1
|
Yan J, Li T, Deng M, Fan H. Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Do Interventional Radiologists Need to Know? Front Oncol 2022; 12:927123. [PMID: 35785181 PMCID: PMC9243354 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.927123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Rupture of HCC (rHCC) is a life-threatening complication of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and rHCC may lead to a high rate of peritoneal dissemination and affect survival negatively. Treatment for rHCC mainly includes emergency surgery, interventional therapies, and palliative treatment. However, the management of rHCC should be carefully evaluated. For patients with severe bleeding, who are not tolerant to open surgery, quick hemostatic methods such as rupture tissue ablation and TAE/TACE can be performed. We described clinical presentation, prognosis, complication, interventional management, and current evidence of rHCC from the perspective of interventional radiologists. Overall, our review summarized that interventional therapies are necessary for most patients with rHCC to achieve hemostasis, even in some patients with Child-Pugh C. Moreover, TAE/TACE followed by staged hepatectomy is a beneficial treatment for rHCC according to current clinical evidence. TAE/TACE is the first choice for most patients with rHCC, and appropriate interventional treatment may provide staged surgery opportunities for those who are not tolerant to emergency surgery to reach an ideal prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingxin Yan
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China
- Department of Postgraduate, Qinghai University, Xining, China
| | - Ting Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, Chengdu, China
- Department of Postgraduate, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Manjun Deng
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China
- Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Hydatid Disease Research, Xining, China
| | - Haining Fan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China
- Qinghai Province Key Laboratory of Hydatid Disease Research, Xining, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yan J, Li T, Deng M, Fan H. Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Do Interventional Radiologists Need to Know? Front Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.927123\] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Rupture of HCC (rHCC) is a life-threatening complication of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and rHCC may lead to a high rate of peritoneal dissemination and affect survival negatively. Treatment for rHCC mainly includes emergency surgery, interventional therapies, and palliative treatment. However, the management of rHCC should be carefully evaluated. For patients with severe bleeding, who are not tolerant to open surgery, quick hemostatic methods such as rupture tissue ablation and TAE/TACE can be performed. We described clinical presentation, prognosis, complication, interventional management, and current evidence of rHCC from the perspective of interventional radiologists. Overall, our review summarized that interventional therapies are necessary for most patients with rHCC to achieve hemostasis, even in some patients with Child–Pugh C. Moreover, TAE/TACE followed by staged hepatectomy is a beneficial treatment for rHCC according to current clinical evidence. TAE/TACE is the first choice for most patients with rHCC, and appropriate interventional treatment may provide staged surgery opportunities for those who are not tolerant to emergency surgery to reach an ideal prognosis.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hepatic Toxicity After Selective Chemoembolization Is Associated With Decreased Survival Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 216:1283-1290. [PMID: 33703926 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.23478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for and outcomes of hepatotoxicity after selective chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study included 182 patients (136 men and 46 women; median age, 63 years [interquartile range, 57-70 years]) who underwent 338 consecutive doxorubicin drug-eluting bead (DEB) chemoembolization procedures between 2011 and 2014. Outcomes were assessed until November 2019. In 97% of procedures, two or fewer segments were targeted. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage was 0 or A for 77 procedures (22.8%), B for 75 (22.2%), C for 122 (36.1%), and D for 64 (18.9%). Hepatotoxicity was defined as worsened ascites or encephalopathy or as grade 3 or 4 elevations in liver function test results, creatinine levels, or the international normalized ratio within 30 days. Risk factors were assessed by univariate and multivariable generalized estimating equations. Transplant-free survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS. Hepatotoxicity was observed after 84 of 338 procedures (24.9%) performed for 70 of 182 patients (38.5%) and was irreversible for 40 procedures (11.8%). On multivariable analysis, risk factors for irreversible toxicity included Child-Pugh class C liver function (odds ratio [OR], 4.4; 95% CI, 1.0-19.0; p = .04), BCLC stage C (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.6-16.0; p = .006) or D (OR, 7.4; 95% CI, 2.1-25.5; p = .002) disease, TIPS or hepatofugal portal venous flow (OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 2.3-17.0; p < .001), and a serum α-fetoprotein level of 200 ng/mL or greater (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1-6.1; p = .03). Irreversible toxicity was associated with reduced transplant-free survival among patients who were ineligible for liver transplant (hazard ratio, 2.5; standard error, 0.42; p = .03). CONCLUSION. Irreversible hepatotoxicity was common after selective chemoembolization in patients with advanced stage disease, an elevated serum α-fetoprotein level, or reduced hepatic portal venous perfusion, and it may hasten death among patients who are ineligible for liver transplant.
Collapse
|
4
|
Young S, Sanghvi T, Lake JJ, Rubin N, Golzarian J. Predicting post-transarterial chemoembolization outcomes: A comparison of direct and total bilirubin serums levels. Diagn Interv Imaging 2020; 101:355-364. [PMID: 31948887 PMCID: PMC7772772 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To retrospectively review the ability of direct bilirubin serum level to predict mortality and complications in patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compare it to the predictive value of the currently utilized total bilirubin serum level. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 219 patients who underwent TACE for 353 hepatocelluar carcinomas (HCC) at a single institution were included. There were 165 men and 54 women, with a mean age of 61.4±7.6 (SD) [range: 27-86 years]. The patients' electronic medical records were evaluated and they were divided into cohorts based on total bilirubin (<2, 2-3, and >3mg/dL) as well as direct bilirubin (<1 and 1-2mg/dL). RESULTS Direct bilirubin serum level was significantly greater in the cohort of patients who did not survive as compared to those who survived 6 months ([0.58±0.46 (SD) mg/dL; range: <0.1-1.8mg/dL] vs. [0.40±0.31 (SD) mg/dL; range: <0.1-1.6mg/dL], respectively) (P=0.04) and 12 months ([0.49±0.38 (SD) mg/dL; range: <0.1-1.8mg/dL] vs. [0.38±0.32 (SD) mg/dL; range: <0.1-1.6mg/dL], respectively) (P=0.03). While total bilirubin serum level was not significantly different in those who did not and did survive 6 months ([1.54±0.99 (SD) mg/dL; range: 0.3-3.9mg/dL] vs. [1.27±0.70 (SD) mg/dL; range: 0.3-3.75mg/dL], respectively) (P=0.16), it was significantly different when evaluating 12 months survival ([1.46±0.87 (SD)mg/dL; range: 0.3-3.9mg/dL] vs. [1.22±0.65 (SD) mg/dL; range: 0.3-3.9mg/dL]) (P=0.03). Akaike information criterion (AIC) analysis revealed that direct bilirubin level more accurately predicted overall survival (AIC=941.19 vs. 1000.51) and complications (AIC=352.22 vs. 357.42) than total bilirubin serum levels. CONCLUSION Direct bilirubin serum level appears to outperform total bilirubin concentration for predicting complications and overall survival in patients undergoing TACE. Patients with relatively maintained direct bilirubin levels should be considered for TACE, particularly in the setting of bridging to transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Young
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 , USA.
| | - T Sanghvi
- Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Minneapolis, MN 55471 , USA
| | - J J Lake
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hepatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55471 , USA
| | - N Rubin
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 , USA
| | - J Golzarian
- Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 , USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maeda M, Saeki I, Sakaida I, Aikata H, Araki Y, Ogawa C, Kariyama K, Nouso K, Kitamoto M, Kobashi H, Sato S, Shibata H, Joko K, Takaki S, Takabatake H, Tsutsui A, Takaguchi K, Tomonari T, Nakamura S, Nagahara T, Hiraoka A, Matono T, Koda M, Mandai M, Mannami T, Mitsuda A, Moriya T, Yabushita K, Tani J, Yagi T, Yamasaki T. Complications after Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study Involving 9,411 Japanese Patients. Liver Cancer 2020; 9:50-62. [PMID: 32071909 PMCID: PMC7024979 DOI: 10.1159/000502744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is considered a safe and minimally invasive procedure. We previously reported that the mortality and complication rates for RFA were 0.038% (5/13,283 patients) and 3.54% (579 complications/16,346 procedures), respectively, from 1999 to 2010 (previous period). In this study, we investigated the clinical criteria for RFA and the mortality and complication rates from 2011 to 2015 (recent period). METHODS Data were collected from 25 centers by using a questionnaire developed by the Chugoku-Shikoku Society for Local Ablation Therapy of HCC. The criteria for RFA, RFA modification, use of image-guidance modalities, mortality, and complications during the previous and recent periods were compared. RESULTS We evaluated 11,298 procedures for 9,411 patients, including those that involved new devices (bipolar RFA and internally adjustable electrode system). The criterion of hepatic function for RFA increased from a Child-Pugh score ≤8 during the previous period to ≤9 during the recent period. The criteria regarding the tumor location and other risk factors have been expanded recently because of the increased use of several modifications of the RFA procedure and image-guidance modalities. The mortality rate was 0.064% (6/9,411 patients), and the complication rate was 2.92% (330 complications/11,298 procedures). There was no difference in mortality rates between the 2 periods (p = 0.38), but the complication rates was significantly lower during the recent period (p = 0.038). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Our findings confirmed that RFA, including the use of new devices, is a low-risk procedure for HCC, despite the expansion of the criteria for RFA during the recent period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Maeda
- aDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Issei Saeki
- aDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Isao Sakaida
- aDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Aikata
- cDepartment of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical and Health Science, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Araki
- dDivision of Internal Medicine, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Chikara Ogawa
- eDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Kazuya Kariyama
- fDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama City Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Nouso
- fDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama City Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Mikiya Kitamoto
- gDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Haruhiko Kobashi
- hDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japanese Red Cross Okayama Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shuichi Sato
- iDepartment of Hepatology, Shimane University Hospital, Shimane, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Shibata
- jDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Kouji Joko
- kDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Ehime, Japan
| | - Shintaro Takaki
- lDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hiroshima Red Cross and Atomic Bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Takabatake
- mDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Akemi Tsutsui
- nDepartment of Hepatology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Koichi Takaguchi
- nDepartment of Hepatology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Tetsu Tomonari
- oDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Nakamura
- pDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takakazu Nagahara
- qDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tottori Prefectural Kousei Hospital, Tottori, Japan
| | - Atsushi Hiraoka
- rGastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Ehime, Japan
| | - Tomomitsu Matono
- sDivision of Medicine and Clinical Science, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Tottori, Japan
| | - Masahiko Koda
- tDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hino Hospital, Tottori, Japan
| | - Mari Mandai
- uDivision of Internal Medicine, Okayama Saiseikai General Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Mannami
- vDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chugoku Central Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan,wDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Akeri Mitsuda
- xDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tottori Red Cross Hospital, Tottori, Japan
| | - Takashi Moriya
- yDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chugoku Rousai Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kazuhisa Yabushita
- zDivision of Internal Medicine, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Joji Tani
- aDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Takahito Yagi
- bDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yamasaki
- aDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan,bDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan,*Takahiro Yamasaki, MD, PhD, Department of Oncology and Laboratory, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Minami-kogushi, Ube, Yamaguchi 755-8505 (Japan), E-Mail
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fidelman N, Johanson C, Kohi MP, Kolli KP, Kohlbrenner RM, Lehrman ED, Taylor AG, Kelley RK, Yao FY, Roberts JP, Kerlan RK. Prospective Phase II trial of drug-eluting bead chemoembolization for liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma and marginal hepatic reserve. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2019; 6:93-103. [PMID: 31355158 PMCID: PMC6588798 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s206979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) is safe and effective for liver transplantation candidates with liver-limited hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without vascular invasion and baseline hepatic dysfunction. Materials and methods: Seventeen adult liver transplantation candidates (median age 66 years, range 58–73 years; 13 men) with HCC were treated with DEB-TACE as a part of Stage 1 of a prospective single-institution Phase II trial. All patients had marginal hepatic reserve based on at least one of the following criteria: ascites (n=14), bilirubin between 3 and 6 mg/dL (n=5), AST 5–10 times upper normal limit (n=1), INR between 1.6 and 2.5 (n=4), portal vein thrombosis (n=2), and/or portosystemic shunt (n=2). Primary study objectives were safety and best observed radiographic response. Results: Thirty-seven DEB-TACE procedures were performed. Objective response rate and disease control rate were 63% and 88%, respectively. HCC progression was observed in 12 patients. Median time to progression was 5.6 months (range 0.9–13.6 months). Within 1 month following DEB-TACE, 13 patients (76%) developed grade 3 or 4 AE attributable to the procedure. Four patients (all within Milan Criteria) were transplanted (2.7–6.9 months after DEB-TACE), and 12 patients died (1.8–32 months after DEB-TACE). All deaths were due to liver failure that was either unrelated to HCC (n=5), in the setting of metastatic HCC (n=5), or in the setting of locally advanced HCC (n=2). Mortality rate at 1 month was 0%. Conclusions: DEB-TACE achieves tumor responses but carries a high risk of hepatotoxicity for liver transplant candidates with HCC and marginal hepatic reserve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - R Kate Kelley
- Department of Medicine - Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology
| | | | - John P Roberts
- Department of Surgery - Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fukumitsu N, Takahashi S, Okumura T, Ishida T, Murofushi KN, Ohnishi K, Aihara T, Ishikawa H, Tsuboi K, Sakurai H. Normal liver tissue change after proton beam therapy. Jpn J Radiol 2018; 36:559-565. [PMID: 29980916 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-018-0757-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan.
| | - Shinsei Takahashi
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Toshiki Ishida
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Keiko Nemoto Murofushi
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Kayoko Ohnishi
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Teruhito Aihara
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Koji Tsuboi
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, 305-8575, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mazzanti R, Arena U, Tassi R. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Where are we? World J Exp Med 2016; 6:21-36. [PMID: 26929917 PMCID: PMC4759352 DOI: 10.5493/wjem.v6.i1.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2015] [Revised: 12/14/2015] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second cause of death due to malignancy in the world, following lung cancer. The geographic distribution of this disease accompanies its principal risk factors: Chronic hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection, alcoholism, aflatoxin B1 intoxication, liver cirrhosis, and some genetic attributes. Recently, type II diabetes has been shown to be a risk factor for HCC together with obesity and metabolic syndrome. Although the risk factors are quite well known and it is possible to diagnose HCC when the tumor is less than 1 cm diameter, it remains elusive at the beginning and treatment is often unsuccessful. Liver transplantation is thus far considered the best treatment for HCC as it cures HCC and the underlying liver disease. Using the Milan criteria, overall survival after liver transplantation for HCC is about 70% after 5 years. Many attempts have been made to go beyond the Milan Criteria and according to recent works reasonably good results have been achieved by using a histochemical marker such as cytokeratine 19 and the so-called "up to seven criteria" to divide patients into categories according to their risk of relapse. In addition to liver transplantation other therapies have been proposed such as resection, tumor ablation by different means, embolization and chemotherapy. An important step in the treatment of advanced HCC has been the introduction of sorafenib, the first oral, systemic drug that has provided significant improvement in survival. Treatment of HCC patients must be multidisciplinary and by using the different approaches discussed in this review it is possible to offer prolonged survival and quite good and sometimes even excellent quality of life to many patients.
Collapse
|