Efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients who failed other nucleos(t)ide analogs

Medical Advances in Hepatitis D Therapy: Molecular Targets

An approximate number of 250 million people worldwide are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus, making them susceptible to a coinfection with hepatitis D virus. The superinfection causes the most severe form of a viral hepatitis and thus drastically worsens the course of the disease. Until recently, the only available therapy consisted of interferon-α, only eligible for a minority of patients. In July 2020, the EMA granted Hepcludex conditional marketing authorization throughout the European Union. This first-in-class entry inhibitor offers the promise to prevent the spread in order to gain control and eventually participate in curing hepatitis B and D. Hepcludex is an example of how understanding the viral lifecycle can give rise to new therapy options. Sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide, the virus receptor and the target of Hepcludex, and other targets of hepatitis D therapy currently researched are reviewed in this work. Farnesyltransferase inhibitors such as Lonafarnib, targeting another essential molecule in the HDV life cycle, represent a promising target for hepatitis D therapy. Farnesyltransferase attaches a farnesyl (isoprenyl) group to proteins carrying a C-terminal Ca1a2X (C: cysteine, a: aliphatic amino acid, X: C-terminal amino acid) motif like the large hepatitis D virus antigen. This modification enables the interaction of the HBV/HDV particle and the virus envelope proteins. Lonafarnib, which prevents this envelopment, has been tested in clinical trials. Targeting the lifecycle of the hepatitis B virus needs to be considered in hepatitis D therapy in order to cure a patient from both coexisting infections. Nucleic acid polymers target the hepatitis B lifecycle in a manner that is not yet understood. Understanding the possible targets of the hepatitis D virus therapy is inevitable for the improvement and development of a sufficient therapy that HDV patients are desperately in need of.

Renal safety and biochemical changes for 2 years after switching to tenofovir alafenamide from long-term other nucleotide analog treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Long-term use of nucleotide analogs such as adefovir (ADV) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) may cause renal impairment. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has less systemic exposure than TDF did. The aims were to examine longitudinal changes in renal function and biochemical parameters for 2 years after switching from long-term ADV and TDF to TAF, and to explore factors associated with improved renal function after TAF in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

The prospective observational cohort study included 306 patients with chronic hepatitis B who underwent switching from long-term TDF or ADV to TAF. The primary outcome was the changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after TAF.

RESULTS

Among 306 patients, 190 (65.3%) and 106 (34.7%) had chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 1-2 and 3a-4 at baseline. In patients with CKD stages 3a-4, the mean eGFR significantly increased until week 12 and plateaued from week 12 to year 2 (adjusted slope using linear mixed effect models: +9.01 ml/min/1.73 m² /year until week 12; p < 0.001). In contrast, the mean eGFR plateaued from baseline to year 2 in the CKD stages 1-2 subgroup. Multivariate logistic regression showed that baseline CKD stage ≥3a, steeper decline in eGFR 1 year before TAF, and shorter duration of any nucleotide analog use was significantly associated with ≥10% improvement in eGFR in year 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from TDF or ADV to TAF resulted in favorable renal safety for 2 years. In CKD stage 3a-4 subgroup, eGFR after TAF was recovered in the first 12 weeks and subsequently stabilized.

Clinical Results of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in a Hemodialysis Patient with Chronic Hepatitis B

A male hepatitis B virus (HBV) carrier in his 40s under hemodialysis treatment exhibited chronic hepatitis (alanine aminotransferase: 41 IU/L, HBV-DNA: >9.1 log copies/mL). Following discontinuation of the initial treatment with pegylated interferon-α-2a at 24 weeks due to adverse effects, the administration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (300 mg/week) led to a rapid improvement in hepatitis markers: HBV DNA became undetectable at month 34, and seroconversion of hepatitis B envelope antigen was confirmed at 45 months. No side effects were recorded during TDF treatment. TDF is a newly approved nucleoside analogue that may cause severe side effects via proximal tubular injury in patients with renal dysfunction. However, few reports have described its use in hemodialysis patients, whose anuric state may render them less susceptible to side effects including kidney injury. Hepatitis improved remarkably without any adverse drug reactions in the present case. TDF may therefore be considered for chronic hepatitis B patients receiving hemodialysis.

Japan Society of Hepatology Guidelines for the Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection: 2019 update

The Drafting Committee for Hepatitis Management Guidelines established by the Japan Society of Hepatology published the first version of the Guidelines for the Management of Hepatitis B in 2013 (first English version in 2014), and has since been publishing updates to the Guidelines as new drugs become available, with the latest original Japanese version being Version 3.1. Herein, the Drafting Committee publishes the second English version that contains all the changes made since the first English version of the guidelines was published in 2014. This 2019 version covers: (i) the nucleos(t)ide analogs, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tenofovir alafenamide; (ii) updates to treatment recommendations and management of drug-resistant hepatitis B virus that reflect the new availability of these drugs; and (iii) new information about hepatitis B virus reactivation with each update. This latest update also contains information about treatment goals, indications for treatment and cessation of nucleos(t)ide analog therapy, most of which were covered by the first version.

Entecavir resistance mutations rtL180M/T184L/M204V combined with rtA200V lead to tenofovir resistance

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) imposes a high genetic barrier to drug resistance and potently inhibits replication of multidrug-resistant hepatitis B virus. Few clinical cases with confirmed TDF-resistance have been reported to date.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Here, we report viral rebound in a patient with chronic hepatitis B who underwent TDF monotherapy and harboured a quadruple mutant consisting of classic entecavir (ETV)-resistance mutations (rtL180M/T184L/M204V) together with an rtA200V mutation in the reverse transcriptase gene. Sequencing analysis revealed that this quadruple mutant emerged as a major viral population. In vitro phenotyping demonstrated that the rtL180M/T184L/A200V/M204V mutant had moderate resistance to TDF treatment, with a 4.52-fold higher half maximal effective concentration than that of wild-type virus. Importantly, this patient with TDF resistance achieved virological suppression after TDF/ETV combination rescue therapy.

CONCLUSION

An rtL180M/T184L/A200V/M204V mutant with moderate resistance to TDF monotherapy was selected during sequential nucleoside analogue (NA) treatment in a stepwise manner. ETV/TDF combination therapy effectively suppressed replication of this TDF-resistant mutant. Our studies provide novel insights into the treatment of NA-naïve patients as well as patients with TDF resistance.

Hepatitis B surface antigen reduction as a result of switching from long-term entecavir administration to tenofovir

Background and Aim

Loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is an important goal in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. We investigated whether switching from long‐term entecavir (ETV) administration to tenofovir (TFV) (tenofovir alafenamide [TAF] or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [TDF]) could contribute to the reduction of HBsAg levels.

Methods

The degree of HBsAg reduction by 48 weeks in 30 patients following switching from ETV to TFV was compared with results from 147 patients who continued ETV as a control.

Results

TFV group switched to TFV after mean 6.79 years of ETV administration. HBV‐DNA levels remained below 1.0 log IU/mL in all cases in both groups during 48 weeks. Median HBsAg reduction at 48 weeks was 0.075 (−0.05 to 0.38) log/IU/mL in the TFV switch group, and 0.070 (−0.28 to 0.50) in the ETV continuation group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.5). In a subgroup of hepatitis B e antigen negative patients whose HBsAg had not been reduced (HBsAg reduction ≤0 log IU/mL) in the 48 weeks prior to entry into the study, HBsAg reduction was significantly higher in the TFV switch group than in the ETV continuation group (0.15 [0.07–0.135] in TFV, 0.09 [−0.14 to 0.25] log IU/mL in ETV, p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Although HBsAg reduction is equivalent with ETV continuation and switching to TFV in all patients at 48 weeks, switching from ETV to TFV could provide an alternative therapeutic strategy toward HBsAg elimination in a specific subpopulation of patients.

Strategies for the treatment of HBV/HDV

An estimated 240 million people worldwide are chronically infected with the hepatitis B virus (HBV). Despite readily available vaccination, HBV infections remain highly prevalent. As established HBV infections constitute a strong risk factor for developing hepatocellular carcinoma their treatment is a major task for the health system. Unfortunately, HBV is not curable with today's medicine. Approximately 15 million HBV patients have developed a hepatitis delta (HDV) infection on top of their HBV infection. The patients superinfected with this satellite virus suffer from a more severe disease development. The knowledge of the viruses, their classifications, clinical implications, treatment options and efforts to increase the drug variety are compiled in this review. The current standard therapies include nucleosidic reverse transcriptase inhibitors and interferon. As the known treatments fail to cure HBV and HDV, targeted treatment is highly warranted. The focus of this review is set on the drugs currently under clinical investigation. Furthermore, strategies for the development of targeted treatment, and compounds with novel mode of action are described.

HBV quasispecies composition in Lamivudine-failed chronic hepatitis B patients and its influence on virological response to Tenofovir-based rescue therapy

The present study sought to evaluate the structure of HBV quasispecies in Lamivudine (LMV)-failed chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients and its impact in defining the subsequent virological responses to Tenofovir (TDF)-based rescue-therapy. By analyzing HBV clones encompassing reverse transcriptase (RT) and surface (S) region from LMV-failed and treatment-naïve CHB patients, we identified 5 classical and 12 novel substitutions in HBV/RT and 9 substitutions in immune-epitopes of HBV/S that were significantly associated with LMV failure. In silico analysis showed spatial proximity of some of the newly-identified, mutated RT residues to the RT catalytic centre while most S-substitutions caused alteration in epitope hydrophobicity. TDF administration resulted in virological response in 60% of LMV-failed patients at 24-week but non-response in 40% of patients even after 48-weeks. Significantly high frequencies of 6 S-substitutions and one novel RT-substitution, rtH124N with 6.5-fold-reduced susceptibility to TDF in vitro, were noted at baseline in TDF non-responders than responders. Follow-up studies depicted greater evolutionary drift of HBV quasispecies and significant decline in frequencies of 3 RT and 6 S-substitutions in responder-subgroup after 24-week TDF-therapy while most variants persisted in non-responders. Thus, we identified the HBV-RT/S variants that could potentially predict unfavorable response to LMV/TDF-therapy and impede immune-mediated viral clearance.