N-acetylcysteine prevents glutathione decrease and does not interfere with paracetamol antinociceptive effect at therapeutic dosage: a randomized double-blind controlled trial in healthy subjects

Drug-Induced Liver Injury Due to Doxycycline: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Antibiotics are among the most common causes of drug-induced liver injury worldwide. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and nitrofurantoin are the most common culprits while tetracyclines are a rare cause of liver injury. Among tetracyclines, minocycline has been reported more frequently than doxycycline, which is an extremely rare cause of drug-induced liver injury. We present a healthy 28-year-old male patient from rural United States who was taking doxycycline for Lyme disease. After five days of therapy, he developed nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and significant transaminitis consistent with a hepatocellular pattern of liver injury. After a thorough workup which ruled out other causes such as infection, autoimmune diseases, liver malignancy, and vascular, structural, and metabolic disorders, his liver injury was attributed to doxycycline. We reached the diagnosis also by demonstrating a consistent temporal association between doxycycline intake and liver injury and the patient recovered completely with the cessation of doxycycline. Recognition of doxycycline as a cause of drug-induced liver injury should be considered in patients utilizing this antibiotic. Doxycycline, unlike minocycline, has a short latency period. Early recognition and discontinuation of doxycycline in our patient resulted in the complete resolution of symptoms and transaminitis preventing further morbidity and mortality.

Optimizing human performance in extreme environments through precision medicine: From spaceflight to high-performance operations on Earth

Humans operating in extreme environments often conduct their operations at the edges of the limits of human performance. Sometimes, they are required to push these limits to previously unattained levels. As a result, their margins for error in execution are much smaller than that found in the general public. These same small margins for error that impact execution may also impact risk, safety, health, and even survival. Thus, humans operating in extreme environments have a need for greater refinement in their preparation, training, fitness, and medical care. Precision medicine (PM) is uniquely suited to address the needs of those engaged in these extreme operations because of its depth of molecular analysis, derived precision countermeasures, and ability to match each individual (and his or her specific molecular phenotype) with any given operating context (environment). Herein, we present an overview of a systems approach to PM in extreme environments, which affords clinicians one method to contextualize the inputs, processes, and outputs that can form the basis of a formal practice. For the sake of brevity, this overview is focused on molecular dynamics, while providing only a brief introduction to the also important physiologic and behavioral phenotypes in PM. Moreover, rather than a full review, it highlights important concepts, while using only selected citations to illustrate those concepts. It further explores, by demonstration, the basic principles of using functionally characterized molecular networks to guide the practical application of PM in extreme environments. At its core, PM in extreme environments is about attention to incremental gains and losses in molecular network efficiency that can scale to produce notable changes in health and performance. The aim of this overview is to provide a conceptual overview of one approach to PM in extreme environments, coupled with a selected suite of practical considerations for molecular profiling and countermeasures.

GENETIC INFLUENCES ON PAIN MECHANISMS

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To review the available results for genetic influences on pain syndrome development.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: In the period from 2009 to 2020, a total of 45 research papers describing the key points of genetic influences on pain mechanisms in both adults and children were published in Ukrainian and English and they are now included in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar research databases.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Pain is a comprehensive characteristic of a person; therefore, it is inevitable that several genes with little individual effect interact with each other and environmental factors, influencing pain susceptibility and chronic pain syndrome manifestation. This requires searching for biomarkers for diagnosing and predicting the development of acute and chronic pain syndromes, especially in pediatric practice.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Clinical Evidence of N-Acetyl Cysteine Protective Effects

Oxidative stress is a key pathological feature implicated in both acute and chronic liver diseases, including drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The latter describes hepatic injury arising as a direct toxic effect of administered drugs or their metabolites. Although still underreported, DILI remains a significant cause of liver failure, especially in developed nations. Currently, it is understood that mitochondrial-generated oxidative stress and abnormalities in phase I/II metabolism, leading to glutathione (GSH) suppression, drive the onset of DILI. N-Acetyl cysteine (NAC) has attracted a lot of interest as a therapeutic agent against DILI because of its strong antioxidant properties, especially in relation to enhancing endogenous GSH content to counteract oxidative stress. Thus, in addition to updating information on the pathophysiological mechanisms implicated in oxidative-induced hepatic injury, the current review critically discusses clinical evidence on the protective effects of NAC against DILI, including the reduction of patient mortality. Besides injury caused by paracetamol, NAC can also improve liver function in relation to other forms of liver injury such as those induced by excessive alcohol intake. The implicated therapeutic mechanisms of NAC extend from enhancing hepatic GSH levels to reducing biomarkers of paracetamol toxicity such as keratin-18 and circulating caspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18. However, there is still lack of evidence confirming the benefits of using NAC in combination with other therapies in patients with DILI.

Paracetamol: A Review of Guideline Recommendations

Musculoskeletal pain conditions are age-related, leading contributors to chronic pain and pain-related disability, which are expected to rise with the rapid global population aging. Current medical treatments provide only partial relief. Furthermore, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids are effective in young and otherwise healthy individuals but are often contraindicated in elderly and frail patients. As a result of its favorable safety and tolerability record, paracetamol has long been the most common drug for treating pain. Strikingly, recent reports questioned its therapeutic value and safety. This review aims to present guideline recommendations. Paracetamol has been assessed in different conditions and demonstrated therapeutic efficacy on both acute and chronic pain. It is active as a single agent and is additive or synergistic with NSAIDs and opioids, improving their efficacy and safety. However, a lack of significant efficacy and hepatic toxicity have also been reported. Fast dissolving formulations of paracetamol provide superior and more extended pain relief that is similar to intravenous paracetamol. A dose reduction is recommended in patients with liver disease or malnourished. Genotyping may improve efficacy and safety. Within the current trend toward the minimization of opioid analgesia, it is consistently included in multimodal, non-opioid, or opioid-sparing therapies. Paracetamol is being recommended by guidelines as a first or second-line drug for acute pain and chronic pain, especially for patients with limited therapeutic options and for the elderly.

Randomized Trial on the Clinical Utility of a Novel Biomarker Panel to Identify Treatable Determinants of Chronic Pain

Millions suffer daily from chronic pain diagnosed anatomically and treated with opioids. Research shows that underlying nutritional, metabolic and oxidative stressors, which drive the development or worsening of chronic pain, are not diagnosed despite the fact that treatment of these primary pain pathways relieves pain and increases function. One of the main reasons for this gap in care is the lack of a simple diagnostic assay to help clinicians make these diagnoses. We examined the clinical utility of a urine-based pain biomarker panel. Primary care physicians were randomized into the test group and compared to controls. We measured their ability to make the diagnosis and treat a total of nine standardized patients, with common but challenging cases of chronic pain, over two rounds of data collection in a pre–post design using a fixed-effects model. Intervention doctors received educational materials on a novel pain biomarker panel after the baseline round and had access to biomarker test results. Provider responses were measured against evidence-based criteria. The two study arms at baseline provided similar, poor care for three different primary pain pathways: nutritional deficiencies (5.0% control versus 9.2% intervention treated, p = 0.208), metabolic abnormalities (1.0% control versus 0% for intervention treated, p = 0.314), and oxidative stress (1.2% control versus 0% intervention treated, p = 0.152). After the introduction of the Foundation Pain Index (FPI) biomarker test, physicians in the intervention group were 41.5% more likely to make the diagnosis of a micronutrient deficiency, 29.4% more likely to identify a treatable metabolic abnormality and 26.1% more likely to identify an oxidative stressor. These diagnostic and treatment improvements were seen across all three case types, ranging from a relative +54% (p = 0.004) for chronic neuropathic pain to +35% (p = 0.007) in chronic pain from other causes to +38% (p = 0.002) in chronic pain with associated mental health issues. Intervention doctors were also 75.1% more likely to provide a non-opioid treatment to patients on chronic opioids (O.R. 1.8, 95% C.I. 0.8–3.7), 62% less likely to order unnecessary imaging for their patients with low back pain (O.R. 0.38, 95% C.I. 0.15–0.97) and 66% less likely to order an unnecessary pain referral (O.R. 0.34, 95% C.I. 0.13–0.90). This experimental study showed significant clinical utility of a validated pain biomarker panel that determines nutritional deficiencies, metabolic abnormalities and oxidative stressors that drive underlying treatable causes of pain. When integrated into routine primary care practice, this testing approach could considerably improve diagnostic accuracy and provide more targeted, non-opioid treatments for patients suffering from chronic pain.

Medicinal Thiols: Current Status and New Perspectives

The thiol (-SH) functional group is found in a number of drug compounds and confers a unique combination of useful properties. Thiol-containing drugs can reduce radicals and other toxic electrophiles, restore cellular thiol pools, and form stable complexes with heavy metals such as lead, arsenic, and copper. Thus, thiols can treat a variety of conditions by serving as radical scavengers, GSH prodrugs, or metal chelators. Many of the compounds discussed here have been in use for decades, yet continued exploration of their properties has yielded new understanding in recent years, which can be used to optimize their clinical application and provide insights into the development of new treatments. The purpose of this narrative review is to highlight the biochemistry of currently used thiol drugs within the context of developments reported in the last five years. More specifically, this review focuses on thiol drugs that represent the standard of care for their associated conditions, including N-acetylcysteine, 2,3-meso-dimercaptosuccinic acid, British anti-Lewisite, D-penicillamine, amifostine, and others. Reports of novel dosing regimens, delivery strategies, and clinical applications for these compounds were examined with an eye toward emerging approaches to address a wide range of medical conditions in the future.