1
|
Sadeghpour M, Abdolizadeh A, Yousefi P, Rastegar-Kashkouli A, Chitsaz A. New Daily Persistent Headache (NDPH): Unraveling the Complexities of Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:551-559. [PMID: 37632682 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01161-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The current article aims to provide an overview of new daily persistent headache (NDPH), with a particular emphasis on its pathophysiology, evaluation, and current treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS NDPH is an uncommon and heterogeneous condition associated with various comorbidities and is of great significance due to its prolonged duration and high severity. Variable causes and clinical aspects of NDPH may reflect differences in its underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, including genetics, environmental triggers, neuroinflammation, and brain changes. When assessing a patient with NDPH, potential triggers, past medical history, and differential diagnosis should be carefully considered. Non-pharmacological interventions aimed to improve diet, sleep patterns, and reduce consumption of caffeine and alcohol are recommended for all patients. Nerve blockade and nerve stimulation seem to be more efficacious in children than adults. Antiviral medications and neuroinflammation-targeting treatments may be helpful, particularly, when an infectious disease or severe inflammation is suspected. NDPH patients with concurrent affective disorders may benefit from treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, or benzodiazepines. Cerebrospinal-fluid-lowering medications may be useful for headaches started with a thunderclap or a Valsalva maneuver. Possible treatments for refractory NDPH include intravenous ketamine or lidocaine, onabotulinumtoxinA, and calcitonin gene-related peptide antibodies. Considering the variety of NDPH, it is critical to properly screen patients for correct diagnosis. Proper identification of potential mimics may enable precise therapy opportunities, yet there is no gold standard treatment for NDPH. Further well-designed studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and develop effective treatment strategies for NDPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid Sadeghpour
- School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Ali Abdolizadeh
- Multimodal Imaging Group, Research Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pourya Yousefi
- School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | | | - Ahmad Chitsaz
- Department of Neurology, Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Background Accumulating evidence suggests various specific triggers may lead to new daily persistent headache (NDPH)-like presentations, suggesting that new daily persistent headache is a heterogenous syndrome, and challenging the concept that new daily persistent headache is a primary headache disorder.Method We searched the PubMed database up to August 2022 for keywords including persistent daily headache with both primary and secondary etiologies. We summarized the literature and provided a narrative review of the clinical presentation, diagnostic work-ups, possible pathophysiology, treatment response, and clinical outcomes.Results and conclusion New daily persistent headache is a controversial but clinically important topic. New daily persistent headache is likely not a single entity but a syndrome with different etiologies. The issue with past studies of new daily persistent headache is that patients with different etiologies/subtypes were pooled together. Different studies may investigate distinct subsets of patients, which renders the inter-study comparison, both positive and negative results, difficult. The identification (and removal) of a specific trigger might provide the opportunity for clinical improvement in certain patients, even when the disease has lasted for months or years. Nonetheless, if there is a specific trigger, it remains unknown or unidentified for a great proportion of the patients. We need to continue to study this unique headache population to better understand underlying pathogenesis and, most importantly, to establish effective treatment strategies that hopefully resolve the continuous cycle of pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuan-Po Peng
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Todd D Rozen
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Begasse de Dhaem O, Rizzoli P. Refractory Headaches. Semin Neurol 2022; 42:512-522. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractMedication overuse headache (MOH), new daily persistent headache (NDPH), and persistent refractory headache attributed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection represent a significant burden in terms of disability and quality of life, and a challenge in terms of definition, pathophysiology, and treatment. Regarding MOH, prevention without withdrawal is not inferior to prevention with withdrawal. Preventive medications like topiramate, onabotulinumtoxinA, and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies improve chronic migraine with MOH regardless of withdrawal. The differential diagnosis of NDPH is broad and should be carefully examined. There are no guidelines for the treatment of NDPH, but options include a short course of steroids, nerve blocks, topiramate, nortriptyline, gabapentin, CGRP monoclonal antibodies, and onabotulinumtoxinA. The persistence of headache 3 months after SARS-CoV2 infection is a predictor of poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Begasse de Dhaem
- Headache Specialist at Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, Connecticut
- Department of Neurology at the University of Connecticut, Milford, Connecticut
| | - Paul Rizzoli
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital J Graham Headache Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Purpose of Review The diagnostic criteria of new daily persistent headache (NDPH) have been revised since 2013. The current review focused on the progress of NDPH research over the last few years. Recent Findings Various new triggers and different NDPH mimics have been reported. The association with both cephalic and extracephalic pathologies suggests that NDPH is rather a syndrome with more than one disease mechanism. Recent clinical studies confirmed that migrainous headache remained the most prominent phenotype of NDPH, echoing the change of the diagnostic criteria in 2013. Diagnostic workup, including imaging studies, was unremarkable, except serving to exclude secondary etiologies. Studies on treatment options have yet shown promising targets, and randomized clinical trials are still lacking. Summary Multiple mechanisms, both cranial and systemic, may be involved synergically in the generation of NDPH-like headaches. The search for effective treatment options should base on better understanding of disease mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuan-Po Peng
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Shuu-Jiun Wang
- Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Palacios-Ceña D, Talavera B, Gómez-Mayordomo V, Garcia-Azorin D, Gallego-Gallego M, Cuadrado ML, Guerrero-Peral ÁL. Understanding the diagnoses and medical care experience of patients with new daily persistent headache: a qualitative study in Spain. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e048552. [PMID: 34404708 PMCID: PMC8372810 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the experiences of patients suffering from new daily persistent headache (NDPH) regarding the diagnostic process, treatment and medical care. DESIGN A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted. SETTING A specialised headache unit at two university hospitals in Spain between February 2017 and December 2018. PARTICIPANTS Patients diagnosed with NDPH according to the International Classification of Headache disorders (third beta edition). METHODS Purposeful sampling was performed. Data were collected using unstructured and semistructured interviews, researchers' field notes and patients' drawings. An inductive thematic analysis was used to identify significant emerging themes from interviews, field notes and descriptions of patients' drawings. Also, Guillemin's proposal was used to analyse the contents of drawings. RESULTS Nineteen patients with a mean age of 45.3 were recruited. Four main themes emerged: (1) Seeking a diagnosis, patients visit many doctors without receiving a clear answer and their diagnosis is delayed; (2) Self-medication-minimising pill intake, medication is ineffective, and therefore, some patients discontinue treatment, or are flexible with how they take medication; (3) Trying other non-pharmacological options, many patients turn to other therapies and complementary and/or alternative therapies as a second option, however these are ineffective and (4) Medical care, with two subthemes, referrals and lacking continuity of care, and building the doctor-patient relationship. Patients describe how the referral breaks the continuity of care, and how they identify the traits of a doctor who is approachable and which behaviours the doctor should avoid when caring for patients. CONCLUSIONS An in-depth knowledge of the beliefs and expectations of patients with NDPH will allow the professional to establish a relationship of trust, which will improve the patients' knowledge of which therapies are the most appropriate, and to establish expectations based on the relationship with the doctor, and not only on patients' beliefs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domingo Palacios-Ceña
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón/Madrid, Spain
- Research Group of Humanities and Qualitative Research in Health Science, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón/ Madrid, Spain
| | - Blanca Talavera
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Víctor Gómez-Mayordomo
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Garcia-Azorin
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - María Luz Cuadrado
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE This article provides an overview of a diverse group of primary headache disorders that are categorized in the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd Edition (ICHD-3), as "other primary headache disorders." This article provides clinicians with a distilled understanding of the diagnoses and their epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. RECENT FINDINGS Cough-induced headache requires neuroimaging to exclude posterior fossa pathology and recently has been reported as a common symptom in patients with CSF-venous fistula. Clinical overlap is observed between patients with primary exercise headache and primary headache associated with sexual activity. Patients with recurrent thunderclap headache associated with sexual activity should be presumed to have reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome until proven otherwise. De novo external-pressure headache is a common sequela among health care workers using personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. New daily persistent headache is an important mimicker of chronic migraine or chronic tension-type headache and is distinguished by a daily-from-onset progression of persistent headache; a treatment-refractory course is often observed, and early involvement of a multidisciplinary team, including a psychotherapist, is advised. SUMMARY Patients with primary headache disorders that are classified as "other primary headache disorders" have presentations with unique diagnostic and management considerations. The disorders are highly recognizable, and an appreciation of the diagnoses will aid clinicians in providing safe and effective care for patients presenting with headache.
Collapse
|
7
|
Papetti L, Sforza G, Tarantino S, Moavero R, Ruscitto C, Ursitti F, Ferilli MAN, Vigevano F, Valeriani M. Features and Management of New Daily Persistent Headache in Developmental-Age Patients. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11030385. [PMID: 33668316 PMCID: PMC7996357 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Our aim was to investigate the clinical features of primary new daily persistent headache (NDPH) in a cohort of paediatric patients. Methods. We reviewed the data of patients with persistent daily headache, attending the Headache Centre of Bambino Gesù Children from the January 2009. The ICHD-III criteria were used for diagnosis. Statistical analysis was conducted to study possible correlations between NDPH and population features (age and sex), NDPH and headache qualitative features, and NDPH and response to pharmacological therapies. Results. We included 46 subjects with NDPH. The features of pain more closely resembled those of migraine than to those of tension-type headache (62 vs. 38%). The NDPH patients showed nausea and vomiting less frequently than migraine ones (28.6 vs. 48.2%, p < 0.01). A total of 75% of NDPH patients experienced an onset of the symptoms in the winter months (November to February) (p < 0.01). NDPH was less common in very young children under 10 years of age. Almost 58% of NDPH patients received pharmacological therapy and the most used drug was amitriptyline. A reduction of attacks by at least 50% in a month was detected in 30.6% of patients. Conclusions. NDPH can be very disabling and correlates with seasonal factors. Although long term pharmacological therapy is recommended, considering the long duration that this headache can have, there are no data supporting the treatment choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Papetti
- Department of Neuroscience, Paediatric Headache Center, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy; (L.P.); (G.S.); (S.T.); (R.M.); (F.U.); (M.A.N.F.)
| | - Giorgia Sforza
- Department of Neuroscience, Paediatric Headache Center, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy; (L.P.); (G.S.); (S.T.); (R.M.); (F.U.); (M.A.N.F.)
| | - Samuela Tarantino
- Department of Neuroscience, Paediatric Headache Center, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy; (L.P.); (G.S.); (S.T.); (R.M.); (F.U.); (M.A.N.F.)
| | - Romina Moavero
- Department of Neuroscience, Paediatric Headache Center, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy; (L.P.); (G.S.); (S.T.); (R.M.); (F.U.); (M.A.N.F.)
- Child Neurology Unit, Systems Medicine Department, Tor Vergata University Hospital of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Claudia Ruscitto
- Child Neurology Unit, Systems Medicine Department, Tor Vergata University Hospital of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Fabiana Ursitti
- Department of Neuroscience, Paediatric Headache Center, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy; (L.P.); (G.S.); (S.T.); (R.M.); (F.U.); (M.A.N.F.)
| | - Michela Ada Noris Ferilli
- Department of Neuroscience, Paediatric Headache Center, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy; (L.P.); (G.S.); (S.T.); (R.M.); (F.U.); (M.A.N.F.)
| | - Federico Vigevano
- Department of Neuroscience, Neurology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy;
| | - Massimiliano Valeriani
- Department of Neuroscience, Paediatric Headache Center, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy; (L.P.); (G.S.); (S.T.); (R.M.); (F.U.); (M.A.N.F.)
- Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-066-859-2289
| |
Collapse
|