Outcomes of conventional transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma ≥10 cm

Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Role and Techniques

In the current systemic therapy era, such as immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy, treatment strategy of hepatocellular carcinoma is changing. Transarterial chemoembolization is more expected as a curative treatment option than before. Therefore, it is important to learn key techniques of transarterial chemoembolization procedures to achieve complete response. This article delineates the current indications for transarterial chemoembolization and several techniques used for its implementation.

Effective Utilization of Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization and Drug-eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Guide to Proper Usage

Transarterial chemoembolization is still an effective treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide and is categorized into conventional transarterial chemoembolization with ethiodized oil transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting spherical material transarterial chemoembolization. Several randomized controlled trials conducted in Europe have shown the equivalent efficacy of ethiodized oil transarterial chemoembolization and drug-eluting spherical material transarterial chemoembolization. However, a recent randomized controlled trials in Japan established the superiority of ethiodized oil transarterial chemoembolization in terms of complete response rates although higher liver toxicity for ethiodized oil transarterial chemoembolization. Nevertheless, the survival advantage of ethiodized oil transarterial chemoembolization is yet to be substantiated. The adverse effects of drug-eluting spherical material transarterial chemoembolization are milder than those of ethiodized oil transarterial chemoembolization, rendering drug-eluting spherical material transarterial chemoembolization an advantageous option for patients with bilobar tumors and impaired liver function/performance status. This article aims to provide an overview of these embolization techniques and a review of recent literature.

The New Updated Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Staging System: Roles of Trans-arterial Chemoembolization and Homework to Interventional Radiologists

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, which has been identified as the most commonly used staging system in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, was initially published in 1999, and it was updated in 2022. This new Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging shows more flexible strategies for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma based on each stage. Although the roles of trans-arterial chemoembolization were limited in intermediate stage (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-B) patients in the previous version, its roles have been expanded in the new version of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system. In this manuscript, we introduce how trans-arterial chemoembolization is incorporated in a new Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system and explore the new role of trans-arterial chemoembolization and what interventional radiologists seek for in a near future.

Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety between D-TACE + HAIC + lenvatinib and D-TACE + lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combined treatment regimen of D-TACE, HAIC, and Lenvatinib in patients with massive hepatocellular carcinoma, with the goal of providing a safer and more effective therapeutic strategy for individuals suffering from massive hepatocellular carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using clinical data from 118 patients with unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent treatment at the Interventional Department of Wuhan Union Hospital between June 2018 and December 2021. Based on the treatment approach, the patients were divided into two groups: the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group (N = 54) and the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (N = 64). The primary study endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the two groups. Additionally, the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events in both groups was considered as a secondary study endpoint.

RESULTS

Following the treatment, the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group exhibited significantly higher ORR and DCR compared to the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (68.5% vs. 43.8%, 90.7% vs. 73.4%, P < 0.05). Moreover, the D-TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group demonstrated longer mPFS and mOS in comparison to the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (8.6 months vs. 6.6 months, P = 0.005; 19.5 months vs. 14.1 months, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence rate of common treatment-related adverse events between the TACE + HAIC + Lenvatinib group and the D-TACE + Lenvatinib group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combined treatment regimen of D-TACE, HAIC, and Lenvatinib demonstrated superior therapeutic efficacy and safety in managing unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma. This combination therapy may serve as a viable option for improving the prognosis of patients with unresectable massive hepatocellular carcinoma.

Drug-eluting beads chemoembolization combined with programmed cell death 1 inhibitor and lenvatinib for large hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), lenvatinib, and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor has been widely used in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has achieved promising results. However, there are few studies comparing whether drug-eluting beads TACE (D-TACE) can bring more survival benefits to patients with large HCC compared to conventional TACE (C-TACE) in this triplet therapy.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of triple therapy comprising D-TACE, PD-1 inhibitors, and lenvatinib (D-TACE-P-L) and C-TACE, PD-1 inhibitors, and lenvatinib (C-TACE-P-L) in patients with large HCC (maximum diameter ≥ 5 cm), and analyze the prognostic factors.

METHODS

Following a comprehensive review of our hospital's medical records, this retrospective study included 104 patients: 50 received D-TACE-P-L, and 54 received C-TACE-P-L. We employed Kaplan-Meier estimation to assess the median progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups, utilized Cox multivariate regression analysis to identify prognostic factors, and applied the χ 2 test to evaluate AEs.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) and median PFS were significantly higher in the D-TACE-P-L group compared to the C-TACE-P-L group (ORR: 66.0% vs 44.4%, P = 0.027; median PFS: 6.8 months vs 5.0 months, P = 0.041). Cox regression analysis identified treatment option, portal vein tumor thrombus, and hepatic vein invasion as protective factors for PFS. AEs were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

D-TACE-P-L may have significantly better PFS and ORR for large HCC, while exhibiting similar AEs to C-TACE-P-L.

The impacts of physical factors on huge hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiotherapy

Aims: To assess the influence of various physical factors on the outcome of transarterial chemoembolization combined with γ-ray hypofractionated radiation therapy (TACE-γHRT) for unresectable huge (≥10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (UH-HCC) patients.Materials & methods: A total of 162 UH-HCC patients with different tumor locations treated with TACE-γHRT and a retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the impacts of selected physical parameters on clinical outcomes.Results: The selected physical factors influenced the clinical outcomes significantly. No adverse events exceeding grade 3 were observed in the enrolled patients.Conclusion: Higher P70 and marginal dose, smaller tumor size and tumor location of neither skin nor gastrointestinal tracts involved were independent predictors for better overall survival and progression free survival.

Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

The study aims to evaluate the benefits and potential adverse effects of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) protein inhibitors in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A systematic literature search of several databases for relevant studies, published from inception up to May 2023, was performed. Clinical trials investigating TACE combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors compared with other treatment regimens for advanced HCC were included. Data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models and expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Trial sequential analysis was used to determine whether the study results were sufficiently conclusive. Totally thirteen cohort studies comprising 1279 patients were included. The combined use of TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitors significantly improved overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) compared with other treatment regimens. The incidences of all-grade or grade ≥ 3 adverse events were comparable and did not differ significantly between the two groups. Prognostic factor analysis identified treatment options, portal vein tumor thrombus, extrahepatic metastasis, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage as independent prognostic factors for OS. Extrahepatic metastasis, Child-Pugh score, and hepatic vein invasion emerged as independent prognostic factors for PFS. TSA suggested that the available data were adequate for drawing numerical conclusions regarding ORR and DCR. An approach combining TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitors appeared to offer significant improvements in OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR in patients with advanced HCC without significantly increasing the risk for all-grade adverse events.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using CalliSpheres beads loaded with arsenic trioxide for unresectable large or huge hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® beads loaded with arsenic trioxide (CBATO-TACE) in the first-line treatment of patients with large (5 cm ≤ maximum diameter < 10 cm) or huge (maximum diameter ≥ 10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to the CBATO-TACE group and the conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (cTACE) group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS), treatment response, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The extrahepatic collateral arteries, liver function, and liver fibrosis after the first TACE were also evaluated.

RESULTS

From September 2018 to September 2020, a total of 207 patients who underwent TACE were consecutively enrolled in this study. The median PFS was 9.5 months (range: 8.0 - 11.0) in the CBATO group, which was significantly longer than that in the cTACE group (6.0 months, range: 4.0-6.0) (p < 0.0001). Patients in the CBATO group had a median OS of 22 months (range: 20.0 - 27.0) compared with 16 months (range: 15.0 - 20.0) in the cTACE group (p = 0.0084). The most common TRAEs were fever (p = 0.043), and nausea and vomiting (p = 0.002), which were more observed in the cTACE group. In addition, the progressive disease time, pulmonary metastasis rate (p = 0.01), the mean number of extrahepatic collateral arteries (p = 0.01), and average number of TACE sessions (p = 0.025) were significantly decreased in the CBATO group.

CONCLUSIONS

CBATO-TACE achieved better therapeutic outcomes and similar safety profile compared to cTACE in large or huge HCC patients. Furthermore, CBATO-TACE was able to reduce extrahepatic collateral arteries production and extrahepatic lung metastasis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Our study showed that CalliSpheres® beads loaded with arsenic trioxide (CBATO-TACE) were effective and safe for the treatment of large and giant HCC. In addition, CBATO-TACE can reduce lateral hepatic branch artery formation and extrahepatic pulmonary metastasis, which provides a new treatment approach for unresectable HCC.

KEY POINTS

• We compare long-term efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® beads loaded with arsenic trioxide (CBATO-TACE) and conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (cTACE) in patients with large (5 cm ≤ maximum diameter < 10 cm) or huge HCC (maximum diameter ≥ 10 cm). • Compared with cTACE, CBATO-TACE significantly improved therapeutic outcomes, overall survival, and progression-free survival in patients with large or huge HCC. The safety assessment suggested that CBATO-TACE is a safe treatment that improves the quality of life and has good treatment adherence.

A retrospective study of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib compared with TACE monotherapy for BCLC B2 stage hepatocellular carcinoma

The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with lenvatinib (Len) plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and TACE alone in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B2 stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A total of 66 patients with BCLC B2 stage HCC were retrospectively reviewed in the present study, of which 34 patients received Len + TACE, while 32 patients received TACE alone between May 2018 and May 2020. Survival outcome, tumor response and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two treatment groups. The 6-month, 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were significantly higher in the Len + TACE group (97.1, 85.3 and 76.3%, respectively) compared with those in the TACE group [(93.8, 81.1 and 45.4%, respectively); hazard ratio (HR), 0.395; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.180-0.867; P=0.023], but no significant difference in progression-free survival rate was observed between the two groups (HR, 0.815; 95% CI, 0.437-1.520; P=0.510). Patients receiving Len + TACE demonstrated a higher objective response rate compared with those receiving TACE alone (64.7 vs. 34.4%; P=0.014). Therefore, Len + TACE combination therapy was associated with increased OS and tumor response compared with that of TACE monotherapy in patients with BCLC B2 stage HCC. However, large-scale, multicenter, prospective studies are needed to further confirm these results.

Benefits of step-by-step debulking microwave ablation for huge unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractoriness

OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and efficacy of step-by-step debulking Microwave Ablation (MWA) with Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) monotherapy for huge (≥10 cm in diameter) unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after TACE refractoriness.

METHODS

This is a multi-center retrospective study carried out on 599 patients with huge unresectable HCC who received TACE as first-line therapy at five hospitals from January 2009 to December 2018. A total of 103 patients with TACE refractoriness were divided into two cohorts: monthly step-by-step debulking MWA (n = 52) or continued TACE (n = 51). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after refractory TACE were evaluated. Residual liver and tumor volume were recorded for the MWA group.

RESULTS

Median follow-up period was 24.3 months and median OS and PFS were significantly longer in the MWA group than in the TACE group (OS 21.0 vs. 11.7 months, PFS 6.1 vs. 3.0 months, both p < 0.001). The one-, two-, and three-year OS rates in the MWA and TACE groups were 73.1%, 46.6%, and 37.2% versus 43.1%, 15.5%, and 2.9%, respectively. Furthermore, the 0.5-, 1-, and 2-year PFS rates in the MWA and TACE groups were 51.9%, 36.5%, and 25.0% versus 27.5%, 11.8%, and 0, respectively. Multivariate analyses confirmed that switching to debulking MWA treatment was an independent favorable prognostic factor for PFS and OS. In the MWA group, the average additions of residual liver volume/total liver volume were 7.7% ± 6.7%, 7.2% ± 10.2%, and 10.1% ± 8.8% after the first, second, and third MWA procedure.

CONCLUSION

Step-by-step debulking MWA can significantly improve long-term OS and PFS in patients with huge unresectable HCCs compared with repeated TACE after TACE refractoriness. Key PointThe debulking MWA therapy provides significantly longer OS and PFS than continued TACE for patients with huge unresectable HCCs after TACE-refractory, especially with complete tumor ablation.The most common complications were fever (48.1%) and pain (46.2%) in the MWA group. Two major complications (abdominal infection) were recorded in the MWA group, which recovered after symptomatic treatment.During the course of repeated MWAs, liver hyperplasia appeared mainly after the second MWA procedure and the average maximum increased RLV/TLV rate was 16.3%±12.7%.

Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Lenvatinib Plus PD-1 Inhibitor for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor (TACE-L-P) versus TACE combined with lenvatinib (TACE-L) for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of advanced HCC patients treated with TACE-L-P (TACE-L-P group) or TACE-L (TACE-L group) from January 2019 to December 2020 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. The differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor responses (based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups. Potential factors affecting OS and PFS were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were included in this study. Among them, 41 received TACE-L-P and 40 received TACE-L. The patients in TACE-L-P group had prolonged OS (median, 16.9 vs. 12.1 months, P=0.009), longer PFS (median, 7.3 vs. 4.0 months, P=0.002) and higher objective response rate (56.1% vs. 32.5%, P=0.033) and disease control rate (85.4% vs. 62.5%, P=0.019) than those in TACE-L group. Multivariate analyses revealed that the treatment option of TACE-L, main portal vein invasion and extrahepatic metastasis were the independent risk factors for OS, while TACE-L and extrahepatic metastasis were the independent risk factors for PFS. In subgroup analyses, a superior survival benefit was achieved with TACE-L-P in patients with extrahepatic metastasis or tumor number >3 but not in those with main portal vein invasion. The incidence and severity of AEs in TACE-L-P group were comparable to those in TACE-L group (any grade, 92.7% vs. 95.0%, P=1.000; grade 3, 36.6% vs. 32.5%, P=0.699).

CONCLUSION

TACE-L-P significantly improved survival over TACE-L with an acceptable safety profile in advanced HCC patients, especially those with extrahepatic metastasis or tumor number >3 but without main portal vein invasion.

Comparison of Chemoembolization, Radioembolization, and Transarterial Ethanol Ablation for Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma (≥ 10 cm) in Tumour Response and Long-Term Survival Outcome

PURPOSE

To compare transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization using Yttrium-90 (TARE), and transarterial ethanol ablation (TEA) for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in treatment responses and long-term survival outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study approved by institutional committee, inclusion criteria were tumour ≥ 10 cm, newly diagnosed, treatment naïve, Child A, Performance Score 0 or 1, no venous invasion or extrahepatic disease on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. There were 107 patients (Supportive Care [SC] 17, TACE 54, TARE 17, TEA 19). Survival outcomes of SC and TACE were compared (TACE selected as benchmark for transarterial treatments). Tumour response and overall survival (OS) of the three groups were compared.

RESULTS

OS of TACE (vs. SC) was significantly longer (9.9 [5.9, 24.1] months versus 2.8 [1.5, 10.2], p = 0.001). Complete response of TEA was significantly better (TEA 10/19 [52.6%] versus TARE 2/17 [12.5%], p = 0.013, versus TACE 9/54 [16.7%], p = 0.002). OS of TEA (vs. TACE) was significantly longer (21.6 [12, 41] months versus 9.9 [5.9, 24.1], p = 0.014, hazard ratio 0.6 (0.3, 1). OS of TEA (vs. TARE) was longer (21.6 [12, 41] months versus 11.9 [7, 28.7], p = 0.082, hazard ratio 0.6 (0.3, 1.3) in favour of TEA).

CONCLUSION

In patients with huge HCC, transarterial treatment as represented by TACE had a survival benefit over supportive care. In this retrospective analysis, TEA was associated with better tumour response and survival outcome as compared to TACE or TARE; therefore, transarterial treatment could be useful for prolonging patient survival, and TEA could be a preferred option.

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) plus apatinib versus DEB-TACE alone in treating huge hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Background

Apatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inhibits angiogenesis under the tumor hypoxic environment induced by drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), which is hypothesized to have synergic effect with DEB-TACE in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE plus apatinib in treating huge HCC patients.

Methods

Totally, 73 huge HCC patients (tumor size > 10 cm) were screened and divided into DEB-TACE plus apatinib group (N = 34) or DEB-TACE group (N = 39) based on the treatment they received. Their clinical response and adverse events were retrieved. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated.

Results

DEB-TACE plus apatinib achieved a trend of higher objective response rate (64.7% vs. 43.6%, P = 0.071), but similar disease control rate (88.2% vs. 79.5%, P = 0.314) than DEB-TACE alone. Moreover, DEB-TACE plus apatinib reached an improved PFS (median (95%CI): 19.0 months (15.5–22.5) vs. 10.9 months (8.0–13.8), P = 0.025) and OS (median (95%CI): 25.1 months (20.3–29.9) vs. 13.7 months (9.8–17.6), P = 0.042) than DEB-TACE alone. After adjustment by multivariate Cox’s regression analyses, DEB-TACE plus apatinib (vs. DEB-TACE alone) was independently correlated with better PFS (HR: 0.420, P = 0.004) and OS (HR: 0.477, P = 0.022). Regarding safety, adverse events were mostly mild and manageable; also, they were of no difference between DEB-TACE plus apatinib and DEB-TACE alone (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

DEB-TACE plus apatinib achieves prolonged PFS and OS, while similar adverse events occurrence compared to DEB-TACE alone in huge HCC treatment.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11845-021-02884-w.

Prognostic Significance of Tumor Growth Rate (TGR) in Patients with Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization

The prognostic value of the tumor growth rate (TGR) in huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HHCC) patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) as an initial treatment remains unclear. This two-center retrospective study was conducted in 97 patients suffering from HHCC. Demographic characteristics, oncology characteristics, and some serological markers were collected for analysis. The TGR was significantly linear and associated with the risk of death when applied to restricted cubic splines. The optimal cut-off value of TGR was −8.6%/month, and patients were divided into two groups according to TGR. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the high-TGR group had a poorer prognosis. TGR (hazard ratio (HR), 2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23–3.43; p = 0.006), presence of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.13–3.27; p = 0.016), and subsequent combination therapy (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.35–0.99; p = 0.047) were independent predictors of OS in the multivariate analysis. The model with TGR was superior to the model without TGR in the DCA analysis. Patients who underwent subsequent combination therapy showed a longer survival in the high-TGR group. This study demonstrated that higher TGR was associated with a worse prognosis in patients with HHCC. These findings will distinguish patients who demand more personalized combination therapy and rigorous surveillance.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Modified FOLFOX as an Alternative Treatment Option in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Failed or Unsuitability for Transarterial Chemoembolization

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with modified FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) as an alternative treatment option in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with failed or unsuitability for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2018 to January 2020, 87 advanced HCC patients who progressed on TACE or were not eligible for TACE received HAIC treatment with modified FOLFOX. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, and adverse events graded according to CTCAE 5.0. Based on prognostic factors determined by multivariate analysis, a nomogram was developed to predict patient survival.

RESULTS

The median OS and PFS were 9.0 months (95%CI 7.6-10.4) and 3.7 months (95%CI 3.1-4.3), respectively. The objective response rate was 13.8%, with a disease control rate of 48.3%. Grade 3 adverse events were observed, such as infection (9.2%), thrombocytopenia (5.7%), hyperbilirubinemia (3.4%), abdominal pain (2.3%) and alanine aminotransferase increase (2.3%). Albumin, AST, and extrahepatic metastasis were incorporated to construct a new nomogram that could stratify patients into three prognostic subgroups, including low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with significant differences in 9-month OS rates (71%, 42% and 6%, respectively; p< 0.001). The nomogram was better than the Okuda, AJCC, and CLIP staging systems for OS prediction.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the feasibility of HAIC with modified FOLFOX as an alternative treatment strategy for advanced HCC when TACE is ineffective or unsuitable.

Chemoembolization for Single Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Preserved Liver Function: Analysis of Factors Predicting Clinical Outcomes in a 302 Patient Cohort

The purpose of this study was to define the role of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with a single large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and define the patient groups benefiting from TACE. Treatment-naïve patients with preserved liver function who received TACE as the first-line treatment for single large (>5 cm) HCC without macrovascular invasion and extrahepatic metastasis between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival, progression-free survival, radiologic tumor response, complications, and predictors of survival were analyzed using multivariate analysis, and then a pretreatment risk-prediction model was created using the four predictive factors of tumor size, tumor type, ALBI grade, and ECOG performance status. Patients with scores of 0 (n = 54), 1-2 (n = 170), and 3-6 (n = 78) according to the model were classified as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk, respectively. The corresponding median OS values were 141, 55, and 28 months, respectively. The percentage of major complications increased as tumor size increased (4-21%). Asymptomatic, nodular HCC patients with a tumor size of 5-7 cm and ALBI grade 1 benefited the most from TACE. By contrast, the value of TACE in the treatment of single huge HCC (>10 cm) with high complication rates remains unclear.

Liver resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for huge hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matched analysis

To date, it is unclear which treatment modality, liver resection (LR) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the more appropriate for patients with huge (≥ 10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study aim was to compare, using propensity score matching, short- and long-term outcomes of patients with huge HCC who underwent potentially curative LR or TACE. Patients with huge HCC who had been managed at the Clinical Center by curative-intent LR or by palliative TACE between November 2001 and December 2018 were retrospectively identified. The morbidity and mortality rates and overall survival were compared between the groups before and after the propensity score matching. Independent predictors of long-term survival were determined by multivariate analysis. A total of 103 patients with huge HCC were included; 68 were assigned to the LR group and 35 to the TACE group. The overall morbidity rate was higher in the LR group than in the TACE group before matching (64.7% vs. 37.1%, p = 0.012), while there was no difference after matching (60% vs. 30%, p = 0.055). The major morbidity and 30-days mortality were similar between the groups before and after matching. The LR group was associated with longer overall survival than the TACE group before matching (p = 0.032) and after matching (p = 0.023). Total bilirubin and TACE treatment were independent prognostic factors associated with long-term survival. In patients with huge HCC, liver resection provides better long-term survival than TACE and should be considered as the initial treatment whenever possible.