Similar long-term efficacy of dual therapy containing raltegravir and a boosted protease inhibitor versus standard triple therapies in pretreated HIV-1-infected patients in a retrospective, real-life cohort of 14 years

The effect of protease inhibitor-based dual antiretroviral regimens on CD4/CD8 ratio during the first year of therapy in ART-naïve patients with HIV-infection

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of protease inhibitor (PI)-based dual therapy on CD4/CD8 ratio during the first year of therapy in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve patients using data from randomized controlled clinical trials.

METHODS

We pooled data from the GARDEL and ANDES studies, both randomized controlled clinical trials that recruited ART-naïve people living with HIV and randomly assigned them to receive PI-based dual therapy (DT) or triple therapy (TT) aiming to compare viral efficacy. We compared median CD4/CD8 ratios and the proportion of patients with CD4/CD8 ratio > 1 at 48 weeks after ART initiation in both treatment arms using the Mann-Whitney U-test and the χ² test. We performed subgroup analysis for patients > 50 years old, with baseline CD4 counts ≤ 200 cells/μL, viral load > 100 000 HIV RNA copies/mL, and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based therapy.

RESULTS

We analysed data from 571 patients: 292 on DT and 279 on TT. No differences were observed in CD4/CD8 ratio (0.632 vs. 0.617, P = 0.729) or in the proportion of patients with CD4/CD8 ratio > 1 (17.9% vs. 19.3%, P = 0.678) 48 weeks after ART initiation. Subgroup analysis showed no further differences.

CONCLUSION

The impact of PI-based DT regimens on the CD4/CD8 ratio during the first year of treatment for ART-naïve patients is similar to that of TT.

Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir plus boosted-darunavir dual therapy among highly treatment-experienced patients

BACKGROUND

Dual therapies decrease toxicity, pill-burden and treatment-associated cost. The combination of high genetic barrier drugs such as dolutegravir plus boosted-darunavir may be suitable as simplification regimen for patients harbouring multidrug-resistant virus.

METHODS

Patients switched to a once-daily regimen consisting of dolutegravir plus darunavir, boosted with cobicistat or ritonavir, were included in this cohort study. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with HIV RNA viral load <37 copies/ml at week 48 (NCT02491242).

RESULTS

Overall, 51 patients were enrolled. At baseline, all patients had failed to ≥2 antiretroviral classes. Genotypic resistance profiles showed a mean of primary mutations of 1.2 for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 2.4 for nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors and 3.5 for protease inhibitors (PIs), but they were virologically suppressed for a median of 33 months (IQR 12-60). Only five patients had reduced sensitivity to darunavir and mean genotypic susceptibility score of dual therapy was 1.95 over 2. At week 48, there were no virological failures, three patients discontinued the regimen due to neuropsychiatric adverse events, two were lost to follow-up, and therefore the efficacy was 90% (95% CI, 82, 99%, intention-to-treat analysis). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased by 8.8 ml/min/1.73 m², though kidney tubular parameters, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol and triglycerides levels improved after switching to dual therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In highly treatment-experienced patients who were virologically suppressed, switching to the combination of dolutegravir plus boosted-darunavir dual therapy was effective and well tolerated, improving lipid and renal parameters.