Inhibitor development after switching of FVIII concentrate in multitransfused patients with severe haemophilia A

An update of the current pharmacotherapeutic armamentarium for hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

For several decades, we have seen unprecedented advances in novel therapy development for hemophilia A. These advances address the unmet need of replacement therapy, and they include the development of recombinant products with improved pharmacokinetics, subcutaneously administered products, and those with better efficacy and safety profiles in hemophilia A management.

AREAS COVERED

In this update of hemophilia A treatment, the author summarizes data from completed standard half-life FVIII products, extended half-life FVIII products and FVIII mimetic studies. All products have an acceptable safety profile. The standard half-life products, EHL-FVIII products and emicizumab are efficacious in the prevention and treatment of bleeds and for EHL-FVIII in the perisurgical setting.

EXPERT OPINION

Advances in pharmacotherapy for hemophilia A have been characterized by changing care goals from supportive care to eliminating infections, preventing inhibitors, and more recently achieving zero bleeds in many patients. While gene therapy has the potential for functional cure in hemophilia A, it has many limitations which need to be addressed. Therefore, pharmacotherapy is likely to remain the mainstay in the management of hemophilia A and promises to get better with currently available therapies. Evolving factor and non-factor replacement therapies may also improve current unmet needs in hemophilia A management.

The inhibitors - a challenge for the management of patients with hereditary haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Our research strategy was aimed at evaluating the possible implication of the type of factor VIII product administered as substitution treatment to haemophilia A patients in the occurrence of inhibitors and their consequences on the management.

METHODS

Scientific articles from July 2015 to July 2017 were searched using the PubMed and PubMed Central databases. The used search terms included "haemophilia A", "inhibitors", "plasma-derived factor VIII" and "recombinant factor VIII".

RESULTS

The risk factors for inhibitors occurrence may be patients-related (genetic and nongenetic) and treatment-related. The possibility of a correlation between the increased purity of factor VIII given as substitution treatment and the occurrence of inhibitors is discussed in the light of literature data. Plasma-derived factor VIII is less immunogenic, but not entirely safe from the point of view of the possibility of transmitting biological agents. It is obvious that there is not enough plasma-derived factor VIII for the planet's needs. Recombinant factor VIII products have revolutionized the treatment of patients with haemophilia A over the past 3 decades by the disappearance of transfusion-related infections and their complications. They are safer in terms of pathogens and the new long-acting factor VIII products are based on recombinant DNA technology.

CONCLUSION

Plasma-derived or recombinant factor VIII products must co-exist on the market for the benefit of haemophilic patients. Future solutions could be: less immunogenic factor VIII products, nonfactor replacement strategies, or bispecific antibody that mimics the function of coagulation factor VIII.

Incidence of low-titre factor VIII inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A: meta-analysis of observational studies

INTRODUCTION

A few studies have been focused on low-titre inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A. Although several putative factors have been implicated in the development of these inhibitors, solid data are still lacking.

AIM

The aim of this study was to perform a proportion meta-analysis on the incidence of low-titre inhibitors in haemophilia A.

METHODS

We surveyed the PubMed database to identify studies on de novo development of low-titre inhibitors in haemophilia A patients. On the basis of these data, we carried out a proportion meta-analysis to summarize information on incidence and between-study variability. Furthermore, the following three covariates were assessed by meta-regression: (i) mild disease vs. severe haemophilia; (ii) status of previously untreated patient (PUP) as opposed to multi-transfused and (iii) type of factor VIII.

RESULTS

Our literature search on PubMed extracted 340 eligible articles. From these, we selected 33 patient cohorts that were included in our meta-analysis (19 cohorts for PUPs and 14 cohorts for multi-transfused or unselected patients). The pooled incidence of low-titre inhibitors was 10.3% (95%CI: 8.3-12.5%) for studies including PUPs and 5.8% (95%CI: 2.5-10.4%) for the other studies; the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003). Meta-regression of 31 patient cohorts found that mild disease and type of factor VIII were not associated with an increased incidence of low-titre inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirmed that PUPs show a higher incidence of low-titre inhibitors than the other patients. Furthermore, our data showed that mild haemophilia was not associated with an increased incidence of low-titre inhibitors.

Answering relevant research questions via careful observation of clinical practice: a fresh look at the old way forward

Although many aspects of inhibitor development have been elucidated, the role of switching FVIII product concentrate in the risk of inhibitors development in previously treated patients is still under discussion. To provide their contribution, Aznar et al [9] transparently showed the numerous different brands used over time and the number of patients treated with one or another class of concentrates in their center. This way of inclusively reporting data as generated in routine clinical practice would need to be adopted more broadly among hemophilia treater and scientists. Strength and limitations of the approach are discussed.