Joint surgery in von Willebrand disease: a multicentre cross-sectional study

Clinical, economic, and health-related quality of life burden associated with von Willebrand disease in adults and children: Systematic and targeted literature reviews

INTRODUCTION

Debilitating clinical complications in von Willebrand disease (VWD) can affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL), increase healthcare costs and cause long-lasting consequences. However, the magnitude of these burdens needs to be more fully explored.

AIM

To estimate the prevalence and burden of clinical complications, the impact on HRQoL and the economic burden associated with VWD.

METHODS

Embase^® , MEDLINE^® , the Cochrane Library and conference proceedings were searched for studies on VWD evaluating clinical complications, HRQoL and cost and resource use.

RESULTS

Among 16 studies assessing clinical complications in VWD, the most prevalent bleeding symptoms were menorrhagia (2%-95% [n = 7 studies]), epistaxis (12%-80% [n = 6]) and easy bruising (46%-65% [n = 2]). Among 17 studies evaluating HRQoL, the most common assessment scales were the generic SF-36 (n = 8 studies) and the EQ-5D (n = 2). Bleeding symptoms were associated with reduced QoL in six of seven studies, and of six studies evaluating treatment impact, four reported improvements in one or more HRQoL components. Among 25 studies on cost and resource use, key observations included higher post-surgery healthcare costs in VWD versus non-VWD patients (n = 1 study) and higher costs and resource use in VWD patients with bleeding complications versus those without (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Although limited, available evidence suggests that VWD patients experience a high burden of clinical complications, reduced QoL and high healthcare costs. Haemarthrosis is more common in severe VWD than is often assumed, and bleeds (including haemarthrosis) can reduce QoL. Research efforts to improve QoL and other outcomes should be prioritized.

Von Willebrand Disease Epidemiology, Burden of Illness and Management: A Systematic Review

Introduction

Although hereditary von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common bleeding disorder, its epidemiology is not well understood. A systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020197674/CRD42021244374) on the epidemiology/burden of illness of VWD was conducted to better understand patients' unmet needs.

Methods

Observational studies (published January 1, 2010 to April 14, 2021) were identified in MEDLINE and Embase databases, using free-text keywords and thesaurus terms for VWD and outcomes of interest. Pragmatic web-based searches of the gray literature, including conference abstracts, were performed, and reference lists of retained publications were manually searched for additional sources. Case reports and clinical trials (phase 1-3) were excluded. Outcomes of interest were incidence, prevalence, mortality, patient characteristics, burden of illness, and therapeutic management/treatments currently used for VWD.

Results

Of the 3095 identified sources, 168 were included in this systematic review. Reported VWD prevalence (22 sources) ranged from 108.9 to 2200 per 100,000 in population-based studies and from 0.3 to 16.5 per 100,000 in referral-based studies. Reported times between first symptom onset and diagnosis (two sources; mean 669 days; median 3 years) highlighted gaps in timely VWD diagnosis. Bleeding events reported in 72-94% of the patients with VWD (all types; 27 sources) were mostly mucocutaneous including epistaxis, menorrhagia, and oral/gum bleeding. Poorer health-related quality of life (three sources) and greater health care resource utilization (three sources) were reported for patients with VWD than in general populations.

Conclusion

Available data suggest that patients with VWD experience high disease burden in terms of bleeding, poor quality of life, and health care resource utilization.

Addressing unmet needs in rare bleeding disorders: selected poster extracts of recent research in hemophilia A and von Willebrand disease presented at the 14th Annual Congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD) (Feb 3-5, 2021; virtual congress)

Hemophilia A and von Willebrand disease (VWD) are inherited rare bleeding disorders affecting normal hemostasis. Patients with VWD, especially those with severe disease types, share some similarities to patients with hemophilia A in their burden of disease: they suffer from an increased risk of potentially severe and life-threatening bleeds and associated long-term consequences, such as impaired joint health and overall lower quality of life. However, the two bleeding disorders differ in their primary cause and affected patient population, and comprise a range of different bleeding phenotypes with varying unmet needs. Generating scientific evidence to advance health care for patients with rare bleeding disorders is challenging due to the low prevalence and heterogeneity of affected populations, including patient demographics and symptom severities. Innovative study designs are needed to adequately answer relevant scientific questions and address patients' unmet needs. In support of advancing clinical outcomes and treatment options for these patients, at the recent EAHAD 2021 annual congress, novel approaches and data from clinical and real-world observational studies, as well as systematic literature analyses, were presented. Herein, extracts from seven selected posters reporting research in hemophilia A and VWD funded by Takeda are discussed.

von Willebrand disease: what does the future hold?

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by its heterogeneous clinical manifestation, which complicates its diagnosis and management. The clinical management of VWD has remained essentially unchanged over the last 30 years or so, using von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrates, desmopressin, and anti-fibrinolytic agents as main tools to control bleeding. This is in contrast to hemophilia A, for which a continuous innovative path has led to novel treatment modalities. Despite current VWD management being considered effective, quality-of-life studies consistently reveal a higher than anticipated burden of VWD on patients, which is particularly true for women. Apparently, despite our perceived notion of current therapeutic efficiency, there is space for innovation with the goal of reaching superior efficacy. Developing innovative treatments for VWD is complex, especially given the heterogeneity of the disease and the multifunctional nature of VWF. In this perspective article, we describe several potential strategies that could provide the basis for future VWD treatments. These include genetic approaches, such as gene therapy using dual-vector adenoassociated virus and transcriptional silencing of mutant alleles. Furthermore, protein-based approaches to increase factor FVIII levels in VWD-type 3 or 2N patients are discussed. Finally, antibody-based options to interfere with VWF degradation (for congenital VWD-type 2A or acquired von Willebrand syndrome-type 2A) or increase endogenous VWF levels (for VWD-type 1) are presented. By highlighting these potential strategies, we hope to initiate an innovative path, which ultimately would allow us to better serve VWD patients and their specific needs.