Laboratory monitoring of replacement therapy for major surgery in von Willebrand disease

Bleeding management in type 3 von Willebrand disease with anti-von Willebrand factor inhibitor: A literature review and case report

Treatment of type 3 von Willebrand disease by infusion of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates may lead to the development of anti-VWF antibodies, challenging haemostasis management. The systematic review of the literature presented here retrieved 15 such cases (surgery n = 11, bleeding n = 4). The heterogeneous patient management mostly involved continuous infusion of FVIII, or recombinant FVIIa together with various other strategies. Off-label infusion of the bispecific monoclonal antibody emicizumab was prescribed in three cases and in a complex local case, ultimately well-controlled with emicizumab. This illustrates the fact that emicizumab appears as a therapeutic option in this context of allo-immunisation.

Perioperative hemostasis management in patients with von Willebrand disease: an institutional experience

OBJECTIVES

Patients with von Willebrand disease (vWD) undergoing surgery are routinely treated with von Willebrand factor (vWF)/factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate to control bleeding risk, but consensus is lacking on optimal dosing. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tailored doses of vWF/FVIII concentrate according to intervention-associated bleeding risk in vWD patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of vWD patients who underwent surgical procedures at a haemophilia centre. Patients received vWF/FVIII concentrate with dosage and duration of treatment dependent on intervention type (dental, gynaecological, abdominal or orthopaedic/traumatic) and bleeding risk (moderate/high).

RESULTS

Eighty-three surgical procedures (42 patients) were included. Median preoperative loading doses of vWF/FVIII concentrate were 29.9 IU/kg and 35.7 IU/kg for interventions with moderate ( n  = 16) or high ( n  = 67) bleeding risk, respectively. The median perioperative dose was highest in orthopaedic or trauma-related surgery (140 IU/kg) and lowest in dental or gynaecological interventions (76.4 IU/kg and 80.0 IU/kg, respectively). During follow-up, no bleeding or other complications were observed in 95% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Individually tailored doses of vWF/FVIII concentrate according to intervention-associated bleeding risk were effective in preventing postoperative bleeding, with few complications observed. These doses may be used as guidance in routine clinical care.

Real-world healthcare costs and resource utilization in patients with von Willebrand disease and angiodysplasia

OBJECTIVE

To describe the economic burden among VWD patients with angiodysplasia compared to VWD patients without angiodysplasia and the general population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis using the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Databases® (January 2011-September 2020). Selected patients had ≥1 medical claim for VWD or low VWF, ≥1 medical claim for AGD, and ≥3 GI-related bleeding episodes within a year. HCRU and all-cause costs were compared with the VWD (only) and the general cohorts.

RESULTS

The mean total all-cause costs were $150,101 among patients with VWD and angiodysplasia (n = 34), higher compared to $48,249 among matched VWD patients without angiodysplasia (n = 136) and $31,029 among matched individuals of the general population [n = 136; p-value < 0.0001]. The differences in costs between groups were primarily due to inpatient care. During the 12-month follow-up, VWD patients with symptomatic (n = 35), asymptomatic (n = 81), and suspected (n = 378) angiodysplasia had an average of 4.1, 0.6, and 3.8 gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds, respectively. Desmopressin, VWF concentrates, and aminocaproic acid were the most frequent treatments used. The most frequent procedures to treat GI-related bleeding and underlying lesions were blood transfusion and laser therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recent therapeutic advances, there is room for considerable reduction of the disease burden in patients with VWD and angiodysplasia.

Effectiveness of long-term prophylaxis using pdFVIII/VWF concentrate in patients with inherited von Willebrand disease

Background

Patients with symptomatic von Willebrand disease (VWD) should be offered long‐term prophylaxis (LTP) to prevent recurrent bleedings. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Voncento®, a plasma‐derived FVIII/VWF concentrate (ratio 1:2.4), administrated in LTP.

Methods

We included patients from the OPALE study (May 2016 to April 2021), a French multicenter observational study following patients with inherited VWD, who received a Voncento® LTP during the study period.

Results

Among the 130 OPALE‐study patients, 23 patients (12 women) received a LTP and were therefore included. The median (range) age was 16 (1–85) years; 16 patients were type 3, 1 was type 2A, 6 were type 2B. Before inclusion, 19 (83%) were under LTP and 4 (17%) received on‐demand (OD) treatment. The indications for initiating prophylaxis in the overall population were joint bleeding (43%), ear, nose, and throat (ENT) bleeding including epistaxis or oral bleeding (39%), and recurrent muscle hematoma (22%). The medians (ranges) dose of Voncento® per infusion, frequency, and weekly dose were 45 (33–109) IU/kg, 2 infusions per week, and 96 (44–222) IU/kg/week, respectively. The median (range) annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 0.8, 0.7 (0–3.5), and 0 (0–2.3) for type 2A, 2B, 3 patients, respectively. There was no difference regarding to the dose, frequency of infusion, or in terms of ABR in 9/19 patients who replaced previous concentrates with Voncento®. During the study period, no adverse event was reported.

Conclusion

These results suggest that Voncento® is effective to prevent recurrent bleedings in patients symptomatic VWD.

Translating the success of prophylaxis in haemophilia to von Willebrand disease

INTRODUCTION

There is limited awareness of von Willebrand disease (VWD), leading to challenges in both diagnosis and defining the optimal treatment approach for these patients. Patients with VWD are typically treated on-demand, with short-term prophylaxis used during surgery. In contrast, early initiation, and long-term use of prophylaxis is the standard of care in patients with severe haemophilia and can be successfully used to prevent joint bleeding and reduce chronic arthropathy.

AIM

To provide an understanding of the current evidence for the prophylactic treatment of patients with VWD and compare this to the management of patients with haemophilia.

METHODS

Review of published literature using a non-systematic search of PubMed and reference lists of sourced articles.

RESULTS

The successes seen with prophylaxis in haemophilia provide the rationale for long-term prophylaxis in patients with severe forms of VWD; preventing spontaneous, excessive and sometimes life-threatening bleeding, and reducing chronic joint disease. Currently, there are a few clinical trials assessing the long-term benefits of prophylaxis in VWD, and guidelines for the optimal prophylaxis treatment approach are lacking. Greater attempts to provide comprehensive, long-term care for patients with VWD are needed but still lacking within the community. This review highlights the success of prophylaxis in haemophilia and how this knowledge might be applied and translated to patients with VWD.

CONCLUSIONS

Lessons can be learned from the use of prophylaxis in haemophilia and prophylaxis should be considered the standard of care for a subgroup of patients with severe VWD.

Effectiveness and safety of hFVIII/VWF concentrate (Voncento®) in patients with inherited von Willebrand disease requiring surgical procedures: the OPALE multicentre observational study

BACKGROUND

In patients with moderate to severe qualitative and quantitative von Willebrand disease (VWD), even minor surgical procedures can be associated with a risk of life-threatening bleeding. Treatment strategies vary according to the levels of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and Factor VIII (FVIII). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of Voncento^® (CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany), a plasma-derived FVIII/VWF concentrate (ratio 1:2.4), during surgeries performed in patients with inherited VWD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The OPALE study, a French multicentre observational study, was carried out from May 2016 to May 2019. It evaluated and analysed patients with inherited VWD (any type) requiring treatment with Voncento^® who underwent surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 92 patients were enrolled, and 66 patients underwent 100 surgical procedures: 69 minor and 31 major surgeries conducted in 30 patients with type 1, 50 patients with type 2, and 20 patients with type 3 VWD. During minor surgeries, the median number of infusions was one (range: 1-9), the pre-operative loading dose was 41 IU VWF:RCo kg^-1 (range: 18-147), and the total dose was 63 (range: 18-594). During major surgeries, the number of infusions was 4 (range: 1-23), the pre-operative loading dose was 43 (range: 25-66) IU VWF: RCo kg^-1, and the total dose was 155 (range: 40-575). The median FVIII:C levels ranged from 78 to 165 IU dL^-1 during 5 days after minor surgeries and from 86 and 167 IU dL^-1 during 11 days after major surgeries. VW:RCo levels ranged between 35 and 65 IU dL^-1 and between 34 and 76 IU dL^-1 after minor and major surgeries, respectively. The overall clinical effectiveness was qualified as "excellent" or "good" in 99% of patients. No thrombotic events related to Voncento^® were recorded.

DISCUSSION

The present study suggests that Voncento^® is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for the peri-operative management of patients with all VWD types.

von Willebrand factor and factor VIII levels after desmopressin are associated with bleeding phenotype in type 1 VWD

The bleeding phenotype of patients with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) is very heterogeneous. We hypothesized that this heterogeneity may partly be explained by variability in response of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) levels to stress during hemostatic challenges. We therefore investigated whether VWF and FVIII levels after administration of desmopressin, which mimic in vivo hemostatic response during hemostatic challenges, explain the heterogeneity in bleeding phenotype of patients with type 1 VWD. We performed a retrospective cohort study in 122 patients with type 1 VWD. All patients received a test dose of desmopressin shortly after diagnosis. Patients' mean age was 47 ± 14 years, and the mean Tosetto bleeding score was 10 ± 7. Higher FVIII activity during the complete time course after desmopressin administration (1, 3, and 5-6 hours), and higher VWF and FVIII levels combined at 3 hours after desmopressin administration, were associated with a lower bleeding score: β = -0.9 (-1.7; -0.1) and β = -1.2 (-1.9; -0.5), respectively, adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and comorbidities. Patients with FVIII activity in the highest quartile 3 hours after desmopressin administration had a much lower bleeding score compared with patients in the other 3 quartiles (β = -5.1 [-8.2; -2.0]) and also had a lower chance of an abnormal bleeding score (odds ratio = 0.2 [0.1-0.5]), both adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities. In conclusion, VWF and FVIII levels after desmopressin administration, which mimic hemostatic response to hemostatic challenges, are associated with the bleeding phenotype of patients with type 1 VWD. This may partly explain the variability in bleeding phenotype of these patients.

New therapies for von Willebrand disease

The management of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is based upon the dual correction of the primary hemostasis defect, due to the inherited deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF), and of the secondary defect of factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C), due to the loss of binding and stabilization by VWF of this intrinsic coagulation factor in flowing blood. The traditional therapeutic weapons (the synthetic derivative of the antidiuretic hormone desmopressin and plasma-derived VWF/FVIII concentrates) are able to transiently correct both the defects. With the goal of tackling the primary deficiency in the disease, that is, VWF, but at the same time exploiting the normal capacity of patients to produce FVIII, the novel approach of replacing only VWF was implemented in the last 10 years. Following the manufacturing of a concentrate fractionated from human plasma and of one obtained by recombinant DNA technology, clinical studies have shown that VWF-only products correct not only the primary VWF deficiency but also the secondary FVIII:C deficiency. The demonstrated efficacy of these products in various clinical situations and, ultimately, in such a hemostasis-challenging context as surgery testifies to the effectiveness and safety of this approach. It remains to be seen whether VWF-only products are efficacious and safe in still-unexplored situations, such as use in children; the long-term use for prophylaxis; and in recurrent gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding due to angiodysplasia, a major therapeutic problem in VWD.

New therapies for von Willebrand disease

The management of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is based upon the dual correction of the primary hemostasis defect, due to the inherited deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF), and of the secondary defect of factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C), due to the loss of binding and stabilization by VWF of this intrinsic coagulation factor in flowing blood. The traditional therapeutic weapons (the synthetic derivative of the antidiuretic hormone desmopressin and plasma-derived VWF/FVIII concentrates) are able to transiently correct both the defects. With the goal of tackling the primary deficiency in the disease, that is, VWF, but at the same time exploiting the normal capacity of patients to produce FVIII, the novel approach of replacing only VWF was implemented in the last 10 years. Following the manufacturing of a concentrate fractionated from human plasma and of one obtained by recombinant DNA technology, clinical studies have shown that VWF-only products correct not only the primary VWF deficiency but also the secondary FVIII:C deficiency. The demonstrated efficacy of these products in various clinical situations and, ultimately, in such a hemostasis-challenging context as surgery testifies to the effectiveness and safety of this approach. It remains to be seen whether VWF-only products are efficacious and safe in still-unexplored situations, such as use in children; the long-term use for prophylaxis; and in recurrent gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding due to angiodysplasia, a major therapeutic problem in VWD.

In Vitro Assessment of von Willebrand Factor in Cryoprecipitate, Antihemophilic Factor/VWF Complex (Human), and Recombinant von Willebrand Factor

Patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) often require treatment with supplemental von Willebrand factor (VWF) prior to procedures or to treat bleeding. Commercial VWF concentrates and more recently recombinant human VWF (rVWF) have replaced cryoprecipitate as the mainstay of therapy. In comparison with cryoprecipitate, the VWF content and multimer distribution under current manufacturing processes of these commercial products has not been reported. We measured the factor VIII (FVIII:C), VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF collagen-binding activity (VWF:CB), VWF platelet-binding activity by GPIbM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (VWF:GPIbM), and percentage of high-molecular-weight (HMWM) VWF in 3 pools of group A and O cryoprecipitate, 3 vials of VWF concentrate (Humate-P), and 1 lot of rVWF (Vonvendi). We found that both group O and group A cryoprecipitate have significantly higher ratios of VWF:GPIbM activity and FVIII:C activity relative to VWF:Ag and have better preservation of HMWM than Humate-P. Although not compared statistically, rVWF appears to have more HMWM VWF and a higher ratio of VWF:GPIbM to VWF:Ag than Humate-P and cryoprecipitate. The estimated acquisition cost for our hospital for treating one major bleeding episode was more than 4-fold higher with Humate-P and 7- to 10-fold higher with rVWF than with cryoprecipitate.

Rare Co-occurrence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Type 2B von Willebrand Disease: Implications for Endoscopic Surveillance and Esophageal Dilation

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and type 2B von Willebrand disease (vWD) are both rare diseases, and the co-occurrence is unlikely. Patients with EoE often need recurrent endoscopic dilations and esophageal biopsies, and the safety of these procedures in the setting of bleeding disorders is not well described in the literature. We describe successful management strategies in a patient with co-existing EoE and type 2B vWD who required multiple dilations and biopsies. This approach might be used for patients with other esophageal disorders and type 2B vWD as well.

Phase 3 study of recombinant von Willebrand factor in patients with severe von Willebrand disease who are undergoing elective surgery

Essentials Recombinant von Willebrand factor (rVWF) is effective in von Willebrand disease (VWD). A phase 3 study of rVWF, with/without recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) before surgery in VWD. Overall rVWF's efficacy was rated excellent/good; rVWF was administered alone in most patients. rVWF was well-tolerated and hemostasis was achieved in patients with severe VWD undergoing surgery. SUMMARY: Background Recombinant von Willebrand factor (rVWF) has demonstrated efficacy for on-demand treatment of bleeding in severe von Willebrand disease (VWD), warranting evaluation in the surgical setting. Objectives This study (NCT02283268) evaluated the hemostatic efficacy/safety profile of rVWF, with/without recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII), in patients with severe VWD undergoing surgery. Patients/Methods Patients received rVWF 40-60 IU kg-1 , VWF ristocetin cofactor activity was measured 12-24 h before surgery. If endogenous FVIII activity (FVIII:C) target levels were achieved 3 h before surgery, rVWF was administered alone 1 h before surgery; rVWF was co-administered with rFVIII if target endogenous FVIII levels were not achieved. rVWF was infused postoperatively to maintain target trough levels. Overall and intraoperative hemostatic efficacy, the pharmacodynamics of rVWF administration and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Results All patients treated with rVWF for major (n = 10), minor (n = 4) and oral (n = 1) surgery had overall and intraoperative hemostatic efficacy ratings of excellent (73.3% and 86.7%) or good (26.7% and 13.3%). Most rVWF infusions (89.4%) were administered alone, resulting in hemostatically effective levels of endogenous FVIII within 6 h, which were sustained for 72-96 h; 70% (n = 7/10) of major surgeries were performed without rFVIII co-administration. Six patients reported 12 treatment-emergent AEs. Two patients each had one serious AE: diverticulitis (not treatment related) and deep vein thrombosis (sponsor-assessed as possibly treatment related). No severe allergic reactions or inhibitory antibodies were reported. Conclusions These data support the efficacy and safety profile of rVWF in patients with severe VWD undergoing elective surgery.