Impact of body size on first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication success using vonoprazan and amoxicillin dual therapy

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker-Based Dual, Triple, and Quadruple Regimens for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Infection Treatment: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

In the last few years, numerous new potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB)-based randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the first-line regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection treatment from various countries have been published. However, no network meta-analysis (NWM) exists, which examines the comparative efficacy and safety of P-CAB-based dual, triple, and quadruple treatments, and, therefore, in this NWM, we examined this matter comparing efficacy and safety of these P-CAB-based regimens.

METHODS

Databases were searched for identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion of relevant RCTs. Extracted data were entered into a Bayesian NWM, and the ranking order for each regimen was evaluated by means of the surface under the cumulative ranking area values.

RESULTS

Twenty-five eligible RCTs were included with 7,605 patients randomized to 6 first-line regimens, i.e. P-CAB dual therapy, P-CAB triple therapy, P-CAB quadruple therapy, PPI dual therapy, PPI triple therapy, and PPI quadruple therapy. The surface under the cumulative ranking area values (%) for these 6 regimens were 92.7, 62.5, 33.9, 75.1, 19.4, and 16.3, respectively. The comparative effectiveness ranking showed that P-CAB dual therapy regimen ranked first for efficacy and last for adverse effects and had the best profile for integrated efficacy-safety.

DISCUSSION

In this NWM concerning the comparative efficacy and safety of P-CAB-based dual, triple, and quadruple regimens for the first-line H. pylori infection treatment, the overall results showed that P-CAB-based dual treatment ranked first for efficacy with the best-integrated efficacy-safety profile. This is of importance, since the dual regimens overcome the crucial issue of clarithromycin resistance. Consequently, these findings are expected to be useful in helping clinical decision making and future guidelines.

Dual Therapies Containing an Antibiotic Plus a Proton Pump Inhibitor or Vonoprazan for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review

Due to the increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance, the efficacy of standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has declined, with eradication rates now falling below 80% in most countries. Although bismuth quadruple therapy and concomitant therapy are advised in regions with high clarithromycin resistance, these treatments commonly cause frequent adverse events and require the use of two or three antibiotics. This review article evaluates the effectiveness of 14-day mono-antibiotic therapies for H. pylori infection through randomized controlled trials conducted from 1 October 2014 to 1 October 2024. The pooled eradication rates for 14-day high-dose amoxicillin/proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dual therapies were 86.1% (3335/3875; 95% confidence interval (CI): 85.1-87.2%) by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 87.3% (3232/3702; 95% CI: 86.2-88.4%) by per-protocol (PP) analysis. For 14-day high-dose amoxicillin/vonoprazan dual therapies, the rates were 87.4% (1085/1241; 95% CI: 85.5-89.2%) by ITT and 93.0% (1044/1124; 95% CI: 91.5-94.5%) by PP. In the penicillin-allergic population, 14-day tetracycline/vonoprazan dual therapy showed eradication rates of 92.0% (138/150) by ITT and 95.1% (135/142) by PP. In conclusion, 14-day tetracycline/vonoprazan dual therapy presents an effective option for eradicating H. pylori in patients allergic to penicillin. For those without a penicillin allergy, first-line treatments can include 14-day mono-antibiotic regimens, such as high-dose amoxicillin/PPI dual, high-dose amoxicillin/vonoprazan dual, and tetracycline/vonoprazan dual therapies.

Efficacy of probiotics regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection increases the risks of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer diseases, and the incidence of gastric cancer. However, antibiotic resistance and adverse effects led to the emergence of alternative treatments such as probiotics supplementation. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of incorporating probiotics into the various eradication regimens for H. pylori.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science from inception to May 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing standard therapy (triple or quadrable therapy). for H. pylori with or without probiotic supplementation. Dichotomous data was reported using an odds ratio (OR) for intention-to-treat (ITT) and risk ratios (RR) for side effects with a 95 % confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

We included 91 RCTs involving 13,680 patients. Adding probiotics to standard treatment was associated with a higher H. pylori eradication rate in the ITT analysis (78.75 % vs 62.43 %, OR = 1.62, 95 % CI: 1.41 to 1.87, P < 0.0001), and per-protocol (PP) analysis (80.33 % vs 72.63 %, OR = 1.60, 95 % CI: 1.34 to 1.91, P < 0.0001). Meanwhile, dyspepsia, gastric ulcer, and peptic ulcer were comparable in both groups. The probiotics group was associated with significantly fewer side effects including, abdominal pain (RR = 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.54 to 0.86), bad taste (RR = 0.64, 95 % CI: 0.53 to 0.78), diarrhea (RR = 0.49, 95 % CI: 0.40 to 0.61), epigastric pain/bloating (RR = 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.65 to 0.88), headache/dizziness (RR = 0.46, 95 % CI: 0.29 to 0.74), (RR = 0.65, 95 % CI: 0.55 to 0.77), or nausea/vomiting (RR = 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.56 to 0.83). The network meta-analysis showed that, compared to the placebo, Bifidobacterium longum had the highest efficacy in eradicating H. pylori (ITT: 81.06 % vs 64.88 %, PP: 88 % vs 75.71 %) (OR = 2.52, 95 % CI: 1.18 to 5.49).

CONCLUSION

Adding probiotics to standard H. pylori therapy not only increased the rate of eradication but also reduced some of the adverse reactions throughout therapy, particularly nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, epigastric pain/bloating, and taste issues.

Ten-day versus 14-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin high-dose dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in China: A multicenter, open-label, randomized study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Only a few studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of different durations of vonoprazan and amoxicillin (VA) high-dose dual therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 10 days versus 14 days of VA high-dose dual therapy for H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

This study was conducted in 14 centers in China. A total of 250 patients infected with H. pylori were randomly assigned to Group VA-10 or VA-14. Both groups received the VA dual therapy (vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1000 mg three times daily). The primary endpoint was the H. pylori eradication rate. Secondary endpoints included adverse events and patient compliance.

RESULTS

Group VA-10 achieved eradication rates of 89.60%, 91.06%, and 91.67% as determined by the intention-to-treat (ITT), modified intention-to-treat (MITT), and per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. The eradication rates were similar to those in Group VA-14: 91.20%, 93.44%, and 93.39%. The difference and 90% confidence interval boundary -1.60% (-7.73% to 4.53%) in the ITT analysis, -2.39% (-8.00% to 3.23%) in the MITT analysis, and -1.72% (-7.29% to 3.85%) in the PP analysis were greater than the predefined noninferiority margin of -10%, establishing a noninferiority of Group VA-10 versus Group VA-14 (noninferiority P = 0.001 in ITT analysis, P < 0.001 in MITT analysis, and P < 0.001 in PP analysis, respectively). No significant differences were observed in adverse events between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ten-day VA dual therapy achieves comparable efficacy and safety to the 14-day regimen in Chinese population, providing patients with greater convenience and economic benefits.

Effectiveness and safety of vonoprazan and amoxicillin dual regimen with Saccharomyces boulardii supplements on eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Currently, Vonoprazan (VPZ) and amoxicillin dual regimen (VA-dual) has not achieved satisfied efficacy as the first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in China. Thus, we aimed to determine the effect of VA-dual plus Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) on H. pylori eradication rate.

METHODS

Naive H. pylori-infected patients were randomly allocated to the ECAB group [20-mg esomeprazole, 500-mg clarithromycin, 1000-mg amoxicillin, and 220-mg bismuth twice/day for 14 days] or the VAS group [20-mg VPZ twice/day, 750-mg amoxicillin three times/day, and 250-mg S. boulardii twice/day for 10 days]. Factors associated with eradication success were explored, and cost-effectiveness analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

Herein, 126 patients were finally included and randomly assigned to the two groups in a 1:1 ratio. The H. pylori eradication rates of VAS and ECAB groups by intention-to-treat analysis were 87.3% and 88.9% (P = 1.000) and by per-protocol analysis were 87.3% and 91.8% (P = 0.560), respectively. The ECAB group had a significantly higher incidence of adverse events than the VAS group. Superior H. pylori eradication in the VAS group was related to small body surface area and being a non-smoker. The cost-effectiveness ratio of the VAS group was less than that of the ECAB group.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of S. boulardii to VA-dual for 10 days is as effective as the 14-days bismuth-based quadruple regimen while ensuring fewer adverse events and lesser cost. This regimen is particularly suitable for low-BSA patients or non-smokers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical trial Registry No. ChiCTR2100055101 31/12/2021.

Relationship between obesity severity and Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgery: A post hoc analysis

BACKGROUND

The global prevalence of obesity is increasing and represents a major public health challenge. However, there is a paucity of data regarding Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) eradication in people with obesity. The aim of the study is to examine the influence of obesity degree on H. pylori eradication in patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgery.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis was conducted in a cohort of 204 adults patients (129 individuals diagnosed with obesity, 75 normal weight) H. pylori positive, included in two multicenter, prospective studies. Patients underwent a 14-day quadruple concomitant treatment, and H. pylori eradication was assessed using the 13C-urea breath test. The cohort was stratified according to body mass index (BMI), and statistical analyses were performed using chi-squared test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Eradication rates were significantly lower in patients with obesity compared with normal weight individuals (68.2% vs. 88.0%, OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.63, p < 0.01). Furthermore, within the population diagnosed with obesity, the degree of obesity correlated with decreased eradication rates, with class 3 (BMI 40.0-49.9) and class 4 (BMI ≥ 50.0) obesity showing the lowest rates (67% and 51%, with an OR 0.28 and 0.15 respectively, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that obesity may influence H. pylori eradication, especially among severe obesity patients undergoing bariatric surgery, which could have implications for the development of ulcers and gastritis as well as the risk of gastric cancer. Tailored eradication strategies may be necessary to improve treatment efficacy in this population.

Microparticles and nanoparticles-based approaches to improve oral treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori is a gram-negative, spiral-shaped, flagellated bacterium that colonizes the stomach of half the world's population. Helicobacter pylori infection causes pathologies of varying severity. Standard oral therapy fails in 15-20% since the barriers of the oral route decrease the bioavailability of antibiotics and the intrinsic factors of bacteria increase the rates of resistance. Nanoparticles and microparticles are promising strategies for drug delivery into the gastric mucosa and targeting H. pylori. The variety of building blocks creates systems with distinct colloidal, surface, and biological properties. These features improve drug-pathogen interactions, eliminate drug depletion and overuse, and enable the association of multiple actives combating H. pylori on several fronts. Nanoparticles and microparticles are successfully used to overcome the barriers of the oral route, physicochemical inconveniences, and lack of selectivity of current therapy. They have proven efficient in employing promising anti-H. pylori compounds whose limitation is oral route instability, such as some antibiotics and natural products. However, the current challenge is the applicability of these strategies in clinical practice. For this reason, strategies employing a rational design are necessary, including in the development of nano- and microsystems for the oral route.

The impact of secondhand smoke on failure of Helicobacter pylori therapy is not inferior to that of smoking

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown the associations between smoking and failure to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), but less is known about the impact of secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) on H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

Between July 2022 to July 2023, 646 patients who received proton pump inhibitor (PPIs) as first-line H. pylori eradication therapy were recruited for the study. Information was obtained via the hospital database and a telephone questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were used to examine risk factors of H. pylori eradication failure.

RESULTS

This was a single-center retrospective study consisting of 646 patients who received PPIs as first-line H. pylori eradication therapy. This included 122 smokers, 165 never-smokers with SHS, and 359 never-smokers with no SHS exposure. Compared with subjects in the "eradication success" group, those in the "eradication failure" group tended to have higher prevalence of smoke consumption and have higher prevalence of SHS exposure. In binary logistic regression analysis, smoking (OR 3.409, 95 % CI: 1.782- 6.522, P < 0.001) and SHS (OR 3.188, 95 % CI: 1.726-5.886, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of eradication failure. In addition, never-smokers with SHS exposure and smoking had similar effects on H. pylori eradication (OR, 0.893; 95 % CI, 0.464 to 1.717, P value = 0.734).

CONCLUSION

Both smoking and SHS are independent risk factors for H. pylori eradication failure. Furthermore, the impact of SHS is not inferior to smoking.

Crises in Antimicrobial Stewardship: Misuse of Clarithromycin for Helicobacter pylori Therapy

Helicobacter pylori is a class I carcinogen that infects more than 100 million individuals in the United States. Antimicrobial therapy for H. pylori has typically been prescribed empirically rather than based on susceptibility testing. Until recently, therapeutic recommendations have generally ignored the principles of antibiotic stewardship. A combination of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (triple therapy) remains popular despite increasing clarithromycin resistance and poor cure rates. Concomitant therapy (a PPI, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole) is recommended and widely used despite all patients receiving at least one unneeded antibiotic. In 2020, the Food and Drug Administration approved vonoprazan, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin triple therapy, which administers unneeded clarithromycin to >90% of patients (i.e., ~6 tons of unneeded clarithromycin/million treatments). In the late 1980s, the infectious disease community functionally transferred responsibility for the management of H. pylori to gastroenterology, which has managed the infection as another common gastrointestinal disease such as constipation. In 2022, both traditional and noninvasive molecular-based susceptibility testing for H. pylori became available in the United States. In order to reduce and prevent antibiotic misuse, the infectious disease community should reclaim responsibility for the management of this important infectious disease.

Comparison of vonoprazan-based with rabeprazole-based dual therapy for treatment-naive patients of Helicobacter pylori infection: a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

The application of vonoprazan significantly improved the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of the 10-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) and 14-day rabeprazole-amoxicillin (RA) dual therapy, and to provide a more efficient, safer, and convenient dual regimen for H. pylori infection.

METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label, multi-center, randomized controlled study of treatment-naive patients with H. pylori infection. The participants were randomly assigned to the 10-day VA group with vonoprazan 20 mg Bid plus amoxicillin 1 g Tid or the 14-day RA group with rabeprazole 10 mg Tid plus amoxicillin 1 g Tid. The effectiveness, the adverse events, and the patient compliance of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 690 patients were enrolled. The eradication rates of 10-day VA and 14-day RA dual therapy were 89.3% and 84.9% in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (P = 0.088); 90.6% and 85.9% by modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis (P = 0.059); 91.4% and 86.6% by per-protocol (PP) analysis (P = 0.047). Non-inferiority was confirmed between the two groups (all P < 0.001). No discernible differences were observed in adverse effects and compliance between groups. Poor compliance reduced the eradication efficacy (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-day VA dual therapy was non-inferior to the 14-day RA dual therapy for H. pylori treatment-naive patients, which should be given priority in the first-line treatment. The application of vonoprazan reduced treatment course and antibiotic use. Patients' adherence was crucial for the success of eradication.

Alcohol increases treatment failure for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Asian populations

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Whether alcohol intake is associated with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication failure remains controversial, and this meta-analysis was aimed at investigating the effect of alcohol on the risk of H. pylori eradication failure.

METHODS

Relevant studies were systematically screened for and retrieved from PubMed and Web of Science (updated to January 2022), and relevant references were manually reviewed. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Subgroup, publication bias, and sensitivity analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No significant association was found between alcohol consumption and the risk of H. pylori eradication failure (OR = 1.09, 95% CI, 0.94-1.26). However, in subgroup analyses stratified by region, a positive association was found in Asian patients (OR = 1.23, 95% CI, 1.03-1.47). In Asian patients, alcohol consumption was associated with the risk of H. pylori eradication failure when the duration of therapy was > 7 days (OR = 1.17, 95% CI, 1.10-1.25), when the treatment regimen included nitroimidazoles (OR = 1.16, 95% CI, 1.09-1.24), and when patients were treated with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (OR = 1.17, 95% CI, 1.10-1.25). Alcohol intake > 40 g/day was associated with H. pylori eradication failure (OR = 3.17, 95% CI, 1.56-6.41). Moreover, in Asian patients who were administered a vonoprazan (VPZ)-based therapy regimen, alcohol consumption had no effect on H. pylori eradication rates (OR = 1.73, 95% CI, 0.98-3.05).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis clearly showed that a higher daily alcohol intake was associated with a higher risk of H. pylori eradication failure in Asian populations. Moreover, a VPZ-based treatment regimen can prevent this effect.

Optimizing Helicobacter pylori Treatment: An Updated Review of Empirical and Susceptibility Test-Based Treatments

As the rate of discovery of drug-resistant Helicobacter pylori cases increases worldwide, the relevant societies have updated their guidelines for primary eradication regimens. A promising strategy against drug-resistant H. pylori is tailored therapy based on the results of an antibiotic susceptibility test; however, it is difficult to apply this strategy to all cases. Although culture-based antibiotic susceptibility tests can assess resistance to any antimicrobial agent, their greatest disadvantage is the time required to draw a conclusion. In contrast, molecular-based methods, such as polymerase chain reaction, can rapidly determine the presence of resistance, although a single test can only test for one type of antimicrobial agent. Additionally, the limited availability of facilities for molecular-based methods has hindered their widespread use. Therefore, low-cost, minimally invasive, simple, and effective primary regimens are needed. Several studies have compared the efficacy of the latest primary eradication regimens against that of tailored therapies, and their results have shaped guidelines. This article reviews the latest research on empirical and tailored treatments for H. pylori infections. Evidence for the superiority of tailored therapy over empirical therapy is still limited and varies by region and treatment regimen. A network meta-analysis comparing different empirical treatment regimens showed that vonoprazan triple therapy provides a superior eradication effect. Recently, favorable results towards vonoprazan dual therapy have been reported, as it reached eradication levels similar to those of vonoprazan triple therapy. Both vonoprazan dual therapy and tailored therapy based on antibiotic susceptibility tests could contribute to future treatment strategies.

The efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy for radically eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori).

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge  Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases were searched up to July 7, 2022, to identify clinical trials comparing the efficacy of VA dual therapy and triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. After evaluating the quality of the included studies, random effects models were conducted, and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the efficacy and safety of each approach.

RESULTS

Six publications (including four randomized controlled trials) involving 2019 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the eradication rate for VA dual therapy was 89.9%, while it was 85.2% for triple therapy based on other acid inhibitors. The eradication rate of H. pylori in the VA dual regimen group was higher than that in the PPI-based (omeprazole or lansoprazole) triple therapy group (RR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.23, p < 0.0001). However, the efficacy of VA dual therapy was comparable with VA-Clarithromycin (VAC) triple therapy (RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.93-1.02). Besides, the incidence of adverse reactions in VA dual therapy was also lower than that in triple therapy (RR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.91, p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSION

Compared with PPI-based triple therapy, VA dual therapy showed a better therapeutic effect, safety and patient compliance rate for eradicating H. pylori, which should be used as a novel curative strategy in the future.

Therapeutic eradication choices in Helicobacter pylori infection in children

Current recommendations on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication in children differ from adults. In H. pylori-infected adults, the eradication is always recommended because of the risk to develop gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal associated diseases. Instead, before treating infected children, we should consider all the possible causes and not merely focus on H. pylori infection. Indeed, pediatric international guidelines do not recommend the test and treat strategy in children. Therefore, gastroscopy with antimicrobial susceptibility testing by culture on gastric biopsies should be performed before starting the eradication therapy in children to better evaluate all the possible causes of the symptomatology and to increase the eradication rate. Whether antibiotic susceptibility testing is not available, gastroscopy is anyway recommended to better set any possible cause of symptoms and not simply focus on the presence of H. pylori. In children the lower antibiotics availability compared to adults forces to treat based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing to minimize the unsuccessful rates. The main antibiotics used in children are amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole in various combinations. In empirical treatment, triple therapy for 14 days based either on local antimicrobial susceptibility or on personal antibiotic history is generally recommended. Triple therapy with high dose of amoxicillin is a valid alternative choice, either in double resistance or in second-line treatment. Moving from therapeutic regimens used in adults, we could also select quadruple therapy with or without bismuth salts. However, all the treatment regimens often entail unpleasant side effects and lower compliance in children. In this review, the alternative and not yet commonly used therapeutic choices in children were also analyzed.

The Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan and Amoxicillin Dual Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

The eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection remains challenging due to increasing bacterial resistance. Resistance rates to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin were higher than 30% in the USA, making current therapies less effective. Vonoprazan triple therapy (VAC) has demonstrated similar efficacy and safety profiles compared to PPI-based triple therapy (PPI). However, the eradication rate of vonoprazan dual therapy (VA) for H. pylori infection in comparison to VAC, and PPI was poorly established. Electronic databases were searched up to 6 October 2022, to identify studies examining the safety and efficacy of VA compared to VAC and PPI. Six studies were included. For empiric therapies among treatment naïve patients, VA, VAC, and PPI did not achieve high cure rates (>90%). The comparative efficacy ranking showed VAC was the most effective therapy, followed by VA, and PPI. The results were similar for clarithromycin-resistant infections. The comparative safety ranking showed VA ranked first, whereas PPI triple therapy was the least safe regimen. These findings should guide the selection of the most effective and safe treatment and conduct additional studies to determine the place of vonoprazan dual versus triple therapies in patients with H. pylori from various countries across the world.

Fourteen-day vonoprazan and low- or high-dose amoxicillin dual therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection: A prospective, open-labeled, randomized non-inferiority clinical study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We previously reported that vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy for 7 or 10 days is not satisfactorily efficacious for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. We aimed to explore the efficacy of VA dual therapy for 14 days as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection.

METHODS

This was a single center, prospective, open-labeled, randomized non-inferiority clinical study conducted in China. Treatment naïve H. pylori infected patients were randomized into two groups: 20 mg vonoprazan (VPZ) b.i.d. in combination with low-dose (1000 mg b.i.d.) or high-dose (1000 mg t.i.d) amoxicillin for 14 days. 13C-urea breath tests were used to access the cure rate at least 4 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients were assessed and 110 subjects were randomized. The eradication rate of VPZ with b.i.d. amoxicillin or t.i.d. amoxicillin for 14 days was 89.1% and 87.3% by intention-to-treat analysis, respectively, and 94.1% and 95.9% by per-protocol analysis, respectively. The eradication rate and incidence of adverse events were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

VPZ with b.i.d. or t.i.d. amoxicillin for 14 days provides satisfactory efficacy as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection in China.

Dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

ABSTRACT

Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) has long been recommended for Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) eradication in China. Meanwhile, in the latest national consensus in China, dual therapy (DT) comprising an acid suppressor and amoxicillin has also been recommended. In recent years, the eradication rate of H. pylori has reached >90% using DT, which has been used not only as a first-line treatment but also as a rescue treatment. Compared with BQT, DT has great potential for H. pylori eradication; however, it has some limitations. This review summarizes the development of DT and its application in H. pylori eradication. The H. pylori eradication rates of DT were comparable to or even higher than those of BQT or standard triple therapy, especially in the first-line treatment. The incidence of adverse events associated with DT was lower than that with other therapies. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the effects of dual and quadruple therapies on gastrointestinal microecology. In the short term, H. pylori eradication causes certain fluctuations in the gastrointestinal microbiota; however, in the long term, the gastrointestinal microbiota eventually returns to its normal state. In the penicillin-naïve population, patients receiving DT have a high eradiation rate, better compliance, lower incidence of adverse reactions, and lower primary and secondary resistance to amoxicillin. These findings suggest the safety, efficacy, and potential of DT for H. pylori eradication.

Ten-Day Vonoprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Therapy as a First-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection Compared With Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy

INTRODUCTION

No study has investigated the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy compared with bismuth quadruple therapy (B-quadruple). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 10-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy as a first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection compared with B-quadruple and to explore the optimal dosage of amoxicillin in the dual therapy.

METHODS

A total of 375 treatment-naive, H. pylori-infected subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio into 3 regimen groups including VHA-dual (vonoprazan 20 mg twice/day + amoxicillin 750 mg 4 times/day), VA-dual (vonoprazan 20 mg + amoxicillin 1,000 mg twice/day), and B-quadruple (esomeprazole 20 mg + bismuth 200 mg + amoxicillin 1,000 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg twice/day). Eradication rates, adverse events (AEs), and compliance were compared between 3 groups.

RESULTS

The eradication rates of B-quadruple, VHA-dual, and VA-dual were 90.9%, 93.4%, and 85.1%, respectively, by per-protocol analysis; 89.4%, 92.7%, and 84.4%, respectively, by modified intention-to-treat analysis; 88.0%, 91.2%, and 82.4%, respectively, by intention-to-treat analysis. The efficacy of the VHA-dual group was not inferior to the B-quadruple group (P < 0.001), but VA-dual did not reach a noninferiority margin of -10%. The AEs rates of the B-quadruple group were significantly higher than those of the VHA-dual (P = 0.012) and VA-dual (P = 0.001) groups. There was no significant difference in medication compliance among 3 treatment groups (P = 0.995).

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-day VHA-dual therapy provided satisfactory eradication rates of >90%, lower AEs rates, and similar adherence compared with B-quadruple therapy as a first-line therapy for H. pylori infection. However, the efficacy of VA-dual therapy was not acceptable.

Vonoprazan Triple and Dual Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection in the United States and Europe: Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Novel, effective treatments for Helicobacter pylori infection are needed. This study evaluated the efficacy of vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, vs standard treatment on H pylori eradication in the United States and Europe.

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled, phase 3 trial, treatment-naïve adults with H pylori infection were randomized 1:1:1 to open-label vonoprazan dual therapy (20 mg vonoprazan twice daily; 1 g amoxicillin 3 times daily), or double-blind triple therapy twice a day (vonoprazan 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg; amoxicillin 1 g; clarithromycin 500 mg) for 14 days. The primary outcome was noninferiority in eradication rates in patients without clarithromycin- and amoxicillin-resistant strains (noninferiority margin = 10%). Secondary outcomes assessed superiority in eradication rates in clarithromycin-resistant infections, and in all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 1046 patients were randomized. Primary outcome eradication rates (nonresistant strains): vonoprazan triple therapy 84.7%, dual therapy 78.5%, vs lansoprazole triple therapy 78.8% (both noninferior; difference 5.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to 12.6; P < .001; difference -0.3%; 95% CI, -7.4 to 6.8; P = .007, respectively). Eradication rates in clarithromycin-resistant infections: vonoprazan triple therapy 65.8%, dual therapy 69.6%, vs lansoprazole triple therapy 31.9% (both superior; difference 33.9%; 95% CI, 17.7-48.1; P < .001; difference 37.7%; 95% CI, 20.5-52.6; P < .001, respectively). In all patients, vonoprazan triple and dual therapy were superior to lansoprazole triple therapy (80.8% and 77.2%, respectively, vs 68.5%, difference 12.3%; 95% CI, 5.7-18.8; P < .001; difference 8.7%; 95% CI, 1.9-15.4; P = .013). Overall frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between vonoprazan and lansoprazole regimens (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Both vonoprazan-based regimens were superior to proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy in clarithromycin-resistant strains and in the overall study population.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; NCT04167670.

Rabeprazole plus amoxicillin dual therapy is equally effective to bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in central China: A single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistance emerges as a major issue for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment. High-dose dual therapy has recently shown encouraging results in H. pylori eradication, but it has yet to be validated in this H. pylori highly infected area; it is also not known if this concept can be extended to antibiotics other than amoxicillin, and factors that affect the eradication. We investigate if rabeprazole plus amoxicillin or furazolidone regimens could be a first-line therapy for H. pylori eradication, and factors that affect the curing rate.

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective, open-label, randomized-controlled trial. Naive patients (n=292) were randomly treated with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT), rabeprazole plus amoxicillin (RADT), or furazolidone (RFDT) groups. RADT and FADT use three times daily regimens. H. pylori diagnosis and eradication were determined and confirmed by ¹³ C-urea breath test.

RESULTS

In per-protocol (PP) analysis, H. pylori eradication rate was 91.2% in BQT group, 89.6% in RADT, and 51.0% in RFDT group. In intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, infection was eradicated in 86.7% of patients in BQT group, 85.8% in RADT, and 48.1% in RFDT groups, respectively. Noninferiority was confirmed between BQT and RADT groups. The incidence of side effects in BQT group was significantly higher than that in RADT group. Successful eradication was associated with lower body surface area (BSA) and low body mass index (BMI) in BQT group. Smoking and high BSA index reduced H. pylori eradication rate in RADT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Rabeprazole-amoxicillin dual therapy is equally effective to the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication with fewer side effects and saves use of one antibiotic per each treatment. Successful eradication is also associated with low BSA and non-smoking condition, which deserves future stratified analysis for refinement and optimization.

Cross-roads for meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of H. pylori therapy

Helicobacter pylori infections are responsible for tremendous morbidity and mortality worldwide, leading to efforts to eradicate the organism. However, the effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy has been undermined by the progressive development of antimicrobial resistance. Treatments and treatment guidelines have been based on traditional pairwise meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. More recently, network meta-analyses have also been used in an attempt to provide useful information to the clinician regarding which therapies appear best and which to avoid as the least efficacious. However, both forms of meta-analysis have been undermined by the same problems including the poor quality of the clinical trials using unoptimised regimens and incomparable comparisons related to marked geographic and ethnic genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity. In addition, the comparator regimens often consist of invalid strawman comparisons. New approaches concerning H. pylori treatment and analysis of therapies are needed. H. pylori therapies should be based on antimicrobial stewardship, as in other infectious diseases. This approach requires the use of only optimised therapies proven to be reliably highly effective in the local population (eg, a cure rate of >90%) for both the study and the comparator regimens. Meta-analyses should be restricted to regimens that meet these criteria and must take into account the presence of marked geographical and host genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. In addition, to provide clinically relevant results, treatment outcomes should focus on, and present, actual cure rates in addition to odd ratios.

Impact of smoking on the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although the association between the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and smoking has been confirmed through a meta-analysis, many new studies have reported inconsistent conclusions. An up-to-date meta-analysis based on published relevant studies was conducted in this study to address this issue.

METHODS

Eligible studies up to January 2021 were screened and retrieved using PubMed and Web of Science as well as by performing a manual review of references. We calculated the pooled odd ratios (OR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Begg's test was used to determine the publication bias.

RESULTS

In total, 39 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that smoking increases the failure rate of H. pylori eradication treatment (OR = 1.70, 95%CI, 1.49-1.93). The risk of failure also increases with an increase in the smoking dose (>5 cigarettes per day) (OR = 2.59, 95%CI, 1.28-5.24) and the current smoking status (continued to smoke during treatment) (OR = 2.49, 95%CI, 1.52-4.06). Studies with a large proportion of patients with peptic ulcer (OR = 2.14, 95%CI, 1.51-3.02) revealed a higher failure rate among smokers than those with a low proportion of patients with peptic ulcer (OR = 1.57, 95%CI, 1.36-1.81). When vonoprazan (VPZ) was used to treat H. pylori infection, smoking did not affect the eradication rate (OR = 0.94, 95%CI, 0.51-1.75).

CONCLUSION

Smoking increases the failure rate of H. pylori eradication treatment. The risk of H. pylori eradication failure in smokers increases with a current smoking status and a high smoking dose. However, when VPZ is used to treat the H. pylori infection, smoking has no effect on the eradication rate.

The Ideal Helicobacter pylori Treatment for the Present and the Future

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication treatments are widely performed to improve gastric mucosal inflammation, promote ulcer healing, and reduce the incidence of gastric cancer. However, there are several issues associated with H. pylori eradication treatment. First, various treatment regimens are currently used worldwide, and the standard treatment varies with region and country. Second, the antimicrobial resistance of H. pylori is increasing due to indiscriminate antibiotic use. Finally, gut microbiota dysbiosis is potentially induced by H. pylori treatment.

SUMMARY

Based on current international guidelines and a network meta-analysis comparing the effects of various treatment regimens, nonbismuth quadruple therapies for 10-14 days and vonoprazan-based triple therapy for 7 days are the currently recommended H. pylori treatment regimens. These regimens show good eradication rates of approximately 90%, even in areas where antimicrobial-resistant strains are highly prevalent. However, these regimens still have inherent drawbacks that may promote further increases in antimicrobial resistance and induce gut microbiota dysbiosis because of the empiric use of multiple antibiotics. Key Message: The ideal concept for the present and future H. pylori eradication treatment involves "a simple, cost-effective strategy that fosters compliance without having a negative impact on the gut microbiota or contributing to future antimicrobial resistance." One interesting possibility that may fulfill this concept is a dual therapy involving vonoprazan and amoxicillin. This is the simplest treatment regimen that provides acceptable eradication rates, improves safety and tolerability, and minimizes the potential for increasing antimicrobial resistance or causing gut microbiota dysbiosis.