What problems associated with ageing are seen in a specialist service for older people living with HIV?

Patient-reported outcome measures in adult HIV care: A rapid scoping review of targeted outcomes and instruments used

OBJECTIVE

There is international interest in the integration of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into routine HIV care, but little work has synthesized the content of published initiatives. We conducted a rapid scoping review primarily to identify their selected patient-reported outcomes and respective instruments.

METHODS

Four databases were searched on 4 May 2022 (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO) for relevant English language documents published from 2005 onwards. Dual review of at least 20% of records, full texts and data extraction was performed. Outcomes and instruments were classified with an adapted 14-domain taxonomy. Instruments with evidence of validation were described.

RESULTS

Of 13 062 records generated for review, we retained a final sample of 94 documents, referring to 60 distinct initiatives led mostly in the USA (n = 29; 48% of initiatives), Europe (n = 16; 27%) and Africa (n = 9; 15%). The measured patient-reported outcome domains were: mental health (n = 42; 70%), substance use (n = 23; 38%), self-management (n = 16; 27%), symptoms (n = 12; 20%), sexual/reproductive health (n = 12; 20%), physical health (n = 9; 15%), treatment (n= 8; 13%), cognition (n = 7; 12%), quality of life (n = 7; 12%), violence/abuse (n = 6; 10%), stigma (n = 6; 10%), socioeconomic issues (n = 5; 8%), social support (n = 3; 5%) and body/facial appearance (n = 1; 2%). Initiatives measured 2.6 outcome domains, on average (range = 1-11). In total, 62 distinct validated PROMs were identified, with 53 initiatives (88%) employing at least one (M = 2.2). Overwhelmingly, the most used instrument was any version of the Patient Health Questionnaire to measure symptoms of depression, employed by over a third (26; 43%) of initiatives.

CONCLUSION

Published PROM initiatives in HIV care have spanned 19 countries and disproportionately target mental health and substance use.

How is Aging Perceived to Affect Well-being in Women Older than 50 Years Living With HIV? A Qualitative Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Advances in HIV treatment have led to more people with HIV living to 50 years and older. No reviews have qualitatively analyzed and synthesized the literature relevant to theory and practice for well-being specifically in Women living with HIV (WLWH) aged 50 years and older. Sixteen eligible qualitative studies were critically appraised and thematically synthesized to investigate how aging was perceived to affect well-being in WLWH aged 50 years and older. Six themes demonstrated how HIV-related stigmas negatively affected social well-being, and how adjusting to living and aging with HIV negatively affected psychological and physical well-being of older WLWH. Holding caring roles also negatively affected physical well-being of WLWH. Globally, majority women aging with HIV were found to experience additional stigmas. Further research could elucidate how HIV-related stigma affects the well-being of global majority women living and aging with HIV. Recommendations are made for future HIV-related clinical practice and theory development.

Practical management of complexity in older people with HIV: approaching an international consensus

ABSTRACTGlobally the community of people with HIV is ageing, and some of these have increasingly complex care needs, with a known excess of non-HIV related comorbidities and related issues including consequent polypharmacy. At the 2022 International AIDS Conference in Montréal, Canada, the "Silver Zone" was created in the Global Village as a safe space for older people with HIV. As part of the Silver Zone activities, a session discussing global models of care for in this group was held. HIV treatment providers and advocates from diverse resource settings and with a diversity of expertise were invited to share their experience, reflections, and ideas, and this consensus statement was formed based on these discussions. Different approaches to care emerged, based on local needs and resources, and it became clear that issues of complexity and frailty need not be age limited. Despite clear regional differences, some common themes became apparent, and a consensus was established on basic principles that may be considered in diverse settings. These are discussed here, with agreement on necessary proximal steps to develop bespoke person-centred care models.

How do geriatricians feel about managing older people living with HIV? A scoping review

Aim

To identify what evidence exists regarding how geriatricians feel about managing older people living with HIV.

Findings

Currently whilst geriatricians are willing to contribute to the care of older people living with HIV, they lack the experience and training to take a prominent role.

Message

Incorporating education about HIV care into geriatric medicine curricula and the formation of quality clinical practice guidelines is required to prepare geriatricians to help participate in the care of older people living with HIV.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-022-00642-4.

Purpose

The proportion of people living with HIV being older adults is increasing and due to high rates of multimorbidity and frailty within this group geriatricians are well placed to contribute to their care. However, little is known about how geriatricians feel about this new opportunity.

Methods

A scoping review was performed following the Arksey & O’Malley’s methodological framework with nine databases searched in December 2021 for studies reporting the experiences or views of geriatricians on caring for people living with HIV. Study inclusion was not limited by language or year of publication. Narrative reviews were excluded. Two reviewers independently performed the extraction using predetermined criteria. A descriptive analysis of extracted information was performed.

Results

Six publications reporting four studies, all conducted in the USA, were identified. The current barriers to geriatricians being involved in the care of older people living with HIV are: their current experience in managing people living with HIV, their knowledge of HIV, specific issues related to older people living with HIV and screening for HIV in older people as well as their attitudes to people living with HIV and experience of managing older LGBTQ + people.

Conclusion

Prior to geriatricians being routinely involved in the care of older people living with HIV further research outside of the USA is required. Geriatricians will also require specific training which should be incorporated into geriatric medicine training curricula as well as the creation of learning tools and quality clinical practice guidelines ideally created in collaboration with HIV organisations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-022-00642-4.