Development of a novel convenient Alzheimer's disease assessment scale, the ABC Dementia Scale, using item response theory

A multimodal non-pharmacological intervention for persons with dementia in nursing homes: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Persons with dementia in nursing homes often experience cognitive decline (e.g., memory and visuospatial/construction problems), behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), and impaired activities of daily living. Therefore, comprehensive interventions for this population are needed. We assessed whether a multimodal non-pharmacological intervention improved cognitive functions, BPSD, and activities of daily living in persons with dementia in nursing homes.

METHODS

This was a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Participants were 40 persons with dementia (38 women) living in four nursing homes (intervention group = 21; control group = 19). The intervention was conducted for 8 weeks, followed by an 8-week follow-up. Outcome measures were scores on the Japanese version of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination Five and the ABC Dementia Scale. In the analysis, parameters were estimated using Bayesian statistics and a mixed-effects linear regression model for the change in each outcome measure.

RESULTS

There were significant between-group differences in changes in ABC Dementia Scale BPSD scores (8-week: posteriori median = 1.66, 95% Bayesian confidence interval 0.36-3.01; 16-week: median = 2.37, 95% Bayesian confidence interval 0.05-4.65). There was also a significant between-group difference in changes in Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination Five constructional ability scores (16-week: median = 0.93, 95% Bayesian confidence interval 0.35-1.50).

CONCLUSION

This intervention may have a maintenance and improvement effect on BPSD in persons with dementia in nursing homes, and a sustained effect on constructional ability post-intervention. The intervention may be useful and easy to apply in practice.

Impairment of Cognitive Function Increases Mortality Risk in Relation to Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation and Renal Dysfunction in Patients With Systolic Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

In contrast to the well-known prognostic values of the cardiorenal linkage, it remains unclear whether impaired cognitive function affects cardiac prognosis in relation to cardiac sympathetic innervation and renal function in patients with heart failure (HF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 433 consecutive HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% underwent the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and a neuropsychological test for screening of cognition impairment or subclinical dementia. Following metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy, patient outcomes with a primary endpoint of lethal cardiac events (CEs) were evaluated for a mean period of 14.8 months. CEs were documented in 84 HF patients during follow-up. MMSE score, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and standardized heart-to-mediastinum ratio of MIBG activity (sHMR) were significantly reduced in patients with CEs compared with patients without CEs. Furthermore, overall multivariate analysis revealed that these parameters were significant independent determinants of CEs. The cutoff values of MMSE score (<26), sHMR (<1.80) and eGFR (<47.0 mL/min/1.73 m2) determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis successfully differentiated HF patients at more increased risk for CEs from other HF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Impairment of cognitive function is not only independently related to but also synergistically increases cardiac mortality risk in association with cardiac sympathetic function and renal function in patients with HF.

Recent Advances in Neuropsychological Test Interpretation for Clinical Practice

Much attention in the field of clinical neuropsychology has focused on adapting to the modern healthcare environment by advancing telehealth and promoting technological innovation in assessment. Perhaps as important (but less discussed) are advances in the development and interpretation of normative neuropsychological test data. These techniques can yield improvement in diagnostic decision-making and treatment planning with little additional cost. Brooks and colleagues (Can Psychol 50: 196-209, 2009) eloquently summarized best practices in normative data creation and interpretation, providing a practical overview of norm development, measurement error, the base rates of low scores, and methods for assessing change. Since the publication of this seminal work, there have been several important advances in research on development and interpretation of normative neuropsychological test data, which may be less familiar to the practicing clinician. Specifically, we provide a review of the literature on regression-based normed scores, item response theory, multivariate base rates, summary/factor scores, cognitive intraindividual variability, and measuring change over time. For each topic, we include (1) an overview of the method, (2) a rapid review of the recent literature, (3) a relevant case example, and (4) a discussion of limitations and controversies. Our goal was to provide a primer for use of normative neuropsychological test data in neuropsychological practice.

Assessing tilavonemab efficacy in early Alzheimer's disease via longitudinal item response theory modeling

INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by declines in cognitive and functional severities. This research utilized the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) to assess the influence of tilavonemab on these deteriorations.

METHODS

Longitudinal Item Response Theory (IRT) models were employed to analyze CDR domains in early-stage AD patients. Both unidimensional and multidimensional models were contrasted to elucidate the trajectories of cognitive and functional severities.

RESULTS

We observed significant temporal increases in both cognitive and functional severities, with the cognitive severity deteriorating at a quicker rate. Tilavonemab did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect on the progression in either severity. Furthermore, a significant positive association was identified between the baselines and progression rates of both severities.

DISCUSSION

While tilavonemab failed to mitigate impairment progression, our multidimensional IRT analysis illuminated the interconnected progression of cognitive and functional declines in AD, suggesting a comprehensive perspective on disease trajectories.

Highlights

Utilized longitudinal Item Response Theory (IRT) models to analyze the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) domains in early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, comparing unidimensional and multidimensional models.Observed significant temporal increases in both cognitive and functional severities, with cognitive severity deteriorating at a faster rate, while tilavonemab showed no statistically significant effect on either domain's progression.Found a significant positive association between the baseline severities and their progression rates, indicating interconnected progression patterns of cognitive and functional declines in AD.Introduced the application of multidimensional longitudinal IRT models to provide a comprehensive perspective on the trajectories of cognitive and functional severities in early AD, suggesting new avenues for future research including the inclusion of time-dependent random effects and data-driven IRT models.

Impact of cataract surgery on cognitive impairment in older people

OBJECTIVES

To examine the impact of cataract surgery on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia in older people.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included patients aged 75 years and older who underwent cataract surgery between 2019 and 2021. Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and MMSE for the visually impaired (MMSE-blind) were measured to evaluate cognitive function before and 3 months after cataract surgery. MMSE score at baseline was used to categorize patients into dementia (MMSE ≤ 23) and MCI groups (23 < MMSE ≤ 27). Logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between improvement in cognitive function and other factors.

RESULTS

Of 132 patients screened for inclusion in the study, 88 met the inclusion criteria; 39 patients were assigned to the dementia group (mean age, 85.7 ± 4.2 years) and 49 to the MCI group (mean age, 84.2 ± 3.4 years). The MCI group showed significant improvement from before to after surgery in the MMSE score (25.65 ± 1.03 vs. 27.08 ± 1.99, respectively, p < 0.001) and MMSE-blind score (18.04 ± 1.14 vs. 19.41 ± 2.01, respectively, p < 0.001). Cognitive function improved significantly in the MCI group compared with the dementia group (odds ratio, 2.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-7.97; and p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract surgery significantly increases cognitive test scores in older patients with MCI. After cataract surgery, the likelihood of improvement in cognitive function may be highly dependent on a patient's preoperative cognitive state.

Kinematic Features of Mandibular Movement during Mastication in Geriatric Individuals Who Are Provided with a Dysphagia Diet at Long-Term Care Facilities

Providing a normal diet to a care recipient who is unable to form an adequate bolus may cause suffocation or aspiration pneumonia. We investigated whether differences in kinematic data of mandibular movements during mastication can be used as an indicator of the need for a dysphagia diet in the elderly in long-term care facilities. We included 63 participants who were provided with solid food in two long-term care facilities. The primary outcome variable was the kinematic data on mandibular movement during cracker chewing. The analysis results were compared between the normal and dysphagia diet groups. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed. Significant differences were observed in the masticatory time, cycle frequency, total change amount, number of linear motions, and circular motion frequency between the normal and modified diet groups. The odds ratio for the circular motion frequency was -0.307, and the calculated cutoff value was 63%, with a sensitivity of 71.4%, a specificity of 73.5%, and an area under the curve of 0.714. Thus, these characteristics may be useful for detecting care recipients who need to be provided with a dysphagia diet. Moreover, the circular motion frequency could be used as a screening test to identify people who need a dysphagia diet.

Effect of a multimodal non-pharmacological intervention on older people with dementia: a single-case experimental design study

BACKGROUND

Older people with dementia (PWD) in nursing homes (NHs) tend to have decreased cognitive function, which may cause behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSDs) and hinder activities of daily living (ADLs). Therefore, taking measures against the cognitive decline of PWD in NH and, in turn, the decline of BPSDs and ADLs is crucial. The purpose of this study was to test whether a multimodal non-pharmacological intervention (MNPI) is effective in maintaining and improving global cognitive function, BPSDs, and ADLs in PWD in NHs.

METHODS

An intervention study using a single-case AB design was conducted in three subjects in NHs. During the non-intervention phase, participants underwent follow-up assessments, and during the intervention phase, they participated in an MNPI. The ABC Dementia Scale (which concurrently assesses ADLs ["A"], BPSDs ["B"], and cognitive function ["C"]) was used for the assessment.

RESULTS

One of the three patients showed improvement in dementia severity, global cognitive function, ADLs, and BPSDs. However, the other two participants showed no improvement following the MNPI, although the possibility of a maintenance effect remained.

CONCLUSION

Although there is room for improvement of the MNPI, it may be effective in maintaining and improving cognitive function, ADLs, and BPSD, in PWD in NHs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ , No. UMIN000045858, registration date: November 1, 2021).

Criterion-related validity of Bedriddenness Rank with other established objective scales of ADLs, and Cognitive Function Score with those of cognitive impairment, both are easy-to-use official Japanese scales: A prospective observational study

Aim

Bedriddenness Rank (BR) and Cognitive Function Score (CFS), issued by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, are easy-to-use and widely used in the medical and long-term care insurance systems in Japan. This study aims to clarify the criterion-related validity of the CFS with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and ABC Dementia Scale (ABC-DS), and to re-evaluate the criterion-related validity of BR with the Barthel Index (BI) or Katz Index (KI) in more appropriate settings and a larger population compared with the previous study.

Methods

A single-center prospective observational study was conducted in an acute care hospital in a suburban city in Japan. All inpatients aged 20 years or older admitted from October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019. The relationship between BR and the BI and KI, and the relationship between CFS and the MMSE and ABC-DS were analyzed using Spearman’s correlation coefficients.

Results

We enrolled 3,003 patients. Of these, 1,664 (56%) patients exhibited normal BR. The median (interquartile range) values of the BI and KI were 100 (65–100) and 6 (2–6), respectively. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between BR and the BI and KI were −0.891 (p < 0.001) and −0.877 (p < 0.001), respectively.

Of the patients, 1,967 (65.5%) showed normal CFS. The median (interquartile range) MMSE of 951 patients with abnormal CFS and ABC-DS of all patients were 15 (2–21) and 117 (102–117), respectively. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between CFS and MMSE and ABC-DS were −0.546 (p < 0.001) and −0.862 (p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

BR and CFS showed significant criterion-related validity with well-established but complicated objective scales for assessing activities of daily living and cognitive functions, respectively. These two scales, which are easy to assess, are reliable and useful in busy clinical practice or large-scale screening settings.

External validation of a new predictive model for falls among inpatients using the official Japanese ADL scale, Bedriddenness ranks: a double-centered prospective cohort study

Background

Several reliable predictive models for falls have been reported, but are too complicated and time-consuming to evaluate. We recently developed a new predictive model using just eight easily-available parameters including the official Japanese activities of daily living scale, Bedriddenness ranks, from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. This model has not yet been prospectively validated. This study aims to prospectively validate our new predictive model for falls among inpatients admitted to two different hospitals.

Methods

A double-centered prospective cohort study was performed from October 1, 2018, to September 30, 2019 in an acute care hospital and a chronic care hospital. We analyzed data from all adult inpatients, for whom all data required by the predictive model were evaluated and recorded. The eight items required by the predictive model were age, gender, emergency admission, department of admission, use of hypnotic medications, previous falls, independence of eating, and Bedriddenness ranks. The main outcome is in-hospital falls among adult inpatients, and the model was assessed by area under the curve.

Results

A total of 3,551 adult participants were available, who experienced 125 falls (3.5%). The median age (interquartile range) was 78 (66–87) years, 1,701 (47.9%) were men, and the incidence of falls was 2.25 per 1,000 patient-days and 2.06 per 1,000 occupied bed days. The area under the curve of the model was 0.793 (95% confidence interval: 0.761–0.825). The cutoff value was set as − 2.18, making the specificity 90% with the positive predictive value and negative predictive value at 11.4% and 97%.

Conclusions

This double-centered prospective cohort external validation study showed that the new predictive model had excellent validity for falls among inpatients. This reliable and easy-to-use model is therefore recommended for prediction of falls among inpatients, to improve preventive interventions.

Trial registration

UMIN000040103 (2020/04/08)

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-02871-5.

Concurrent Validity of the ABC Dementia Scale with Other Standard Scales: A New Comprehensive Instrument for Assessing Dementia in Japan

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The ABC Dementia Scale (ABC-DS), a new tool for evaluating dementia, was developed in Japan. The ABC-DS is a comprehensive instrument that can simultaneously evaluate activities of daily living (ADLs), behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), and cognitive function. The ABC-DS can be administered easily and quickly and can clarify the severity of dementia and its changes over time. While the ABC-DS has been reported to be useful in Alzheimer disease (AD)-type dementia, it has not yet been studied in other types of dementia. The purpose of this study was to reevaluate the standard validity of ABC-DS separately for various dementia types and severities.

METHODS

We evaluated the ABC-DS in outpatients at 1 hospital in Nagasaki Prefecture and patients who use the facility. Domain A, corresponding to ADLs, correlated with Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD); domain B, corresponding to BPSD, correlated with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI); domain C, corresponding to cognitive functions, correlated with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); and the total score of the ABC-DS correlated with the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR).

RESULTS

102 patients, comprising 38 males and 64 females with an average age of 80.7 ± 8.6 years, were enrolled. AD-type dementia was present in 38 cases, vascular dementia (VaD) in 23, mixed dementia in 23, dementia with Lewy bodies in 6, argyrophilic grain dementia in 9, and mild cognitive impairment in 3. A strong correlation was found between ABC-DS domain scores and their respective reference neuropsychological instruments (domain A and the DAD, domain B and the NPI, domain C and the MMSE, and total score and CDR). The correlation of each ABC-DS domain score with the corresponding standard scale depended on the type and severity of dementia, and we observed moderate or high correlations in AD and VaD patients with moderate and severe dementia.

DISCUSSION

Although the ABC-DS targets AD, it can be used in VaD based on the results of this study. In other types of dementia, the results differed depending on the domain; in some conditions, the ABC-DS may not show sufficient concurrent validity with other standard scales. Also, the ABC-DS is more beneficial for moderate-to-severe dementia, as reported in previous studies. It is highly useful in clinical practice in Japan since there more than half of all patients have moderate-to-severe dementia.

High inter-rater reliability of Japanese bedriddenness ranks and cognitive function scores: a hospital-based prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The statistical validities of the official Japanese classifications of activities of daily living (ADLs), including bedriddenness ranks (BR) and cognitive function scores (CFS), have yet to be assessed. To this aim, we evaluated the ability of BR and CFS to assess ADLs using inter-rater reliability and criterion-related validity.

METHODS

New inpatients aged ≥75 years were enrolled in this hospital-based prospective observational study. BR and CFS were assessed once by an attending nurse, and then by a social worker/medical clerk. We evaluated inter-rater reliability between different professions by calculating the concordance rate, kappa coefficient, Cronbach's α, and intraclass correlation coefficient. We also estimated the relationship of the Barthel Index and Katz Index with the BR and CFS using Spearman's correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

For the 271 patients enrolled, BR at the first assessment revealed 66 normal, 10 of J1, 15 of J2, 18 of A1, 31 of A2, 37 of B1, 35 of B2, 22 of C1, and 32 of C2. The concordance rate between the two BR assessments was 68.6%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.61, Cronbach's α of 0.91, and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83, thus showing good inter-rater reliability. BR was negatively correlated with the Barthel Index (r = - 0.848, p < 0.001) and Katz Index (r = - 0.820, p < 0.001), showing justifiable criterion-related validity. Meanwhile, CFS at the first assessment revealed 92 normal, 47 of 1, 19 of 2a, 30 of 2b, 60 of 3a, 8 of 3b, 8 of 4, and 0 of M. The concordance rate between the two CFS assessments was 70.1%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.62, Cronbach's α of 0.87, and an intraclass correlation coefficient 0.78, thus also showing good inter-rater reliability. CFS was negatively correlated with the Barthel Index (r = - 0.667, p < 0.001) and Katz Index (r = - 0.661, p < 0.001), showing justifiable criterion-related validity.

CONCLUSIONS

BR and CFS could be reliable and easy-to-use grading scales of ADLs in acute clinical practice or large-scale screening, with high inter-rater reliabilities among different professions and significant correlations with well-established, though complicated to use, instruments to assess ADLs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000041051 (2020/7/10).

ABC Dementia Scale Classifies Alzheimer's Disease Patients into Subgroups Characterized by Activities of Daily Living, Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia, and Cognitive Function

The course of Alzheimer's disease (AD) varies between individuals, and the relationship between cognitive and functional decline and the deterioration of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) is still poorly understood. Until recently, it was challenging to monitor subsequent changes in these symptoms because there was no single composite scale available that could simultaneously evaluate activities of daily living (ADL), BPSD, and cognitive function (CF) states. The present authors developed a new, brief assessment scale, the "ABC Dementia Scale" (ABC-DS), which is based on item response theory and facilitates concurrent measurement of ADL, BPSD, and CF states. We previously presented the reliability, construct validity, concurrent validity, and responsiveness of the ABC-DS. We obtained the evidence through three clinical trials featuring 1,400 subjects in total. In the present study, we performed a secondary analysis of the data obtained in the previous study. We conducted hierarchical cluster analyses that allowed us to classify 197 AD patients in terms of similarities regarding ADL, BPSD, and CF domain scores, as measured by the ABC-DS. Consequently, the scale identified subgroups of patients with global clinical dementia ratings of 1, 2, and 3. Considering our results in conjunction with the clinical experiences of the AD expert among the present authors regarding longitudinal changes in ADL, BPSD, and CF, we were able to propose potential progression pathways of AD in the form of a hypothetical roadmap.

Development of a novel convenient Alzheimer's disease assessment scale, the ABC Dementia Scale, using item response theory

Aim

The present study aimed to assess the interrater reliability and construct the validity of a novel, convenient informant‐based Alzheimer's disease assessment scale to prepare its final version.

Methods

For the assessment, site investigators, co‐medicals and, if available, medical staff other than doctors or co‐medicals interviewed study informants to assess individuals using this scale. We then analyzed the interrater reliability and construct validity using factor analysis and item response characteristics.

Results

In this study, 427 eligible participants were enrolled. We first examined the interrater reliability, and found that the lower limit of the confidence interval of each item was never <0.4 (except for the item “delusion of theft”). After deleting this item, the 14 items of this scale were organized into three domains (activities of daily living, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, and cognitive function) through factor analysis. After discussion of the similarity of two items and their integration into one item, we confirmed that the final version of the 13‐item scale showed almost the same degree of interrater reliability and construct validity as the former version of this scale.

Conclusions

The final version of this novel Alzheimer's disease assessment scale had high interrater reliability and construct validity. We named it the ABC (activities of daily living, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, and cognitive function) Dementia Scale. Further studies on its validation are required. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 18–23.