Dying at home in rural residential aged care: A mixed-methods study in the Snowy Monaro region, Australia

Primary Palliative Care in Assisted Living and Residential Care: A Metasynthesis

Assisted living (AL) and residential care (RC) settings are experiencing substantial growth as older adults with lower care needs seek alternatives to nursing homes. Despite this trend, there is a lack of skilled nursing care to support palliative care (PC) in these environments. Primary PC delivered by AL staff has emerged as a potential model to bridge this gap, focusing on symptom management and holistic support for individuals with serious illness. A metasynthesis of 88 qualitative studies was conducted to explore the provision of primary PC in AL/RC settings. The National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care was used to provide a holistic framework to identify unmet PC need and gaps in PC delivery. Studies published between 2012 and 2024 were analyzed to identify themes and categories related to PC domains, including physical, psychological, social, spiritual, cultural, end-of-life care, and ethical and legal considerations. Thematic synthesis revealed key findings across the identified PC domains within AL/RC settings. Studies highlighted challenges and opportunities for delivering primary PC in these environments, emphasizing the importance of addressing physical symptoms, psychological distress, social isolation, and spiritual needs among residents with serious illnesses. The metasynthesis underscores the critical role of primary PC in enhancing quality of life and care continuity for older adults residing in AL/RC settings. It also identifies gaps in current practices and emphasizes the need for tailored interventions and training to support care providers in delivering comprehensive PC to this population. By integrating qualitative research findings with the National Consensus Project guidelines, this metasynthesis provides a comprehensive overview of primary PC in AL/RC settings. The study underscores the necessity of enhancing PC delivery in these environments to meet the evolving needs of older adults with serious illnesses, thereby improving overall quality of care for residents with unmet palliative needs.

The Concept of Respite in Palliative Care: Definitions and Discussions

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The definition of respite care remains unclear and its purpose and effectiveness are unproven till date. This paper reviews the current evidence regarding definition and efficacy of respite care, as well as the different programs, models, and interventions employed to deliver the same.

RECENT FINDINGS

A scoping search identified the relevant literature to be included in the review. The current evidence reiterates the lack of clarity in defining and delineating the purpose of respite care. Recent empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of respite care with clear benefits for the carers, patients, their families, and the healthcare system. Along with inpatient, home, and hospice care, respite care is considered as an essential component of palliative care. Evidence, although weak, supports the efficacy of respite care. High-quality studies with clear outlining of the scope of the services and resolution of ambiguities pertaining to its definition are warranted to fill the gaps in knowledge.

The impact of introducing Palliative Care Needs Rounds into rural residential aged care: A quasi-experimental study

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the impact of introducing Palliative Care Needs Rounds (hereafter Needs Rounds) into residential aged care on hospitalisations (emergency department presentations, admissions and length of stay) and documentation of advance care plans.

DESIGN

A quasi-experimental study.

SETTING

Two residential aged care facilities in one rural town in the Snowy Monaro region of New South Wales, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

The intervention group consisted of all residents who died during the study period (April 2018-March 2019), and included a subgroup of decedents who were discussed in a Needs Round. The control cohort included all residents who died in the three-year period prior to introducing Needs Rounds (2015-2017).

INTERVENTION

Needs Rounds are monthly onsite triage/risk stratification meetings where case-based education and staff support help to identify residents most at risk of dying without an adequate plan in place. Needs Rounds were attended by residential aged care staff and led by a palliative medicine physician.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Decedents' hospitalisations (emergency department presentations, admissions and length of stay) in the last three months of life, place of death and documentation of advance care plans.

RESULTS

Eleven Needs Rounds were conducted between April and September 2018. The number of documented advance care plans increased (P < .01). There were no statistically significant changes in hospitalisations or in-hospital deaths.

CONCLUSION

Needs Rounds are an effective approach to increase the documentation of advance care plans within rural residential aged care. Further studies are required to explore the rural influence on outcomes including hospital transfers and preferred place of death.

The 'safe death': An ethnographic study exploring the perspectives of rural palliative care patients and family caregivers

BACKGROUND

In rural settings, relationships between place and self are often stronger than for urban residents, so one may expect that rural people would view dying at home as a major feature of the 'good death'.

AIM

To explore the concept of the 'good death' articulated by rural patients with life-limiting illnesses, and their family caregivers.

DESIGN

Ethnography, utilising open-ended interviews, observations and field-notes.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 12 rural (town and farm) patients with life-limiting illnesses, 18 family caregivers and 6 clinicians, in the Snowy Monaro region of New South Wales, Australia, participated in this study over the course of the deaths of the patients. Interviews were transcribed and analysed with observational data using an emergent thematic process.

RESULTS

A 'safe death' was central to a 'good death' and was described as a death in which one could maintain (1) a connection with one's previous identity; (2) autonomy and control over decisions regarding management of end-of-life care and (3) not being overwhelmed by the physical management of the dying process. For all participants, the preferred place of death was the 'safe place', regardless of its physical location.

CONCLUSION

Safety, in this study, is related to a familiar place for death. A home death is not essential for and does not ensure a 'good death'. We all have a responsibility to ensure all places for dying can deliver the 'safe death'. Future research could explore the inter-relationships between safety and preference for home or home-like places of death.