Involving people with type 2 diabetes in facilitating participation in a cardiovascular screening programme

Self-reported outcomes following lower extremity, carotid and aortic artery disease: protocol for the Danish Vascular (DanVasc) survey

INTRODUCTION

Among lower extremity artery disease (LEAD), symptomatic carotid stenosis (SCS) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), the disease burden is insufficiently illuminated from a patient and societal perspective. Such knowledge is central to identifying patients at risk of poorer outcomes. Therefore, the Danish Vascular (DanVasc) survey aims to describe self-reported health status, health literacy, medication adherence and loneliness, including changes over time, and investigate characteristics associated with worse self-reported health at baseline and their associations with poorer outcomes within 1 year (healthcare utilisation and mortality) in patients with LEAD, SCS and AAA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The DanVasc survey, a national prospective cohort study combining survey data measured at several time points with register-based data, includes validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and ancillary questions developed with patient representatives. Our baseline survey (T0) follows the index contact in vascular outpatient clinics with follow-up surveys determined by the patient's trajectory: (1) newly referred patients in conservative treatment trajectories; the date for the outpatient visit activates 1-month (T1), 3-month (T2) and 12-month (T3) follow-ups. (2) Patients referred for vascular surgery; the surgery date activates 1-month (T1), 3-month (T2) and 12-month (T3) follow-ups. The included PROMs assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), anxiety and depression, sleep, frailty status, health literacy, medication adherence and loneliness. For LEAD, a disease-specific PROM evaluates HRQoL. For AAA, disease-specific ancillary questions are added. Additionally, the DanVasc survey includes questions on health behaviour, preventive measures and sexual life. The DanVasc survey will be linked to national registries to obtain socio-demographic information and data on redeemed prescriptions, clinical information, healthcare utilisation, comorbidities and mortality. From December 2023 to December 2024, we aim to recruit approximately 5500 patients from all seven DanVasc surgery departments. Patient characteristics will be reported using descriptive statistics. Changes over time and factors associated with poorer health outcomes will be analysed using linear, logistic and Cox proportional hazard models, presented as univariate and multivariate regressions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval for the collection of medical record data was granted by the Central Denmark Region, acting on behalf of all Danish regions (record 1-45-70-94-22). Consent to participate is obtained prior to answering the survey. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific publications and conference presentations, and findings will be shared with patients and relevant stakeholders via public and social media.

Arabic-speaking male immigrants' perceptions of preventive initiatives: An interview study

BACKGROUND

Arabic-speaking men are a sparsely investigated population in health promotion and disease prevention. This may hamper their ability to achieve the highest obtainable health due to less accessibility and acceptability of preventive measures.

AIM

We explored Arabic-speaking (Palestinian, Iraqi and Somali) male immigrants' perceptions of preventive initiatives in general and such initiatives for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in particular to understand how to address inequalities in engagement in prevention.

METHODS

This qualitative study employed content analysis of semistructured interviews with 60-66-year-old Arabic-speaking men living in Denmark. Supplementary, structured data, for example, health data, were collected. From June to August 2020, 10 men were interviewed.

FINDINGS

Preventive initiatives were found ethically and culturally acceptable alongside personally and socially relevant; they were perceived as humanitarian and caring for the participants' health, respecting of their self-determination and enabling their empowerment. Thus, the participants entreated that their fellow countrymen be assisted in achieving the prerequisite coping capabilities to address inequality in access, perceived acceptance and relevance. This led us to define one main category 'Preventive initiatives - Caring and humanitarian aid empower us' with the underlying subcategories: 'We are both hampered and strengthened by our basic assumptions' and 'We need help to achieve coping capabilities enabling us to engage in preventive initiatives'.

CONCLUSION

Prevention was perceived as acceptable and relevant. Even so, Arabic-speaking men may be a hard-to-reach group due to their basic assumptions and impaired capabilities for engaging in prevention. Addressing inequality in accessibility, acceptability and relevance in regard to prevention may be promoted through a person-centred approach embracing invitees' preferences, needs and values; and by strengthening invitees' health literacy through efforts at the structural, health professional and individual levels.

PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This study was based on interviews. The interviewees were recruited as public representatives to assist us in building an understanding of Arabic-speaking male immigrants' perceptions of preventive initiatives in general and preventive initiatives for CVD in particular.

Involving people with type 2 diabetes in facilitating participation in a cardiovascular screening programme

BACKGROUND

Knowledge is lacking about how to increase uptake among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) invited to preventive initiatives like cardiovascular screening.

AIM

To explore how to improve participation of people with T2D in cardiovascular screening using patient and public involvement (PPI).

METHODS

Patient and public involvement was included in a qualitative research design. From April to October 2019, we invited 40- to 60-year-old people with T2D (n = 17) to individual consultative meetings, using an interviewing approach. Before the interviews, participants were asked to read a proposed invitation letter to be used in a cardiovascular screening programme. Inductive content analysis was undertaken.

RESULTS

Participants considered cardiovascular screening important and beneficial from both a personal and social perspective. We found that the relational interaction between the person with T2D and the health-care professional was key to participation and that nudging captured through the design of the screening programme and the wording of the invitation letter was requested.

CONCLUSION

In preventive initiatives perceived as meaningful by the invitee, a focus on recruitment is crucial to facilitate participation. This study contributed with knowledge about how to promote participation by involving health-care professionals in recruitment initiatives and through nudging. This knowledge may assist researchers, policymakers and ethicists' understanding and assessment of the ethical appropriateness and public acceptability of nudging in cardiovascular screening.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

By consulting 17 people with T2D, we are now in a position to suggest how a screening initiative should be altered because tools to improve uptake have been identified.