Recovery quality following a single post-anaesthetic dose of dexmedetomidine or romifidine in sevoflurane anaesthetised horses

Evaluation of Recovery Time and Quality After Two Different Post-Operative Doses of Medetomidine in Spanish Purebred Horses Anaesthetized with Medetomidine-Isoflurane Partial Intravenous Anaesthesia

Recovery from general anaesthesia is risky in horses. Alpha2-agonist administration after anaesthesia enhances the quality of recovery but may prolong this phase. Recovery time and quality were investigated after medetomidine administration at the end of general anaesthesia in a prospective, randomised, masked and clinical study. Horses underwent medetomidine-isoflurane partial intravenous anaesthesia. Medetomidine (0.5 or 1 µg/kg) IV was administered just after isoflurane was discontinued. The duration of different recovery phases and the number of attempts were recorded. A composite scale (from 1-excellent to 6-accident) was used for quality assessment. Mann-Whitney U-test was performed (p < 0.05). Twenty-seven horses per group were included. Results for 0.5 and 1 µg/kg groups were as follows: lateral recumbency time: 35 (24-45) and 43 (35-55) minutes; sternal recumbency time: 6 (3-15) and 5 (2-15) minutes; total recovery time: 47 (40-59) and 49 (42-62) minutes; number of attempts to sternal: 1 (1-1) and 1 (1-2) and to standing: 1 (1-3) and 1 (1-2); and, quality: 2 (1-2) and 2 (1-2), respectively. No significant differences between the groups were found. Medetomidine 0.5 µg/kg dose did not decrease the recovery time but maintained the recovery quality.

Combined sevoflurane-dexmedetomidine and nerve blockade on post-surgical serum oxidative stress biomarker levels in thyroid cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of thyroid cancer is increasing annually. Clinical routine thyroid surgery can be performed under a cervical plexus block, but cannot mediate the stress response during the surgery. If thyroid surgery is performed under nerve block, an inappropriate level of blockade may occur. Similarly, the stress response caused by surgery is more serious than that caused by conventional anesthesia. Therefore, it is important to combine blockade with more effective anesthesia methods.

AIM

To investigate the effects of combining sevoflurane-dexmedetomidine inhalation general anesthesia with the cervical plexus nerve block on the post-surgical levels of the serum oxidative stress biomarkers levels in thyroid cancer patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 96 thyroid cancer patients admitted to the hospital between January 2019 and December 2020. Participants were divided into a control group (n = 47) and an experimental group (n = 49). The experimental group received a combination of inhaled sevoflurane-dexmedetomidine and cervical plexus block, while the control group received conventional general anesthesia. The groups were compared for serum levels of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) before and after surgery, and the adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and norepinephrine (NE) levels at 1 and 12 h post-surgery. The Bispectral index (BIS) and the incidence of anesthesia side effects were also compared.

RESULTS

Following surgery, MCP-1 was significantly lower in the experimental group compared to the control group, whereas GSH-Px was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.001). The serum ACTH and NE levels were significantly lower in the experimental group than those the control group at 1 and 12 h post-surgery (P < 0.001). BIS was significantly lower in the experimental group than that in the control group at 20 minutes into the operation, but the direction of the difference was reversed at eye opening (P < 0.001). The incidence of side effects was 10.20% (5/49) and 12.76% (6/47) in the experimental and control groups, respectively, the difference being non-significant.

CONCLUSION

Sevoflurane-dexmedetomidine inhalation general anesthesia combined with cervical plexus nerve block can reduce the postoperative stress and inflammatory responses in thyroid cancer patients, while maintaining high anesthesia effectiveness and safety.

Recovery of horses from general anaesthesia: A systematic review (2000-2020) of the influence of anaesthetic protocol on recovery quality

BACKGROUND

The recovery phase after equine general anaesthesia (GA) is a time of considerable risk and therefore has been the subject of extensive research over the last 20 years. Various pharmacological interventions have been developed and studied with the objective of improving recovery quality and reducing anaesthetic-related mortality and morbidity. Nevertheless, some controversy remains regarding the influence of anaesthetic protocol choice on recovery quality from GA and its implications for recovery-related mortality and morbidity. A systematic review of the literature investigating the influence of anaesthetic protocol choice on recovery quality is currently lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a detailed evaluation of the equine veterinary literature investigating the effect of anaesthetic protocol choice on equine recovery quality utilising the GRADE framework.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic evaluation of the equine veterinary literature was performed using the GRADE framework.

METHODS

A literature search was performed and studies were assessed for eligibility by both authors utilising PRISMA guidelines. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated by both authors, categorically summarised and the quality of evidence for each sub-topic was assessed using the GRADE framework.

RESULTS

A total of 124 studies were identified which directly assessed the impact of anaesthetic protocol choice on recovery quality after GA in horses. Evaluation of the available evidence indicated that certain partial intravenous anaesthesia (PIVA) agents, cessation of intravenous lidocaine 30 minutes prior to recovery and provision of adequate analgesia improves recovery quality.

MAIN LIMITATIONS

The validity of the results of some studies may have been compromised by missing data and small sample sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence to indicate that certain PIVA agents, cessation of intravenous lidocaine 30 minutes prior to recovery and provision of adequate analgesia improves recovery quality.

Demographic, preoperative and anaesthesia-related risk factors for unsatisfactory recovery quality in horses undergoing emergency abdominal surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine demographic, preoperative and anaesthesia-related variables that may be associated with unsatisfactory recovery quality in horses undergoing emergency abdominal surgery (colic) in an equine teaching hospital.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

ANIMALS

A total of 313 horses.

METHODS

The anaesthetic records of horses admitted for surgical treatment of colic between 2005 and 2018 were examined. Overall quality of recovery was assessed as dangerous, poor, fair, good or excellent. The following categories were constructed as a dichotomic variable: unsatisfactory recovery (poor and dangerous recoveries) and satisfactory recovery (excellent, good and fair recoveries). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate the association between all studied variables and recovery.

RESULTS

All recoveries were unassisted. Unsatisfactory recovery quality totalled 17.2% (3.5% and 13.7% were dangerous and poor recoveries, respectively), whereas satisfactory recoveries totalled 82.8% (26.2%, 40.9% and 15.7% were fair, good and excellent recoveries, respectively). Univariable analysis showed that unsatisfactory recoveries were associated with high preoperative packed cell volume, pain behaviour, poor premedication and induction quality, high intraoperative mean heart rate, low mean arterial blood pressure, dobutamine dose ≥1.5 μg kg^-1 minute^-1, non-administration of romifidine, long anaesthesia time and prolonged time to stand. The multivariable model showed that factors strongly associated with unsatisfactory recovery quality were dobutamine dose ≥1.5 μg kg^-1 minute^-1 [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 6.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.91-14.96], poor premedication quality (AOR=4.60; 95% CI, 1.73-12.23) and a time to stand > 70 minutes (AOR=2.59; 95% CI, 1.13-5.91).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our study shows that high dobutamine requirements, poor premedication quality and a prolonged time to stand are risk factors for unsatisfactory recovery quality in horses undergoing anaesthesia for colic surgery. Addressing these factors may enable clinicians to improve the quality of recovery phase.

Recovery of horses from general anaesthesia: A systematic review (2000-2020) of risk factors and influence of interventions during the recovery period

BACKGROUND

In equine anaesthesia, the recovery period is a time of considerable risk and has been the focus of prolific research. Risk factors, including age, type and duration of procedure or temperament may influence recovery quality. Unfortunately, the anaesthetist is unable to control for these factors, therefore various pharmacological interventions and recovery methods have been developed with the objective of improving recovery quality. However, no consensus among anaesthetists has been reached for many of these interventions and their implications for recovery-related mortality and morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review of the published evidence relating to risk factors and interventions in the recovery period which may influence recovery quality from equine general anaesthesia (GA).

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic evaluation of the equine veterinary literature using the GRADE framework.

METHODS

A literature search was performed and studies were assessed for eligibility by both authors utilising PRISMA guidelines. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated by both authors, categorically summarised and the quality of evidence for each sub-topic was assessed using the GRADE framework.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies were identified which directly assessed the impact of risk factors and recovery interventions on recovery quality after equine GA. There was evidence to support that peri-anaesthetic risk factors such as anaesthesia duration, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status and surgical procedure influenced recovery quality. We also identified sufficient evidence that administration of α-2 adrenoreceptor agonists immediately prior to recovery, improves recovery quality.

MAIN LIMITATIONS

The validity of the results of some studies may have been compromised by missing data and small sample sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery quality is influenced by factors including: anaesthesia duration, ASA physical status and surgical procedure. Recovery quality can be improved by the administration of an α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist immediately prior to recovery.

Recovery after General Anaesthesia in Adult Horses: A Structured Summary of the Literature

Simple Summary

Recovery is the most dangerous phase of general anaesthesia in horses. Numerous publications have reported about this phase, but structured reviews that try to reduce the risk of bias of narrative reviews/expert opinions, focussing on the topic are missing. Therefore, the aim of the present article was to publish the first structured review as a summary of the literature focussing on the recovery phase after general anaesthesia in horses. The objective was to summarise the available literature, taking into account the scientific evidence of the individual studies. A structured approach was followed with two experts in the field independently deciding on article inclusion and its level of scientific evidence. A total number of 444 articles, sorted by topics and classified based on their levels of evidence, were finally included into the present summary. The most important findings were summarised and discussed. The present structured review can be used as a compilation of the publications that, to date, focus on the recovery phase after general anaesthesia in adult horses. This type of review tries to minimise the risk of bias inherent to narrative reviews/expert opinions.

Abstract

Recovery remains the most dangerous phase of general anaesthesia in horses. The objective of this publication was to perform a structured literature review including levels of evidence (LoE) of each study with the keywords “recovery anaesthesia horse”, entered at once, in the search browsers PubMed and Web of Science. The two authors independently evaluated each candidate article. A final list with 444 articles was obtained on 5 April 2021, classified as: 41 “narrative reviews/expert opinions”, 16 “retrospective outcome studies”, 5 “surveys”, 59 “premedication/sedation and induction drugs”, 27 “maintenance with inhalant agents”, 55 “maintenance with total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA)”, 3 “TIVA versus inhalants”, 56 “maintenance with partial intravenous anaesthesia (PIVA)”, 27 “other drugs used during maintenance”, 18 “drugs before/during recovery”, 18 “recovery systems”, 21 “respiratory system in recovery”, 41 “other factors”, 51 “case series/reports” and 6 “systems to score recoveries”. Of them, 167 were LoE 1, 36 LoE 2, 33 LoE 3, 110 LoE 4, 90 LoE 5 and 8 could not be classified based on the available abstract. This review can be used as an up-to-date compilation of the literature about recovery after general anaesthesia in adult horses that tried to minimise the bias inherent to narrative reviews.