Intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with acquired Von Willebrand syndrome: A single referral centre experience

Cancer-Related Coagulopathy and Perioperative Considerations

Cancer-related coagulation abnormalities are characterized by complex dysregulation of the hemostatic system, predisposing patients to increased risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications and associated increased morbidity and mortality. Advances in anticancer therapies with improved outcomes have led to better survival and older age of patients living with or having survived cancer. There is also a significant increase in the number of patients diagnosed with cancer. All these factors will increase the number of patients presenting for surgical procedures, both cancer-related and noncancer related. It is important for the anesthesiologist to understand the magnitude of cancer-related coagulation derangement, its types, pathophysiology, and clinical presentation, to optimize the perioperative management of this high-risk rapidly growing patient population.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in monoclonal gammopathy - A scoping review on hemostatic management

BACKGROUND

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) has been associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), with limited data on its management.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search in Medline (Ovid), Embase, and Scopus up to September 11, 2019, for studies reporting on the management of AVWS associated with MGUS (AVWS-MGUS). Data on patient characteristics, laboratory parameters at presentation, and clinical and laboratory outcomes were extracted.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of different therapeutic approaches.

RESULTS

Seventy-five studies were included in the final review, for a total of 137 patients. Most patients had von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity <30 IU/dL (86.6%) and factor VIII levels <50 IU/dL (91.8%). Bleeding severity ranged from no bleeding (16.1%) to minor bleeding (46.4%) and major bleeding (37.5%). The overall clinical success rates for 1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP), factor replacement therapy, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) were 43.8%, 33.3%, and 85.4%, respectively. The laboratory response rates for DDAVP, factor replacement therapy, and IVIG were 39.0%, 62.9%, and 88.6%, respectively. Several other treatments were also reported in small numbers, out of which myeloma-directed therapies, plasma exchange, recombinant factor VIIa, and antifibrinolytics appeared most successful, while immunosuppressive agents were largely ineffective.

CONCLUSION

IVIG appears to be an effective treatment for AVWS-MGUS bleeding, conferring a high clinical success rate with measurable laboratory outcomes; albeit temporary. DDAVP and factor replacement therapy may be partially successful in controlling minor bleeds, but not major bleeds. Other less commonly used agents may be effective in certain cases, although data are limited.