Primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in India over the past two decades: A systematic review

A survey of practice patterns and adherence to national and international guidelines on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection among gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows in India

BACKGROUND

Patients and primary care providers alike benefit greatly from the expertise of gastroenterologists when it comes to managing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. However, information on gastroenterologists' practices in the management of H. pylori infection is scarce in this part of the world. This study aimed at evaluating the practice patterns of gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows in India.

METHOD

This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey of gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows working in India.

RESULTS

Total 207 gastroenterologists and 53 fellows filled out the questionnaire. Responses were received from all around India. Approximately 70% of respondents perceive H. pylori to be a gastric pathogen, while 20% regard it as a commensal bacterium. While the proportion of respondents who chose a test and treat method (34.6%) for uninvestigated dyspepsia without alarm symptoms was comparable to empirical proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (38.8%), about one-fifth chose a scope and treat strategy in this setting. Even in the absence of alarm signs, more than half of respondents (61.5%) preferred endoscopic biopsy to detect H. pylori. While rapid urease testing (RUT) was the preferred modality (80%) for detecting H. pylori, about one-third preferred single-site RUT (from the antrum). Only 40% followed the Updated Sydney protocol, while performing biopsies and a majority (78.8%) are unable to discontinue PPIs before testing for H. pylori. PPI-clarithromycin-based triple treatment was the preferred regimen (67%) for first-line eradication, while nearly a quarter of respondents did not utilize bismuth due to concerns about adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

The survey reveals a lack of adherence to the current H. pylori guidelines for diagnosis, testing and treatment among gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows in India. It is vital that scientific societies simplify guidelines, investigate challenges to their effective implementation and execute targeted interventions to increase adherence.

Overcoming antibiotic-resistant Helicobacter pylori infection: Current challenges and emerging approaches

Recent studies have shown a noticeable increase in global Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) resistance, with clarithromycin resistance surpassing 15% in various areas. However, inadequate epidemiological monitoring, especially in developing countries, and the absence of uniform testing methods lead to discrepancies between regions and a possible underestimation of resistance levels. The complexity of treating H. pylori is driven by its highly dynamic genome, which is prone to frequent mutations contributing to phenotypical resistance. The usual course of action in empirical treatment involves using a combination of various drugs simultaneously, leading to significant resistance selection pressure and potential side effects. The emergence of H. pylori strains resistant to multiple drugs is closely tied to failures in first-line treatment, highlighting the need to prevent further resistance by using optimal initial empirical therapy or regimens guided by antibiotic susceptibility testing, requiring a collection of mixed samples and multiple isolates for accurate assessment. The emergence of new treatments like potassium-competitive acid blockers offers a hopeful approach to decrease antimicrobial usage while still ensuring effectiveness in comparison to traditional therapies with proton pump inhibitors. Additionally, the use of probiotics is under investigation to identify specific strains and formulations that may mitigate therapy-associated adverse effects.

Looking Back, Moving Forward: Challenges and Opportunities for Global Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control

Despite the introduction of Pap testing for screening to prevent cervical cancer in the mid-20th century, cervical cancer remains a common cause of cancer-related mortality and morbidity globally. This is primarily due to differences in access to screening and care between low-income and high-income resource settings, resulting in cervical cancer being one of the cancers with the greatest health disparity. The discovery of human papillomavirus (HPV) as the near-obligate viral cause of cervical cancer can revolutionize how it can be prevented: HPV vaccination against infection for prophylaxis and HPV testing-based screening for the detection and treatment of cervical pre-cancers for interception. As a result of this progress, the World Health Organization has championed the elimination of cervical cancer as a global health problem. However, unless research, investments, and actions are taken to ensure equitable global access to these highly effective preventive interventions, there is a real threat to exacerbating the current health inequities in cervical cancer. In this review, the progress to date and the challenges and opportunities for fulfilling the potential of HPV-targeted prevention for global cervical cancer control are discussed.

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Helicobacter pylori against eight antibiotics: A study from North India

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility of eight drugs effective against Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) strains and the genetic diversity of H. pylori virulence genes to foresee clinical outcomes in North India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight H. pylori strains isolated from patients suffering from various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases were included in the study. MICs of various antibiotics were determined by the agar dilution method. The chi-squared test and Fisher exact test were used to determine the p-value, which was considered significant at p-value ≤ 0.05. RStudio 4.0 was used to for the data visualization.

RESULTS

The prevalence of drug resistance was found to be: cefixime (CFM) (41.3%), furazolidone (FZD) (34.4%), amoxicillin (AMX) (20.7%), levofloxacin (LVFX) (70.7%), metronidazole (MTZ) (39.6%), tetracycline (TET) (20.7%), clarithromycin (CLA) (17.2%), and rifabutin (RIF) (17.2%). Out of 58 H. pylori strains, 3 were pan susceptible. There were H. pylori strains with single-drug resistance (21.8%, 12/55), dual resistance (30.9%, 17/55), triple resistance (20%, 11/55), and multidrug resistance (27.3%, 15/55). The resistance rate in MTZ, CLA and RIF were found to be significantly higher in females as compared to males (p = 0.005, p = 0.002, and p = 0.02), respectively. The resistance to TET exhibited significantly higher levels in gastritis compared to GERD, DU, and other disease groups (p = 0.04) respectively.

CONCLUSION

TET, AMX, CLA, and RIF were found to be more effective antibiotics against H. pylori infections, whereas more studies are required to provide evidence on increasing resistance rate of LVFX.

Prospective Evaluation of a New Liquid-Type Rapid Urease Test Kit for Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Rapid and accurate diagnostic tools are essential for the timely recognition of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in clinical practice. The rapid urease test (RUT) is a comparatively accurate and time-saving method recommended as a first-line diagnostic test. The primary objective of conducting the RUT is to obtain rapid results, thus enabling the initiation of an eradication therapy based on clarithromycin resistance testing. This study aimed to assess the reaction time and accuracy of a new liquid-type RUT.

METHOD

In this prospective study, consecutive dyspeptic or check-up patients referred to our clinic for endoscopy were assessed to evaluate the rapidity and accuracy of a novel liquid-type RUT (Helicotest®, WON Medical, Bucheon, Republic of Korea) compared with another commercial RUT kit (HP kit, Chong Kun Dang, Seoul, Republic of Korea) and a real-time quantitative PCR-based assay (Seeplex® H.pylori-ClaR Detection, Seegene, Republic of Korea). RUTs were analyzed at 10 min, 30 min, 60 min, and 120 min.

RESULTS

Among the 177 enrolled patients, 38.6% were infected with H. pylori. The positivity rates of the liquid-type RUT were 26.1, 35.8, 39.2%, and 41.5% at 10, 30, 60, and 120 min, respectively. When compared with the HP kit test, the time needed to confirm positivity was significantly reduced by 28.6 min (95% CI, 16.60-39.73, p < 0.0001). Helicotest® had a greater accuracy (96.02 ± 1.47), sensitivity (98.53 ± 1.46) and NPV (99.03 ± 0.97) compared to the HP kit.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the commonly used RUT, the new liquid-type RUT presented faster and reliable results. Such findings could improve H. pylori treatment outcomes, particularly in outpatient clinical settings.