Increased Risk of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Development after Dupilumab Use for Atopic Dermatitis

There have been several reports of dupilumab use and the development of CTCL; however, the risk of CTCL development has not been adequately evaluated at the population level. The objective of this study is to determine whether dupilumab administration for AD is associated with an increased risk of developing CTCL and to identify at-risk populations within this group. This retrospective cohort study used TriNetX, a deidentified medical record database including over 107 million patients, to identify eligible patients. Treatment and control groups were evaluated for the development of CTCL. Patients of any age with a documented diagnosis of AD were included. The treatment cohort included individuals treated with dupilumab, while the control cohort included AD patients treated with alternative therapies. Selected biologics were excluded from both groups. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate three age groups and to identify whether the risk of CTCL development was higher within a given time frame after starting dupilumab. We identified a total of 1,181,533 patients with AD. Of these, 19,612 patients were prescribed dupilumab. Both treatment and control groups included 19,612 patients matched for age, race, and sex. The mean age was 32.3 years (P = 0.96), and females accounted for approximately 52% (P = 0.93) in both groups. Patients treated with dupilumab for AD had an increased relative risk (RR) of developing CTCL compared to those never treated with dupilumab (RR = 4.59, 95% confidence interval 2.459-8.567, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that about half of the CTCL cases after dupilumab therapy (54.5%, 30/55) occurred in patients over the age of 60 years. In contrast, all CTCL cases (100%, 12/12) within the untreated cohort were observed in individuals over the age of 60. Of the patients diagnosed with CTCL following dupilumab use, the majority (62%, 34/55) were diagnosed within the first year. Overall, we find that the use of dupilumab for treating AD is associated with an increased relative risk of developing CTCL. This risk is highest in the first year of therapy and in adult patients. These findings suggest exercising caution in treating select groups of patients with dupilumab.

Risk of Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma with Psoriasis Biologic Therapies

BACKGROUND

The risk of developing cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) in patients using psoriasis biologics has not been well characterized. The goals of this review were to investigate the incidence of CTCL in patients with psoriasis receiving biologic therapy in clinical trials and psoriasis registries, and to review cases of CTCL and biologic use reported in scientific publications.

METHODS

The US National Library of Medicine clinical trials database (clinicaltrials.gov) was queried to identify phase 3 and 4 clinical trials of the 12 biologic agents currently FDA approved for psoriatic disease. The incidence of CTCL in these trials was examined and summarized. To examine the incidence of CTCL in psoriasis registries, a Medline search was conducted. Finally, we performed a systematic review of CTCL cases reported in the literature.

RESULTS

Only two cases of CTCL were reported in 35,801 subjects with psoriasis receiving a biologic agent in the active arm of 108 psoriasis phase 3 clinical trials. One of these CTCL cases was determined by the investigator to be CTCL misdiagnosed as psoriasis prior to randomization. No cases of CTCL were reported in 5440 subjects with psoriasis in 34 phase 4 clinical trials. Only one case of CTCL was identified in 34,111 registry subjects. In the literature, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors had the highest number of reported cases of CTCL (34 cases), followed by interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (7 cases), and IL-12/23 inhibitors (6 cases). No cases of CTCL were found to be reported with IL-23 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that the development of CTCL is rare in the setting of psoriasis biologic use. Of the limited number of cases of CTCL found, most were in the setting of TNF inhibitor use and no cases of CTCL were reported in the setting of IL-23 inhibitor use.

Adnexotropic and granulomatous mycosis fungoides following TNF-α inhibitor treatment

Recent publications have documented an increased prevalence of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in patients undergoing tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitor therapy. Herein, we present an uncommon manifestation of mycosis fungoides (MF) with unique pathological findings after the initiation of adalimumab therapy for the treatment of psoriasis. One year after starting treatment, the patient noticed a slowly growing, eroded plaque on the left cheek, the biopsy of which demonstrated mixed granulomatous and adnexotropic lymphocytic infiltrate with features characteristics of MF. In the following months, the patient developed pink- and violet-colored scaly plaques on the right posterior upper arm and right medial upper arm. Biopsy of these plaques also revealed findings compatible with MF. T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality studies by PCR revealed identical T-cell clones in the samples obtained from the cheek, right posterior upper arm, and right medial upper arm. TCR clonality studies of a long-standing psoriatic plaque on the right thigh failed to reveal similar T-cell clones. Blurring of histopathologic presentation by TNF-α inhibitors could greatly complicate the identification of MF subtypes. Providers treating patients with TNF-α inhibitors must be aware of the risk of cutaneous lymphoma development and the potential deviations from their expected presentations. In patients without an initial biopsy, the possibility of pre-existing CTCL with psoriasiform presentation should be considered.

Development of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Following Biologic Treatment: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma following biologic therapy is extremely rare.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the development of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) following treatment with a biologic agent.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed for patients who developed CTCL after exposure to biologic therapy. Works were limited to English language and excluded animal studies, guidelines, and protocols. Potentially eligible titles were identified using controlled vocabulary in tandem with key words. The search strategy was peer-reviewed prior to execution.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight total studies revealed sixty-two patients who developed CTCL following exposure to a biologic agent. Of these, 44% were Caucasian, and the median age at diagnosis was 56 years. Seventy-six percent of patients received biologic therapy for a primary inflammatory skin condition. Dupilumab was the most reported (42%) agent amongst the cohort. The median time from initiation of the biologic agent to diagnosis of CTCL in these cases was 4 months (range: 0-84). Mycosis fungoides (65%) and Sézary syndrome (10%) were the most common subtypes of CTCL diagnosed. Twenty-one (34%) patients were reported to be alive with disease, outcome was not reported in 21 patients (34%), ten patients (16%) were alive and in complete remission, eight patients (13%) died of disease and two patients (3%) died due to other causes.

CONCLUSION

While biologic agents may have a role in the development of CTCL, in order to definitively elucidate their role, more methodologically robust studies (such as those that utilize population databases) would need to occur.

Paradoxical eruptions to targeted therapies in dermatology: A systematic review and analysis

BACKGROUND

Antibody-based therapies that inhibit proinflammatory cytokine signaling are commonly used in dermatology. Paradoxically, these medications may induce or exacerbate inflammatory disorders.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the spectrum of manifestations, incidence, timing, potential mechanisms of, and general management approaches to paradoxical cutaneous reactions induced by cytokine-targeted antibodies in dermatology.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and analysis of published cases of cutaneous paradoxical reactions (PRs) reported in association with tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin (IL) 12/23 (p40), IL-17A/17R, IL-23 (p19), and IL-4Rα inhibitors.

RESULTS

We identified 313 articles reporting 2049 cases of PRs. Tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors resulted in 91.2% (1869/2049) of all cases, followed by IL-17/17R (3.5%), IL-4Rα (2.7%), IL-12/23 (2.4%), and IL-23 (0.01%) inhibitors. Psoriasiform and eczematous eruptions were the most commonly reported, but a wide spectrum of patterns were described. Phenotypically overlapping reaction patterns were common. Time to onset typically ranged from weeks to months but could occur more than a year later. Improvement or resolution upon discontinuation of the inciting drug was common.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Familiarity with the clinical features of PRs from cytokine-blocking antibodies may facilitate efficient recognition and management.

Interleukin 36 expression in psoriasis variants and other dermatologic diseases with psoriasis-like histopathologic features

BACKGROUND

Elevated epidermal interleukin (IL)-36 expression distinguishes psoriasis from eczematous dermatitis, but other psoriasiform dermatitides (PDs) have not been thoroughly investigated for IL-36 expression. In this study, we assess the IL-36 staining pattern (IL36-SP) in psoriasis variants and other PDs including lichen simplex chronicus (LSC), prurigo nodularis (PN), lichen planus (LP), tinea, pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP), mycosis fungoides (MF), pemphigus foliaceus (PF), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), impetigo (IMP), and syphilis (SY).

METHODS

IL-36 immunostaining was performed on 307 cases of psoriasis and various PDs. IL36-SP in the upper epidermis was graded on a scale of 0-4.

RESULTS

High IL36-SP occurred in all variants of psoriasis, as well as in AGEP, PRP, PN, tinea, IMP, and LP (P > 0.05). SY, PF, LSC, and MF showed a lower IL36-SP (P ≤ 0.05) compared with psoriasis.

CONCLUSION

All variants of psoriasis exhibit high IL36-SP. IL-36 staining can assist in differentiating MF, PF, SY, and LSC from psoriasis, particularly MF and LSC, which have consistent low IL-36 expression. AGEP, PRP, tinea, IMP, PN, and LP exhibit high IL-36 expression similar to psoriasis, indicating Th17 activation in these diseases.

Erythroderma: psoriasis or lymphoma? A diagnostic challenge and therapeutic pitfall

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis and lymphoma risk is widely debated, but few is known about misdiagnosis risk between erythrodermic psoriasis and lymphoma . In fact erythroderma might represent a clinical presentation of psoriasis, cutaneous T cell lymphomas and skin dissemination of systemic lymphomas.

METHODS

All patients referred to psoriasis outpatient service with a diagnosis of erythrodermic psoriasis were re-examined. Among them, all the patients with a subsequent lymphoma diagnosis were included. For each patient data concerning age, gender, age at erythroderma onset, age at lymphoma diagnosis, immune-suppressive therapy, type of lymphoma and relative stage, lymphoma treatment and outcome were obtained.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (15 females and 10 males) with a diagnosis of erythrodermic psoriasis were retrieved. Among them, 9 patients (5 males and 4 females) were affected by erythrodermic lymphoma, including 4 patients with Sèzary syndrome, 3 with mycosis fungoides, and 2 with peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified. Prior to lymphoma diagnosis all the patients (9/9) received cyclosporine, two (2/9) of them methotrexate, one (1/9) azatioprine, and two (2/9) systemic corticosteroids. The prognosis of our patients was poor, due to immune-suppressive drugs administration in patients with undiagnosed lymphoma. The only exception was one (1/9) patient with Sèzary syndrome still alive with disease after 120 months of follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of patients with erythroderma, multiple skin biopsies and specific peripheral blood studies like flow cytometry and T-cell receptor gene rearrangement analysis are required in order to avoid misdiagnosis risk between psoriasis and lymphoma.

Risk of mycosis fungoides in psoriatic patients: a critical review

Psoriasis has been controversially associated with risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and mycosis fungoides (MF). Also patients who developed MF after systemic treatment for psoriasis have been reported, and some authors suggested that the association between MF and psoriasis is not infrequent. We performed an extensive literature review in order to examine the risk of developing MF in psoriatic patients with a systematic search of the English-language databases. An increased risk for lymphoma overall in psoriatic patients has been found only by three out of seven studies. The risk of developing MF in psoriatic patients has been investigated by different studies in different populations and with different methodologies presenting bias and limitations, and it seems reasonable that misclassification between psoriasis and MF may explain the association reported. In contrast to the large number of psoriatic patients treated with biologicals, only 27 case reports of MF after biological therapy for psoriasis have been reported, and in 10 cases, the initial psoriasis diagnoses were then revised as MF. A true association between MF and psoriasis is possible, but the real incidence and prevalence are still unknown. The reported higher risk of developing MF in psoriatic patients should be reconsidered in the light of the bias of misclassification and the low magnitude reported in previous studies. There is not enough evidence to support a causal relation among biological therapies and MF in psoriatic patients.