Zavegepant nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine: A Phase 2/3 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial

Clinical evaluation of zavegepant for the acute treatment of migraine

Zavegepant is the first intranasal calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine and offers a new nonoral option for patients. This article reports the findings of a comprehensive literature review to assess zavegepant's safety and effectiveness. Evidence synthesis involved reporting findings from clinical trials and evaluating comparative effectiveness. This review was prepared by the University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) Student Chapter. The student author group won the AMCP National Pharmacy and Therapeutics competition for their zavegepant product review in March 2024.

Long-term safety and tolerability of zavegepant 10-mg nasal spray with concomitant use of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies or other select preventive migraine medications: Results from a phase 2/3 open-label study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of zavegepant (ZAV) when used as needed for acute treatment of migraine in patients taking concomitant preventive migraine medications (anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies [CGRP mAbs] or other select preventive migraine medications [OSPs]).

BACKGROUND

People with migraine often use preventive and acute treatments concomitantly for breakthrough attacks. ZAV 10-mg nasal spray is the first intranasal, small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults.

METHODS

This was a subgroup analysis of data from a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase 2/3 clinical trial that assessed the safety and tolerability of ZAV for the acute treatment of migraine. Participants self-administered 1 ZAV dose/day as needed up to 8 times/month for up to 52 weeks to treat migraine attacks of any severity. Participants were categorized into five cohorts based on their current or concomitant use of preventive treatments: ZAV + CGRP mAbs, ZAV + OSPs, ZAV + CGRP mAbs or OSPs, ZAV monotherapy (ZAVmono), and the overall study population. Adverse events (AEs), clinical laboratory results, and vital signs data were evaluated and summarized descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 603 participants self-administered ≥1 dose of ZAV and 341 participants (56.6%) completed the study. Among the 603 ZAV-treated participants, 39 (6.5%) received ZAV + CGRP mAbs, 72 (11.9%) received ZAV + OSPs, 103 (17.1%) received ZAV + CGRP mAbs or OSPs (eight participants received both CGRP mAbs and OSPs), and 500 (82.9%) received ZAVmono. Baseline characteristics were similar across cohorts. The mean number of ZAV doses self-administered per month was similar across cohorts (3.1-3.3). The proportion of participants experiencing an AE was similar across cohorts (range: 73.6-76.9%). The most frequent AEs were dysgeusia (range across cohorts: 28.2-41.7%), nasal discomfort (9.7-15.4%), COVID-19 (7.2-8.7%), nausea (4.2-10.3%), back pain (4.4-15.4%), throat irritation (4.4-12.8%), and nasal congestion (5.2-7.7%). Most AEs had mild-to-moderate severity and resolved without treatment. The proportion of participants who discontinued due to an AE was similar across cohorts (range: 4.2-7.7%). No serious AEs related to ZAV treatment occurred. The proportion of participants who experienced a local-irritation AE was similar across cohorts (range: 49.4-51.4%), as was the proportion who experienced a hepatic-related AE (3.8-7.7%). No AEs related to medication-overuse headache, suicidality, or cardiovascular events occurred. No clinically meaningful trends in laboratory test results or vital signs were observed.

CONCLUSION

Self-administration of ZAV 10-mg nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine up to 8 times/month for up to 52 weeks appeared well-tolerated irrespective of concomitant use of CGRP mAbs or OSPs.

Head-to-head relief: ubrogepant, rimegepant, and zavegepant in migraine treatment

Migraine, a significant cause of disability worldwide, heavily impacts daily functioning and quality of life. Despite various acute treatment options, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and triptans, patients experience limited relief or adverse effects. This review examines the efficacy and safety of gepants - ubrogepant, rimegepant, and zavegepant - in the acute treatment of migraine. We assessed phase II and III clinical trials, focusing on clinically relevant endpoints such as pain freedom and freedom from the most bothersome symptom at two hours post-treatment. We calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve significant endpoints for each gepant. Gepants are recommended for the acute treatment of migraine in individuals who do not respond to triptan monotherapy or combination therapy, who experience only partial effectiveness, or who cannot tolerate or have contraindications to triptans. The NNT values for achieving pain freedom at two hours were 9 for rimegepant, 11 for zavegepant, and 12 for ubrogepant, which are comparable to NSAIDs such as naproxen (NNT = 11). Paracetamol, although not an NSAID, showed similar efficacy (NNT = 12). Triptans demonstrated lower NNTs, indicating higher efficacy. Gepants offer effective, well-tolerated alternatives with no significant cardiovascular risk and minimal potential for medication-overuse headache.

Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of migraine

We here present evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of migraine. These guidelines, created by the Italian Society for the Study of Headache and the International Headache Society, aim to offer clear, actionable recommendations to healthcare professionals. They incorporate evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials and expert-based opinions. The guidelines follow the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the quality of evidence. The guideline development involved a systematic review of literature across multiple databases, adherence to Cochrane review methods, and a structured framework for data extraction and interpretation. Although the guidelines provide a robust foundation for migraine treatment, they also highlight gaps in current research, such as the paucity of head-to-head drug comparisons and the need for long-term outcome studies. These guidelines serve as a resource to standardize migraine treatment and promote high-quality care across different healthcare settings.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted therapy in migraine: current role and future perspectives

Almost 40 years ago, the discovery of the vasoactive neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its role in migraine pathophysiology ushered in a new era in migraine treatment. Since 2018, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the CGRP pathway are available for migraine prevention. The approval of these drugs marks a pioneering development, as they are the first pharmacological agents specifically tailored for migraine prevention. Introduction of these agents contrasts the historical reliance on traditional preventive medications initially formulated for other indications and later repurposed for migraine therapy. Although the emergence of evidence on the efficacy and safety of CGRP-targeted mAbs has raised the bar for treatment success in migraine, their efficacy in other headache entities, such as cluster headache, is low to moderate. Small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists called gepants have also been proven to be effective both as acute and preventive migraine treatments. Furthermore, these agents have bridged the traditional categories of acute and preventive treatment strategies. Short-term prevention and treatment during the prodromal phase of migraine represent emerging strategies enabling clinicians to develop treatment approaches designed to meet changing patient needs; however, these strategies still require more formal evidence. Although solid data have been gathered, further research concerning the efficacy and long-term safety of drugs targeting the CGRP pathway and robust pharmacoeconomic evaluations are needed. Finally, randomised withdrawal and switching studies would facilitate the formulation of evidence-based guidance for the discontinuation of and switching between drugs targeting the CGRP pathway.

The efficacy and safety of zavegepant nasal inhalation versus oral calcitonin-gene related peptide receptor antagonists in the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

The latest randomized controlled trial (RCT) revealed that zavegepant, a new nasal inhalation calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, has a clear efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. However, whether the efficacy of this new nasal inhalation drug is better than other oral CGRP receptor antagonists remained to be confirmed. Therefore, we designed this network meta-analysis (NMA) to provide a reference for the clinical application of zavegepant.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science up to December 1, 2024. RCTs using CGRP receptor antagonists (excluding non-randomized, non-English or no extractable data trials) to treat adult patients suffering from acute migraine were included. STATA 18.0 and R STUDIO were used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 15 randomized clinical trials with 11,179 patients were included. Compared with the placebo, zavegepant 10 mg demonstrated a significantly higher efficiency for pain freedom at 2 h (relative risk (RR) = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.28-1.82, I2 = 0.0%, P < 0.001) and most bothersome symptom (MBS) freedom at 2 h (RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.13-1.42, I2 = 0.0%, P < 0.001), but did not show significant superiority over oral CGRP receptor antagonists. In terms of safety, zavegepant 10 mg was significantly inferior to placebo but not inferior to oral CGRP receptor antagonists.

CONCLUSION

Zavegepant 10 mg can quickly relieve symptoms and has no significant difference in safety compared with oral drugs, which can provide rapid and safe efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. However, compared with other oral CGRP receptor antagonists, zavegepant 10 mg by nasal inhalation has no obvious advantage in long-term symptom relief rate.

Evidence-based review and frontiers of migraine therapy

BACKGROUND

Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is identified as one of the "episodic syndromes that may be associated with migraine," along with benign paroxysmal torticollis, benign paroxysmal vertigo, and abdominal migraine. It has been proposed that CVS and migraine may share pathophysiologic mechanisms of hypothalamic activation and altered dopaminergic signaling, and impaired sensorimotor intrinsic connectivity. The past decade has brought groundbreaking advances in the treatment of migraine and other headache disorders. While many of these therapies have yet to be studied in episodic syndromes associated with migraine including CVS and abdominal migraine, the potential shared pathophysiology among these conditions suggests that use of migraine-specific treatments may have a beneficial role even in those for whom headache is not the primary symptom.

PURPOSE

This manuscript highlights newer therapies in migraine. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its relation to migraine pathophysiology and the therapies that target the CGRP pathway, as well as a 5HT1F receptor agonist and neuromodulation devices used to treat migraine are briefly discussed as they may potentially prove to be useful in the future treatment of CVS.

Comparative bioavailability of single-dose zavegepant during and between migraine attacks: A phase 1, randomized, open-label, fixed-sequence, two-period study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rate and extent of absorption of zavegepant 10 mg (therapeutic dose) or 20 mg (supratherapeutic dose) nasal spray during a migraine attack versus non-migraine period, assess safety, and explore efficacy and the relationship between zavegepant concentration and therapeutic response.

BACKGROUND

Physiologic changes occurring during a migraine attack could affect the pharmacokinetics of treatments for migraine.

METHODS

This was a Phase 1, multicenter, open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period, fixed-sequence, comparative bioavailability study. Participants with a history of 2-8 migraine attacks per month of moderate or severe pain intensity were randomized to a single dose of zavegepant 10 or 20 mg, administered intranasally during a migraine attack (Period 1) and in a non-migraine period (Period 2). Blood samples were collected pre-dose and at pre-specified intervals up to 24 h post-dose for plasma zavegepant concentration measurement. Safety was monitored throughout, and efficacy (migraine pain intensity score, nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, aura, and functional disability) assessed during Period 1. Plasma zavegepant pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by standard noncompartmental methods, including maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf), and time of Cmax (Tmax).

RESULTS

A total of 37 participants were evaluable for pharmacokinetics. Following administration of zavegepant 10 mg, geometric mean ratios for Period 1/Period 2 were 82.8% (90% confidence interval [CI] 60.5-113.2) for Cmax and 90.1% (90% CI 70.2-115.5) for AUC0-inf. Following administration of zavegepant 20 mg, geometric mean ratios for Period 1/Period 2 were 72.5% (90% CI 57.9-90.8) for Cmax and 73.4% (90% CI 58.8-91.7) for AUC0-inf. Averaging over the study period, geometric mean ratios for zavegepant 20 mg/10 mg were 142.5% (90% CI 118.6-171.4) for Cmax and 157.0% (90% CI 133.6-184.5) for AUC0-inf. Median Tmax was 0.5 h for both doses regardless of Period. Zavegepant was well tolerated in both study periods and effective during Period 1 at both dose levels. There was no apparent correlation between concentration at 0.5 h or 2 h post-dose and efficacy outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Zavegepant exposure was comparable during a migraine attack and a non-migraine period, particularly at the therapeutic dose of 10 mg. When averaging over migraine and non-migraine periods, there was a less-than-dose proportional increase in zavegepant exposure when the dose was doubled from 10 to 20 mg. The median Tmax was 0.5 h regardless of migraine attack or dose. Zavegepant 10 and 20 mg exhibited favorable safety profiles during migraine attacks and non-migraine periods, and were effective to relieve pain, associated symptoms, and functional disability during migraine attacks, with no apparent correlation between zavegepant concentration and efficacy outcomes.

Assessment of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan: A phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled study in healthy adults

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND

Zavegepant is a high-affinity, selective, small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist administered as a nasal spray approved in the United States for the acute treatment of migraine. Triptans, including sumatriptan, are a different class of drugs for acute migraine treatment and are associated with a risk of increased blood pressure (BP). Hence, it is important to study the drug-drug interactions between zavegepant and sumatriptan due to potential coadministration in clinical settings.

METHODS

This was a Phase 1, single-center, partially blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-arm study. Eligible participants were males aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 40 years or females aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 50 years. On Day 1, participants received sumatriptan 2 × 6 mg subcutaneous injections (1 h apart) and were then randomized (6:1 ratio) to receive zavegepant 2 × 10 mg nasal spray (1 in each nostril) or placebo on Days 2 and 3. On Day 4, zavegepant or placebo was coadministered with sumatriptan after the second sumatriptan injection. BP, PK, and safety were evaluated at pre-specified time points.

RESULTS

Forty-two participants enrolled in the study received at least one dose of any treatment and were included in the safety analyses. Forty-one participants who completed the study were included in the BP and PK analyses. The mean (standard deviation) time-weighted average (TWA) of mean arterial pressure (MAP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 87.2 (6.8) vs. sumatriptan 86.9 (6.0)]), diastolic BP (DBP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 72.3 (6.8) vs. sumatriptan 72.1 (6.2)]), and systolic BP (SBP [sumatriptan + zavegepant 116.8 (10.2) vs. sumatriptan 116.2 (8.6)]) did not change following zavegepant and sumatriptan coadministration on Day 4 compared to sumatriptan alone on Day 1. Statistical comparisons of the TWA of MAP, DBP, and SBP between sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration and sumatriptan alone were similar; the differences observed were 0.04 mmHg for MAP (90% confidence interval [CI]: -0.69, 0.77 mmHg), 0.00 mmHg for DBP (90% CI: -0.76, 0.76 mmHg), and 0.33 mmHg for SBP (90% CI: -0.97, 1.63 mmHg). Sumatriptan PK after sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration versus sumatriptan alone was similar; the comparison ratios were 102.5% (90% CI: 100.7%, 104.2%) for AUC0-inf and 104.1% (90% CI: 98.0%, 110.6%) for Cmax. A small difference in zavegepant PK exposure after sumatriptan and zavegepant coadministration versus zavegepant alone was not considered clinically relevant: the comparison ratios were 112.4% (90% CI: 103.4%, 122.3%) for AUC0-24 and 96.7% (90% CI: 88.9%, 105.2%) for Cmax. Overall, 90% (38/42) of participants experienced ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event that was mild or moderate in severity. All treatments were generally safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Coadministration of zavegepant with sumatriptan was safe and without PD or PK interactions in healthy adults.

Effects of multiple-dose administration of zavegepant nasal spray on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol-levonorgestrel

OBJECTIVE

The potential for drug-drug interaction of multiple-dose intranasal zavegepant on the single-dose oral contraceptive ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel (EE-LNG) was evaluated.

BACKGROUND

Zavegepant (as a nasal spray) is a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved in the United States for treatment of acute migraine in adults.

METHODS

This single-center, Phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence study included healthy, nonsmoking females (18-45 years old). In treatment Period 1, a single oral dose of EE-LNG 0.02-0.10 mg was administered on Day 1. In treatment Period 2, intranasal zavegepant (20 mg daily; 10 mg per nostril separated by 1 h) was administered on Days 1-5; 1 oral dose of EE-LNG 0.02-0.10 mg was administered immediately after first 10 mg intranasal zavegepant dose on Day 2. Blood samples for EE-LNG concentrations were collected on Day 1, treatment Period 1, and Day 2, treatment Period 2, and zavegepant concentrations on Day 2, treatment Period 2. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters included maximum observed concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from Time 0 to last non-zero concentration (AUC0-t), and AUC from Time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf). The safety and pharmacokinetic sample sizes were 26 and 23, respectively.

RESULTS

Statistical comparisons of pharmacokinetic exposure parameters after co-administration of zavegepant and EE-LNG versus EE-LNG alone showed small, but statistically insignificant, changes in either EE or LNG exposure. EE comparison ratios (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) were 109.9% (105.3%, 114.8%) for AUC0-inf and 110.2% (104.6%, 116.1%) for Cmax. LNG comparison ratios (90% CIs) were 107.0% (100.2%, 114.3%) for AUC0-inf and 108.8% (99.9%, 118.4%) for Cmax. Frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events included dysgeusia (n = 25, 96%), throat irritation (n = 11, 42%), headache (n = 10, 39%), nasal discomfort (n = 7, 27%), pharyngeal paresthesia (n = 5, 19%), and nausea (n = 4, 15%).

CONCLUSION

Co-administration of zavegepant nasal spray with a single dose of an oral contraceptive resulted in no clinically meaningful changes (<12% increase) in EE-LNG exposure.

Population pharmacokinetic modeling of zavegepant, a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, in healthy adults and patients with migraine

Zavegepant (ZAVZPRET™) is a high-affinity, selective, small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist available for acute treatment of migraine in adults. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed to describe zavegepant plasma concentration-time course, characterize bioavailability, and identify covariates affecting zavegepant exposure. The model was developed and validated using data from 10 phase I clinical studies, wherein zavegepant was administered intravenously, intranasally, or orally to healthy adults and patients with migraine. Plasma concentration-time data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. A three-compartment model with first-order elimination from the central compartment, and sequential zero- and first-order absorption best described the observed plasma concentration-time course of zavegepant. Bioavailability was 5.1% and 0.65% for intranasal and oral treatment, respectively; absorption rate constants were 5.8 and 0.8 h-1, respectively. Body weight-based empirical allometric scaling was applied using standard exponents (0.75 for clearance and 1 for volume of distribution). Age (range 18-71 years), race, ethnicity, sex, renal function, and co-administration of oral contraceptives or sumatriptan did not significantly change zavegepant pharmacokinetics. Moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 7-9) or co-administration of rifampin decreased elimination clearance of oral zavegepant by ~40%. The zavegepant population pharmacokinetic model adequately characterized zavegepant concentration-time profiles, the bioavailability of intranasal and oral zavegepant, as well as the effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on zavegepant pharmacokinetics.

Deconvoluting zavegepant drug-drug interactions: A phase I study to evaluate the effects of rifampin and itraconazole on zavegepant pharmacokinetics

Zavegepant is a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for acute migraine treatment. This Phase I, open-label, fixed-sequence study evaluated the effects of itraconazole (a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 [CYP3A4] and P-glycoprotein [P-gp] inhibitor) on the pharmacokinetics of intranasal/oral zavegepant and the effects of rifampin (a strong inducer of CYP3A4 and P-gp; and an inhibitor of organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B3 [OATP1B3]) on oral zavegepant in healthy participants. In the intranasal/oral zavegepant-itraconazole cohort, participants received a single 10-mg dose of zavegepant nasal spray on Day 1, followed by oral zavegepant (50 mg) on Day 3. Itraconazole 200 mg once daily was administered from Days 4 to 12. On Day 7 zavegepant nasal spray and on Day 11 oral zavegepant were coadministered with itraconazole. In the oral zavegepant-rifampin cohort, participants received oral zavegepant (100 mg) on Day 1, rifampin 600 mg once daily on Days 2-10, and rifampin with zavegepant on Day 11. No significant change in zavegepant exposure was observed following coadministration of itraconazole with zavegepant nasal spray. For oral zavegepant coadministered with itraconazole, the area under the curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) and the maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of oral zavegepant increased by 59% and 77%, respectively. For oral zavegepant coadministered with rifampin, the AUC0-inf and Cmax of oral zavegepant increased by approximately 2.3- and 2.2-fold, respectively. These results suggest that OATP1B3 and intestinal P-gp are the more prominent pathways, as opposed to CYP3A4, for a zavegepant drug-drug interaction. Coadministration of OATP1B3 inhibitors with zavegepant nasal spray should be avoided.

Assessing the occurrence of hypertension in patients receiving calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for episodic and chronic migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of episodic and chronic migraine was invetigated. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Ovid Medline, Web of Science and Embase databases from their inception until April 2024 for randomized controlled trials comparing CGRP monoclonal antibodies with placebo or other active treatments in adults with episodic or chronic migraine. The primary outcome assessed was the incidence of hypertension, and secondary outcomes were tolerability, acceptability and adverse events. Data analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and the strength of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A total of eleven studies involving 9729 participants were found eligible and included for data analysis. The results revealed that the pooled odds ratio for the incidence of hypertension in patients receiving CGRP monoclonal antibodies compared to placebo was (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60, 2.21; I2 = 32%), suggesting no significant increase in hypertension risk. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in tolerability or acceptability between the CGRP monoclonal antibody and placebo groups. However, the overall risk of total adverse events was significantly higher in the CGRP monoclonal antibody group (odds ratio (OR): 1.13; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.33; I2 = 56%; p = 0.01). These findings indicate that CGRP monoclonal antibodies are well-tolerated and present a generally safe option for treating episodic and chronic migraine. Although there was no significant increase in the incidence of hypertension, a slight rise in overall adverse events was observed. Consequently, CGRP monoclonal antibodies may be considered a viable treatment option for patients who have not found other treatments effective or tolerable, or who have contraindications to alternative therapies. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk, registration number: CRD42024554897).

Intranasal zavegepant for the acute treatment of migraine

INTRODUCTION

Migraine is a highly prevalent chronic, inherited neurological condition of the brain which carries a significant level of disability. Despite advances, there is an unmet need for more effective therapies.

AREAS COVERED

Zavegepant nasal spray is a recent therapeutic option which acts as a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist. The objective is to review the efficacy, safety, and additional results of the most recent trials investigating intranasal zavegepant for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura. The authors searched PubMed using the keywords 'zavegepant,' 'Zavzpret,' 'migraine,' 'calcitonin gene-related peptide,' 'CGRP receptor antagonists.' This article covers Phase 1, Phase 2/3, and Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal zavegepant for treatment of acute migraine attacks.

EXPERT OPINION

Intranasal zavegepant is an efficacious, safe, and tolerable anti-migraine drug based on clinical trials and clinical experience. It is especially useful for patients who experience attacks of sudden onset, those with nausea or vomiting, or a high cardiovascular risk burden. Dysgeusia was common; future studies are needed to better characterize this adverse event. Head-to-head studies are lacking with other migraine-specific therapies; the decision to treat should be patient-centered, with attack-specific characteristics in mind.

Unlocking the potential of luteolin: A natural migraine management approach through network pharmacology

Background

Luteolin, a natural flavonoid, exhibits antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties and has been investigated for potential health benefits. Its focus on migraine management arises from its ability to mitigate neuroinflammation, a key factor in migraine attacks.

Methods

pkCSM and Swiss ADME were employed to assess luteolin's pharmacokinetic properties, revealing challenges such as low water solubility and limited skin permeability. OSIRIS Property Explorer is used to check the toxicity. Ligand binding simulations indicated luteolin's potential to interact with calcitonin gene related peptide proteins, crucial in migraine pathophysiology. DisGeNet identified common targets related to migraine, with subsequent network analysis emphasizing promising targets.

Results and Discussion

Luteolin demonstrated good intestinal absorption but faced BBB limitations, suggesting a potential for oral administration but questioning direct brain impact. Nanoformulation was proposed to address solubility challenges, emphasizing the need for in vivo validation. The highest binding affinity with CGRP proteins PDBID: 6PFO (-7.63 kcal/mol) suggested a potential for migraine treatment, requiring empirical confirmation. Enrichment network analysis illustrated luteolin's potential in migraine treatment, emphasizing key targets such as PTGS2, AKT1, ESR1, MMP2, and MMP9. Luteolin shows promise for migraine management, evident in its pharmacokinetic, toxicological profiles, and interactions with CGRP proteins. Challenges like low solubility suggest the need for nanoformulations and empirical validation. Target identification and network analysis offer insights, highlighting potential therapeutic avenues in migraine treatment.

Conclusion

Luteolin holds promise in migraine management, necessitating further research for translation into effective interventions, considering its neuroprotective potential in broader neurological conditions.

Understanding the efficacy and tolerability of migraine treatment: a deep dive into CGRP antagonists

INTRODUCTION

The discovery of the role of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGPR) in migraine pathogenesis ushered in a new era in headache medicine. This evidence led to the development of small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists and monoclonal antibodies targeting either CGRP or its receptor.

AREAS COVERED

We will present selected aspects of the role of CGRP in the pathogenesis of migraine, the efficacy of CGRP-targeted treatment, and the still-open questions regarding the practical application of CGRP antagonists in headache medicine.

EXPERT OPINION

CGRP-targeting drugs represent a transformative approach to migraine treatment, offering superior efficacy and tolerability compared to traditional therapies, they are a helpful addition to the treatment arsenal but also have their flaws and require further observation. Their availability provides new hope for migraine patients, particularly those who have not responded adequately to conventional treatments. Future directions for migraine care planning, especially for chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache, should include universal access to these specific and effective forms of therapy to prevent complications from the disease and its negative effects in many aspects of a patient's life.

Mass balance and pharmacokinetic characterization of zavegepant in healthy male subjects

Zavegepant, a high-affinity, selective, small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, is approved as a nasal spray for acute treatment of migraine in adults. This phase I, open-label, single-center, single-period, nonrandomized study in six healthy male subjects assessed mass balance recovery after a single 15-min intravenous (IV) infusion dose of carbon-14 ([14C])-zavegepant. Blood, urine, and fecal samples were collected over 192 h for analysis of zavegepant in plasma and urine; total radioactivity (TR) in plasma, whole blood, urine, and feces; and zavegepant metabolite profiling and structural identification in plasma, urine, and feces. An average of 96.6% of radioactivity administered was recovered in excreta. Most TR (mean 84.9%) was recovered in the feces, indicating that biliary/fecal elimination was the main route. Volume of distribution of zavegepant based on the terminal phase (129 L) was higher than total body water (42 L), indicating substantial distribution into tissue. Total plasma clearance of zavegepant (220 mL/min) is identical to whole blood clearance given the blood/plasma partition ratio of 1, lower than typical hepatic blood flow (1450 mL/min). The observed plasma terminal half-life of zavegepant was 6.8 h. Exposure to zavegepant accounted for ~90% of circulating plasma TR, suggesting that very low levels of uncharacterized circulating metabolites were present. Metabolite profiling did not identify any metabolites representing ≥10% of radioactivity in plasma, urine, or feces. A single IV infusion of 5 mg [14C]-zavegepant was well tolerated in healthy male subjects. Disposition findings of IV [14C]-zavegepant are applicable to the disposition of the approved zavegepant nasal spray.

Comparison of gepant effects at therapeutic plasma concentrations: connecting pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND

Orally administered second-generation gepants are effective for the treatment of migraine. The intranasal administration of the third-generation gepant zavegepant might have additional benefits including a rapid onset of action, but it is not clear yet to which extent this has clinical relevance.

METHODS

We examined the effect of zavegepant on the relaxations induced by calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in human isolated middle meningeal arteries. Furthermore, we connected the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of gepants by combining data from clinical and basic research.

RESULTS

We showed that 10 nM zavegepant potently antagonized the functional response to CGRP. We also showed that all gepants are effective at inhibiting functional responses to CGRP at their therapeutic plasma concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

The relatively low predicted potency of zavegepant to inhibit CGRP-induced relaxation at therapeutic systemic plasma concentrations may point to the relevance of local delivery to the trigeminovascular system through intranasal administration. This approach may have additional benefits for various groups of patients, including overweight patients.

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Inhibitors in the Treatment of Migraine in the Pediatric and Adolescent Populations: A Review

There are limited well-studied treatments for migraine in the pediatric population. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors are an established safe and effective treatment in adults, and use may be appropriate for pediatric patients in certain clinical situations. We describe migraine pathophysiology as it relates to CGRP, provide an overview of available medications, and discuss clinical usage in this population.

Zavegepant Intranasal Spray for Migraines

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of intranasal zavegepant in the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura.

DATA SOURCE

PubMed, Embase database, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using the following terms: Zavzpret, Zavegepant, BHV-3500, and migraine.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Articles published in English from January 2013 to September 2023 related to pharmacology, safety, efficacy, and clinical trials were assessed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In a phase 2/3 trial, zavegepant 10 and 20 mg were more effective than placebo on primary endpoints of freedom of pain (22.5%, 23.1%, and 15.5%, respectively), and freedom from most bothersome symptoms (MBSs) (41.9%, 47.9%, and 33.7%, respectively) 2 hours after treatment. The incidence of adverse effects for both doses was similar to placebo. In a phase 3 trial, zavegepant 10 mg was compared with placebo. Two hours after treatment, more patients in the zavegepant group achieved pain freedom (24% vs 15%) and relief from MBSs (40% vs 31%) compared with placebo. Common adverse events included dysgeusia (21% zavegepant vs 5% placebo) and nasal discomfort (5% zavegepant vs 1% placebo).

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON WITH EXISTING DRUGS

Zavegepant is indicated for acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. Zavegepant method of administration and prompt relief of migraine symptoms may be an attractive alternative to triptans for those in need of relief.

CONCLUSION

Zavegepant may be a convenient and useful acute treatment option for migraines with and without aura.

International Headache Society global practice recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine

BACKGROUND

In an effort to improve migraine management around the world, the International Headache Society (IHS) has here developed a list of practical recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine. The recommendations are categorized into optimal and essential, in order to provide treatment options for all possible settings, including those with limited access to migraine medications.

METHODS

An IHS steering committee developed a list of clinical questions based on practical issues in the management of migraine. A selected group of international senior and junior headache experts developed the recommendations, following expert consensus and the review of available national and international headache guidelines and guidance documents. Following the initial search, a bibliography of twenty-one national and international guidelines was created and reviewed by the working group.

RESULTS

A total of seventeen questions addressing different aspects of acute migraine treatment have been outlined. For each of them we provide an optimal recommendation, to be used whenever possible, and an essential recommendation to be used when the optimal level cannot be attained.

CONCLUSION

Adoption of these international recommendations will improve the quality of acute migraine treatment around the world, even where pharmacological options remain limited.

Long-term safety of zavegepant nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine: A phase 2/3 open-label study

BACKGROUND

Zavegepant is the first small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for intranasal administration for the acute treatment of migraine. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of zavegepant in the acute treatment of migraine under repeated, as-needed dosing for up to one year.

METHODS

This phase 2/3, one-year open-label safety study of zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine enrolled adults aged ≥18 years with a history of two to eight moderate to severe monthly migraine attacks. Participants used one dose of zavegepant as needed to self-treat migraine attacks of any severity, up to eight times per month, for 52 weeks.

RESULTS

Participants were enrolled between 29 June and 4 December 2020. Of the 608 participants entering long-term treatment, 603 were treated with study drug. Participants administered a mean (SD) of 3.1 (1.55) zavegepant doses per month. There were no deaths. Of the seven serious adverse events reported, none was considered related to treatment. Altogether, 6.8% (41/603) of treated participants had an adverse event leading to study drug discontinuation. The most frequent adverse event leading to discontinuation was dysgeusia (1.5% [9/603]). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥5% of participants) were dysgeusia (39.1% [236/603]); nasal discomfort (10.3% [62/603]); COVID-19 (7.5% [45/603]); nausea (6.1% [37/603]); nasal congestion and throat irritation (5.5% [33/603] each); and back pain (5.3% [32/603]). Aminotransferases >3x the upper limit of normal occurred in 2.6% [16/603] of participants; none had concurrent elevations in bilirubin >2x upper limit of normal.

CONCLUSIONS

One year of zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray up to eight times per month was safe and well tolerated.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04408794.

Real-world study of adverse events associated with gepant use in migraine treatment based on the VigiAccess and U.S. Food and Drug Administration's adverse event reporting system databases

Background

This study aimed to investigate the real-world profile of adverse events (AEs) associated with gepant medications in the clinical treatment of migraines by analyzing data collected from the VigiAccess database and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. As novel migraine therapies, gepants act by targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, demonstrating effective control of migraine attacks and good tolerability. Nonetheless, comprehensive real-world studies on the safety of gepants are still lacking, particularly regarding their safety in large populations, long-term use, and potential adverse reactions in specific groups, which necessitates further empirical research. Leveraging these two international adverse event reporting system databases, we systematically gathered and analyzed reports of AEs related to gepant medications, such as rimegepant. Our focus encompasses but is not limited to severe, new, and rare adverse reactions induced by the drugs, as well as safety issues pertaining to the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, and renal systems. Through descriptive statistical analyses, we assessed the incidence and characteristics of AEs, compared AEs among gepants, and uncovered previously unknown AE information, all with the goal of providing a reference for the selection of clinical treatment regimens and AE monitoring.

Methods

By extracting all AE reports concerning "rimegepant", "atogepant", and "ubrogepant" from the VigiAccess and FAERS database since its establishment up to 31 March 2024, a retrospective quantitative analysis was conducted. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) method were used to compare AEs among the three gepants.

Results

In the VigiAccess and FAERS databases, 23542 AE reports in total, respectively, were identified as being related to gepant medications. Among gastrointestinal system AEs, rimegepant had the greatest proportion and greatest signal strength; nausea was most severe and had the strongest signal in rimegepant AEs, whereas constipation was most prominent and had the strongest signal in atogepant AEs. In skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, rash and pruritus were more frequently observed with rimegepant, followed by ubrogepant. Alopecia emerged as a novel AE, being more severe in rimegepant and secondarily in atogepant. Regarding cardiac disorders, the three gepants showed comparable rates of cardiac AEs, yet rimegepant exhibited the strongest AE signal. In musculoskeletal and connective tissue AEs, ubrogepant presented the most positive signals for skeletal muscle AEs. Furthermore, among the rare blood and lymphatic system disorder AEs, rimegepant had the highest number of reports of Raynaud's phenomenon and the strongest signal. The study also revealed that while reports of AEs involving liver diseases were scarce across the three gepants, severe AEs were detected in clinical trials, highlighting the need for continued, enhanced monitoring of liver system AEs through large-scale datasets.

Conclusion

Gepant medications exhibit similarities and differences in their safety profiles. Analysis of the two databases indicated the presence of AEs across various systems, including gastrointestinal disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue diseases, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, organ-specific effects, and liver diseases. However, each drug displays distinct incidences and signal intensities for these AEs. Additionally, the study revealed a rare AE in the form of Raynaud's phenomenon. These findings suggest that during clinical use, individualized medication selection and AE monitoring should be based on the patient's physiological condition and specific characteristics.

[CGRP: from neuropeptide to the therapeutic target (background and pathophysiology)]

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays a pivotal role in migraine pathophysiology. The importance of CGRP in migraine became evident from numerous clinical studies investigating CGRP levels both interictally and ictally and reports on the efficacy of CGRP-based migraine therapies. In this paper, the above mentioned studies will be presented and the reader will be introduced to the development of CGRP-based medication. Finally, current study results on CGRP receptor antagonists, the so-called gepants, will be presented.

[Anti-CGRP-based Migraine Medications: A Comprehensive Overview]

In the early 1990s, the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) was identified as a key messenger in the pathophysiology of migraine and emerged as a treatment target, fundamentally transforming our approach to migraine therapy. While previous prophylactic drugs were non-specific and often caused intolerable side effects, the discovery of CGRP marked the advent of a new era in migraine treatment. The two main classes of CGRP-specific migraine treatments are monoclonal antibodies that bind to CGRP or the CGRP receptor, and CGRP receptor antagonists, the so-called gepants. Extensive clinical trials have conclusively demonstrated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of monoclonal CGRP(-receptor) antibodies in the prophylactic treatment of both episodic and chronic migraine. The same positive results apply to the use of various gepants. They have proven to be not only an effective alternative to triptans in acute migraine therapy but also promising options for continuous use as prophylactic treatments. In this review, we aim to present the current state of research on CGRP-specific migraine therapy and insights in real-world data from the first years after their launch in clinical practice.

Reduced hepatic impairment study to evaluate pharmacokinetics and safety of zavegepant and to inform dosing recommendation for hepatic impairment

Zavegepant, a high-affinity, selective, small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, is approved in the United States for acute treatment of migraine in adults. The effects of moderate hepatic impairment (8 participants with Child-Pugh score 7-9 points) on the pharmacokinetics of a single 10-mg intranasal dose of zavegepant versus eight matched participants with normal hepatic function were evaluated in a phase I study. Pharmacokinetic sampling determined total and unbound plasma zavegepant concentrations. Moderate hepatic impairment increased the exposure of total zavegepant (~2-fold increase in AUC0-inf and 16% increase in Cmax) versus normal hepatic function, which is not considered clinically meaningful. The geometric least squares mean ratios (moderate impairment/normal) of plasma zavegepant AUC0-inf and Cmax were 193% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 112, 333; p = 0.051) and 116% (90% CI: 69, 195; p = 0.630), respectively. The geometric mean fraction unbound of zavegepant was similar for participants with moderate hepatic impairment (0.13; coefficient of variation [CV] 13.71%) versus those with normal hepatic function (0.11; CV 21.43%). Similar exposure findings were observed with unbound zavegepant versus normal hepatic function (~2.3-fold increase in AUC0-inf and 39% increase in Cmax). One treatment-emergent adverse event (mild, treatment-related headache) was reported in a participant with normal hepatic function. No dosage adjustment of intranasal zavegepant is required in adults with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Revolutionizing migraine management: advances and challenges in CGRP-targeted therapies and their clinical implications

Migraine, a prevalent neurological disorder, affects approximately 14.1% of the global population and disproportionately impacts females. This debilitating condition significantly compromises quality of life, productivity, and incurs high healthcare costs, presenting a challenge not only to individuals but to societal structures as a whole. Despite advances in our understanding of migraine pathophysiology, treatment options remain limited, necessitating ongoing research into effective therapies. This review delves into the complexity of migraine management, examining the roles of genetic predisposition, environmental influences, personalized treatment approaches, comorbidities, efficacy and safety of existing acute and preventive treatments. It further explores the continuum between migraine and tension-type headaches and discusses the intricacies of treating various migraine subtypes, including those with and without aura. We emphasize the recent paradigm shift toward trigeminovascular activation and the release of vasoactive substances, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which offer novel therapeutic targets. We assess groundbreaking clinical trials, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspectives, safety, tolerability, and the real-world application of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants. In the face of persisting treatment barriers such as misdiagnosis, medication overuse headaches, and limited access to specialist care, we discuss innovative CGRP-targeted strategies, the high cost and scarcity of long-term efficacy data, and suggest comprehensive solutions tailored to Turkiye and developing countries. The review offers strategic recommendations including the formulation of primary care guidelines, establishment of specialized outpatient clinics, updating physicians on novel treatments, enhancing global accessibility to advanced therapies, and fostering patient education. Emphasizing the importance of lifestyle modifications and holistic approaches, the review underscores the potential of mass media and patient groups in disseminating critical health information and shaping the future of migraine management.

Concentration-QTc and cardiac safety analysis of single and multiple zavegepant nasal spray doses in healthy participants to support approval

Zavegepant is a novel gepant administered as a nasal spray approved in the United States at a 10 mg dose for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. The cardiovascular safety of zavegepant nasal spray was assessed in both single-ascending dose (SAD) and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) studies in healthy participants. The SAD study included 72 participants (54 active/18 placebo) who received 0.1-40 mg zavegepant or placebo. The MAD study included 72 participants (56 active/16 placebo) who received 5-40 mg zavegepant or placebo for 1-14 days. Plasma zavegepant pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters (Fridericia-corrected QT interval [QTcF], heart rate, PR interval, ventricular depolarization [QRS], T-wave morphology, and U-wave presence) were analyzed pre- and post-zavegepant administration. Using pooled data from the SAD and MAD studies, the relationship between time-matched plasma zavegepant concentrations and QTc interval was assessed using a linear mixed-effects model to evaluate the potential for QTc interval prolongation. Results showed that single and multiple doses of zavegepant had no significant impact on ECG parameters versus placebo, and there was no concentration-dependent effect on QTcF interval. The estimated slope of the plasma zavegepant concentration-QTcF model was -0.053 ms per ng/mL with a 90% confidence interval of -0.0955 to -0.0110 (p = 0.0415), which is not considered clinically meaningful. At doses up to four times the recommended daily dose, zavegepant does not prolong the QT interval to any clinically relevant extent.

Zavegepant for Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of zavegepant (BHV-3500), a recently approved nasal spray containing a third-generation calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, for treating acute migraine attacks.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted across various databases up to 06/26/2023 to identify relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on zavegepant's efficacy and safety in treatment of acute migraine attacks. Primary outcome: freedom from pain at 2 hours postdose. Safety outcomes were evaluated based on adverse events (AEs), with zavegepant 10 mg and placebo groups compared for incidence of AEs.

RESULTS

Two RCTs, involving 2061 participants (1014 receiving zavegepant and 1047 receiving placebo), were quantitatively analyzed. An additional trial was included for qualitative synthesis. Zavegepant 10 mg exhibited a significantly higher likelihood of achieving freedom from pain at 2 hours postdose compared with the placebo group (risk ratio [RR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28 to 1.84). It also showed superior relief from the most bothersome symptoms at 2 hours postdose compared with placebo (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.42). However, the zavegepant 10 mg group experienced a higher incidence of AEs compared with placebo (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.12), with dysgeusia being the most reported AE (RR 4.18, 95% CI 3.05 to 5.72).

CONCLUSION

Zavegepant 10 mg is more effective than placebo in treating acute migraine attacks, providing compelling evidence of its efficacy in relieving migraine pain and most bothersome associated symptoms. Further trials are necessary to confirm its efficacy, tolerability, and safety in diverse clinic-based settings with varied patient populations.

Developments in targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide

INTRODUCTION

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)-targeted therapy has revolutionized migraine treatment since its first approval in 2018. CGRP-targeted therapy includes monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and gepants, which modulate trigeminal nociceptive and inflammatory responses, alleviating pain sensitization involved in migraine pathogenesis. CGRP-targeted therapy is effective not only for migraine but also for other chronic headache disorders that share the CGRP pathway.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review the latest developments and evidence for CGRP-targeted therapy for episodic migraine and chronic migraine. In addition, the authors discuss the emerging evidence on response prediction, menstrual migraine, vestibular migraine, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, post-traumatic headache, and the relationship between selected migraine comorbidities and CGRP.

EXPERT OPINION

Since the launch of CGRP-targeted therapy, many practical issues have been raised. Generally, it's safe to combine CGRP-targeted mAbs and gepants; this is an excellent option for patients with partial response. When considering stopping CGRP-targeted therapy, although a disease-modifying effect is likely, the optimal time for discontinuation remains unknown. Finally, beyond migraine, CGRP-targeted therapy may be used for other chronic pain disorders and psychological comorbidities.

Asymmetric Hydrogenation of Indazole-Containing Enamides Relevant to the Synthesis of Zavegepant Using Neutral and Cationic Cobalt Precatalysts

The cobalt-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of indazole-containing enamides relevant to the synthesis of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, zavegepant (1), approved for the treatment of migraines, is described. Both neutral bis(phosphine)cobalt(II) and cationic bis(phosphine)cobalt(I) complexes served as efficient precatalysts for the enamide hydrogenation reactions, providing excellent yield and enantioselectivities (up to >99.9%) for a range of related substrates, though key reactivity differences were observed. Hydrogenation of indazole-containing enamide, methyl (Z)-2-acetamido-3-(7-methyl-1H-indazol-5-yl)acrylate, was performed on a 20 g scale.

Acute Treatment of Migraine: Expert Consensus Statements from the United Arab Emirates (UAE)

INTRODUCTION

Migraine, characterized by recurrent headaches and often accompanied by other symptoms like nausea, vomiting, and sensitivity to light and sound, significantly impacts patients' quality of life (QoL) and daily functioning. The global burden of migraines is reflected not only in terms of reduced QoL but also in the form of increased healthcare costs and missed work or school days. While UAE (United Arab Emirates)-specific consensus-based recommendations for the effective use of preventive calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-based migraine therapies have been published previously, an absence of such regional guidance on the management of acute migraine represents a gap that needs to be urgently addressed.

METHODS

A task force of eight neurologists from the UAE with expertise in migraine management conducted a comprehensive literature search and developed a set of expert statements on the management of acute migraine that were specific to the UAE context. To ensure diverse perspectives are considered, a Delphi panel comprising 16 neurologists plus the task force members was set up. Consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi survey method. Consensus was predefined as a median rating of 7 or higher without discordance (if > 25% of the Delphi panelists rate an expert statement as 3 or lower on the Likert scale). Expert statements achieving consensus were adopted.

RESULTS

The Modified Delphi method was used successfully to achieve consensus on all nine expert statements drafted by the task force. These consensus statements aim to provide a comprehensive guide for UAE healthcare professionals in treating acute migraine. The statements cover all aspects of acute migraine treatment, including what goals to set, the timing of treatment, treatment strategy to use in case of inadequate response to triptans, safety aspects of combining gepants for acute attacks with preventive CGRP-based therapies, special population (pregnant and pediatric patients) considerations, and the management of the most bothersome symptoms (MBS).

CONCLUSIONS

Adopting these consensus statements on the treatment of acute migraine can help enhance patient care, improve outcomes, and standardize treatment practices in the UAE. The collaborative effort of experts with diverse experiences in developing these consensus statements will strengthen the credibility and applicability of these statements to various healthcare settings in the country.

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of lasmiditan and CGRP-antagonists for the acute treatment of migraine in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes associated with the use of lasmiditan, rimegepant, ubrogepant, and zavegepant for the acute management of migraine headaches.

METHODS

We searched four electronic databases from database inception to August 31, 2023, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that report efficacy and safety for the acute treatment of migraine. The risk of bias in the included RCTs was evaluated according to the Cochrane tool, and the certainty of evidence using the CINeMA approach. We conducted frequentist network meta-analyses (NMA) to summarise the evidence. Data were analyzed using R-4.3.1.

RESULTS

A total of 18 eligible studies including 10 different types of interventions with 22,429 migraine patients were included. NMA results showed that compared to ubrogepant (25 mg and 50 mg) and zavegepant, lasmiditan (100 mg and 200 mg) exhibits an elevated probability of achieving pain relief within a 2-hour interval. Similarly, relative to zavegepant, rimegepant (75 mg) and ubrogepant (50 mg and 100 mg) demonstrate an enhanced likelihood of sustaining pain relief over a 24-hour period. Furthermore, in contrast to ubrogepant (25 mg) and lasmiditan (50 mg), rimegepant (75 mg) presents a heightened probability of achieving freedom from photophobia within 2 h. Regarding safety, lasmiditan carries the highest risk of adverse events, which are associated with an increased incidence of adverse effects, including dizziness, somnolence, asthenia, paresthesia, and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

In this NMA, a spectrum of evidence ranging from very low to high levels underscores the favorable efficacy and tolerability of rimegepant 75 mg and ubrogepant 100 mg, positioning them as potential candidates for the acute management of migraine. Concurrently, lasmiditan (100 mg and 200 mg) exhibits notable efficacy, albeit accompanied by an increased susceptibility to adverse events. These findings should still be approached with caution, primarily due to the intrinsic limitations associated with indirect comparisons.

Headache Management in Individuals with Brain Tumor

Headache occurs commonly in individuals diagnosed with cerebral neoplasm. Though the features of a brain tumor-associated headache may vary, a progressive nature of headache and a change in headache phenotype from a prior primary headache disorder often are identified. Pathophysiologic mechanisms proposed for headache associated with brain tumor include headache related to traction on pain-sensitive structures, activation of central and peripheral pain processes, and complications from surgical, chemotherapeutic and/or radiotherapy treatment(s). Optimization of headache management is important for an individual's quality of life. Treatments are based upon patient-specific goals of care and may include tumor-targeted medical and surgical interventions, as well as a multimodal headache treatment approach incorporating acute and preventive medications, nutraceuticals, neuromodulation devices, behavioral interventions, anesthetic nerve blocks, and lifestyles changes.

Novel FDA-approved zavegepant drug for treating migraine

Migraine is a complex neurological disorder characterized by recurring episodes of severe headaches. The pathophysiology of migraine involves abnormalities in neuronal networks, cortical spreading depression, and sensitization of trigeminovascular pathways. The global prevalence of migraine has increased substantially, warranting advancements in treatment strategies. A significant trigger in migraine pathophysiology is calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Several drugs, such as gepants and monoclonal antibodies (MABs) targeting CGRP or its receptor, have been developed to antagonize CGRP signaling. Zavegepant (Zavzpret), a novel CGRP receptor antagonist, has recently been approved by the FDA for the acute treatment of migraine. Clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy in providing headache and symptom relief, with a statistically significant percentage of patients achieving freedom from headaches and most bothersome symptoms. Despite mild adverse effects, such as taste disorders and nausea, Zavzpret's overall safety profile remains acceptable.

The history and rationale of the development of new drugs for migraine treatment

Migraine is one of the most prevalent and disabling diseases in the world. Migraine attack treatments and prophylactic treatments of this disease are essential to lessen its individual, social, and economic impact. This is a narrative review of the main drugs used for treating migraine, as well as the experimental models and the theoretical frameworks that led to their development. Ergot derivatives, triptans, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, tricyclic antidepressants, beta-blockers,: flunarizine,: valproic acid,: topiramate, onabotulinumtoxin A, ditans, monoclonal antibodies against CGRP and its receptor, and gepants are discussed. Possible therapeutic targets for the development of new drugs that are under development are also addressed. Many of the drugs currently in use for treating migraine were developed for the treatment of other diseases, but have proven effective for the treatment of migraine, expanding knowledge about the disease. With a better understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine, new drugs have been and continue to be developed specifically for the treatment of this disease.

Metabolic and toxicological considerations regarding CGRP mAbs and CGRP antagonists to treat migraine in COVID-19 patients: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Migraine pharmacological therapies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), including monoclonal antibodies and gepants, have shown clinical effect and optimal tolerability. Interactions between treatments of COVID-19 and CGRP-related drugs have not been reviewed.

AREAS COVERED

An overview of CGRP, a description of the characteristics of each CGRP-related drug and its response predictors, COVID-19 and its treatment, the interactions between CGRP-related drugs and COVID-19 treatment, COVID-19 and vaccination-induced headache, and the neurological consequences of Covid-19.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinicians should be careful about using gepants for COVID-19 patients, due to the potential drug interactions with drugs metabolized via CYP3A4 cytochrome. In particular, COVID-19 treatment (especially nirmatrelvir packaged with ritonavir, as Paxlovid) should be considered cautiously. It is advisable to stop or adjust the dose (10 mg atogepant when used for episodic migraine) of gepants when using Paxlovid (except for zavegepant). CGRP moncolconal antibodies (CGRP-mAbs) do not have drug - drug interactions, but a few days' interval between a COVID-19 vaccination and the use of CGRP mAbs is recommended to allow the accurate identification of the possible adverse effects, such as injection site reaction. Covid-19- and vaccination-related headache are known to occur. Whether CGRP-related drugs would be of benefit in these circumstances is not yet known.

Pyrazole: an emerging privileged scaffold in drug discovery

Pyrazole or 1H-pyrazole, a five-membered 1,2-diazole, is found in several approved drugs and some bioactive natural products. A myriad number of derivatives of this small molecule have been reported in clinical and preclinical studies for the potential treatment of several diseases. The number of drugs containing a pyrazole nucleus has increased significantly in the last 10 years. Some of the best-selling drugs in this class are ibrutinib, ruxolitinib, axitinib, niraparib and baricitinib, and are used to treat different types of cancers; lenacapavir to treat HIV; riociguat to treat pulmonary hypertension; and sildenafil to treat erectile dysfunction. Several aniline-derived pyrazole compounds have been reported as potent antibacterial agents with selective activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Here, we discuss the pyrazole-derived drugs reported up to September 2023.

Zavegepant nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine: A meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Zavegepant nasal spray is a novel CGRP receptor antagonist that has been developed for the acute treatment of migraine - a prevalent disease leading to disability and economic burden. The meta-analysis aims to quantify the efficacy of Zavegepant compared to standard care or placebo in achieving pain freedom, freedom from most bothersome symptoms (MBS), sustained pain freedom, and pain relapse at 2 to 48 hours.

METHODS

Databases and registers were systematically searched to identify relevant clinical trials. Two independent reviewers used a standardized data extraction form to collect relevant data on primary and secondary outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed in RevMan 5.4 software. The efficacy of Zavegepant was compared to placebo using odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, chi-square test, Z value, and P value. Cochrane ROB-2 and ROBINS-I tools were used to assess the biases (osf.io/b32ne).

RESULTS

Of 36 identified studies, 3 were included in this meta-analysis. Zavegepant was more effective in achieving pain freedom (OR: 1.6, P < .00001), and freedom from MBS at 2 hours (OR = 1.4, P < .00001). The intervention group demonstrated a higher likelihood of sustained pain freedom between 2 and 48 hours (OR = 1.74, P < .00001). Although there was a trend towards reduced pain relapse between 2 and 48 hours in the intervention group, the difference was insignificant (OR = 0.67, P = .11).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirms the effectiveness of Zavegepant nasal spray in treating acute migraine, with significant improvements in pain and symptom relief. Further research is needed to determine the effect on pain relapse and overall safety.

Efficacy and safety of intranasal agents for the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intranasal agents may be ideal for the treatment of migraine patients. Many new acute intranasal-specific therapies have been developed, but few of them have been directly compared. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and safety of various intranasal agents for the treatment of acute migraine in adult patients.

METHODS

The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and PubMed were searched from inception to 15 August 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using intranasal agents (no restrictions on dose, formulation, dosing regimen or timing of the first dose) to treat adult patients with acute migraine were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was pain freedom at 2 h, and the primary safety endpoint was adverse events (AEs). The analysis process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies (21 RCTs, 9738 participants) were included. Compared to the placebo, 5 mg of zolmitriptan using a conventional liquid nasal spray device was the most effective for pain freedom at 2 h [odds ratio (OR): 4.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.43 to 6.43] and 24 h (OR: 5.49, 95% CI: 3.58 to 8.42) among all the interventions. Butorphanol nasal spray 1 mg was the most effective (OR: 8.62, 95% CI: 1.11 to 66.92) for pain freedom at 1 h, but with low-quality evidence. DFN-02 presented the highest freedom from nausea (OR: 4.95, 95% CI: 1.29 to 19.01) and phonophobia (OR: 5.36, 95% CI: 1.67 to 17.22) at 2 h, albeit with lower odds of achieving complete pain freedom. ROX-828 showed the highest improvement in freedom from photophobia at 2 h (OR: 4.03, 95% CI: 1.66 to 9.81). Dihydroergotamine nasal spray was significantly associated with the highest risk of AEs (OR: 9.65, 95% CI: 4.39 to 21.22) and was not recommended for routine use. Zavegepant nasal spray demonstrated the lowest risk of AEs (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.37 to 3.03). The results of sensitivity analyses for the primary endpoints (pain freedom at 2 h and AEs) were generally consistent with those of the base case model.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with other new intranasal-specific therapies in treating migraine attacks, zolmitriptan nasal spray 5 mg was the most effective agent for pain freedom at 2 h. Zavegepant nasal spray 10 mg had the fewest adverse side effects.

A Brief Review of Gepants

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gepants are small molecules that antagonize calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors. Due to their favorable side effect profile and versatility in treating headaches acutely and preventively, gepants are preferred over triptans. We will cover the indications for the four FDA-approved gepants in adults: rimegepant, atogepant, ubrogepant, and zavegepant. This review will illustrate how gepants will continue to revolutionize the acute and preventive treatment of headaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

Gepants are now available in oral tablet, dissolving tablet, and intra-nasal spray formulations. Recent studies have shown promising utility in treating the pre-headache or prodromal phase. They have favorable tolerability, no evidence for association with medication overuse, and remain a safer alternative in those who have cerebrovascular risk factors. Additional research is needed to explore occurrence of Raynaud's phenomenon in participants treated with gepants, as it has been associated with CGRP monoclonal antibodies, but are not extensively studied in gepants. Gepants are expected to play a significant role in the next generation of migraine treatments.

Molecular Mechanisms of Migraine: Nitric Oxide Synthase and Neuropeptides

Migraine is a common condition with disabling attacks that burdens people in the prime of their working lives. Despite years of research into migraine pathophysiology and therapeutics, much remains to be learned about the mechanisms at play in this complex neurovascular condition. Additionally, there remains a relative paucity of specific and targeted therapies available. Many sufferers remain underserved by currently available broad action preventive strategies, which are also complicated by poor tolerance and adverse effects. The development of preclinical migraine models in the laboratory, and the advances in human experimental migraine provocation, have led to the identification of key molecules likely involved in the molecular circuity of migraine, and have provided novel therapeutic targets. Importantly, the identification that vasoconstriction is neither necessary nor required for headache abortion has changed the landscape of migraine treatment and has broadened the therapy targets for patients with vascular risk factors or vascular disease. These targets include nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and several neuropeptides that are involved in migraine. The ability of NO donors and infusion of some of these peptides into humans to trigger typical migraine-like attacks has supported the development of targeted therapies against these molecules. Some of these, such as those targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), have already reached clinical practice and are displaying a positive outcome in migraineurs for the better by offering targeted efficacy without significant adverse effects. Others, such as those targeting pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP), are showing promise and are likely to enter phase 3 clinical trials in the near future. Understanding these nitrergic and peptidergic mechanisms in migraine and their interactions is likely to lead to further therapeutic strategies for migraine in the future.

Emerging experimental drugs in clinical trials for migraine: observations and key talking points

INTRODUCTION

There have been significant advances in the treatment of migraine. In response to the clinical success of monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide, there is interest in the clinical trial outcomes of alternative emerging drugs that act on novel targets associated with migraine pathophysiology. As approximately 50% of patients do not respond to CGRP therapies, there is significant value in future drug innovation. Emerging drugs in clinical trials for the treatment of migraine aim to fill this need.

AREAS COVERED

The emerging drugs that will be discussed in this review include zavegepant, lasmiditan, delta opioid receptor agonists, neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies targeting pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and its receptor, dual orexin receptor antagonists, metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 antagonists, and inducers of ketosis.

EXPERT OPINION

When considering the preclinical and clinical research related to the emerging drug classes discussed in this review, most therapies are derived from highly supported targets of migraine pathogenesis. Although the individual drugs discussed in this review may be of dubious clinical value, the importance of the therapeutic targets on which they act cannot be understated. Future research is necessary to appropriately target the pathways elucidated by preclinical studies.

Safety and Efficacy of Zavegepant in Treating Migraine: A Systematic Review

Drugs that act on the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway herald the dawn of a new era in the management of migraine headaches. The blockade of CGRP alleviates neural inflammation and has been associated with reduced pain sensitization. Zavegepant is a third-generation drug and is the first intranasal CGRP antagonist to be developed. This systematic review aims to assess the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and tolerability of Zavegepant as an abortive treatment for migraine. Studies that assessed the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Zavegepant for migraine were identified through a systematic literature review of PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane databases in April 2023. Our systematic review yielded a total of six studies that fit our inclusion criteria. Of these, data from only two randomized control trials (RCTs) was homogenous; hence, forest plots of results pooled from the included studies were not reported. The included studies showed that Zavegepant is an efficacious and well-tolerated abortive treatment modality for episodic migraine in adult patients. Zavegepant showed safety and efficacy in migraine treatment according to various parameters throughout the six included studies. These parameters include adverse events, pharmacokinetic properties, CGRP inhibition, effect on blood pressure/electrocardiogram, pain freedom, and freedom from most bothersome symptoms.

Zavegepant: First Approval

Zavegepant is a third generation, small-molecule, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist being developed by Pfizer, under a license from Bristol-Myers Squibb, for the prevention and treatment of chronic and episodic migraine. In March 2023, zavegepant nasal spray (ZAVZPRET™) received its first approval in the USA for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. Clinical development of an oral formulation of zavegepant is currently underway. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of zavegepant leading to this first approval for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults.

Research Progress in Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Bone Repair

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has 37 amino acids. Initially, CGRP had vasodilatory and nociceptive effects. As research progressed, evidence revealed that the peripheral nervous system is closely associated with bone metabolism, osteogenesis, and bone remodeling. Thus, CGRP is the bridge between the nervous system and the skeletal muscle system. CGRP can promote osteogenesis, inhibit bone resorption, promote vascular growth, and regulate the immune microenvironment. The G protein-coupled pathway is vital for its effects, while MAPK, Hippo, NF-κB, and other pathways have signal crosstalk, affecting cell proliferation and differentiation. The current review provides a detailed description of the bone repair effects of CGRP, subjected to several therapeutic studies, such as drug injection, gene editing, and novel bone repair materials.

Migraine: from pathophysiology to treatment

Migraine is an extremely disabling, common neurological disorder characterized by a complex neurobiology, involving a series of central and peripheral nervous system areas and networks. A growing increase in the understanding of migraine pathophysiology in recent years has facilitated translation of that knowledge into novel treatments, which are currently becoming available to patients in many parts of the world and are substantially changing the clinical approach to the disease. In the first part of this review, we will provide an up to date overview of migraine pathophysiology by analyzing the anatomy and function of the main regions involved in the disease, focusing on how these give rise to the plethora of symptoms characterizing the attacks and overall disease. The second part of the paper will discuss the novel therapeutic agents that have emerged for the treatment of migraine, including molecules targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (gepants and monoclonal antibodies), serotonin 5-HT_1F receptor agonists (ditans) and non-invasive neuromodulation, as well as providing a brief overview of new evidence for classic migraine treatments.

Efficacy, safety and indirect comparisons of lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis to study the efficacy and safety of newly developed drugs for the acute treatment of migraine attacks.

METHODS

MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 11 February 2022. Phase 3 randomized controlled trials examining all formulations of lasmiditan, rimegepant and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of adults with migraine, were included. Data were extracted following the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Seven studies (SAMURAI, SPARTAN, CENTURION, Study 302, Study 303, ACHIEVE I and II) involving n = 12,859 patients were included. All treatments were superior in efficacy to placebo. Lasmiditan 200 mg showed the highest two-hour pain freedom, while two-hour freedom from most bothersome symptom was equally achieved by the higher doses of lasmiditan (100 and 200 mg), rimegepant and the higher doses of ubrogepant (50 and 100 mg). The odds of treatment-emergent adverse events were greatest with all doses of lasmiditan.

CONCLUSION

Lasmiditan 200 mg was the most effective intervention in the treatment of migraine attacks, although it was associated with high degrees of dizziness, nausea and somnolence. Rimegepant showed slightly lower, but similar efficacy rates to lasmiditan. Ubrogepant had overall the best tolerability profile. These conclusions are limited by the absence of head-to-head comparisons, limitations of individual trials and of the meta-analysis methodology itself.PROSPERO trial registration: CRD42022308224.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine in the USA: a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled multicentre trial

BACKGROUND

Intranasal formulations can provide treatment options for people with migraine in whom oral drugs are ineffective, slow-acting, or intolerable because of nausea and vomiting. Zavegepant, an intranasally administered small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, was previously assessed in a phase 2/3 trial. This phase 3 trial aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and timecourse of response for zavegepant nasal spray with placebo in the acute treatment of migraine.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trial, conducted at 90 academic medical centres, headache clinics, and independent research facilities in the USA, recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with a history of two to eight moderate or severe migraine attacks per month. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray or matching placebo and self-treated a single migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity. Randomisation was stratified by the use or non-use of preventive medication. Study centre personnel entered eligible participants into the study using an interactive web response system that was operated and managed by an independent contract research organisation. All participants, investigators, and the funder were masked to group assignment. The coprimary endpoints, freedom from pain and freedom from the most bothersome symptom at 2 h after the treatment dose, were assessed in all randomly assigned participants who took the study medication, had a migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity at baseline, and provided at least one evaluable post-baseline efficacy datapoint. Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04571060, and is closed to accrual.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 27, 2020, and Aug 20, 2021, 1978 participants were recruited and assessed for eligibility. 1405 participants were eligible (703 were assigned to zavegepant and 702 to placebo), and 1269 were included in the efficacy analysis set (623 in the zavegepant group and 646 in the placebo group). 2 h after the treatment dose, more participants in the zavegepant group than in the placebo group had pain freedom (147 [24%] of 623 participants vs 96 [15%] of 646 participants, risk difference 8·8 percentage points, 95% CI 4·5-13·1; p<0·0001) and freedom from their most bothersome symptom (247 [40%] vs 201 [31%], risk difference 8·7 percentage points, 3·4-13·9; p=0·0012). The most common adverse events in either treatment group (≥2%) were dysgeusia (129 [21%] of 629 in the zavegepant group vs 31 [5%] of 653 in the placebo group), nasal discomfort (23 [4%] vs five [1%]), and nausea (20 [3%] vs seven [1%]). No signal of hepatotoxicity due to zavegepant was identified.

INTERPRETATION

Zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray was efficacious in the acute treatment of migraine, with favourable tolerability and safety profiles. Additional trials are needed to establish the long-term safety and consistency of effect across attacks.

FUNDING

Biohaven Pharmaceuticals.