies in this field can be assessed and compared. The ILAE-IFCN clinical practice guideline on automated seizure detection using wearable devices recommends using clinically validated wearable devices for automated detection of tonic-clonic seizures when significant safety concerns exist. The studies published after the guideline was issued only provide incremental knowledge and would not change the current recommendations.

Out-of-hospital multimodal seizure detection: a pilot study

Background

Out-of-hospital seizure detection aims to provide clinicians and patients with objective seizure documentation in efforts to improve the clinical management of epilepsy. In-patient studies have found that combining different modalities helps improve the seizure detection accuracy. In this study, the objective was to evaluate the viability of out-of-hospital seizure detection using wearable ECG, accelerometry and behind-the-ear electroencephalography (EEG). Furthermore, we examined the signal quality of out-of-hospital EEG recordings.

Methods

Seventeen patients were monitored for up to 5 days. A support vector machine based seizure detection algorithm was applied using both in-patient seizures and out-of-hospital electrographic seizures in one patient. To assess the content of noise in the EEG signal, we compared the root-mean-square (RMS) of the recordings to a reference threshold derived from manually categorised segments of EEG recordings.

Results

In total 1427 hours of continuous EEG was recorded. In one patient, we identified 15 electrographic focal impaired awareness seizures with a motor component. After training our algorithm on in-patient data, we found a sensitivity of 91% and a false alarm rate (FAR) of 18/24 hours for the detection of out-of-hospital seizures using a combination of EEG and ECG recordings. We estimated that 30.1% of the recorded EEG signal was physiological EEG, with an RMS value within the reference threshold.

Conclusion

We found that detection of out-of-hospital focal impaired awareness seizures with a motor component is possible and that applying multiple modalities improves the diagnostic accuracy compared with unimodal EEG. However, significant challenges remain regarding a high FAR and that only 30.1% of the EEG data represented usable signal.