Efficacy of additional radiofrequency ablation after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for stage B1 of modified Bolondi’s subclassification for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma is considered  the most common cause of hepatic focal lesions in Egypt. TACE is still the recommended treatment approach for patients in the intermediate stage. In the current research, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for a selected category in the intermediate stage (BCLC stage B).

Methods

This prospective study was conducted in the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University between September 2022, and March 2024. In addition to AFP, Pelviabdominal ultrasound and computerized tomography (CT) were used for HCC diagnosis. According to the Child–Pugh score plus Milan and up-to-7 criteria, we used Modified Bolondi’s Subclassification (Kinki Criteria), to sub-classifies the BCLC B stage into B1/B2/B3 subcategories. Radiofrequency ablation was done in the interventional ultrasound unit. Treatment efficacy was assessed 6 months after tumor ablation.

Results

One hundred twenty participants were enrolled in our research trial, 72 (60%) were within the intermediate stage, and 48 (40%) had early-stage HCC. Most of our patients were males, 78 (65%). All the early-stage-HCC patients were Child–Pugh Score A (n = 48), while the intermediate-stage (BCLC B) group was classified in both Child–Pugh Score A (n = 59) and B (n = 16). Within the intermediate group (BCLC-stage B), All enrolled cases fell within category “B1” within the Kinki Criteria. Logistic regression analysis illustrated that the pre-treatment level of Platelet count and post-treatment level of AFP shows a statistically significant prediction effect on treatment response rate with p-value (0.028 and 0.007 respectively).

Conclusion

percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is considered an effective treatment option for the B1 subcategory according to Kinki Criteria for intermediate-stage HCC (BCLC-B1) but long-term follow-up is recommended.

Long-term outcome and eligibility of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma over 3.0 cm in diameter

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is effective for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a diameter ≤ 3.0 cm. The present study aimed to elucidate the prognostic factors and clarify the indication of treatment for RFA outcomes in patients with HCC with a diameter > 3.0 cm. Among 2188 patients with HCC who underwent RFA, 100 patients with HCC with a diameter > 3.0 cm were enrolled in this study between August, 2000 and August, 2021. We analyzed local therapeutic efficacy, long-term outcomes, and prognostic factors in patients with HCC with a diameter > 3.0 cm. Among all patients, 77 patients achieved complete ablation in one session. There were no treatment-related deaths or major complications. Local tumor recurrence occurred in 48% (n = 48) of the patients, and distant tumor recurrence occurred in 82% (n = 82) of the patients during the study period. The survival rates at 1-, 3-, 5-, 10-, and 15- years were 93.0%, 66.0%, 40.0%, 15.5%, and 10.2%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed that distant tumor recurrence, Child-Pugh class B, and pre-ablation des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) levels ≥ 200 mAU/mL were independent unfavorable prognostic factors with a hazard ratio of 3.34 (95% CI, 1.57-7.11; P = 0.002), 2.43 (95% CI, 1.35-4.37; P = 0.003), and 1.83 (95% CI, 1.14-2.93; P = 0.012), respectively. In conclusion, patients with HCC with a diameter > 3.0 cm with Child-Pugh class A and DCP levels < 200 mAU/mL might be eligible for RFA treatment.

Combined radiofrequency ablation or microwave ablation with transarterial chemoembolization can increase efficiency in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma without more complication: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are widely used in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in clinical practice. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with RFA or MWA versus TACE monotherapy for intermediate-stage HCC.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local tumor control (LTC) rate, and major complication. Subgroup analysis for different TACE combination therapies was performed.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 1799 patients with intermediate-stage HCC were included. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for OS was in favor of TACE combination therapy (HR, 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.62). Specifically, the TACE combination therapy was associated with higher 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates. Regarding tumor progression, the TACE combination therapy showed significantly better PFS (HR, 0.47, 95% CI, 0.37-0.61) and higher 1-, 2- and 3-year PFS rates than TACE monotherapy. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for the LTC was also in favor of TACE combination therapy (OR, 0.36, 95% CI, 0.24-0.53). No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the major complication rate (OR, 1.26, 95% CI, 0.74-2.16). These results were consistent across subgroups of TACE + RFA versus TACE and TACE + MWA versus TACE.

CONCLUSION

TACE combined with RFA or MWA can provide significantly better OS, PFS and LTC than TACE monotherapy for patients with intermediate-stage HCC, without increasing the risk of major complications.

Comparison of combined transarterial chemoembolization and ablations in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the efficacy of three combination therapies, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cryoablation (CRA) for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Online databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were searched.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies with 5468 pooled patients (TACE + RFA: 21 studies with 3398 patients, TACE + MWA:14 studies with 1477 patients, and TACE + CRA: 7 studies with 593 patients) reported combination therapy versus TACE alone. The TACE + MWA subcohort had the best odds of long-term overall survival (OR 4.81, 95% CI 1.44, 16.08, P = 0.011) and objective response rate (OR 3.93, 95% CI 2.34, 6.61, P < 0.001) compared with the other two combination subcohorts. The TACE + RFA and TACE + MWA subcohorts had approximately similar odds of 1-year recurrence-free survival (OR 5.21, 95% CI 2.13, 12.75, P < 0.001 and OR 4.61, 95% CI 1.70, 12.51, P = 0.003, respectively). The disease control rate was similar between the TACE + MWA and TACE + CRA subcohorts (OR 4.01, 95% CI 2.66, 6.04, P < 0.001 and OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.68, 9.74, P = 0.002) but greater than the TACE + RFA subcohort (OR 3.23, 95% CI 2.14, 4.86, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the TACE + MWA subcohort had the best efficacy and outcomes, especially for younger patients (less than 60-year-old) with tumor size of ≤ 3 cm, compared with the TACE + RFA or TACE + CRA subcohorts.

The combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) and thermal ablation versus TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer worldwide. Hepatic resection is regarded as the curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. However, only about 20% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma are candidates for resection, which highlights the importance of effective nonsurgical therapies. Until now, transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is the most common palliative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, but its clinical benefits remain unsatisfactory. During recent years, some studies have reported that the combination of TACE plus thermal ablation can confer a more favourable prognosis than TACE alone. However, clear and compelling evidence to prove the beneficial or harmful effects of the combination of TACE and thermal ablation therapy is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of the combination of thermal ablation with TACE versus TACE alone in people with hepatocellular carcinoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed searches in the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science. We endeavoured to identify relevant randomised clinical trials also in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases. We searched trial registration websites for ongoing studies. We also handsearched grey literature sources. The date of last search was 22 December 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include all randomised clinical trials comparing the combination of TACE plus thermal ablation versus TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma, no matter the language, year of publication, publication status, and reported outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We planned to use standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We planned to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For time-to-event variables, we planned to use the methods of survival analysis and express the intervention effect as a hazard ratio (HR) with 95% Cl. If the log HR and the variance were not directly reported in reports, we planned to calculate them indirectly, following methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. We planned to assess the risk of bias of the included studies using the RoB 2 tool. We planned to assess the certainty of evidence with GRADE and present the evidence in a summary of findings table.

MAIN RESULTS

Out of 2224 records retrieved with the searches, we considered 135 records eligible for full-text screening. We excluded 21 of these records because the interventions used were outside the scope of our review or the studies were not randomised clinical trials. We listed the remaining 114 records, reporting on 114 studies, under studies awaiting classification because we could not be sure that these were randomised clinical trials from the information in the study paper. We could not obtain information on the registration of the study protocol for any of the 114 studies. We could not obtain information on study approval by regional research ethics committees, either from the study authors or through our own searches of trial registries. Corresponding authors did not respond to our enquiries about the design and conduct of the studies, except for one from whom we did not receive a satisfactory response. We also raised awareness of our concerns to editors of the journals that published the 114 studies, and we did not hear back with useful information. Moreover, there seemed to be inappropriate inclusion of trial participants, based on cancer stage and severity of liver disease, who should have obtained other interventions according to guidelines from learned societies. Accordingly, we found no confirmed randomised clinical trials evaluating the combination of TACE plus thermal ablation versus TACE alone for people with hepatocellular carcinoma for inclusion in our review. We identified five ongoing trials, by handsearching in clinical trial websites.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We could not find for inclusion any confirmed randomised clinical trials assessing the beneficial or harmful effects of the combination of TACE plus thermal ablation versus TACE alone in people with hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, our results did not show or reject the efficiency of the combination of TACE plus thermal ablation versus TACE alone for people with hepatocellular carcinoma. We need trials that compare the beneficial and harmful effects of the combination of TACE plus thermal ablation versus TACE alone in people with hepatocellular carcinoma, not eligible for treatments with curative intent (liver transplantation, ablation surgical resection) and who have sufficient liver reserve, as assessed by the Child Pugh score, and who do not have extrahepatic metastases. Therefore, future trial participants must be classified at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B (intermediate stage) (BCLC-B) or an equivalent, with other staging systems.

Combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a review

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization has been widely used in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, double blood supply and the existence of portal vein tumor thrombus influence the efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

MAIN BODY

Theoretically, portal vein embolization combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization may bring a breakthrough in the therapeutic effect of hepatocellular carcinoma. The feasibility, efficacy, long-term survival benefits, and side effects of the combined treatment have been explored in previous studies. Chemotherapeutic agents may also be added in the portal vein embolization procedure to further improve the treatment response.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we review the existing data and studies on the combined treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and provide an overall view of the strategy.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with haemophilia

Haemophilia is an X-linked inherited bleeding disorder caused by coagulation factor deficiency. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major complication associated with the disease. No study thus far has investigated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for HCC in patients with haemophilia.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RFA for HCC in haemophilia patients.

METHODS

From July 2008 to June 2019, 217 patients with HCC underwent 300 RFA sessions. Of these, 18 sessions were performed in ten haemophilia patients (H group) and 282 in 207 non-haemophilia patients (NH group). The patients' characteristics, incidence of haemorrhagic complications and rates of local tumour recurrence were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

A majority of the haemophilia patients received clotting factor concentrate replacement therapy before and after RFA treatment, with the aim of reaching a plasma clotting factor level of higher than 60%-80%. Twelve haemorrhagic complications were observed in the NH group (4.2%; 12/282). Major bleeding requiring control procedures was observed in two patients and minor bleeding with careful observation was noted in ten patients. No bleeding complications were observed in the H group (0/18). There were no significant differences in the 5-year local tumour recurrence rates after RFA treatment between the groups (35.0% in the H group and 32.1% in the NH group).

CONCLUSION

RFA could be an effective and a safe method for HCC treatment in patients with haemophilia.

Treatment Selection for Early to Intermediate Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Many guidelines and standard therapies have been published for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Multiple options for the treatment of early to intermediate-stage HCC have resulted in several differences between the guidelines. In addition, more than a few non-standard therapies have been used in a real-world clinical setting. Radiofrequency ablation or chemotherapy, including hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and molecular target agents, are sometimes selected for the treatment of intermediate HCC, whereas in many guidelines, the recommended therapy for these patients is transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. The present status of these topics is reviewed and summarized.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone or combined with ablation for recurrent intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching study

PURPOSE

The recurrence after curative hepatectomy is common. Limited data have investigated the effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with ablation in treating recurrent intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy. We aim to compare the efficacy of TACE combined with ablation versus TACE alone in treating recurrent intermediate-stage HCC after hepatectomy.

METHODS

A total of 183 patients with recurrent intermediate-stage HCC after hepatectomy were enrolled at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, including 111 patients who underwent TACE alone and 72 patients who underwent TACE combined with ablation (TACE-Ablation). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared by the log-rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the confounding bias.

RESULTS

Before PSM, the 5-year OS rates were 43.3% vs. 27.9% (P = 0.001), and the 5-year PFS rates were 21.7% vs. 13.0% (P < 0.001) for TACE-Ablation and TACE-alone groups, respectively. After PSM, TACE-Ablation still resulted in better 5-year OS (41.6% vs. 30.2%, P = 0.028) and 5-year PFS rate (21.3% vs. 15.8%, P = 0.024) than that of TACE alone. Patients in TACE-Ablation group exhibited similar major complication rates to TACE-alone group but higher minor complication rates both before and after PSM. Cox regression analysis identified TACE-alone modality as an independently unfavourable predictor for OS and PFS (both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TACE combined with ablation is safe and superior to TACE alone in tumour control and prolonging overall survival in recurrent intermediate-stage HCC after hepatectomy.

Ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: beyond the standard indications

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary liver neoplasia, represents the fifth most common malignant disease in men. Percutaneous ablation treatment is recommended among the treatments suggested for HCC patients in the very early/early stage. In the last decade, very important results in terms of survival benefits have been obtained with local ablative therapies, also outside the standard indications, thanks to many technical innovations. In particular, important results of ablation as a safe and effective technique have been obtained in the treatment of intermediate- or advanced-stage patients with HCC, and in the treatment of unfavourable tumour locations. Moreover, awareness is growing regarding the necessity of overcoming the rigidity of traditional guidelines in the treatment of HCC due to the complexity of patients with HCC, focusing on Precision Medicine. In this context, it is important to know the standard and non-standard indications of ablation in the treatment of HCC in order to offer the best therapeutic option tailored for each patient. The aim of this study was to analyse the possible clinical applications of ablative therapies for HCC patients, beyond the traditional indications recommended in the most widespread clinical practice guidelines for the management of HCC.

Treatment of Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Japan: Position of Curative Therapies

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard therapy for intermediate-stage (IM) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, IM-HCC includes various clinical conditions, and various therapies were conducted in practice. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the actually conducted treatments for IM-HCC and their efficacies to elucidate the treatment strategies suitable for IM-HCC.

METHODS

This study included 627 IM-HCC of 5,260 HCC from 9 hospitals. We examined the treatment strategies of these patients and analyzed the efficacy of each therapy with the Cox proportional hazard model and propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

Liver resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and TACE were performed in 165, 108, and 351 patients, respectively. Liver resection and RFA were preferably selected in cases of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-B1/B2, and patient survival was significantly longer than in those treated with TACE (p< 0.0001). However, no beneficial effect of these active therapies was observed in cases of BCLC-B3/B4. Multivariate analysis revealed that surgical resection (hazard ratio = 0.384) and RFA (hazard ratio = 0.597) were negative risk factors for survival. Propensity score-matching analysis revealed that -survival of RFA-treated patients was longer than that of TACE-treated patients (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

RFA and surgical resection were effective for IM-HCC, particularly in BCLC-B1/B2 cases.

A new prediction model for prognosis of patients with intermediate-stage HCC after conventional transarterial chemoembolization: an internally validated study

Purpose: The prognosis of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by conventional TACE (cTACE) is greatly heterogeneous. This study aimed to develop a new survival prediction model to help select patients who would benefit better from cTACE treatment. Methods: We collected data of 848 treatment-naïve patients with BCLC B HCC who received cTACE as first-line therapy. The prognostic model's variables were derived from univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The concordance index (C-statistic) calculated through cross-validation and bootstrap resampling was used for the model selection. The calibration of our final prediction model was also assessed. Results: The model showed a better discrimination ability than Bolondi's BCLC B1-B4 subclassification to predict the prognosis of BCLC B patients (C-statistic, 0.66 vs. 0.60; difference, 0.05, 95% CI, 0.03-0.07). In cross-validation, bootstrap resampling demonstrated that the model maintained sufficiently discriminant (an average of C-statistic, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.65-0.68). The model calibration was accurate in predicting survival of patients matched well with the observed outcomes. On the basis of the improved survival of 18 months or more as the responding patient, the observations of patients in each response category (responder and non-responder) were fair-moderately matched with those predicted by the model (κ=0.40, P<0.001). Conclusions: Based on clinically available features of patient, tumor and liver function, we developed an alternative prediction model with better performance than the Bolondi's substaging system for intermediate HCC patients after cTACE, which could help define the distinct subgroup of BCLC B patients who are suitable for cTACE treatment.

Prognostic impact of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison with TACE alone using decision-tree analysis after propensity score matching

AIMS

The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is still poor. We aimed to evaluate the impact of TACE combined with radiofrequency ablation (TACE+RFA) on the prognosis of HCC patients using decision-tree analysis after propensity score matching.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. We enrolled 420 patients with HCC treated with TACE alone (n = 311) or TACE+RFA (n = 109) between 1998 and 2016 (median age, 72 years; male / female, 272/148; Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A / B, 215/205). The prognosis of patients who underwent TACE+RFA was compared to patients who underwent TACE alone after propensity score matching. Decision-tree analysis was used to investigate the profile for prognosis of the patients.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in age, sex, BCLC stage, or albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score between both groups. The survival rate of the TACE+RFA group was significantly higher than the TACE alone group (median survival time [MST] 57.9 months vs. 33.1 months, P < 0.001). In a stratification analysis according to BCLC stage, the overall survival rate of the TACE+RFA group was significantly higher than the TACE alone group in BCLC stage A and B (MST 57.9 and 50.7 months vs. 39.8 and 24.5 months [P = 0.007 and 0.001], respectively). Decision-tree analysis showed that TACE+RFA was the third distinguishable factor for survival in patients with α-fetoprotein level >7 ng/mL and ALBI <-2.08.

CONCLUSION

Decision-tree analysis after propensity score matching showed that TACE+RFA could prolong the survival of HCC patients compared to TACE alone.

Current status of the combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization and local ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the current status and ideal time interval of the combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and local ablation for patients with HCCs.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, local ablation has been proposed as an alternative curative treatment in the management of HCC. Additionally, many treatment options are available including TACE molecular targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Similar overall survival rates and prognoses have been obtained with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) microwave ablation (MWA) and cryoablation for patients with HCCs up to 3 cm in diameter. Yet, MWA has shown superiority in treating large HCCs while cryoablation has several advantages compared with RFA or MWA. Furthermore, the treatment strategy of TACE combined with local ablation is widely accepted by many physicians in order to further increase the survival rate and improve the prognosis of patients with HCCs. However, the time interval between the two sessions of combination therapy remains uncertain in the current guidelines. Combination therapy of TACE and local ablation has advantages on survival and prognosis in patients with HCC compared with monotherapy. Good patient selection for the right modality needs to be carried out to guarantee the most efficacious treatment for HCC patients. Further studies are needed to find the ideal time interval between TACE and local ablation for HCC patients.

Efficacy of combination therapy with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard therapy for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to determine whether combination therapy with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and TACE was superior to TACE monotherapy for intermediate-stage HCC and identify cases in which this technique was the most effective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected patients with intermediate HCC who met the following eligibility criteria: (1) ≥ 20 years of age, (2) receiving initial therapy, (3) ≤7 tumors, and (4) maximum tumor diameter <5 cm. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) using potential confounding factors. We retrospectively compared the cumulative overall survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate between the TACE + RFA and TACE groups. Additionally, a sub-group analysis was performed for preoperative factors.

RESULTS

Among the 103 patients, 92 were selected using PSM. The cumulative overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years for the TACE + RFA group were 97.4%, 70.4%, and 60.4%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those for the TACE group (92.7%, 55.7%, and 22.8%, respectively, p = .045). The recurrence-free survival rates at 0.5, 1, and 2 years for the TACE + RFA group were 80.0%, 58.6%, and 33.3%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those for the TACE group (34.5%, 8.8%, and 2.9%, respectively, p < .01). For the sub-group with α-fetoprotein (AFP) <100 ng/mL, the TACE + RFA group demonstrated a significantly improved prognosis than the TACE group (p = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of RFA to TACE improved cumulative overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with intermediate-stage HCC, especially in patients with AFP <100.

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Simultaneous Computed Tomography-guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Large Hepatocellular Carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Currently, the treatment of large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still a challenging problem. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the main treatment for intermediate end-stage HCC, while it is only a palliative and not a curative treatment due to the existence of residual tumors, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has limitations in complete ablation of large HCC. We hypothesized that TACE combined with simultaneous RFA (herein referred to as TACE + RFA) could improve the efficacy and survival of large HCC. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of TACE + RFA on single large HCC.

METHODS

A total of 66 patients with single large HCC (≥5 cm in diameter) were recruited between February 2010 and June 2016. TACE was first performed and computed tomography was performed immediately after TACE, and the lesions with poor lipiodol deposition were subjected to simultaneous RFA. The success rate, technique-related complications, liver and kidney functions, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, progression-free survival (PFS), median survival time (MST), focal control rate, and long-term survival rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

TACE + RFA were performed smoothly in all the patients with the success rate of 100%. Intra- and post-operative severe complications were not observed. There were no marked differences in mean alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase before TACE + RFA compared with 7 days after TACE + RFA (all P > 0.05). In 57 AFP-positive patients, the levels of serum AFP were reduced by 100.0%, 100.0%, and 94.7% at 1, 3, and 6 months after TACE + RFA, respectively; the tumor control rates (complete remission + partial remission) were 100.0% (66/66), 92.4% (61/66), 87.9% (58/66), and 70.1% (39/55) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after TACE + RFA, respectively. Patients were followed up for 7-82 months after TACE + RFA. The MST was 18.3 months, PFS was 14.2 ± 6.2 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 93.2% (55/59), 42.5% (17/40), and 27.2% (9/33), respectively.

CONCLUSION

TACE + RFA is safe, feasible, and effective in enhancing the focal control rate and survival rate of patients with large HCC.

Meta-analysis of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus radiofrequency ablation versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone for hepatocellular carcinoma

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with TACE alone for hepatocellular carcinoma. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL for all relative randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies until October 31 2016. Tumor response, recurrence-free survival, overall survival and postoperative complications were the major evaluation indices. Review Manager (version 5.3) was used to analyze the data. Dichotomous data was calculated by odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). There were 1 RCT and 10 retrospective studies with 928 patients in this meta-analysis: 412 patients with TACE plus RFA and 516 patients with TACE alone. Compared with TACE alone group, TACE plus RFA group attained higher tumor response rates (OR = 6.08, 95% CI = 4.00 to 9.26, P < 0.00001), achieved longer recurrence-free survival rates (OR_RFS = 3.78, 95% CI: 2.38 to 6.02, P < 0.00001) and overall survival rates (OR_1-year = 3.92, 95% CI = 2.41–6.39, P < 0.00001; OR_3-year = 2.56; 95% CI = 1.81–3.60; P < 0.00001; OR_5-year = 2.78; 95% CI = 1.77–4.38; P < 0.0001). Serious postoperative complications were not observed, although complications were higher in TACE plus RFA group than that in TACE alone group (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.07 to 7.07, P = 0.04). In conclusion, the use of TACE plus RFA for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma can attain higher tumor response rates and improve survival rates than TACE alone.

Multipronged ethanol ablation combined with TACE for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To retrospectively investigate the efficacy of multipronged ethanol ablation with or without transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (3.1-5.0 cm in diameter) at high-risk locations .

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From March 2009 to April 2014, 25 consecutive patients with intermediate HCC who underwent multipronged ethanol ablation combined with TACE were included in the combination treatment group, while 50 patients who underwent multipronged ethanol ablation alone were included in the control group.

RESULTS

Primary technique effectiveness was achieved in 70 patients (25/25, 100% in the combination treatment group; 45/50, 90% in the control group; p = .162). The local tumor progression (LTP) rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 8.0%, 24.0%, 24.0%, and 24.0% in the combination treatment group, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group (24.4%, 44.1%, 66.5% and 66.5%, respectively; p = .043). However, no significant differences of overall survival and disease-free survival were found between the two groups (p = .996 and .974, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Multipronged ethanol ablation combined with TACE could improve local tumor control for patients with intermediate HCC at high-risk locations when compared with multipronged ethanol ablation alone, although the survival outcomes were comparable.

The treatment of intermediate stage tumours beyond TACE: From surgery to systemic therapy

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is dependent on the stage of the disease. Intermediate stage HCC encompasses the largest subgroup of patients with the disease, and is characterized by substantial heterogeneity. The standard therapeutic approach, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), is probably over-used and may not be appropriate for all patients with intermediate stage HCC. In patients with extensive tumour bulk, multi-nodular spread or impaired liver function, TACE may not be optimal and other treatments can be considered as a first-line treatment. These include surgery, percutaneous ablation, radioembolization or systemic treatment. In addition, patients who do not achieve complete or partial necrosis (TACE failure) and patients with early recurrence after TACE, should be managed individually, considering systemic treatments usually reserved for advanced disease. In selected cases and in patients who achieve downstaging, radical approaches such as hepatic resection or even liver transplantation can be considered. In this review, we evaluate the current literature for the treatment strategies for patients with intermediate Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B stage HCC.

Application of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a standard therapy for the treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we tried to elucidate the possibility of using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as an alternative treatment of intermediate-stage HCC.

METHODS

Among 246 patients who were initially diagnosed with intermediate-stage HCC, 76 who were treated with TACE (TACE group) and 91 who were treated with RFA (RFA group) were enrolled in this study. The risk for survival was analyzed with the Cox Proportional Hazard Model, and the survival rates were compared using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

About half (50.6%) of the intermediate-stage HCC patients in the RFA group were diagnosed with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer substage-B1 (BCLC-B1) compared with only 19.7% of the patients in the TACE group. Survival of the RFA group was longer than that of TACE group in patients with BCLC-B1 and BCLC-B2. In contrast, no difference between groups was observed in patients with BCLC-B3/4. Multivariate analysis revealed that large tumor size (>30 mm, hazard ratio = 1.685, P = 0.043), high des-γ-carboxyprothrombin (>100 mAU/mL, hazard ratio = 1.920, P = 0.012), and TACE group (hazard ratio = 1.896, P = 0.016) were significant risk factors for survival. Overall 3-year survival of the patients in the RFA group (69.5%) was significantly longer than that of patients in the TACE group (51.5%) after propensity score matching (P = 0.032). No significant adverse events were observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA was useful for the treatment of less advanced intermediate-stage HCC and could be an alternative to TACE in selected cases.

C-Arm Cone Beam Computed Tomography Guidance for Radiofrequency Ablation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To assess the usefulness of C-arm cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) combined with ultrasound for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

Patients underwent RFA following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or RFA alone under ultrasound or CBCT guidance combined with ultrasound-based techniques. They were divided into 2 groups based on the use (C group) and nonuse (NC group) of CBCT guidance. The technical success of RFA and local tumor progression after the first RFA session were evaluated by dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging methods. Between-group differences were assessed retrospectively.

RESULTS

We enrolled 198 patients with 260 HCC nodules. The complete ablation rates were 63.0 and 89.4% in the NC and C groups, respectively. In log-rank testing, local tumor progression occurred significantly more often in the NC group when RFA was used without TACE, in males when des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin was ≥29 mAU/mL, and when the diameter of a nodule was ≥18 mm. On Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis, the NC group, RFA alone without TACE, and male gender were significant independent variables.

CONCLUSION

TACE followed by RFA under CBCT and ultrasound guidance improves the reliability of ablation of target HCC nodules, reduces the need for additional treatment sessions, and prevents local tumor progression.

Subclassification of patients with intermediate-stage (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage-B) hepatocellular carcinoma using the up-to-seven criteria and serum tumor markers

BACKGROUND

Intermediate-stage [Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage-B (BCLC-B)] hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) comprises of a heterogeneous population of patients with a wide range of tumor burdens. We therefore formulated a subclassification of BCLC-B HCC using the up-to-seven criteria and tumor markers according to the results of a retrospective analysis of these patients.

METHODS

This study included 125 patients newly diagnosed with BCLC-B HCC who underwent transarterial chemoembolization. Among them, 39 and 86 were within or beyond the up-to-seven criteria, respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to investigate factors that contributed to better prognosis associated with the criteria.

RESULTS

Cumulative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rates were significantly higher for patients within the up-to-seven criteria compared with those beyond (p = 0.034 and p = 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that low concentrations of des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) (<150 mAU/ml) and α-fetoprotein (AFP) (<100 ng/ml) were independent contributors to better OS of patients within or beyond the up-to-seven criteria, respectively. Accordingly, the patients were classified as follows: group A (patients within the up-to-seven criteria with DCP <150 mAU/ml), group C (patients beyond the up-to-seven criteria with AFP ≥100 ng/ml), and group B (other patients). OS differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001), and the median survival times of group A, B, and C were 4.2, 2.7, and 1.5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The subclassification system incorporating the up-to-seven criteria combined with DCP and AFP levels may serve as better predictors of prognosis that may guide efforts to improve treatment strategies.