Low-dose or high-dose amoxicillin in vonoprazan-based dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Real-world evidence on the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori treatment in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

A dual therapy regimen containing amoxicillin is a common treatment option for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). While substantial research supports the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan and amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy in the general population, there is still a lack of studies specifically focusing on its safety in elderly patients.

AIM

To evaluate efficacy and safety of VA dual therapy as first-line or rescue treatment for H. pylori in elderly patients.

METHODS

As a real-world retrospective study, data were collected from elderly patients aged 60 years and above who accepted VA dual therapy (vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1000 mg thrice daily for 14 days) for H. pylori eradication in the Department of Gastroenterology at Peking University First Hospital between June 2020 and January 2024. H. pylori status was evaluated by 13C-urease breath test 6 weeks after treatment. All adverse events (AEs) during treatment were recorded.

RESULTS

In total, 401 cases were screened. Twenty-one cases were excluded due to loss to follow-up, lack of re-examination, or unwillingness to take medication. The total of 380 included cases comprised 250 who received VA dual therapy as first-line treatment and 130 who received VA dual therapy as rescue treatment. H. pylori was successfully eradicated in 239 cases (95.6%) in the first-line treatment group and 116 cases (89.2%) in the rescue treatment group. The overall incidence of AEs was 9.5% for both groups. Specifically, 9.2% of patients experienced an AE in the first-line treatment group and 10.0% in the rescue treatment group. Five patients discontinued treatment due to AE, with a discontinuation rate of 1.3%. No serious AE occurred.

CONCLUSION

The VA dual therapy regimen as a first-line treatment and a rescue therapy was effective and safe for elderly patients aged 60 and older.

Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan and high-dose amoxicillin dual therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Vonoprazan is a new acid-suppressing drug that provides an additional choice for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. The effectiveness and safety of vonoprazan and high-dose amoxicillin (VHA) dual therapy requires study in a systematic analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to 16 May 2024. Trials comparing H. pylori eradication rates, adverse events, and compliance of VHA dual therapy with that of other therapies were included. RevMan 5.4 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and two retrospective clinical studies with 4570 samples were included. VHA dual therapy had superior H. pylori eradication rates (intention-to-treat [ITT]: 86.0% vs. 80.7%; odds ratio [OR]=1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.73; P=0.01; per-protocol [PP]: 90.6% vs. 85.7%; OR=1.42; 95% CI 1.07-1.88; P=0.02), fewer adverse events (15.4% vs. 27.7%; OR=0.49; 95% CI 0.35-0.68, P<0.0001), and similar compliance (94.6% vs. 93.2%; OR=1.27; 95% CI 0.98-1.64; P=0.07) compared with other guideline therapies. According to subgroup analysis with PP data, VHA dual therapy is more effective than bismuth quadruple therapy based on proton-pump inhibitors (P-BQT) (93.5% vs. 89.3%; OR=1.76; 95% CI 1.03-3.00; P=0.04). In addition, the eradication rates for 7-day, 10-day and 14-day VHA dual therapy were 65% (95% CI 0.55-0.75), 92% (95% CI 0.91-0.94) and 93% (95% CI 0.90-0.97), respectively.

CONCLUSION

VHA dual therapy for 10 or 14 days showed superior efficacy and safety compared with therapies recommended by the guidelines and should be prioritised for adoption.

Comparison of Amoxicillin Administered Twice versus Four Times a Day in First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication Using Tegoprazan, Clarithromycin, and Bismuth: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

This study aimed to investigate the effects of different amoxicillin (AMX) dosing schedules on bismuth quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori treatment-naïve patients. A total of 139 H. pylori-infected patients received a 2-week eradication regimen consisting of 50 mg tegoprazan, 500 mg clarithromycin, and 300 mg bismuth tripotassium dicitrate twice daily, 1000 mg AMX twice daily (BID group), or 500 mg AMX four times daily (QID group). We performed a urea breath test to evaluate H. pylori eradication eight weeks after treatment and compared the H. pylori eradication rate, patient compliance, and adverse drug events between the BID and QID groups. Based on propensity score matching, 114 and 100 patients were included in intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, respectively. The H. pylori eradication rate did not differ significantly according to the ITT (82.5% vs. 87.7%, p = 0.429) and PP (95.9% vs. 98.0%, p = 0.536) analyses between the BID and QID groups. No significant differences were found in treatment compliance or adverse drug event rates between the two groups. In conclusion, the eradication rate of first-line H. pylori therapy containing tegoprazan, clarithromycin, and bismuth was not affected by AMX dosing schedules administered twice and four times daily.

Efficacy and safety of Vonoprazan-based treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the nine most widely studied Vonoprazan (VPZ)-based treatment regimens along with traditional Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based treatment regimens in eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

DESIGN

Through searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, we exclusively included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the efficacy of VPZ-based and PPI-based therapies for H. pylori infection. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly.

RESULTS

The RCTs were collected from the earliest available date up to August 2023. Twenty-one RCTs were included, with a total sample size of 5481. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that the eradication rate of the VPZ-based quadruple 14-day (VPZ-Q14) treatment regimen in Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was the highest (SUCRA: 0.874); The eradication rate of the VPZ-based quadruple 10-day (VPZ-Q10) treatment plan in Per-protocol (PP) analysis was the highest (SUCRA: 0.849). All regimens were well tolerated without significant differences. According to the probability ranking of safety, high-dose VPZ-based dual 14-day therapy (H-VPZ-D14) ranked first in SUCRA, reaching 0.952. This indicates that H-VPZ-D14 treatment is the safest with a relatively low incidence of adverse effect. Therefore, VPZ-based therapies not only have a higher eradication rate, but also possess satisfactory safety.

CONCLUSION

Compared with traditional PPI-based therapies, VPZ-based therapies have shown superior eradication effects. Based on the Ranking Plot of the Network, the VPZ-Q14 or VPZ-Q10 treatment regimen for H. pylori has a higher eradication rate and acceptable differences compared to other treatment regimens. In addition, for regions with high antibiotic resistance rates, we recommend a 14-day quadruple therapy with bismuth based on VPZ.