1
|
Bosdijk A, Nieboer AP, Cramm JM. The development of an integrated neighborhood approach for health promotion and prevention: a qualitative exploration of stakeholders' views. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:125. [PMID: 38017576 PMCID: PMC10683097 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01077-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the promise of integrated neighborhood approaches, including the essential roles of communities and collaboration between the medical and social domains, has been widely acknowledged, the realization of such approaches in practice often remains difficult. To gain insight into the development of integrated neighborhood approaches, this case study describes the experiences of stakeholders involved in such an approach for health promotion and prevention in Rotterdam. METHODS Interviews with 18 stakeholders (including health and social care professionals, health insurance employees, and policymakers) were conducted, and stakeholders' statements were analyzed thematically. RESULTS The results reveal a lack of alignment among the professional, organizational, and system levels. Elements needed for collaboration between health and social care professionals are not supported at the organizational and system levels. The lack of integration at the policy and organizational levels encourages competition and self-interest instead of stimulating collaboration. CONCLUSIONS Intersectoral collaboration and coordination must take place not only between professionals, but also at the organizational and policy levels. As long as integration at the organizational and system levels is lacking, professionals' ability to collaborate and provide coordinated support to neighborhood residents will be compromised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anniek Bosdijk
- Department of Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Anna Petra Nieboer
- Department of Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jane Murray Cramm
- Department of Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 5: Co-creative qualitative approaches for emerging themes in primary care research: Experience-based co-design, user-centred design and community-based participatory research. Eur J Gen Pract 2022; 28:1-12. [PMID: 35037811 PMCID: PMC8765256 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2021.2010700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
This article, the fifth in a series aiming to provide practical guidance for qualitative research in primary care, introduces three qualitative approaches with co-creative characteristics for addressing emerging themes in primary care research: experience-based co-design, user-centred design and community-based participatory research. Co-creation aims to define the (research) problem, develop and implement interventions and evaluate and define (research and practice) outcomes in partnership with patients, family carers, researchers, care professionals and other relevant stakeholders. Experience-based co-design seeks to understand how people experience a health care process or service. User-centred design is an approach to assess, design and develop technological and organisational systems, for example, eHealth, involving end-users in the design and decision-making processes. Community-based participatory research is a collaborative approach addressing a locally relevant health issue. It is often directed at hard-to-reach and vulnerable people. We address the context, what, why, when and how of these co-creative approaches, and their main practical and methodological challenges. We provide examples of empirical studies using these approaches and sources for further reading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albine Moser
- Research Centre Autonomy and Participation of Chronically Ill People, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
- Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Irene Korstjens
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yip O, Dhaini S, Esser J, Siqeca F, Mendieta MJ, Huber E, Zeller A, De Geest S, Deschodt M, Zúñiga F, Zullig LL, King HA, Urfer P, Vounatsou P, Obas K, Briel M, Schwenkglenks M, Quinto C, Blozik E. Health and social care of home-dwelling frail older adults in Switzerland: a mixed methods study. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:857. [PMID: 36376806 PMCID: PMC9663289 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03552-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Home-dwelling frail older adults are often faced with multimorbidity and complex care needs, requiring health and social care systems that support frail older adults to age in place. The objective of this paper was to investigate the types of formal health and social care as well as informal care and social support used by home-dwelling frail older adults; whether they perceive their support as sufficient; and their experience with and preferences for care and support. Methods Using an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, we first conducted a secondary analysis of a subset of cross-sectional data from the ImplemeNtation of a community-baSed care Program for home dwelling senIoR citizEns (INSPIRE) population survey using descriptive analysis. Subsequently, we analyzed existing data from interviews in the parent study to help explain the survey results using applied thematic analysis. Results were organized according to adapted domains and concepts of the SELFIE framework and integrated via a joint display table. Results Of the parent population survey respondents, 2314 older adults indicating frailty were included in the quantitative arm of this study. Interview data was included from 7 older adults who indicated frailty. Support from health and social, formal and informal caregivers is diverse and anticipated to increase (e.g., for ‘care and assistance at home’ and ‘meal services’). Informal caregivers fulfilled various roles and while some older adults strongly relied on them for support, others feared burdening them. Most participants (93.5%) perceived their overall support to meet their needs; however, findings suggest areas (e.g., assessment of overall needs) which merit attention to optimize future care. Conclusions Given the anticipated demand for future care and support, we recommend efforts to prevent fragmentation between health and social as well as formal and informal care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03552-z.
Collapse
|
4
|
Values Underpinning Integrated, People-Centred Health Services: Similarities and Differences among Actor Groups Across Europe. Int J Integr Care 2022; 22:6. [PMID: 36043027 PMCID: PMC9374025 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.6015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: In addition to the functional aspects of healthcare integration, an understanding of its normative aspects is needed. This study explores the importance of values underpinning integrated, people-centred health services, and examines similarities and differences among the values prioritised by actors across Europe. Methods: Explorative cross-sectional design with quantitative analysis. A questionnaire of 18 values was conducted across Europe. A total of 1,013 respondents indicated the importance of each of the values on a nine-point scale and selected three most important values. Respondents were clustered in four actor groups, and countries in four European sub-regions. Results: The importance scores of values ranged from 7.62 to 8.55 on a nine-point scale. Statistically significant differences among actor groups were found for ten values. Statistically significant differences across European sub-regions were found for six values. Our analysis revealed two clusters of values: ‘people related’ and ‘governance and organisation’. Discussion and conclusion: The study found that all 18 values in the set are considered important by the respondents. Additionally, it revealed distinctions in emphasis among the values prioritised by actor groups and across sub-regions. The study uncovered two clusters of values that contribute to a conceptually based definition of integrated, people-centred health services.
Collapse
|
5
|
Poškutė V, Kazlauskaitė R, Matonytė I. Stakeholder collaboration in long-term care of older people in Lithuania. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:193-202. [PMID: 33852735 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Demographic situation, changes in the role of women in society and growing demand for long-term care (LTC) of older people have challenged the ability to meet the growing LTC needs in most developed countries. In countries where responsibility for LTC is still largely laid on families, it is, however, even more critical and calls for improvements in formal LTC systems. More intensive stakeholder collaboration in LTC policy development, organising and delivery are of primary importance in improving LTC systems. Such collaboration, however, is not always successful; thus, it is critical to understand what makes it effective and efficient. In this paper, we specifically look into multistakeholder collaboration in LTC in Lithuania, one of the fastest ageing countries in the EU, with the demand for LTC services growing fast and exceeding the supply despite rising business and NGO engagement. To determine facilitators of such collaboration, we build on the data obtained through eight focus group discussions with all key stakeholder representatives (LTC policymakers, organisers and service providers [public, private and NGOs], 54 participants in total). Our findings indicate that in addition to national and organisational level facilitators studied in prior research, there are important individual level factors, such as meaningfulness at work, concern and care for others, possibility for personal growth and development, satisfaction with supervision, a sense of belonging and role clarity. On the other hand, our results show that collaboration is constrained by a shortage of human resources, increased workload caused by growing LTC demand, bureaucratic requirements, legal restrictions, lack of awareness of LTC service availability among elder persons, and prevailing social norms and attitudes to institutionalised care. Interestingly, a lack of financial resources is not perceived as a major constraint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Irmina Matonytė
- ISM University of Management and Economics, Vilnius, Lithuania
- General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yip O, Huber E, Stenz S, Zullig LL, Zeller A, De Geest SM, Deschodt M. A Contextual Analysis and Logic Model for Integrated Care for Frail Older Adults Living at Home: The INSPIRE Project. Int J Integr Care 2021; 21:9. [PMID: 33976598 PMCID: PMC8064293 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Implementation science methods and a theory-driven approach can enhance the understanding of whether, how, and why integrated care for frail older adults is successful in practice. In this study, we aimed to perform a contextual analysis, develop a logic model, and select preliminary implementation strategies for an integrated care model in newly created information and advice centers for older adults in Canton Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland. METHODS We conducted a contextual analysis to determine factors which may influence the integrated care model and implementation strategies needed. A logic model depicting the overall program theory, including inputs, core components, outputs and outcomes, was designed using a deductive approach, and included stakeholders' feedback and preliminary implementation strategies. RESULTS Contextual factors were identified (e.g., lack of integrated care regulations, existing community services, and a care pathway needed). Core components of the care model include screening, referral, assessment, care plan creation and coordination, and follow-up. Outcomes included person-centred coordinated care experiences, hospitalization rate and symptom burden, among others. Implementation strategies (e.g., nurse training and co-developing educational materials) were proposed to facilitate care model adoption. CONCLUSION Contextual understanding and a clear logic model should enhance the potential for successful implementation of the integrated care model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Yip
- Nursing Science (INS), Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Evelyn Huber
- Nursing Science (INS), Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Switzerland
- Institute of Nursing, School of Health Professions, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, CH
| | - Samuel Stenz
- Nursing Science (INS), Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Leah L. Zullig
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, USA
| | - Andreas Zeller
- Centre for Primary Health Care, University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sabina M. De Geest
- Nursing Science (INS), Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Switzerland
- Academic Center for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mieke Deschodt
- Nursing Science (INS), Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Switzerland
- Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium
- Healthcare and Ethics, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, UHasselt, Belgium
| | - the INSPIRE consortium
- Matthias Briel, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Franziska Zúñiga, Penelope Vounatsou, Carlos Quinto, Eva Blozik, Flaka Siqeca, Maria José Mendieta Jara
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Bruin SR, Billings J, Stoop A, Lette M, Ambugo EA, Gadsby E, Häusler C, Obermann K, Ahi GP, Reynolds J, Ruppe G, Tram N, Wistow G, Zonneveld N, Nijpels G, Baan C. Different Contexts, Similar Challenges. SUSTAIN's Experiences with Improving Integrated Care in Europe. Int J Integr Care 2020; 20:17. [PMID: 32607104 PMCID: PMC7319084 DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jenny Billings
- Integrated Care Research Unit Centre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Annerieke Stoop
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, NL
- Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC – VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL
- Scientific Centre for Transformation in Care and Welfare (Tranzo), University of Tilburg, Tilburg, NL
| | - Manon Lette
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, NL
- Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC – VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL
| | - Eliva A. Ambugo
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, NO
| | - Erica Gadsby
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | | | - Konrad Obermann
- Mannheim Institute of Public Health (MIPH), Heidelberg University, DE
| | - Gerli-Paat Ahi
- Praxis Centre for Policy Studies Foundation, Tallinn, EE
| | - Jillian Reynolds
- Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Barcelona, ES
| | - Georg Ruppe
- Austrian Interdisciplinary Platform on Ageing/OEPIA, Vienna, AT
| | - Nhu Tram
- AGE Platform Europe, Brussels, BE
| | - Gerald Wistow
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Nick Zonneveld
- National Centre of Excellence in Long Term Care, Utrecht, NL
- TIAS School for Business and Society, University of Tilburg, Tilburg, NL
| | - Giel Nijpels
- Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC – VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL
| | - Caroline Baan
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, NL
- Scientific Centre for Transformation in Care and Welfare (Tranzo), University of Tilburg, Tilburg, NL
| | | |
Collapse
|