Effects of silica gel on reduction in gluten during several beer brewing stages

A Comprehensive Comparison of Gluten-Free Brewing Techniques: Differences in Gluten Reduction Ability, Analytical Attributes, and Hedonic Perception

This study provides a comprehensive comparison among the most common gluten-free (GF) brewing practices, with a focus on the impact of each treatment on physicochemical parameters and consumer acceptability of the final beer. In addition, the influence of a longer cold maturation on the natural reduction of the gluten content was investigated. Prolyl endopeptidase addition was found to be the most effective treatment in reducing gluten levels (−75.93%), followed by silica gel (−53.09%), longer cold maturation (−4.32%), and tannins (−1.85%). Nonetheless, none of the treated beer samples was gluten-free (gluten content > 20 ppm) due to the high nitrogen content of the original wort. The silica gel application treatment affected the physicochemical and sensory characteristics of the final beer the least. According to the difference from control test results, no significant difference in terms of overall liking, appearance, odor/aroma, or taste was observed between the silica gel-treated sample and control beer (p > 0.05). On the other hand, the application of enzymes and tannins significantly affected the appearance and the beer odor/aroma. Nevertheless, all beer samples received positive sensory acceptance scores.

Gluten hypersensitivities and their impact on the production of gluten-free beer

This article consists of a study of the literature and an assessment of available data on the production of gluten-free beer and its constituents. The article shows how the FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission for Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses defines celiac disease, gluten-free products, and gluten-free beer. It describes diet-dependent diseases, which require a gluten-free diet, and groups of potential consumers of gluten-free beer. This article describes the use of oats as a raw material for the production of brewing malt and its usefulness in the production of beer. It specifies how the technological process of standard beer production needs to be modified so that the product meets the requirements of patients with celiac disease. The article also provides an overview of literature data on the production of gluten-free beer from pseudocereal malts, such as sorghum malt, buckwheat malt, amaranth malt, and quinoa malt.

Gluten-Free Brewing: Issues and Perspectives

Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated gluten-sensitive enteropathy. Currently, it affects around 1% of world population, but it is constantly growing. Celiac patients have to follow a strict gluten-free (GF) diet. Beer is one of the most consumed beverages worldwide, but it is not safe for people with CD. It has a gluten content usually above the safe threshold (20 ppm), determined by the official method for hydrolyzed foods (R5-competitive-ELISA). The demand on the market for GF beers is increasingly growing. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of different strategies to produce GF beer, highlighting strengths and weaknesses of each approach and taking into account technological and sensory issues. GF cereals or pseudocereals have poor brewing attitudes (if used as main raw material) and give the beer unusual flavour. Instead, enzymatic treatments allow traditional brewing process followed by gluten content reduction. A survey on 185 GF-producing breweries (both industrial and craft) from all over the world have been considered to assess which approach is most used. Beers brewed with GF cereals and pseudocereals (used in well-balanced proportions) are more common than gluten-removed (GR) beers, obtained by enzymatic treatment.

Bulk, Foam, and Interfacial Properties of Tannic Acid/Sodium Caseinate Nanocomplexes

For this work, the aim was to investigate the adsorption of the tannic acid (TA)/sodium caseinate (SC) nanocomplexes at the air/water interface and then to research its relationship with foam properties. First, nanocomplexes were prepared in a different mass ratio of TA and SC. The bulk behavior of nanocomplexes was evaluated by dynamic light scattering (DLS), signal-intensifying fluorescence probe (ANS), etc. As the concentration of TA increased, the z-average siameter ( D _z) of TA/SC nanocomplexes decreased gradually and the negative charge increased. Meanwhile, the surface hydrophobicity ( S_o) of the SC also decreased after the addition of TA. The interfacial properties were determined by dynamic surface tension and dilational rheology. The presence of polyphenols decreased the surface pressure (π) that resulted in poor foamability. However, the elastic ( E_d) component of the dilational modulus of films also increased as polyphenols concentration increased, which gave rise to admirable foam stability. The contribution of polyphenols to stabilize foam columns may be caused by interfacial interaction between proteins and polyphenols.