Peripheral, Interictal Serum S100B Levels are Not Increased in Chronic Migraine Patients

Plasma levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light chain in patients with chronic migraine: a multicenter case-control study

OBJECTIVE

Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (pGFAP) and plasma neurofilament light chain (pNfL) levels reflect astrocyte activation and neuronal damage, respectively. Whether these phenomena play a role in migraine is unknown. This study aimed to compare pGFAP and pNfL levels in patients with chronic migraine (CM) and age-matched controls and to analyze their relation with clinical features.

METHODS

The study evaluated two independent cohorts of patients, including in total 58 CM and 69 controls. pGFAP and pNfL were quantified with single molecule array (Simoa) technology. Demographic and clinical data were collected for each subject; differences in NfL/GFAP levels between CM and controls were evaluated in analyses adjusted for the effect of age and sex; clinical characteristics associated with NfL/GFAP levels were separately evaluated in the two cohorts.

RESULTS

In both cohorts, we did not find a significant difference in pGFAP or pNFL levels between CM and matched controls. The study did not find any correlation between pGFAP or pNfL levels and any migraine characteristics (namely presence of migraine aura, attack frequency, migraine intensity, years of disease).

CONCLUSIONS

Our negative results support the assumption that migraine represents a benign condition, characterized by transient functional brain alterations and not by the accumulation over time of neuroaxonal damage and/or associated astrocyte activation detectable by neurodegeneration marker proteins.

Serum neurofilament light chain levels in migraine patients: a monocentric case-control study in China

PURPOSE

Serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) can reflect nerve damage. Whether migraine can cause neurological damage remain unclear. This study assesses sNfL levels in migraine patients and explores whether there is nerve damage in migraine.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted in Xiamen, China. A total of 138 migraine patients and 70 healthy controls were recruited. sNfL (pg/mL) was measured on the single-molecule array platform. Univariate, Pearson correlation and linear regression analysis were used to assess the relationship between migraine and sNfL levels, with further subgroup analysis by migraine characteristics.

RESULTS

Overall, 85.10% of the 208 subjects were female, with a median age of 36 years. sNfL levels were higher in the migraine group than in the control group (4.85 (3.49, 6.62) vs. 4.11 (3.22, 5.59)), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.133). The two groups showed an almost consistent trend in which sNfL levels increased significantly with age. Subgroup analysis showed a significant increase in sNfL levels in patients with a migraine course ≥ 10 years (β = 0.693 (0.168, 1.220), P = 0.010). Regression analysis results show that age and migraine course are independent risk factors for elevated sNfL levels, and there is an interaction between the two factors. Patients aged < 45 years and with a migraine course ≥ 10 years have significantly increased sNfL levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to evaluate sNfL levels in migraine patients. The sNfL levels significantly increased in patients with a migraine course ≥ 10 years. More attention to nerve damage in young patients with a long course of migraine is required.

Serological Biomarkers of Chronic Migraine

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic migraine (CM) is a chronic form of migraine that differs from episodic migraine (EM) in terms of prevalence, comorbidities, response to treatment, and biomarkers. The aim of this review was to summarize the recent findings on serological biomarkers of CM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neuronal, inflammatory, and vascular markers have been investigated to assess their diagnostic and prognostic ability and treatment effectiveness. Several markers showed significant alterations according to disease status and treatment response in CM. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), glutamate, and adiponectin appear to be the most promising blood biomarkers for CM. Most studies have shown altered ictal and interictal levels of these markers in CM compared with those in EM and controls. Additionally, they showed a significant association with treatment outcomes. Total adiponectin and high-molecular-weight adiponectin levels were less studied as biomarkers of CM than CGRP and glutamate levels but showed promising results. The development of suitable biomarkers could revolutionize the diagnosis and treatment of CM and ultimately decrease the disability and societal costs of the disease.

Safety and Efficacy of Zavegepant in Treating Migraine: A Systematic Review

Drugs that act on the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway herald the dawn of a new era in the management of migraine headaches. The blockade of CGRP alleviates neural inflammation and has been associated with reduced pain sensitization. Zavegepant is a third-generation drug and is the first intranasal CGRP antagonist to be developed. This systematic review aims to assess the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of Zavegepant as an abortive treatment for migraine. Studies that assessed the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Zavegepant for migraine were identified through a systematic literature review of PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane databases in April 2023. Our systematic review yielded a total of six studies that fit our inclusion criteria. Of these, data from only two randomized control trials (RCTs) was homogenous; hence, forest plots of results pooled from the included studies were not reported. The included studies showed that Zavegepant is an efficacious and well-tolerated abortive treatment modality for episodic migraine in adult patients. Zavegepant showed safety and efficacy in migraine treatment according to various parameters throughout the six included studies. These parameters include adverse events, pharmacokinetic properties, CGRP inhibition, effect on blood pressure/electrocardiogram, pain freedom, and freedom from most bothersome symptoms.

Exploring Novel Therapeutic Targets in the Common Pathogenic Factors in Migraine and Neuropathic Pain

Migraine and neuropathic pain (NP) are both painful, disabling, chronic conditions which exhibit some symptom similarities and are thus considered to share a common etiology. The calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has gained credit as a target for migraine management; nevertheless, the efficacy and the applicability of CGRP modifiers warrant the search for more effective therapeutic targets for pain management. This scoping review focuses on human studies of common pathogenic factors in migraine and NP, with reference to available preclinical evidence to explore potential novel therapeutic targets. CGRP inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies alleviate inflammation in the meninges; targeting transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels may help prevent the release of nociceptive substances, and modifying the endocannabinoid system may open a path toward discovery of novel analgesics. There may exist a potential target in the tryptophan-kynurenine (KYN) metabolic system, which is closely linked to glutamate-induced hyperexcitability; alleviating neuroinflammation may complement a pain-relieving armamentarium, and modifying microglial excitation, which is observed in both conditions, may be a possible approach. Those are several potential analgesic targets which deserve to be explored in search of novel analgesics; however, much evidence remains missing. This review highlights the need for more studies on CGRP modifiers for subtypes, the discovery of TRP and endocannabinoid modulators, knowledge of the status of KYN metabolites, the consensus on cytokines and sampling, and biomarkers for microglial function, in search of innovative pain management methods for migraine and NP.

Elevated Blood S100B Levels in Patients With Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background:

In recent years, a growing number of researches indicate that S100B may act in migraine, but the relationship between S100B and migraine remains controversial. Therefore, the current study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to quantitatively summarize S100B levels in migraine patients.

Methods

We used Stata 12.0 software to summarize eligible studies from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang databases. We applied standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) to appraise the association between S100B and migraine.

Results

The combined results of nine case-control studies indicated that compared with healthy controls, overall migraine patients had significantly increased S100B levels in peripheral blood (SMD = 0.688, 95%CI: 0.341–1.036, P < 0.001). The S100B levels in migraineurs during ictal periods (SMD =1.123, 95%CI: 0.409–1.836, P = 0.002) and interictal periods (SMD = 0.487, 95%CI: 0313–0.661, P < 0.001), aura (SMD = 0.999, 95%CI: 0.598–1.400, P < 0.001) and without aura (SMD = 0.534, 95%CI: 0.286–0.783, P < 0.001) were significantly higher than those in the controls. The subgroup analyses by age, country, migraine assessment, and assay method of S100B also illustrated a statistically obvious association between S100B levels and migraine, indicating that age may be the most important source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis showed that no individual study has a significant influence on the overall association between S100B and migraine.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrates that the level of S100B in peripheral blood of patients with migraine was significantly increased. Migraine may be associated with pathological reactions involving S100B, which is instrumental for the clinical diagnosis of migraine and therapy that considers S100B as a potential target.

Role of Omics in Migraine Research and Management: A Narrative Review

Migraine is a neurological disorder defined by episodic attacks of chronic pain associated with nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. It is known to be a complex disease with several environmental and genetic factors contributing to its susceptibility. Risk factors for migraine include head or neck injury (Arnold, Cephalalgia 38(1):1-211, 2018). Stress and high temperature are known to trigger migraine, while sleep disorders and anxiety are considered to be the comorbid conditions with migraine. Studies have reported various biomarkers, including genetic variants, proteins, and metabolites implicated in migraine's pathophysiology. Using the "omics" approach, which deals with genetics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, more specific biomarkers for various migraine can be identified. On account of its multifactorial nature, migraine is an ideal study model focusing on integrated omics approaches, including genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. The current review has been compiled with an aim to focus on the genomic alterations especially involved in the regulation of glutamatergic neurotransmission, cortical excitability, ion channels, solute carrier proteins, or receptors; their expression in migraine patients and also specific proteins and metabolites, including some inflammatory biomarkers that might represent the migraine phenotype at the molecular level. The systems biology approach holds the promise to understand the pathophysiology of the disease at length and also to identify the specific therapeutic targets for novel interventions.

How does the brain change in chronic migraine? Developing disease biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Validated chronic migraine biomarkers could improve diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive abilities for clinicians and researchers, as well as increase knowledge on migraine pathophysiology.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this narrative review is to summarise and interpret the published literature regarding the current state of development of chronic migraine biomarkers.

FINDINGS

Data from functional and structural imaging, neurophysiological, and biochemical studies have been utilised towards the development of chronic migraine biomarkers. These biomarkers could contribute to chronic migraine classification/diagnosis, prognosticating patient outcomes, predicting response to treatment, and measuring treatment responses early after initiation. Results show promise for using measures of brain structure and function, evoked potentials, and sensory neuropeptide concentrations for the development of chronic migraine biomarkers, yet further optimisation and validation are still required.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging, neurophysiological, and biochemical changes that occur with the progression from episodic to chronic migraine could be utilised for developing chronic migraine biomarkers that might assist with diagnosis, prognosticating individual patient outcomes, and predicting responses to migraine therapies. Ultimately, validated biomarkers could move us closer to being able to practice precision medicine in the field and thus improve patient care.