1
|
Numakura K, Kobayashi M, Muto Y, Sato H, Sekine Y, Sobu R, Aoyama Y, Takahashi Y, Okada S, Sasagawa H, Narita S, Kumagai S, Wada Y, Mori N, Habuchi T. The Current Trend of Radiation Therapy for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:8092-8110. [PMID: 37754502 PMCID: PMC10529045 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30090587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
A recent approach to radiotherapy for prostate cancer is the administration of high doses of radiation to the prostate while minimizing the risk of side effects. Thus, image-guided radiotherapy utilizes advanced imaging techniques and is a feasible strategy for increasing the radiation dose. New radioactive particles are another approach to achieving high doses and safe procedures. Prostate brachytherapy is currently considered as a combination therapy. Spacers are useful to protect adjacent organs, specifically the rectum, from excessive radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuyuki Numakura
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Mizuki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Yumina Muto
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Hiromi Sato
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Yuya Sekine
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Ryuta Sobu
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Yu Aoyama
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Yoshiko Takahashi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Syuhei Okada
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Hajime Sasagawa
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Shintaro Narita
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| | - Satoshi Kumagai
- Department of Radiology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (S.K.); (Y.W.); (N.M.)
| | - Yuki Wada
- Department of Radiology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (S.K.); (Y.W.); (N.M.)
| | - Naoko Mori
- Department of Radiology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (S.K.); (Y.W.); (N.M.)
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan; (M.K.); (Y.M.); (H.S.); (Y.S.); (R.S.); (Y.A.); (Y.T.); (S.O.); (H.S.); (S.N.); (T.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haas S, Mikkelsen AH, Kronborg CJS, Oggesen BT, Møller PF, Fassov J, Frederiksen NA, Krogsgaard M, Graugaard-Jensen C, Ventzel L, Christensen P, Emmertsen KJ. Management of treatment-related sequelae following colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:458-488. [PMID: 35969031 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Colorectal cancer survivors are one of the most rapidly growing groups of patients living with and beyond cancer. In a national multidisciplinary setting, we have examined the extent of late treatment-related sequelae in colorectal cancer survivors and present the scientific evidence for management of these conditions in this patient category with the aim of facilitating identification and treatment. METHOD A systematic search for existing guidelines and relevant studies was performed across 16 and 4 databases, respectively, from inception to 2021. This yielded 13 guidelines and 886 abstracts, of which 188 were included in the finalized guideline (231 included for full text review). Secondarily, bibliographies were cross-referenced and 53 additional articles were included. RESULTS Symptoms have been divided into overall categories including psychosocial, bowel-related, urinary, sexual (male and female), pain/neuropathy and fatigue symptoms or complaints that are examined individually. Merging and grading of data resulted in 22 recommendations and 42 management strategies across categories. Recommendations are of a more general character, whereas management strategies provide more practical advice suited for initiation on site before referral to specialized units. CONCLUSION Treatment-related sequelae in colorectal cancer survivors are common and attention needs to be focused on identifying patients with unmet treatment needs and the development of evidence-based treatment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Haas
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Pia F Møller
- Department of Surgery, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Janne Fassov
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Lise Ventzel
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Peter Christensen
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Katrine Jøssing Emmertsen
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mechanisms, mitigation, and management of urinary toxicity from prostate radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:e534-e543. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00544-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
4
|
Faithfull S, Cockle-Hearne J, Lemanska A, Otter S, Skene SS. Randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of the symptom management after radiotherapy (SMaRT) group intervention to ameliorate lower urinary tract symptoms in men treated for prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:3165-3176. [PMID: 34932140 PMCID: PMC8857109 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06749-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effectiveness of the symptom management after radiotherapy (SMaRT) group intervention to improve urinary symptoms in men with prostate cancer. METHODS The randomised controlled trial (RCT) recruited men from one radiotherapy centre in the UK after curative radiotherapy or brachytherapy and with moderate to severe urinary symptoms defined as scores ≥ 8 on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire. Sixty-three men were randomised either; to SMaRT, a 10-week symptom-management intervention including group support, education, pelvic floor muscle exercises, or a care-as-usual group. The primary outcome was the IPSS at 6 months from baseline assessment. Secondary outcomes were IPSS at 3 months, and International Continence Society Male Short Form (ICS), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life prostate scale (EORTC QLQ-PR25), EORTC QLQ-30 and Self-Efficacy for Symptom Control Inventory (SESCI) at 3 and 6 months from baseline. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to analyse the effect of the intervention. RESULTS SMaRT group intervention did not improve urinary symptoms as measured by IPSS at 6-months. The adjusted difference was - 2.5 [95%CI - 5.0 to 0.0], p = 0.054. Significant differences were detected at 3 months in ICS voiding symptoms (- 1.1 [- 2.0 to - 0.2], p = 0.017), ICS urinary incontinence (- 1.0 [- 1.8 to - 0.1], p = 0.029) and SESCI managing symptoms domain (13.5 [2.5 to 24.4], p = 0.017). No differences were observed at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS SMaRT group intervention provided short-term benefit in urinary voiding and continence and helped men manage symptoms but was not effective long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Faithfull
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, Surrey, UK.
| | - Jane Cockle-Hearne
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, Surrey, UK
| | - Agnieszka Lemanska
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, Surrey, UK
| | - Sophie Otter
- Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, Surrey, UK
| | - Simon S Skene
- Surrey Clinical Trials Unit, University of Surrey, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Haas S, Mikkelsen AH, Kronborg C, Oggesen BT, Faaborg PM, Serup-Hansen E, Spindler KLG, Christensen P. Management of late adverse effects after chemoradiation for anal cancer. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1688-1701. [PMID: 34845967 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1983208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Significant improvements in the treatment of anal cancer have produced a growing population of anal cancer survivors. These patients often experience late adverse effects related to their treatment. Research has revealed substantial unmet needs because of long-term symptoms and functional impairments after treatment that may negatively affect health-related quality of life. The purpose of the present guidelines is to review the scientific evidence for the management of late adverse effects after (chemo)radiotherapy ([C]RT) for anal cancer and to extrapolate knowledge from other pelvic malignancies treated with pelvic (C)RT so that they may guide the clinical management of late adverse effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS Relevant studies were systematically searched in four databases from their inception to June 2020 (no language limitation) and guidelines were searched in 16 databases, focussing on bowel dysfunction, psychosocial aspects, pain, and sexual and urinary dysfunction. The guidelines were developed by a panel of experts using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, levels of evidence, and grades of recommendations. SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE Late adverse effects after (C)RT for anal cancer are associated with a low overall quality of life among survivors. The most pronounced late adverse effects are bowel dysfunction (present in up to 78%), urinary dysfunction (present in up to 45%), and sexual dysfunction (present in up to 90% of men and up to 100% of women). Only indirect data on adequate treatment options of these late adverse effects for anal cancer are available. CONCLUSION Quality of life and late adverse effects should be monitored systematically following treatment for anal cancer to identify patients who require further specialist evaluation or support. Increased awareness of the extent of the problem may serve to stimulate and facilitate multidisciplinary collaboration, which is often required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Haas
- Danish Cancer Society, National Research Centre for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Camilla Kronborg
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Pia Moeller Faaborg
- Department of Surgery, Vejle Hospital, Danish Colorectal Cancer Centre South, Vejle, Denmark
| | | | | | - Peter Christensen
- Danish Cancer Society, National Research Centre for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang K, Tepper JE. Radiation therapy-associated toxicity: Etiology, management, and prevention. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71:437-454. [PMID: 34255347 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is a curative treatment for many malignancies and provides effective palliation in patients with tumor-related symptoms. However, the biophysical effects of RT are not specific to tumor cells and may produce toxicity due to exposure of surrounding organs and tissues. In this article, the authors review the clinical context, pathophysiology, risk factors, presentation, and management of RT side effects in each human organ system. Ionizing radiation works by producing DNA damage leading to tumor death, but effects on normal tissue may result in acute and/or late toxicity. The manifestation of toxicity depends on both cellular characteristics and affected organs' anatomy and physiology. There is usually a direct relationship between the radiation dose and volume to normal tissues and the risk of toxicity, which has led to guidelines and recommended dose limits for most tissues. Side effects are multifactorial, with contributions from baseline patient characteristics and other oncologic treatments. Technological advances in recent decades have decreased RT toxicity by dramatically improving the ability to deliver RT that maximizes tumor dose and minimizes organ dose. Thus the study of RT-associated toxicity is a complex, core component of radiation oncology training that continues to evolve alongside advances in cancer management. Because RT is used in up to one-half of all patients with cancer, an understanding of its acute and late effects in different organ systems is clinically pertinent to both oncologists and nononcologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Joel E Tepper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms after Prostate Radiation. Curr Urol Rep 2021; 22:37. [PMID: 34041611 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01048-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To present urologists with guidance on how to approach and manage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients who have undergone radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS There are few studies that specifically examine treatment approaches for LUTS in patients who have undergone prostate cancer RT. LUTS after prostate RT are unique when compared to de novo LUTS. Understanding these distinctions is important for urologists' practice as well as patients' quality of life. Discussion of the risks and management of post-RT LUTS should be included in the shared decision-making process when counseling patients on various treatment options for prostate cancer. Further studies evaluating treatments for storage and voiding symptoms after RT are needed to help guide future care.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lemanska A, Poole K, Griffin BA, Manders R, Saxton JM, Turner L, Wainwright J, Faithfull S. Community pharmacy lifestyle intervention to increase physical activity and improve cardiovascular health of men with prostate cancer: a phase II feasibility study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e025114. [PMID: 31186245 PMCID: PMC6585832 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a community pharmacy lifestyle intervention to improve physical activity and cardiovascular health of men with prostate cancer. To refine the intervention. DESIGN Phase II feasibility study of a complex intervention. SETTING Nine community pharmacies in the UK. INTERVENTION Community pharmacy teams were trained to deliver a health assessment including fitness, strength and anthropometric measures. A computer algorithm generated a personalised lifestyle prescription for a home-based programme accompanied by supporting resources. The health assessment was repeated 12 weeks later and support phone calls were provided at weeks 1 and 6. PARTICIPANTS 116 men who completed treatment for prostate cancer. OUTCOME MEASURES The feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and the delivery model were assessed by evaluating study processes (rate of participant recruitment, consent, retention and adverse events), by analysing delivery data and semi-structured interviews with participants and by focus groups with pharmacy teams. Physical activity (measured with accelerometry at baseline, 3 and 6 months) and patient reported outcomes (activation, dietary intake and quality of life) were evaluated. Change in physical activity was used to inform the sample size calculations for a future trial. RESULTS Out of 403 invited men, 172 (43%) responded and 116 (29%) participated. Of these, 99 (85%) completed the intervention and 88 (76%) completed the 6-month follow-up (attrition 24%). Certain components of the intervention were feasible and acceptable (eg, community pharmacy delivery), while others were more challenging (eg, fitness assessment) and will be refined for future studies. By 3 months, moderate to vigorous physical activity increased on average by 34 min (95% CI 6 to 62, p=0.018), but this was not sustained over 6 months. CONCLUSIONS The community pharmacy intervention was feasible and acceptable. Results are encouraging and warrant a definitive trial to assess the effectiveness of the refined intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Lemanska
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Karen Poole
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Bruce A Griffin
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Ralph Manders
- School of Biosciences and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - John M Saxton
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Joe Wainwright
- Surrey Human Performance Institute, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Sara Faithfull
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Factors Influencing Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Advanced Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Int Neurourol J 2018; 22:192-199. [PMID: 30286582 PMCID: PMC6177728 DOI: 10.5213/inj.1836084.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to investigate the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and to identify factors that influenced LUTS in advanced cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Methods This cross-sectional study included a total of 158 advanced cancer patients with CIPN. A structured questionnaire including the International Prostate Symptom Score and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecology Oncology Group/Neurotoxicity scale was used. Data were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression analysis. Results Nocturia was the most prevalent LUTS. A positive relationship was found between CIPN symptoms and LUTS. The duration of cancer diagnosis and the severity of CIPN were key factors that influenced LUTS. Conclusions The severity of CIPN symptoms was the most important predictor of LUTS. Nurses’ care for advanced cancer patients should incorporate a comprehensive health assessment, which includes a history of treatment and physical neuropathic symptoms, for any patient complaining of CIPN symptoms.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lemanska A, Dearnaley DP, Jena R, Sydes MR, Faithfull S. Older Age, Early Symptoms and Physical Function are Associated with the Severity of Late Symptom Clusters for Men Undergoing Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:334-345. [PMID: 29459102 PMCID: PMC5952898 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Revised: 12/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To identify symptom clusters and predisposing factors associated with long-term symptoms and health-related quality of life after radiotherapy in men with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data from the Medical Research Council RT01 radiotherapy with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy trial of 843 patients were used. PROs were collected over 5 years with the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) and the 36 item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Symptom clusters were explored using hierarchical cluster analysis. The association of treatment dose, baseline patient characteristics and early symptom clusters with the change in severity of PROs over 3 years was investigated with multivariate linear mixed effects models. RESULTS Seven symptom clusters of three or more symptoms were identified. The clusters were stable over time. The longitudinal profiles of symptom clusters showed the onset of acute symptoms during treatment for all symptom clusters and significant recovery by 6 months. Some clusters, such as physical health and sexual function, were adversely affected more than others by androgen deprivation therapy, and were less likely to return to pretreatment levels over time. Older age was significantly associated with decreased long-term physical function, physical health and sexual function (P < 0.001). Both baseline and acute symptom clusters were significant antecedents for impaired function and health-related quality of life at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS Men with poorer physical function and health before or during treatment were more likely to report poorer PROs at year 3. Early assessment using PROs and lifestyle interventions should be used to identify those with higher needs and provide targeted rehabilitation and symptom management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Lemanska
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
| | - D P Dearnaley
- Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - R Jena
- Cambridge University Hospitals, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - M R Sydes
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London, UK
| | - S Faithfull
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|