Continuous infusion of simoctocog alfa in haemophilia A patients undergoing surgeries

Managing Relevant Clinical Conditions of Hemophilia A/B Patients

The Medical Directors of nine Italian Hemophilia Centers reviewed and discussed the key issues concerning the replacement therapy of hemophilia patients during a one-day consensus conference held in Rome one year ago. Particular attention was paid to the replacement therapy needed for surgery using continuous infusion (CI) versus bolus injection (BI) of standard and extended half-life Factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates in severe hemophilia A patients. Among the side effects, the risk of development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) and thromboembolic complications was addressed. The specific needs of mild hemophilia A patients were described, as well as the usage of bypassing agents to treat patients with high-responding inhibitors. Young hemophilia A patients may take significant advantages from primary prophylaxis three times or twice weekly, even with standard half-life (SHL) rFVIII concentrates. Patients affected by severe hemophilia B probably have a less severe clinical phenotype than severe hemophilia A patients, and in about 30% of cases may undergo weekly prophylaxis with an rFIX SHL concentrate. The prevalence of missense mutations in 55% of severe hemophilia B patients allows the synthesis of a partially changed FIX molecule that can play some hemostatic role at the level of endothelial cells or the subendothelial matrix. The flow back of infused rFIX from the extravascular to the plasma compartment allows a very long half-life of about 30 h in some hemophilia B patients. Once weekly, prophylaxis can assure a superior quality of life in a large severe or moderate hemophilia B population. According to the Italian registry of surgery, hemophilia B patients undergo joint replacement by arthroplasty less frequently than hemophilia A patients. Finally, the relationships between FVIII/IX genotypes and the pharmacokinetics of clotting factor concentrates have been investigated.

Continuous Infusion of Factor VIII and von Willebrand Factor in Surgery: Trials with pdFVIII LFB or pdVWF LFB in Patients with Bleeding Disorders

INTRODUCTION

A plasma-derived factor VIII product (pdFVIII, Factane 100 or 200 IU/mL) and a plasma-derived von Willebrand factor product (pdVWF, Wilfactin 100 IU/mL) are approved for replacement therapy by intravenous bolus injections in haemophilia A (HA) and von Willebrand disease (VWD), respectively. However, in situations requiring intensive treatment, continuous infusion (CI) may be desirable to better control target plasma factor levels.

AIM

To evaluate the perioperative haemostatic efficacy and safety of these concentrates administered by CI.

METHODS

Three phase III trials were conducted. Adults with HA (FVIII:C <1%) (Studies 1 and 2) or VWD (VWF:RCo <20%) (Study 3) received a preoperative bolus followed by CI of undiluted concentrate for at least 6 days. Bolus doses and CI rates were based on individual recovery and clearance, respectively. Initial infusion rate had to be higher for 48 hours for HA and 24 hours for VWD patients to anticipate potential fluctuations of factor concentrations during major surgery. Target levels of FVIII:C in HA and VWF:RCo in VWD were 80 and 70 IU/dL, respectively. Efficacy was assessed using a global haemostatic efficacy score.

RESULTS

Studies 1, 2, and 3 included 12, 4 and 6 patients, respectively. Efficacy outcomes were excellent/good in all 22 major surgeries including 18 orthopaedic procedures. Most daily measured FVIII and VWF levels (92%) were on target. No safety concerns, thrombotic events or inhibitors were identified.

CONCLUSION

pdFVIII and pdVWF administered by CI represent an effective and safe alternative to bolus injections in patients with severe HA or VWD undergoing surgery.

Current practices in haemophilic patients undergoing orthopedic surgery - a systematic review

Haemophilia is an inherited disease that requires a different approach in order to evaluate, monitor and treat patients. Despite the great advances in therapeutic agents that have emerged, reports on the impact of monitoring outcomes on treatment decisions are rarely presented. Haemophilia A and haemophilia B are inherited bleeding disorders caused by deficiencies in blood clotting factor proteins. A systematic review was performed to identify literature reports on the current practices in haemophilic patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. The best therapy for haemophilic patients consists in performing primary prophylaxis to prevent joint bleeding and other complications. Besides the primary prophylaxis, thromboprophylaxis is used to prevent venous thrombosis in patients with hemophilia who undergo surgical orthopedic procedures. Further research is needed to better manage the pharmacologic approaches in haemophilic patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Although patients with haemophilia present low risk for thromboembolic complications, such events have been reported in surgical procedures. The recommendations in patients with haemophilia are considerably variable in the current guidelines and clinical practice. The best therapy for haemophilic patients consists in performing primary prophylaxis to prevent joint bleeding and other complications.