A kinetic model for the prevalence of mono- over poly-pupylation

Electrostatic interactions guide substrate recognition of the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein ligase PafA

Pupylation, a post-translational modification found in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other Actinobacteria, involves the covalent attachment of prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) to lysines on target proteins by the ligase PafA (proteasome accessory factor A). Pupylated proteins, like ubiquitinated proteins in eukaryotes, are recruited for proteasomal degradation. Proteomic studies suggest that hundreds of potential pupylation targets are modified by the sole existing ligase PafA. This raises intriguing questions regarding the selectivity of this enzyme towards a diverse range of substrates. Here, we show that the availability of surface lysines alone is not sufficient for interaction between PafA and target proteins. By identifying the interacting residues at the pupylation site, we demonstrate that PafA recognizes authentic substrates via a structural recognition motif centered around exposed lysines. Through a combination of computational analysis, examination of available structures and pupylated proteomes, and biochemical experiments, we elucidate the mechanism by which PafA achieves recognition of a wide array of substrates while retaining selective protein turnover.

Emerging Roles of Non-proteolytic Ubiquitination in Tumorigenesis

Ubiquitination is a critical type of protein post-translational modification playing an essential role in many cellular processes. To date, more than eight types of ubiquitination exist, all of which are involved in distinct cellular processes based on their structural differences. Studies have indicated that activation of the ubiquitination pathway is tightly connected with inflammation-related diseases as well as cancer, especially in the non-proteolytic canonical pathway, highlighting the vital roles of ubiquitination in metabolic programming. Studies relating degradable ubiquitination through lys48 or lys11-linked pathways to cellular signaling have been well-characterized. However, emerging evidence shows that non-degradable ubiquitination (linked to lys6, lys27, lys29, lys33, lys63, and Met1) remains to be defined. In this review, we summarize the non-proteolytic ubiquitination involved in tumorigenesis and related signaling pathways, with the aim of providing a reference for future exploration of ubiquitination and the potential targets for cancer therapies.

Exceptionally versatile take II: post-translational modifications of lysine and their impact on bacterial physiology

Among the 22 proteinogenic amino acids, lysine sticks out due to its unparalleled chemical diversity of post-translational modifications. This results in a wide range of possibilities to influence protein function and hence modulate cellular physiology. Concomitantly, lysine derivatives form a metabolic reservoir that can confer selective advantages to those organisms that can utilize it. In this review, we provide examples of selected lysine modifications and describe their role in bacterial physiology.

The prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein presents poor cleavage sites for proteasomal degradation

In an event reminiscent of eukaryotic ubiquitination, the bacterial prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup)-proteasome system (PPS) marks target proteins for proteasomal degradation by covalently attaching Pup, the bacterial tagging molecule. Yet, ubiquitin is released from its conjugated target following proteasome binding, whereas Pup enters the proteasome and remains conjugated to the target. Here, we report that although Pup can be degraded by the bacterial proteasome, it lacks favorable 20S core particle (CP) cleavage sites and is thus a very poor 20S CP substrate. Reconstituting the PPS in vitro, we demonstrate that during pupylated protein degradation, Pup can escape unharmed and remain conjugated to a target-derived degradation fragment. Removal of this degradation fragment by Dop, a depupylase, facilitates Pup recycling and re-conjugation to a new target. This study thus offers a mechanistic model for Pup recycling and demonstrates how a lack of protein susceptibility to proteasome-mediated cleavage can play a mechanistic role in a biological system.

Inter- and intramolecular regulation of protein depupylation in Mycobacterium smegmatis

Whereas intracellular proteolysis is essential for proper cellular function, it is a destructive process, which must be tightly regulated. In some bacteria, a Pup-proteasome system tags target proteins for degradation by a bacterial proteasome. Pup, a small modifier protein, is attached to target proteins by PafA, the sole Pup ligase, in a process termed pupylation. In mycobacteria, including Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pup undergoes a deamidation step by the enzyme Dop prior to its PafA-mediated attachment to a target. The catalytic mechanism of Pup deamidation is also used by Dop to perform depupylation, namely the removal of Pup from already tagged proteins. Hence, Dop appears to play contradictory roles: On the one hand, deamidation of Pup promotes pupylation, while on the other hand, depupylation reduces tagged protein levels. To avoid futile pupylation-depupylation cycles, Dop activity must be regulated. An intramolecular regulatory mechanism directs Dop to catalyze deamidation more effectively than depupylation. A complementary intermolecular mechanism results in Dop depletion under conditions where protein pupylation and degradation are favorable. In this work, we studied these regulatory mechanisms and identified a flexible loop in Dop, previously termed the Dop-loop, that acts as an intramolecular regulatory element that allosterically controls substrate preference. To investigate regulation at the intermolecular level, we used the CRISPR interference system to knock down the expression of M. smegmatis ATP-dependent intracellular proteases and found that the ClpCP protease is responsible for Dop depletion under starvation conditions. These findings clarify previous observations and introduce a new level for the regulation of Dop activity. DATABASE: Structural data are available in the PDB database under the accession numbers 4BJR and 4B0S.

Pup-Click-A New Chemoenzymatic Method for the Generation of Singly Pupylated Targets

Conjugation of the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) to cellular proteins tags these proteins for degradation by a proteasome in actinobacteria. To study the Pup-proteasome system in in vitro biochemical assays, Pup-tagged (i.e., pupylated) proteins are often used. However, the purification of a homogeneous preparation of pupylated proteins often suffers from poor yields and limitations in terms of selecting the target protein and its site of pupylation. Here, we report on the development of a biochemical methodology we term Pup-Click for the generation of pupylated protein mimics in vitro. Pup-Click relies on a natural pupylation reaction combined with the use of a synthetic peptide and genetic code expansion via the use of unnatural amino acids and Click chemistry. In principle, this approach allows for conjugation of Pup to any selected target at potentially any desired position. Importantly, pupylated protein mimics generated by Pup-Click are recognized and processed by enzymes of the Pup-proteasome system. As such, Pup-Click can serve as a powerful tool for studying this protein degradation pathway.

Biology and Biochemistry of Bacterial Proteasomes

Proteasomes are a class of protease that carry out the degradation of a specific set of cellular proteins. While essential for eukaryotic life, proteasomes are found only in a small subset of bacterial species. In this chapter, we present the current knowledge of bacterial proteasomes, detailing the structural features and catalytic activities required to achieve proteasomal proteolysis. We describe the known mechanisms by which substrates are doomed for degradation, and highlight potential non-degradative roles for components of bacterial proteasome systems. Additionally, we highlight several pathways of microbial physiology that rely on proteasome activity. Lastly, we explain the various gaps in our understanding of bacterial proteasome function and emphasize several opportunities for further study.

Proteasome accessory factor A (PafA) transferase activity makes sense in the light of its homology with glutamine synthetase

The Pup-proteasome system (PPS) is a prokaryotic tagging and degradation system analogous in function to the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). Like ubiquitin, Pup is conjugated to proteins, tagging them for proteasomal degradation. However, in the PPS, a single Pup-ligase, PafA, conjugates Pup to a wide variety of proteins. PafA couples ATP hydrolysis to formation of an isopeptide bond between Pup and a protein lysine via a mechanism similar to that used by glutamine synthetase (GS) to generate glutamine from ammonia and glutamate. GS can also transfer the glutamyl moiety from glutamine to a hydroxyl amine in an ATP-independent manner. Recently, the ability of PafA to transfer Pup from one protein to another was demonstrated. Here, we report that such PafA activity mechanistically resembles the transferase activity of GS. Both PafA and GS transferase activities are ATP-independent and proceed in two catalytic steps. In the first step catalyzed by PafA, an inorganic phosphate is used by the enzyme to depupylate a Pup donor, while forming an acyl phosphate Pup intermediate. The second step consists of Pup conjugation to the new protein, alongside the release of an inorganic phosphate. Detailed experimental analysis, combined with kinetic modeling of PafA transferase activity, allowed us to correctly predict the kinetics and magnitude of Pup transfer between two targets, and analyze the effects of their affinity to PafA on the efficiency of transfer. By deciphering the mechanism of the PafA transferase reaction in kinetic detail, this work provides in-depth mechanistic understanding of PafA, a key PPS enzyme.

Pupylation of PafA or Pup inhibits components of the Pup-Proteasome System

The pupylation of cellular proteins plays a crucial role in the degradation cascade via the Pup-Proteasome system (PPS). It is essential for the survival of Mycobacterium smegmatis under nutrient starvation and, as such, the activity of many components of the pathway is tightly regulated. Here, we show that Pup, like ubiquitin, can form polyPup chains primarily through K61 and that this form of Pup inhibits the ATPase-mediated turnover of pupylated substrates by the 20S proteasome. Similarly, the autopupylation of PafA (the sole Pup ligase found in mycobacteria) inhibits its own enzyme activity; hence, pupylation of PafA may act as a negative feedback mechanism to prevent substrate pupylation under specific cellular conditions.

How to control an intracellular proteolytic system: Coordinated regulatory switches in the mycobacterial Pup-proteasome system

Intracellular proteolysis is critical for the proper functioning of all cells, owing to its involvement in a wide range of processes. Because of the destructive nature of protein degradation, intracellular proteolysis is restricted by control mechanisms at almost every step of the proteolytic process. Understanding the coordination of such mechanisms is a challenging task, especially in systems as complex as the eukaryotic ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). In comparison, the bacterial analog of the UPS, the Pup-proteasome system (PPS) is much simpler and, therefore, allows for insight into the control of a proteolytic system. This review integrates available information to present a coherent picture of what is known of PPS regulatory switches and describes how these switches act in concert to enforce regulation at the system level. Finally, open questions regarding PPS regulation are discussed, providing readers with a sense of what lies ahead in the field.

Targets of ubiquitin like system in mycobacteria and related actinobacterial species

Protein turnover and recycling is a prerequisite in all living organisms to maintain normal cellular physiology. Many bacteria are proteasome deficient but they possess typical protease enzymes for carrying out protein turnover. However, several groups of actinobacteria such as mycobacteria harbor both proteasome and proteases. In these bacteria, for cellular protein turnover the target proteins undergo post-translational modification referred as pupylation in which a small protein Pup (prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein) is tagged to the specific lysine residues of the target proteins and after that those target proteins undergo proteasomal degradation. Thus, Pup serves as a degradation signal, helps in directing proteins toward the bacterial proteasome for a turnover. Although the Pup-proteasome system has a multifaceted role in environmental stresses, pathogenicity and regulation of cellular signaling, but the fate of all types of pupylation such as mono and polypupylation on the proteins is still not completely understood. In this review, we present the mechanisms involved in the activation and conjugation of Pup to the target proteins, describing the structural sketch of pupylation and fundamental differences between the eukaryotic ubiquitin-proteasome and bacterial Pup-proteasome systems. We are also presenting a concise classification and cataloging of the complete battery of experimentally identified Pup-substrates from various species of actinobacteria.

The regulatory significance of tag recycling in the mycobacterial Pup-proteasome system

Pup, a ubiquitin analog, tags proteins for degradation by the bacterial proteasome. As an intracellular proteolytic system, the Pup-proteasome system (PPS) must be carefully regulated to prevent excessive protein degradation. Currently, those factors underlying PPS regulation remain poorly understood. Here, experimental analysis combined with theoretical modeling of in vivo protein pupylation revealed how the basic PPS design allows stable and controlled protein pupylation. Specifically, the recycling of Pup when targets are degraded allows the PPS to maintain steady-state levels of protein pupylation and degradation at a rate limited by proteasome function, and at a pupylome level limited by Pup concentrations. This design allows the Pup-ligase, a highly promiscuous enzyme, to act in a controlled manner without causing damage, and the PPS to be effectively tuned to control protein degradation. This study thus provides understanding of how the inherent design of an intracellular proteolytic system serves crucial regulatory purposes.

Prokaryotic Ubiquitin-Like Protein and Its Ligase/Deligase Enyzmes

Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) and the modification enzymes involved in attaching Pup to or removing it from target proteins present a fascinating example of convergent evolution with respect to eukaryotic ubiquitination. Like ubiquitin (Ub), Pup is a small protein that can be covalently attached to lysine side chains of cellular proteins, and like Ub, it can serve to recruit tagged proteins for proteasomal degradation. However, unlike Ub, Pup is conformationally highly dynamic, exhibits a different linkage connectivity to its target lysines, and its ligase belongs to a different class of enzymes than the E1/E2/E3 cascade of ubiquitination. A specific feature of actinobacteria (aside from sporadic cases in a few other lineages), pupylation appears to have evolved to provide an advantage to the bacteria under certain environmental stresses rather than act as a constitutive modification. For Mycobacterium tuberculosis, pupylation and the recruitment of pupylated substrates to the proteasome support persistence inside host macrophages during pathogenesis, rendering the Pup-proteasome system an attractive drug target. In this review, we consider the dynamic nature of Pup in relation to its function, discuss the reaction mechanisms of ligation to substrates and cleavage from pupylated substrates, and put them in context of the evolutionary history of this post-translational modification.

Bacterial Proteasomes: Mechanistic and Functional Insights

Regulated proteolysis is essential for the normal physiology of all organisms. While all eukaryotes and archaea use proteasomes for protein degradation, only certain orders of bacteria have proteasomes, whose functions are likely as diverse as the species that use them. In this review, we discuss the most recent developments in the understanding of how proteins are targeted to proteasomes for degradation, including ATP-dependent and -independent mechanisms, and the roles of proteasome-dependent degradation in protein quality control and the regulation of cellular physiology. Furthermore, we explore newly established functions of proteasome system accessory factors that function independently of proteolysis.

An Extended Loop of the Pup Ligase, PafA, Mediates Interaction with Protein Targets

Pupylation, the bacterial equivalent of ubiquitylation, involves the conjugation of a prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) to protein targets. In contrast to the ubiquitin system, where many ubiquitin ligases exist, a single bacterial ligase, PafA, catalyzes the conjugation of Pup to a wide array of protein targets. As mediators of target recognition by PafA have not been identified, it would appear that PafA alone determines pupylation target selection. Previous studies indicated that broad specificity and promiscuity are indeed inherent PafA characteristics that probably dictate which proteins are selected for degradation by the Pup-proteasome system. Nonetheless, despite the canonical role played by PafA in the Pup-proteasome system, the molecular mechanism that dictates target binding by PafA remains uncharacterized since the discovery of this enzyme about a decade ago. In this study, we report the identification of PafA residues involved in the binding of protein targets. Initially, docking analysis predicted the residues on PafA with high potential for target binding. Mutational and biochemical approaches subsequently confirmed these predictions and identified a series of additional residues located on an extended loop at the edge of the PafA active site. Mutating residues in this loop rendered PafA defective in the pupylation of a wide variety of protein targets but not in its catalytic mechanism, suggesting an important role for this extended loop in the binding of protein targets. As such, these findings pave the way toward an understanding of the molecular determinants that dictate the broad substrate specificity of PafA.

The Mechanism of Mycobacterium smegmatis PafA Self-Pupylation

PafA, the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) ligase, catalyzes the Pup modification of bacterial proteins and targets the substrates for proteasomal degradation. It has been reported that that M. smegmatis PafA can be poly-pupylated. In this study, the mechanism of PafA self-pupylation is explored. We found that K320 is the major target residue for the pupylation of PafA. During the self-pupylation of PafA, the attachment of the first Pup to PafA is catalyzed by the other PafA molecule through an intermolecular reaction, while the formation of the polymeric Pup chain is carried out in an intramolecular manner through the internal ligase activity of the already pupylated PafA. Among the three lysine residues, K7, K31 and K61, in M. smegmatis Pup, K7 and K31 are involved in the formation of the poly-Pup chain in PafA poly-pupylation. Poly-pupylation of PafA can be reversibly regulated by depupylase Dop. The polymeric Pup chain formed through K7/K31 linkage is much more sensitive to Dop than the mono-Pup directly attached to PafA. Moreover, self-pupylation of PafA is involved in the regulation of its stability in vivo in a proteasome-dependent manner, suggesting that PafA self-pupylation functions as a mechanism in the auto-regulation of the Pup-proteasome system.

Posttranslational regulation of coordinated enzyme activities in the Pup-proteasome system

The proper functioning of any biological system depends on the coordinated activity of its components. Regulation at the genetic level is, in many cases, effective in determining the cellular levels of system components. However, in cases where regulation at the genetic level is insufficient for attaining harmonic system function, posttranslational regulatory mechanisms are often used. Here, we uncover posttranslational regulatory mechanisms in the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup)-proteasome system (PPS), the bacterial equivalent of the eukaryotic ubiquitin-proteasome system. Pup, a ubiquitin analog, is conjugated to proteins through the activities of two enzymes, Dop (deamidase of Pup) and PafA (proteasome accessory factor A), the Pup ligase. As Dop also catalyzes depupylation, it was unclear how PPS function could be maintained without Dop and PafA canceling the activity of the other, and how the two activities of Dop are balanced. We report that tight Pup binding and the limited degree of Dop interaction with high-molecular-weight pupylated proteins results in preferred Pup deamidation over protein depupylation by this enzyme. Under starvation conditions, when accelerated protein pupylation is required, this bias is intensified by depletion of free Dop molecules, thereby minimizing the chance of depupylation. We also find that, in contrast to Dop, PafA presents a distinct preference for high-molecular-weight protein substrates. As such, PafA and Dop act in concert, rather than canceling each other's activity, to generate a high-molecular-weight pupylome. This bias in pupylome molecular weight distribution is consistent with the proposed nutritional role of the PPS under starvation conditions.