Effect of three or more treatments with lusutrombopag in patients with cirrhotic thrombocytopenia: A retrospective single-center study

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Lusutrombopag for Chronic Liver Disease Based on Pre-Treatment Platelet Counts: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Oral thrombopoietin receptor agonists are used to treat thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled for invasive procedures. The efficacy of lusutrombopag based on the pretreatment platelet count was investigated.

METHODS

Patients treated at nine hospitals from December 2015 to December 2023 were included. Efficacy was assessed by comparing the proportion of patients achieving a platelet count ≥ 50 000/μL and the change in platelet count.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were eligible for evaluation. Patients with a pretreatment platelet count < 40 000/μL had a significantly lower rate of achieving a platelet count of ≥ 50 000/μL than those with a pretreatment count of 40 000-50 000/μL (62.5% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.038); however, there was no significant difference in the change in platelet count (25 700 vs. 24 400/μL, p = 0.972). Patients with viral-related cirrhosis showed a significantly greater change in platelet count than the others (29 100 vs. 19 200/μL, p = 0.012). For patients receiving multiple lusutrombopag treatments, the change in platelet count was significantly lower in the second treatment than in the first treatment (26 900 vs. 20 800/μL, p = 0.041). The main adverse event observed was thrombosis (2.9%).

DISCUSSION

Lusutrombopag increases platelet count regardless of pretreatment levels, but efficacy, defined as achieving a platelet count of ≥ 50 000/μL, may be insufficient in patients with a pretreatment platelet count < 40 000/μL. Additionally, patients with non-viral liver disease responded less well to treatment compared to those with viral liver disease. Therefore, treatment strategies should be tailored based on pretreatment platelet counts and the etiology of liver disease.

A single course of lusutrombopag for multiple invasive procedures in cirrhosis-associated thrombocytopenia: A case series

RATIONALE

Lusutrombopag is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist which reduces the need for platelet transfusions before planned invasive procedures. A post hoc analysis of data from the registration trials observed that lusutrombopag-treated patients who achieved a platelet count > 50 × 109/L (responder patients) did so in a median of 6 days and the effect on platelet count lasted for nearly 3 weeks in total. Since patients with cirrhosis often require repeat invasive procedures, this kind of response-time trend sheds light on the possibility of placing more than one invasive procedure within a single course of lusutrombopag treatment.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Platelet transfusion represents the gold standard in this setting, but is limited by the risk of adverse events and limited availability.

DIAGNOSES

We describe our experience with lusutrombopag in three patients with severe cirrhosis-associated thrombocytopenia who underwent multiple invasive procedures after a single course of treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

The treatment schedule is lusutrombopag orally 3 mg/daily for 7 days and then a time window of 6 days (day 9-14) for the elective invasive procedure.

OUTCOMES

All three patients achieved good response to lusutrombopag treatment and were able to undergone more invasive procedures in the same course of treatment without need of platelet transfusion.

LESSONS

our preliminary experience supports the safety and the effectiveness of lusutrombopag in patients with severe cirrhosis-associated thrombocytopenia who underwent multiple invasive elective procedures after a single course.

Lusutrombopag has slightly stronger effects on patients with mild thrombocytopenia compared with those with severe thrombocytopenia: A multicenter propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

Lusutrombopag effectively increases platelet count in patients with severe thrombocytopenia. However, no multicenter studies analyzing the effects of Lusutrombopag on patients with mild thrombocytopenia (platelet count > 50 000/µL) have been performed. In this study, we aimed to clarify the efficacy of Lusutrombopag on these patients by unifying background factors by propensity score matching.

METHODS

A total of 139 patients with thrombocytopenia were enrolled, and matched for age, sex, etiology, disease, treatment, liver function, renal function, peripheral blood count, and spleen index. The primary endpoint was to compare the increase in platelet count from baseline between the high-platelet group (>50 000/µL) and the low-platelet group (<50 000/µL) after Lusutrombopag treatment, using propensity score matching. The secondary endpoint was to clarify platelet transfusion avoidance rate and adverse events, moreover, to identify independent predictors associated with the increase in platelet count.

RESULTS

The mean increase in platelet count was 67 000/μL vs 48 000/μL in all patients (high- vs low-platelet group, P = .024), and 64 000/μL vs 48 000/μL (P = .12) after propensity score matching. The increase in platelet count and the platelet transfusion avoidance rate tended to be higher in the high-platelet group. There was no significant difference between adverse events. Predictors associated with an increase in platelet count were sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and spleen index by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Lusutrombopag has a little stronger effect in patients with mild thrombocytopenia than those with severe thrombocytopenia and showed a more substantial effect in patients with impaired renal function and small spleen.

Treatment algorithm for thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease undergoing planned invasive procedures

Thrombocytopenia is highly prevalent in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and these patients often require invasive procedures that carry a risk of bleeding. To prevent bleeding, guidelines recommend increasing platelet counts in patients with CLD who have thrombocytopenia and are planned to undergo invasive procedures. There are currently two options to increase platelet counts in patients in this setting: platelet transfusion or thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPORAs). Several treatment algorithms have been developed in the US to help physicians choose the best course of treatment for each patient; however, to date, no such algorithm has been proposed in other countries, where the choice of treatment has been based on each physician's judgment and experience. Here, we discuss the pathogenesis and treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD, we review and present current evidence of the efficacy of TPORAs for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD, and we present our expert opinion on a Japanese treatment algorithm for thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD who are planned to undergo invasive procedures. This algorithm aims to provide guidance for optimal decision making in the selection of TPORA therapy or platelet transfusion based on the latest evidence and according to actual clinical practice.

Efficacy of Lusutrombopag for Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease Scheduled to Undergo Invasive Procedures

Objective Lusutrombopag is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist that improves thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease scheduled to undergo invasive procedures. However, information on the efficacy of repeated lusutrombopag treatment and factors associated with the treatment is scarce. We analyzed the efficacy of repeated lusutrombopag treatment and the factors associated with a response to lusutrombopag. Methods Thirty-nine patients with chronic liver disease who received lusutrombopag treatment before undergoing invasive procedures were enrolled in this retrospective study. Of the 39 patients, 10 received lusutrombopag treatment multiple times for a total of 53 regimens of lusutrombopag treatment. Changes in platelet counts, the effects of repeated lusutrombopag treatment, and factors associated with response to lusutrombopag were analyzed. Results The median platelet count increased significantly from 4.5×10⁴/μL before lusutrombopag treatment to 7.2×10⁴/μL before the invasive procedure (p<0.01), and patients undergoing 49 of the 53 (92%) treatment regimens succeeded in undergoing invasive procedures without needing platelet transfusions. In patients who received lusutrombopag treatment repeatedly, the median platelet count significantly increased following the second administration of lusutrombopag, and the effects of lusutrombopag were similar between the first and second administration. A multivariate analysis identified the absence of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 5.56 for presence; p=0.04) as a significant and independent predictor of a response to lusutrombopag. Conclusion Lusutrombopag treatment significantly increased platelet counts in patients with chronic liver disease, making it possible to receive invasive procedures. The treatment produced identical effects when it was repeated. The efficacy of lusutrombopag might be decreased in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Lusutrombopag is effective and safe in patients with chronic liver disease and severe thrombocytopenia: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is often complicated by severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50,000/µL). Platelet transfusion has been a gold standard for increasing the platelet count to prevent hemorrhagic events in such patients. Lusutrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, can increase the platelet count in such patients when invasive procedures are scheduled. Former studies on lusutrombopag included patients with a platelet count of > 50,000/µL at baseline: the proportions of patients who did not require platelet transfusion were 84–96%, which might be overestimated.

Methods

The efficacy and safety of lusutrombopag were retrospectively investigated in CLD patients with platelet count of < 50,000/µL, a criterion for platelet transfusion, in real-world settings. We examined the proportion of patients who did not require platelet transfusion in 31 CLD patients, which exceeded a minimum required sample size (21 patients) calculated by 80% power at a significance level of 5%. Lusutrombopag, 3 mg once daily, was administered 8–18 days before scheduled invasive procedures.

Results

Among 31 patients who received lusutrombopag, 23 patients (74.2%) patients showed a platelet count of ≥ 50,000/µL (Group A) and did not require platelet transfusion. The remaining 8 patients (25.8%) did not reached platelet ≥ 50,000/µL (Group B). The means of platelet increase were 38,000/µL and 12,000/µL in groups A and B, respectively. A low platelet count at baseline was a characteristic of patients in group B. Among 13 patients who repeatedly used lusutrombopag, lusutrombopag significantly increased the platelet count as the initial treatment. When all repeated uses of lusutrombopag were counted among these 13 patients, platelet transfusion was not required in 82.1% (23/28) of treatments. Although one patient showed portal thrombosis after lusutrombopag treatment, the thrombosis was disappeared by anticoagulant treatment for 35 days. The degree of platelet increase with lusutrombopag was larger than that in their previous platelet transfusion.

Conclusions

The proportion of patients who did not require platelet transfusion was 74.2%, which is smaller than that in former studies which included CLD patients with a platelet count of > 50,000/µL. However, lusutrombopag is effective and safe for CLD patients with a platelet count of < 50,000/µL.