Safety and effectiveness of lusutrombopag in Japanese chronic liver disease patients with thrombocytopenia undergoing invasive procedures: Interim results of a postmarketing surveillance

Safety and effectiveness of lusutrombopag in patients who have chronic liver disease with thrombocytopenia and undergoing invasive procedures: Real-world post-marketing surveillance in Japan

AIM

Lustrombopag has been approved for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver diseases who are scheduled to undergo an invasive procedure. Here, we report the final results of a post-marketing surveillance assessing the safety and effectiveness of lusutrombopag in Japan.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, real-world surveillance collected data from case report forms between October 2016 and May 2021. The observation period was 2 months after the first day of lusutrombopag treatment. Safety and effectiveness (proportion of patients avoiding preoperative platelet transfusion and responders who achieved platelet count increase from baseline) were assessed.

RESULTS

The safety analysis set included 1033 (100.0%), 130 (12.6%), and 14 (1.4%) patients who received one or more, two or more, and three or more treatment cycle(s), and 482 (48.9%), 457 (46.3%), and 43 (4.4%) patients who were Child-Pugh class A, B, and C, respectively. The most common serious adverse drug reactions were portal vein thrombosis, pancytopenia, and white blood cell count decrease, reported in 14 (1.36%), three (0.29%), and two (0.19%) patients, respectively. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was not higher in patients with Child-Pugh class C or those undergoing retreatment cycles compared with other Child-Pugh classes or the first treatment cycle, respectively. During the observation period of the first treatment cycle, 94.7% (889/939) of patients avoided preoperative platelet transfusion and 82.8% (741/895) of the patients met the responder criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

This surveillance study further supports the safety and effectiveness of lusutrombopag in a broad range of patients with chronic liver diseases undergoing planned invasive procedures.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

JapicCTI-163432.

Real-world use of avatrombopag in patients with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia undergoing a procedure

The phase 4 observational cohort study assessed the effectiveness and safety of the thrombopoietin receptor agonist avatrombopag in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and thrombocytopenia undergoing a procedure. Patients with CLD may have thrombocytopenia, increasing the risk of periprocedural bleeding. Prophylactic platelet transfusions used to reduce this risk have limitations including lack of efficacy and transfusion-associated reactions. Prophylactic thrombopoietin receptor agonists have been shown to increase platelet counts and decrease platelet transfusions. Effectiveness was assessed by change from baseline in platelet count and proportion of patients needing a platelet transfusion. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs). Of 50 patients enrolled, 48 were unique patients and 2 patients were enrolled twice for separate procedures. The mean (standard deviation) change in platelet count from baseline to procedure day was 41.1 × 109/L (33.29 × 109/L, n = 38), returning to near baseline at the post-procedure visit (change from baseline -1.9 × 109/L [15.03 × 109/L], n = 11). The proportion of patients not requiring a platelet transfusion after baseline and up to 7 days following the procedure was 98% (n = 49). Serious AEs were infrequent (n = 2 [4%]). No treatment-emergent AEs were considered related to avatrombopag. There were 2 mild bleeding events, no thromboembolic events or deaths, and no patients received rescue procedures (excluding transfusions). This study found that in a real-world setting, treatment with avatrombopag was well tolerated, increased the mean platelet count by procedure day, and reduced the need for intraoperative platelet transfusions in patients with CLD and thrombocytopenia.

Pharmacokinetic Assessment and Treatment Effect of Lusutrombopag in Child-Pugh Class C Patients: Review of Patient Data from Two Clinical Studies and Post-Marketing Surveillance

INTRODUCTION

Patients with thrombocytopenia and chronic liver disease are at increased risk of bleeding during invasive procedures due to low platelet counts. Lusutrombopag, an orally active thrombopoietin receptor agonist, increases platelet count and reduces the need for platelet transfusion in chronic liver disease patients with thrombocytopenia undergoing a planned invasive procedure. The safety of lusutrombopag in patients with Child-Pugh class C chronic liver disease is not known. The present analysis was performed to determine the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of lusutrombopag in patients with Child-Pugh class C chronic liver disease.

METHODS

Data for patients with Child-Pugh class C chronic liver disease were collected from three data sets: a phase 1/2 Child-Pugh class C study (n = 5) (JapicCTI-163289 [Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center]), a phase 3 pivotal study (L-PLUS 2, n = 3) (NCT02389621 [Clinicaltrials.gov]), and ongoing post-marketing surveillance (n = 27) (JapicCTI-163432 [Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center]). Patients received lusutrombopag at 3 mg for up to 7 days. Safety and efficacy assessments were collected from two clinical studies and the post-marketing surveillance; pharmacokinetic data were collected from the phase 1/2 study.

RESULTS

Mean C_max and AUC_0-τ were lower in Child-Pugh class C patients than Child-Pugh class A and B; individual patients' C_max and AUC_0-τ values overlapped among Child-Pugh classes. In lusutrombopag patients who did not receive platelet transfusion (n = 4 in phase 1/2, n = 1 in phase 3, n = 24 in post-marketing surveillance), the median (range) maximum platelet count was 88.5 × 10⁹/L (54-105 × 10⁹/L), 80 × 10⁹/L, and 91 × 10⁹/L (41-186 × 10⁹/L; n = 23), respectively. There were no treatment-related adverse events or treatment-related serious adverse events. One patient from the phase 1/2 study had a non-serious portal vein thrombosis, which was not considered treatment-related.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis presented in this study suggests that lusutrombopag increases platelet counts in Child-Pugh class C patients and is safe and well tolerated in this patient population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

L-PLUS 2: NCT02389621 (Clinicaltrials.gov). Phase 1/2: JapicCTI-163289 (Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center [JAPIC]). Post-marketing surveillance: JapicCTI-163432 (JAPIC).

Lusutrombopag has slightly stronger effects on patients with mild thrombocytopenia compared with those with severe thrombocytopenia: A multicenter propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

Lusutrombopag effectively increases platelet count in patients with severe thrombocytopenia. However, no multicenter studies analyzing the effects of Lusutrombopag on patients with mild thrombocytopenia (platelet count > 50 000/µL) have been performed. In this study, we aimed to clarify the efficacy of Lusutrombopag on these patients by unifying background factors by propensity score matching.

METHODS

A total of 139 patients with thrombocytopenia were enrolled, and matched for age, sex, etiology, disease, treatment, liver function, renal function, peripheral blood count, and spleen index. The primary endpoint was to compare the increase in platelet count from baseline between the high-platelet group (>50 000/µL) and the low-platelet group (<50 000/µL) after Lusutrombopag treatment, using propensity score matching. The secondary endpoint was to clarify platelet transfusion avoidance rate and adverse events, moreover, to identify independent predictors associated with the increase in platelet count.

RESULTS

The mean increase in platelet count was 67 000/μL vs 48 000/μL in all patients (high- vs low-platelet group, P = .024), and 64 000/μL vs 48 000/μL (P = .12) after propensity score matching. The increase in platelet count and the platelet transfusion avoidance rate tended to be higher in the high-platelet group. There was no significant difference between adverse events. Predictors associated with an increase in platelet count were sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and spleen index by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Lusutrombopag has a little stronger effect in patients with mild thrombocytopenia than those with severe thrombocytopenia and showed a more substantial effect in patients with impaired renal function and small spleen.

Relationship between baseline clinical characteristics and efficacy of lusutrombopag in thrombocytopenic patients with chronic liver disease: post hoc analysis of two placebo-controlled phase 3 trials

OBJECTIVE

Lusutrombopag is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved to treat thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). This post hoc analysis of the Japanese L-PLUS 1 and global L-PLUS 2 trials aimed to clarify factors related to platelet count increase after lusutrombopag treatment.

METHODS

In L-PLUS 1, Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to evaluate correlations between platelet count and spleen index, thrombopoietin concentration, white blood cell (WBC) counts, and red blood cell counts (intent-to-treat [ITT] population). Associations between platelet count increase after lusutrombopag treatment and each parameter were assessed by regression analysis and mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM). Associations between time-dependent changes in platelet count increase and each parameter were also examined in the L-PLUS 2 lusutrombopag ITT population by MMRM.

RESULTS

In L-PLUS 1, the baseline platelet count was correlated with pretreatment spleen index (r = -0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.41 to -0.03) and WBC count (r = 0.26, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.43). No selected parameters were associated with the maximum platelet count increase from baseline. Patients with WBC counts below the normal range showed smaller platelet count increases after lusutrombopag treatment than patients with WBC counts within the normal range (p = .0028). In L-PLUS 2 (p = .0533), findings were similar and confirmed by larger pooled data of L-PLUS 1/L-PLUS 2 (p = .0021).

CONCLUSIONS

This post hoc analysis revealed a possible association between baseline WBC count and platelet count increase after lusutrombopag treatment. WBC count could be a relevant factor for lusutrombopag efficacy.

Effects of Lusutrombopag on Post-invasive Procedural Bleeding in Thrombocytopenic Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

INTRODUCTION

Thrombocytopenia can increase the bleeding risk in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) undergoing invasive procedures. Prophylactic platelet transfusion (PT) is often performed to increase platelet counts in patients with CLD undergoing invasive procedures to prevent bleeding. Lusutrombopag, a small-molecule thrombopoietin receptor agonist, is expected to be an alternative therapy to prophylactic PT. This study aimed to compare the effects between lusutrombopag and PT.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a Japanese administrative database (April 2008-May 2019). Patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent planned invasive procedures after the first CLD diagnosis and were observed for ≥ 30 days prior to invasive procedures were considered eligible. Patients who underwent planned invasive procedures with lusutrombopag prescription at 5-30 days before the procedure were categorized as the lusutrombopag group, whereas those who received PT at 1 day before and/or on the same day as the procedure, without lusutrombopag prescription, were classified as the PT group. Outcomes, including bleeding frequency during hospitalization and average medical costs (costs for prophylactic treatment and total costs between the day of the invasive procedure and 30 days after the invasive procedure), were compared between the groups after matching.

RESULTS

Among 738,878 patients with CLD, 379 cases for each group were identified after matching. The incidence of bleeding events was lower in the lusutrombopag group than in the PT group (3.7% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001). Average medical costs were lower in the lusutrombopag group than in the PT group ($6667 as of August 2021 vs. $7170, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Lusutrombopag is suggested to be effective as a prophylactic treatment for bleeding prevention in patients with CLD undergoing planned invasive procedures.

Treatment algorithm for thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing planned invasive procedures

Thrombocytopenia is highly prevalent in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and these patients often require invasive procedures that carry a risk of bleeding. To prevent bleeding, guidelines recommend increasing platelet counts in patients with CLD who have thrombocytopenia and are planned to undergo invasive procedures. There are currently two options to increase platelet counts in patients in this setting: platelet transfusion or thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPORAs). Several treatment algorithms have been developed in the US to help physicians choose the best course of treatment for each patient; however, to date, no such algorithm has been proposed in other countries, where the choice of treatment has been based on each physician's judgment and experience. Here, we discuss the pathogenesis and treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD, we review and present current evidence of the efficacy of TPORAs for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD, and we present our expert opinion on a Japanese treatment algorithm for thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD who are planned to undergo invasive procedures. This algorithm aims to provide guidance for optimal decision making in the selection of TPORA therapy or platelet transfusion based on the latest evidence and according to actual clinical practice.

Repeated Lusutrombopag Treatment for Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Lusutrombopag, a small-molecule thrombopoietin receptor agonist, is used to treat thrombocytopenia based on the results of a phase 3 trial, including data for single-use administration in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) undergoing invasive procedures. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of repeated lusutrombopag use.

METHODS

Lusutrombopag was administered repeatedly in patients undergoing multi-cycle invasive procedures at intervals >1 month.

RESULTS

Data from 8 patients (median platelet count at baseline, 44.0 [range, 35-49] × 109/L) and 25 cycles of invasive procedures, including 2 cycles in 3 patients, 3 cycles in 4 patients, and 7 cycles in 1 patient, were retrospectively evaluated. The procedures included 18 transarterial chemoembolizations, 5 radiofrequency ablations, and 2 liver needle biopsies. Platelet counts increased significantly compared with baseline, and median changes in platelet counts were 46.0 × 109/L (p = 0.012) in cycle 1, 44.0 × 109/L (p = 0.012) in cycle 2, and 42.0 × 109/L (p = 0.008) in cycles 3-7. No severe adverse events, including portal vein thrombus or bleeding, were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated use of lusutrombopag might be safe and effective against thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD undergoing multi-cycle invasive procedures, although long-term data from more patients are required.

Efficacy of Lusutrombopag for Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease Scheduled to Undergo Invasive Procedures

Objective Lusutrombopag is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist that improves thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease scheduled to undergo invasive procedures. However, information on the efficacy of repeated lusutrombopag treatment and factors associated with the treatment is scarce. We analyzed the efficacy of repeated lusutrombopag treatment and the factors associated with a response to lusutrombopag. Methods Thirty-nine patients with chronic liver disease who received lusutrombopag treatment before undergoing invasive procedures were enrolled in this retrospective study. Of the 39 patients, 10 received lusutrombopag treatment multiple times for a total of 53 regimens of lusutrombopag treatment. Changes in platelet counts, the effects of repeated lusutrombopag treatment, and factors associated with response to lusutrombopag were analyzed. Results The median platelet count increased significantly from 4.5×10⁴/μL before lusutrombopag treatment to 7.2×10⁴/μL before the invasive procedure (p<0.01), and patients undergoing 49 of the 53 (92%) treatment regimens succeeded in undergoing invasive procedures without needing platelet transfusions. In patients who received lusutrombopag treatment repeatedly, the median platelet count significantly increased following the second administration of lusutrombopag, and the effects of lusutrombopag were similar between the first and second administration. A multivariate analysis identified the absence of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 5.56 for presence; p=0.04) as a significant and independent predictor of a response to lusutrombopag. Conclusion Lusutrombopag treatment significantly increased platelet counts in patients with chronic liver disease, making it possible to receive invasive procedures. The treatment produced identical effects when it was repeated. The efficacy of lusutrombopag might be decreased in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Lusutrombopag is effective and safe in patients with chronic liver disease and severe thrombocytopenia: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is often complicated by severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50,000/µL). Platelet transfusion has been a gold standard for increasing the platelet count to prevent hemorrhagic events in such patients. Lusutrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, can increase the platelet count in such patients when invasive procedures are scheduled. Former studies on lusutrombopag included patients with a platelet count of > 50,000/µL at baseline: the proportions of patients who did not require platelet transfusion were 84–96%, which might be overestimated.

Methods

The efficacy and safety of lusutrombopag were retrospectively investigated in CLD patients with platelet count of < 50,000/µL, a criterion for platelet transfusion, in real-world settings. We examined the proportion of patients who did not require platelet transfusion in 31 CLD patients, which exceeded a minimum required sample size (21 patients) calculated by 80% power at a significance level of 5%. Lusutrombopag, 3 mg once daily, was administered 8–18 days before scheduled invasive procedures.

Results

Among 31 patients who received lusutrombopag, 23 patients (74.2%) patients showed a platelet count of ≥ 50,000/µL (Group A) and did not require platelet transfusion. The remaining 8 patients (25.8%) did not reached platelet ≥ 50,000/µL (Group B). The means of platelet increase were 38,000/µL and 12,000/µL in groups A and B, respectively. A low platelet count at baseline was a characteristic of patients in group B. Among 13 patients who repeatedly used lusutrombopag, lusutrombopag significantly increased the platelet count as the initial treatment. When all repeated uses of lusutrombopag were counted among these 13 patients, platelet transfusion was not required in 82.1% (23/28) of treatments. Although one patient showed portal thrombosis after lusutrombopag treatment, the thrombosis was disappeared by anticoagulant treatment for 35 days. The degree of platelet increase with lusutrombopag was larger than that in their previous platelet transfusion.

Conclusions

The proportion of patients who did not require platelet transfusion was 74.2%, which is smaller than that in former studies which included CLD patients with a platelet count of > 50,000/µL. However, lusutrombopag is effective and safe for CLD patients with a platelet count of < 50,000/µL.

Is platelet monitoring during 7-day lusutrombopag treatment necessary in chronic liver disease patients with thrombocytopenia undergoing planned invasive procedures? A phase IIIb open-label study

AIM

Lusutrombopag is approved for thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease patients planned to undergo invasive procedures. In previous clinical studies, lusutrombopag treatment was stopped in patients with an increase in platelet count (PC) of ≥20 × 10⁹ /L from baseline and whose PC was ≥50 × 10⁹ /L (discontinuation criteria). We assessed the influence of platelet monitoring during lusutrombopag treatment in lusutrombopag-naïve patients.

METHODS

In this open-label study, Child-Pugh class A and B (A/B) patients were enrolled and treated with lusutrombopag (3 mg/day) for 7 days. In the treatment-naïve A/B-1 group, the discontinuation criteria were applied on day 6. In the treatment-naïve A/B-2 group, the criteria were not applied. In a non-naïve A/B group, the criteria were applied on days 3 and 5-7. The main efficacy end-point was the proportion of patients without platelet transfusion (PT) before the primary invasive procedure.

RESULTS

In the A/B-1, A/B-2, and non-naïve A/B groups, the proportions of patients without PT were 80.9% (38/47), 83.0% (39/47), and 75.0% (6/8), respectively. The mean durations of PC ≥ 50 × 10⁹ /L without PT were 20.7, 20.3, and 22.8 days, respectively. Excessive PC increases (≥200 × 10⁹ /L) were not detected in any group. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 4.3%, 6.4%, and 0% of A/B-1, A/B-2, and non-naïve A/B patients, respectively. Severe portal vein thrombosis occurred in one A/B-2 patient (PC 75 × 10⁹ /L at onset).

CONCLUSIONS

No meaningful efficacy and safety differences were observed among the groups with or without discontinuation criteria and the non-naïve group. These findings support lusutrombopag treatment without platelet monitoring and retreatment with lusutrombopag.

Effect of three or more treatments with lusutrombopag in patients with cirrhotic thrombocytopenia: A retrospective single-center study

AIMS

Thrombocytopenia is a common complication among patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Lusutrombopag, an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist, is used to reduce the risk of hemorrhage in patients with thrombocytopenia who are undergoing invasive procedures. Platelet transfusion was the standard treatment for thrombocytopenia; however, multiple platelet transfusions lead to the production of antiplatelet antibody. The effect of giving lusutrombopag three times or more has not been previously reported. In this study, we investigated the effect of lusutrombopag readministration in patients with thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

This study included 14 patients (total, 24 readministrations) who received lusutrombopag two times or more. Changes in platelet counts were evaluated. Treatment response was defined as an increased platelet count of ≥20 000/μL after lusutrombopag treatment.

RESULTS

Lusutrombopag was given twice in nine patients, three times in three patients, five times in one patient, and six times in one patient. An elevated platelet count of <20 000/μL was noted in only one of the 24 readministrations. There were no postoperative hemorrhagic complications, and no patient had an increased platelet count of >200 000/μL. One patient had a portal venous mural thrombus; however, he was asymptomatic, and the thrombus resolved after anticoagulant treatment, without recurrence. The comparison between the first, second, and third or more treatments showed there was no significant difference in platelet increase.

CONCLUSION

Repeated treatment of lusutrombopag is effective for CLD patients with thrombocytopenia. Moreover, three or more treatments with lusutrombopag showed equal effect compared with one and two treatments with the medication.

Impact of Anti-GPIIb/IIIa Antibody-Producing B Cells as a Predictor of the Response to Lusutrombopag in Thrombocytopenic Patients with Liver Disease

BACKGROUND

To make an accurate estimate of the response to thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonists for thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver disease, we evaluated the influence of antiplatelet autoantibodies on the response to lusutrombopag in thrombocytopenic patients with liver disease.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted at 2 hospitals. Thrombocytopenic patients with liver disease received oral lusutrombopag 3.0 mg once daily for up to 7 days. We analyzed changes in platelet counts from baseline to the maximum platelet count on days 9-14. The definition of clinical response was a platelet count of ≥5 × 104/μL with an increased platelet count of ≥2 × 104/μL from baseline. We assessed the correlation between the response to treatment drug and antiplatelet autoantibodies measured by anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibody-producing B cells.

RESULTS

Thirty patients received the trial drug. There were 25 responders and 5 nonresponders. The median change in platelet counts was 3.9 × 104/μL (95% CI 2.8-4.6, p < 0.0001). The correlation between change in platelet counts and the frequency of the anti-glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antibody-producing B cells was moderate (r = 0.414, 95% CI 0.064-0.674, p = 0.023). In multivariate analysis of factors affecting the change in platelet counts, the anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibody-producing B cells were identified as an independent factor (regression coefficient [B] = 0.089; CI 0.021-0.157, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Anti-GPIIb/IIIa antibody-producing B cells may be a predictor for TPO receptor agonists in patients with chronic liver disease.

Lusutrombopag: A Review in Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease Prior to a Scheduled Procedure

Lusutrombopag (Mulpleta^®), an orally bioavailable, small molecule thrombopoietin receptor agonist, is approved for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in adult patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to undergo a procedure. In placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trials, lusutrombopag significantly increased the proportion of patients who did not require a platelet transfusion prior to the procedure or rescue therapy for bleeding up to 7 days after the scheduled procedure. Lusutrombopag also significantly increased the proportion of patients who were responders (i.e. had a platelet count ≥ 50 × 10⁹/L and an increase of ≥ 20 × 10⁹/L from baseline) compared with placebo. Lusutrombopag is well tolerated, with headache being the most common adverse reaction in lusutrombopag recipients in clinical trials. Thus, lusutrombopag represents a promising emerging therapeutic option for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in adult patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to undergo a procedure.

Safety and effectiveness of lusutrombopag in Japanese chronic liver disease patients with thrombocytopenia undergoing invasive procedures: Interim results of a postmarketing surveillance

AIM

Lusutrombopag is approved for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease patients undergoing invasive procedures. This real-world surveillance assesses the safety and effectiveness of lusutrombopag in Japan.

METHODS

This ongoing, multicenter, prospective, real-world surveillance is collecting data from case report forms between October 2016 and May 2021. Interim data up to September 2018 were used to evaluate safety (adverse events and adverse drug reactions [ADRs]) and effectiveness (proportion of patients avoiding preoperative platelet transfusion and change in platelet count from baseline).

RESULTS

The safety analysis set included 331 patients. The mean baseline platelet count was 46.2 ± 13.7 × 10⁹ /L. Of 377 invasive procedures, radiofrequency ablation (110 procedures, 29.2%) was the most frequent. The mean time from starting lusutrombopag treatment to invasive procedure was 12.3 days. Incidences of serious adverse events and ADRs were 8.76% and 3.32%, respectively. Six cases (1.81%) of portal vein thrombosis were considered serious adverse events; of these, four cases (1.21%) were classified as serious ADRs. Of 300 patients who underwent an invasive procedure (excluding those with platelet transfusion refractoriness), 282 (94.0%) avoided preoperative platelet transfusion. In patients with platelet measurements before and after lusutrombopag administration who did not undergo platelet transfusion, the mean maximum change in platelet count from baseline was 41.7 ± 31.4 × 10⁹ /L (range, -6 to 276; n = 286). All patients receiving second (n = 20) and third (n = 1) treatments avoided preoperative platelet transfusion without developing any ADRs.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world surveillance further supports the safety and effectiveness of lusutrombopag in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing invasive procedures.