Complete characterisation of two new large Xq28 duplications involving F8 using whole genome sequencing in patients without haemophilia A

A unifying model that explains the origins of human inverted copy number variants

With the release of the telomere-to-telomere human genome sequence and the availability of both long-read sequencing and optical genome mapping techniques, the identification of copy number variants (CNVs) and other structural variants is providing new insights into human genetic disease. Different mechanisms have been proposed to account for the novel junctions in these complex architectures, including aberrant forms of DNA replication, non-allelic homologous recombination, and various pathways that repair DNA breaks. Here, we have focused on a set of structural variants that include an inverted segment and propose that they share a common initiating event: an inverted triplication with long, unstable palindromic junctions. The secondary rearrangement of these palindromes gives rise to the various forms of inverted structural variants. We postulate that this same mechanism (ODIRA: origin-dependent inverted-repeat amplification) that creates the inverted CNVs in inherited syndromes also generates the palindromes found in cancers.

Tandem and inverted duplications in haemophilia A: Breakpoint characterisation provides insight into possible rearrangement mechanisms

INTRODUCTION

Approximately half of patients with severe haemophilia A are caused by structural variants in the F8 gene. Unlike inversions or deletions directly impairing the integrity of F8, some duplications do not completely disrupt the open reading frame or even retain an intact F8 copy. Currently, only a few duplication breakpoints were precisely characterized, and the corresponding rearrangement mechanisms and clinical outcomes remain to be further investigated.

AIM

Establishing an effective strategy for breakpoint characterization of duplications and revealing their rearrangement mechanisms.

METHODS

AccuCopy is used for the detection of duplications, long-distance PCR for the characterization of tandem duplications, genome walking technique and whole genome sequencing for the characterization of inverted duplications.

RESULTS

Four F8 duplication rearrangements were successfully characterized at the nucleotide level: one tandem duplication (exons 7-11) and three inverted duplications (exons 7-22, exons 2-26, and exons 15-22). Two shared features of inverted duplication were found after carefully analysing our results and breakpoint information in the literature: 1, an inverted fragment was inserted into the original chromosome via two junctions; 2, one junction is mediated by a pair of inverted repetitive elements, while the other consists of two breakpoints with microhomology.

CONCLUSION

Similar breakpoint features motivated us to propose a DNA replication-based model to explain the formation of duplication rearrangements. Based on our model, we further divide the inverted duplications into three basic types: type I with a DEL-NOR/INV-DUP pattern, type II with a DUP-NOR/INV-DUP pattern and type III with a DUP-TRP/INV-DUP pattern.

Familial transmission of chromoanagenesis leads to unpredictable unbalanced rearrangements through meiotic recombination

Chromoanagenesis is a cellular mechanism that leads to complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCR) during a single catastrophic event. It may result in loss and/or gain of genetic material and may be responsible for various phenotypes. These rearrangements are usually sporadic. However, some familial cases have been reported. Here, we studied six families in whom an asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic parent transmitted a CCR to its offspring in an unbalanced manner. The rearrangements were characterized by karyotyping, fluorescent in situ hybridization, chromosomal microarray (CMA) and/or whole genome sequencing (WGS) in the carrier parents and offspring. We then hypothesized meiosis-pairing figures between normal and abnormal parental chromosomes that may have led to the formation of new unbalanced rearrangements through meiotic recombination. Our work indicates that chromoanagenesis might be associated with a normal phenotype and normal fertility, even in males, and that WGS may be the only way to identify these events when there is no imbalance. Subsequently, the CCR can be transmitted to the next generation in an unbalanced and unpredictable manner following meiotic recombination. Thereby, prenatal diagnosis using CMA should be proposed to these families to detect any pathogenic imbalances in the offspring.