Lupus anticoagulants associated inhibitor against factor IX in a young patient with haemophilia B

Two-center validation of assays for the detection of binding and neutralizing anti-factor VIII antibodies

INTRODUCTION

Patients with hemophilia A treated with coagulation Factor VIII (FVIII) products are at risk for developing anti-FVIII antibodies. The ABIRISK Consortium aimed to provide knowledge on the formation and detection of anti-drug antibodies against biopharmaceutical products, including FVIII. Accordingly, standardized and validated assays for the detection of binding (total) and neutralizing antibodies are needed.

AIM

Two-center validation of an ELISA for the detection of total FVIII-binding IgG-antibodies and Nijmegen-Bethesda assays for the quantification of FVIII-neutralizing antibodies according to consensus validation guidelines.

METHODS

Validation of assays at both sites was done according to published recommendations and included preanalytics, the determination of key assay parameters, including cut-points, assay sensitivity, precision, and FVIII interference.

RESULTS

The validated assays reproducibly detected FVIII-binding and -neutralizing antibodies with comparable performance in both laboratories. Floating screening cut-points were established for both assays. Determined mass-based sensitivity of both assays (all values ≤66 ng/mL) complied with the minimum sensitivity for the detection of anti-drug antibodies as recommended by the FDA (<100 ng/mL). Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation did not exceed 25%. Assay validation further revealed that pre-analytical heat treatment led to potentially false-positive ELISA results, while up to 0.15 IU/mL, residual FVIII showed no significant impact. Overall, good agreement of results was found for patient samples analyzed at both study sites.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive validation of different anti-FVIII-antibody assays in two laboratories gave novel insights into the impact of pre-analytical sample treatment as well as the comparability of test results generated by the use of methodically different assays.

International Council for Standardization in Haematology recommendations for laboratory measurement of factor VIII and FIX type I inhibitors

This guidance document has been prepared on behalf of the International Council for Standardisation in Hematology. The aim of the document is to provide guidance and recommendations on the measurement of factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) inhibitors. After an introduction on the clinical background and relevance of factor VIII and factor IX inhibitor testing, the following aspects of laboratory testing are included: screening for inhibitors, assay principle, sample requirements, testing requirements and interpretation, quality assurance, interferences and recent developments. This guidance document focusses on recommendations for a standardised procedure for the laboratory measurement of FVIII and FIX type I inhibitors. The recommendations are based on published data in peer-reviewed literature and expert opinion.

Laboratory testing for factor VIII and IX inhibitors in haemophilia: A review

Inhibitors are antibodies directed against haemophilia treatment products which interfere with their function. Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in haemophilia A and factor IX (FIX) inhibitors in haemophilia B are significant clinically when they require a change in a patient's treatment regimen. Their persistence may increase morbidity and mortality. Multiple laboratory tests are now available for detecting and understanding inhibitors in haemophilia. Inhibitors are traditionally measured by their interference in clotting or chromogenic factor assays. They may also be detected using immunologic assays, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or fluorescence immunoassay. Anti-FVIII or anti-FIX antibodies of IgG4 subclass best correlate with the presence of functional inhibitors. Improvements in inhibitor measurement have been recently introduced. Preanalytical heat treatment of patient specimens allows testing of patients without delaying treatment. Use of chromogenic and immunologic assays may aid in identification of false-positive results, which are frequent among low-titre inhibitors. Validated reagent substitutions can be used to reduce assay cost. New methods for defining assay positivity and reporting low-titre inhibitors have been suggested. Challenges remain in the areas of quality control, assay standardization, monitoring of patients undergoing immune tolerance induction therapy and testing in the presence of modified and novel treatment products.