Variability in platelet dense granule adenosine triphosphate release findings amongst patients tested multiple times as part of an assessment for a bleeding disorder

A rapid whole-blood adenosine triphosphate secretion test can be used to exclude platelet-dense granule deficiency

BACKGROUND

Delta storage pool disease (δ-SPD) is a rare platelet function disorder (PFD) characterized by a deficiency of dense granules or defective granule secretion, leading to bleeding diathesis. Diagnostics of δ-SPD are difficult and lack standardization, leading to underestimation of its prevalence. Current diagnostic methods are based on granule content assays or lumi-aggregometry, which have limited availability. Therefore, there is an unmet need for a rapid, accessible test for δ-SPD.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic value of a rapid whole-blood adenosine triphosphate (ATP) secretion test for δ-SPD.

METHODS

ATP secretion after PAR-1 activating peptide (PAR-1 AP; TRAP-6) stimulation was assessed in whole blood using luminescence in 50 healthy controls, 22 patients with a suspected PFD other than storage pool disease (non-SPD) and 25 patients with δ-SPD and corrected for platelet count. Diagnostic value of the test was determined with C-statistics, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios (LLRs), and predictive values (PVs).

RESULTS

PAR-1 AP mediated ATP secretion in the rapid test was lower in δ-SPD than in healthy controls and non-SPD patients (P < .0001). The rapid test was able to discriminate between δ-SPD and non-SPD patients (C-statistic 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98). At a cutoff value of the highest value of the δ-SPD group, the sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 64%. This cutoff value corresponded with a positive LLR of 2.75, an optimal negative LLR of 0.00, positive PV of 76%, and negative PV of 100%.

CONCLUSION

A whole-blood ATP secretion test can be used to exclude ẟ-SPD in patients presenting with a primary hemostasis defect.

The Diagnostic Assessment of Inherited Platelet Function Defects - Part 1: An Overview of the Diagnostic Approach and Laboratory Methods

In this article, our goal is to offer an introduction and overview of the diagnostic approach to inherited platelet function defects (iPFDs) for clinicians and laboratory personnel who are beginning to engage in the field. We describe the most commonly used laboratory methods and propose a diagnostic four-step approach, wherein each stage requires a higher level of expertise and more specialized methods. It should be noted that our proposed approach differs from the ISTH Guidance on this topic in some points. The first step in the diagnostic approach of iPFD should be a thorough medical history and clinical examination. We strongly advocate for the use of a validated bleeding score like the ISTH-BAT (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Bleeding Assessment Tool). External factors like diet and medication have to be considered. The second step should rule out plasmatic bleeding disorders and von Willebrand disease. Once this has been accomplished, the third step consists of a thorough platelet investigation of platelet phenotype and function. Established methods consist of blood smear analysis by light microscopy, light transmission aggregometry, and flow cytometry. Additional techniques such as lumiaggregometry, immune fluorescence microscopy, and platelet-dependent thrombin generation help confirm and specify the diagnosis of iPFD. In the fourth and last step, genetic testing can confirm a diagnosis, reveal novel mutations, and allow to compare unclear genetics with lab results. If diagnosis cannot be established through this process, experimental methods such as electron microscopy can give insight into the underlying disease.

Mepacrine Flow Cytometry Assay for the Diagnosis of Platelet δ-granule Defects: Literature Review on Methods-Towards a Shared Detailed Protocol

Accurate assessment of platelet secretion is essential for the diagnosis of inherited or acquired platelet function disorders and more specifically in identifying δ-storage pool disease. Mepacrine, a fluorescent dye, specifically accumulates in platelet δ-granules. The mepacrine flow cytometry (mepacrine FCM) assay has been used for more than half a century in the clinical laboratory as a diagnostic tool for platelet δ-granule disorders. The assay requires a small volume of blood, can be performed in thrombocytopenic patients, provides rapid assessment of δ-granule content and secretion, and, thus, enables differentiation between storage and release defects. There is however a broad heterogeneity in methods, reagents, and equipment used. Lack of standardization and limited data on analytical and clinical performances have led the 2022 ISTH SSC (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee) Subcommittee on Platelet Physiology expert consensus to rate this assay as simple but of uncertain value. Yet, the data used by experts to formulate the recommendations were not discussed and even not mentioned. Guidance for laboratory studies of platelet secretion assay would be very helpful for clinical laboratories and health authorities especially considering the implications of the new In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation in Europe. The purpose of the present work was to review the reported methodologies for the mepacrine FCM assay and to offer an example of detailed protocol. This would help standardization and pave the way for more rigorous comparative studies.

Serotonin secretion by blood platelets: accuracy of high-performance liquid chromatography-electrochemical technique compared with the isotopic test and use in a clinical laboratory

Background

Mild secretion defects are the most frequent and challenging blood platelet disorders to diagnose. Most δ-granule secretion tests lack validation, are not quantitative, or have unreliable response to weak platelet agonists.

Objectives

To compare platelet serotonin secretion by HPLC-electrochemical detection technique (HPLC-ECD) with the reference isotopic test (3H-5-HT), evaluating its performance in clinical laboratories.

Methods

The assay validation followed STARD-2015 recommendations. HPLC-ECD measured the nonsecreted serotonin remaining in platelet pellets after aggregation, comparing it with the reference 3H-5-HT assay. We studied subjects with inherited and aspirin-induced blood platelet disorders and assessed the HPLC-ECD operation for routine clinical diagnosis.

Results

Calibration curves were linear (R2 = 0.997), with SD for residuals of 3.91% and analytical sensitivity of 5ng/mL. Intra- and interassay imprecision bias ranged between -8.5% and 2.1% and -9% and 3.1%, respectively. Serotonin recovery and stability were >95%, and the variability range of measurements was -5.5% to 4.6%. Statistical differences detected between tests were biologically irrelevant, with bias of 1.48% (SD, 8.43) and CI agreement of -18% to 15%. Both assays distinctly detected platelet secretion induced by 10 μM epinephrine and 4 μmM adenosine diphosphate. However, HPLC-ECD is quantitative and more sensitive to low serotonin content in blood platelets. Reference cutoffs for each agonist were determined in 87 subjects. Initially, the HPLC-ECD requires relatively expensive equipment and trained operators but has remarkably cheap running costs and a turn-around time of 24-36 hours. We have used this diagnostic tool routinely for >8 years.

Conclusion

HPLC-ECD assay for platelet serotonin secretion is highly accurate, has advantages over the reference 3H-5-HT test, and is suitable as a clinical laboratory technique.

Testing strategies used in the diagnosis of rare inherited bleeding disorders

INTRODUCTION

Rare Bleeding Disorders have a low population prevalence and may not be recognized by most clinicians. In addition, knowledge gaps of the indicated laboratory tests and their availability add to the potential for delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis. The lack of widely available commercial, regulatory body approved esoteric tests limit them to reference laboratories, thus limiting easy access for patients.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search of Pubmed, Medline, Embase and review of international society guidelines was performed. Additional references from published articles were reviewed. A patient-centered approach to recognition and evaluation of RBD is discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Recognition of RBD relies on obtaining a detailed patient personal and family hemostatic history. Inquiry into a history of involvement of other organ systems is important and if present should lead to suspicion of an inherited platelet disorder or a variant of Ehlers Danlos Syndrome. Multiple factors contribute to the complexity of development of efficient algorithms for diagnostic testing. Limitations in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of screening tests, diagnostic tests, and esoteric tests further compound the complexity of establishing a diagnosis. Educational efforts focusing on clinician awareness of RBDs and available testing options are vital for optimal management of such patients.

Implementation of the new EUR IVD regulation and relation with ISO15189 accreditation: Guidance is urgently required for haemostasis testing

On May 26th 2017 the European Parliament and the Council of The European Union adopted the new regulation on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR)-Regulation EU 2017/746-planned to be applied from May 26th 2022 in substitution to the previous IVD directives (IVDD 98/79 EC). After several health and legal causes due to medical device malfunctions, the European Union (EU) extensively reviewed the previous regulatory, which had remained unchanged since 1998. Aim of the work is to analyse the effects of the new IVDR on the field of haemostasis and thrombosis testing with particular attention to specific clinical conditions. Clinical laboratories will mainly deal with three different situations: (1) Diagnostic test performed with IVDR products used according with clinical indication certified by manufacturers. (2) Diagnostic test performed with certified IVDR products without clinical validation. (3) Diagnostic test performed with reagents classified as Research Use Only (RUO). At present, only few clinical laboratories through different European countries have been prepared to the new IVDR, while many laboratories are not yet aware about crucial aspects of the new process that deeply involves laboratory medicine. In conclusion, each laboratory should be aware of the IVDR certification of the reagents/instruments used in its laboratory. There are several urgent needs regarding IVDR certification: studies about the clinical performance of haemostasis tests, guidelines for LDTs (definition and documentation), internal and external quality controls for the tests recommended/suggested in the guidance/guidelines and finally implementation and/or update of clinical and laboratory guidelines.

Expert opinion on the use of platelet secretion assay for the diagnosis of inherited platelet function disorders: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Platelet Physiology

Assessment of platelet secretion is crucial for diagnosing suspected inherited platelet function disorders (IPFD). A previous survey of the SSC on Platelet Physiology of the ISTH and a comprehensive review highlighted that most of the platelet secretion assays (PSAs) lack standardization and validation. The aim of this study was to provide expert consensus guidance on the use of PSAs for IPFD diagnosis. We surveyed 26 experts from 10 different countries using the RAND/UCLA methodology, to attain a consensus on sensitivity, specificity, feasibility, time to readout, and cost of most PSAs. Answers were then graded in three categories: appropriate, uncertain, and inappropriate. Equivocal or misinterpretable statements required a second and third round survey involving 14 of the original 26 experts. We report here the consolidated results of the entire procedure. There was uniform agreement on several general statements, including that PSAs should be performed in hemostasis laboratories as first line diagnostic tests even in patients with normal platelet aggregation, and should include a δ-granule secretion marker. Among the specific assays examined, lumiaggregometry, other luciferin/luciferase-based assays, high-performance liquid chromatography methods, radiolabeled-serotonin based assays, and whole-mount transmission electron microscopy were rated as appropriate for the measurement of δ-granule release, and platelet P-selectin expression by flow cytometry and released proteins by ELISA for α-granule release. For most of the other PSAs, the expert opinions were widely dispersed. Lack of expert consensus on many PSAs clearly indicates an unmet need for rigorous standardization, multicenter comparison of results, and validation of PSAs for clinical laboratory practice.

Genetics of inherited thrombocytopenias

The inherited thrombocytopenia syndromes are a group of disorders characterized primarily by quantitative defects in platelet number, though with a variety demonstrating qualitative defects and/or extrahematopoietic findings. Through collaborative international efforts applying next-generation sequencing approaches, the list of genetic syndromes that cause thrombocytopenia has expanded significantly in recent years, now with over 40 genes implicated. In this review, we focus on what is known about the genetic etiology of inherited thrombocytopenia syndromes and how the field has worked to validate new genetic discoveries. We highlight the important role for the clinician in identifying a germline genetic diagnosis and strategies for identifying novel causes through research-based endeavors.

Screening and diagnosis of inherited platelet disorders

Inherited platelet disorders are important conditions that often manifest with bleeding. These disorders have heterogeneous underlying pathologies. Some are syndromic disorders with non-blood phenotypic features, and others are associated with an increased predisposition to developing myelodysplasia and leukemia. Platelet disorders can present with thrombocytopenia, defects in platelet function, or both. As the underlying pathogenesis of inherited thrombocytopenias and platelet function disorders are quite diverse, their evaluation requires a thorough clinical assessment and specialized diagnostic tests, that often challenge diagnostic laboratories. At present, many of the commonly encountered, non-syndromic platelet disorders do not have a defined molecular cause. Nonetheless, significant progress has been made over the past few decades to improve the diagnostic evaluation of inherited platelet disorders, from the assessment of the bleeding history to improved standardization of light transmission aggregometry, which remains a "gold standard" test of platelet function. Some platelet disorder test findings are highly predictive of a bleeding disorder and some show association to symptoms of prolonged bleeding, surgical bleeding, and wound healing problems. Multiple assays can be required to diagnose common and rare platelet disorders, each requiring control of preanalytical, analytical, and post-analytical variables. The laboratory investigations of platelet disorders include evaluations of platelet counts, size, and morphology by light microscopy; assessments for aggregation defects; tests for dense granule deficiency; analyses of granule constituents and their release; platelet protein analysis by immunofluorescent staining or flow cytometry; tests of platelet procoagulant function; evaluations of platelet ultrastructure; high-throughput sequencing and other molecular diagnostic tests. The focus of this article is to review current methods for the diagnostic assessment of platelet function, with a focus on contemporary, best diagnostic laboratory practices, and relationships between clinical and laboratory findings.

Cryptogenic oozers and bruisers

Bleeding disorders with normal, borderline, or nondiagnostic coagulation tests represent a diagnostic challenge. Disorders of primary hemostasis can be further evaluated by additional platelet function testing modalities, platelet electron microscopy, repeat von Willebrand disease testing, and specialized von Willebrand factor testing beyond the usual initial panel. Secondary hemostasis is further evaluated by coagulation factor assays, and factor XIII assays are used to diagnose disorders of fibrin clot stabilization. Fibrinolytic disorders are particularly difficult to diagnose with current testing options. A significant number of patients remain unclassified after thorough testing; most unclassified patients have a clinically mild bleeding phenotype, and many may have undiagnosed platelet function disorders. High-throughput genetic testing using large gene panels for bleeding disorders may allow diagnosis of a larger number of these patients in the future, but more study is needed. A logical laboratory workup in the context of the clinical setting and with a high level of expertise regarding test interpretation and limitations facilitates a diagnosis for as many patients as possible.

Diagnostic approach to the patient with a suspected inherited platelet disorder: Who and how to test

Bleeding and thrombocytopenia are common referrals to the pediatric and adult hematology practice. The differential diagnosis encompasses a wide spectrum of entities that vary in acuity, severity, and etiology. Most will be acquired (especially in adult patients), but many can be inherited, and some may have manifestations affecting other organ systems. The first step: defining whether the symptoms and/or laboratory findings are clinically significant and warrant additional work-up, can be equally as challenging as reaching the diagnosis itself. How much bleeding is too much to be considered normal? How low of a platelet count is too low? Once the decision has been made to pursue additional studies, considering the increasing number of laboratory tests available, the diagnostic process can be complex. In this article, we outline a general approach for the evaluation of patients in whom an inherited platelet disorder is being considered. We present two clinical vignettes as introduction to the diagnostic approach to inherited platelet disorders. We describe the rationale for the different types of tests that are clinically available, their limitations, and finally the challenges that are frequently encountered in the interpretation of results. We also intend to provide some guidance on the expected phenotype in terms of severity of bleeding and/or thrombocytopenia according to the etiology of the inherited disorder. Our goal is to provide the practicing hematologist with a practical framework that is clinically applicable in their daily practice.

Investigation of platelet function in patients with chronic kidney disease stages IV-V

INTRODUCTION

Patients with renal failure are at increased risk of both bleeding and thrombosis. Further descriptions of laboratory investigations in these patients are required.

METHODS

Investigation of 24 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages IV-V with light transmission aggregometry, platelet secretion assays and platelet nucleotide analysis. Patients were in a nonbleeding state and not on antiplatelet medication. Results were compared with our local reference range used within the clinical haematology service.

RESULTS

Of the 24 patients, two had decreased responses to arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, collagen, thrombin receptor activator peptide-6 and one had decreased responses to high dose ristocetin, and one had increased response to low dose ristocetin. 11 and 13 out of 24 had abnormal platelet secretion release to collagen and thrombin, respectively. Platelet nucleotide analysis in patients was normal with the exception of a reduction in ADP content in one patient and ATP/ADP ratio in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

In our collection of patients with CKD investigated for platelet function in the nonbleeding state, they generally had normal light transmission aggregometry and nucleotide analysis but around 50% had decreased platelet secretion assays. These results could be important in determining the significance of platelet function tests in patients with bleeding symptoms and renal failure. Further characterization of platelet function tests in future will help characterize haemostasis in renal failure further.

Functional Assessment of Platelet Dense Granule ATP Release

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to explore the feasibility of assessing platelet dense granule release in response to platelet stimuli, using less than 1 mL of whole blood (WB).

METHODS

Optimization of the luciferin-luciferase (LL) assay for ATP release, together with additional modifications, was applied to 1:10 diluted WB.

RESULTS

LL assay optimization using nonstirred 1:10 diluted WB resulted in dense granule ATP release in response to thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP) of similar magnitude to that observed using stirred platelet-rich plasma. Stirring of the 1:10 diluted WB restored collagen-induced dense granule secretion. Addition of lyophilized, formalin-fixed platelets, together with stirring, restored dense granule secretion responsiveness to ADP. TRAP, ADP, and collagen all stimulated ATP release in 1:10 diluted WB under the optimized conditions of this study at levels close to those observed using platelet-rich plasma. Blood sample reconstitution experiments offer hope that this assay may prove robust down to WB platelet counts as low as 50 × 103/μL.

CONCLUSIONS

Platelet dense granule release in response to a number of classic stimuli, including ADP, was accomplished from less than 1 mL WB with minimal specimen processing, using widely available reagents and instrumentation.

Platelet Phenotyping and Function Testing in Thrombocytopenia

Patients who suffer from inherited or acquired thrombocytopenia can be also affected by platelet function defects, which potentially increase the risk of severe and life-threatening bleeding complications. A plethora of tests and assays for platelet phenotyping and function analysis are available, which are, in part, feasible in clinical practice due to adequate point-of-care qualities. However, most of them are time-consuming, require experienced and skilled personnel for platelet handling and processing, and are therefore well-established only in specialized laboratories. This review summarizes major indications, methods/assays for platelet phenotyping, and in vitro function testing in blood samples with reduced platelet count in relation to their clinical practicability. In addition, the diagnostic significance, difficulties, and challenges of selected tests to evaluate the hemostatic capacity and specific defects of platelets with reduced number are addressed.

Platelet lumiaggregation testing: Reference intervals and the effect of acetylsalicylic acid in healthy adults

Background

Light transmission aggregometry with lumiaggregometry are methods commonly recommended as a first-line test in platelet dysfunction diagnostic work-up. They are poorly standardized and usually performed in specialized laboratories. For proper interpretation, each laboratory should establish its own diagnostic approach in order to recognize abnormal aggregation patterns. The aim of this study was to measure plasma lumiaggregometry with basic agonists to establish the analyzer-reagent reference intervals (RI) for adults and to test the method response to aspirin.

Methods

The Chrono-Log Model 700 lumiaggregometer using Chrono-Par and Chrono-lume reagents (Chrono-Log Corp., Havertown, PA, USA) was used to measure the maximal aggregation and adenosine triphosphate release using adenosine diphosphate (2 μmol/L), collagen (2 μg/mL), arachidonic acid (1 μmol/L), epinephrine (5.5 μmol/L) and ristocetin (1.25 mg/mL), and thrombin (1 U/mL). The effect of aspirin on platelet aggregation and granule release was inspected.

Results

RIs derived from 40 healthy adults were calculated using the non-parametric approach. Wider intervals and low lower limits were determined for weak agonist as well as absence or impaired aggregation in up to one of 7 healthy controls. The response of platelets to aspirin shows response comparable to previously reported study.

Conclusions

Locally established RI in our study enable us to investigate platelet function in patients with a high probability of bleeding disorders. Values are agonist and equipment specific. The variability of the method can be reduced by considering standardized preanalytical and analytical variables. Pathological results must be interpreted in the context of other hemostasis test results and clinical findings.

Laboratory Techniques Used to Diagnose Constitutional Platelet Dysfunction

Platelets play a major role in primary hemostasis, where activated platelets form plugs to stop hemorrhaging in response to vessel injuries. Defects in any step of the platelet activation process can cause a variety of platelet dysfunction conditions associated with bleeding. To make an accurate diagnosis, constitutional platelet dysfunction (CPDF) should be considered once von Willebrand disease and drug intake are ruled out. CPDF may be associated with thrombocytopenia or a genetic syndrome. CPDF diagnosis is complex, as no single test enables the analysis of all aspects of platelet function. Furthermore, the available tests lack standardization, and repeat tests must be performed in specialized laboratories especially for mild and moderate forms of the disease. In this review, we provide an overview of the laboratory tests used to diagnose CPDF, with a focus on light transmission platelet aggregation (LTA), flow cytometry (FC), and granules assessment. Global tests, mainly represented by LTA, are often initially performed to investigate the consequences of platelet activation on platelet aggregation in a single step. Global test results should be confirmed by additional analytical tests. FC represents an accurate, simple, and reliable test to analyze abnormalities in platelet receptors, and granule content and release. This technique may also be used to investigate platelet function by comparing resting- and activated-state platelet populations. Assessment of granule content and release also requires additional specialized analytical tests. High-throughput sequencing has become increasingly useful to diagnose CPDF. Advanced tests or external research laboratory techniques may also be beneficial in some cases.

Advances in Platelet Function Testing-Light Transmission Aggregometry and Beyond

Platelet function testing is essential for the diagnosis of hemostasis disorders. While there are many methods used to test platelet function for research purposes, standardization is often lacking, limiting their use in clinical practice. Light transmission aggregometry has been the gold standard for over 60 years, with inherent challenges of working with live dynamic cells in specialized laboratories with independent protocols. In recent years, standardization efforts have brought forward fully automated systems that could lead to more widespread use. Additionally, new technical approaches appear promising for the future of specialized hematology laboratories. This review presents developments in platelet function testing for clinical applications.

Platelet δ-Storage Pool Disease: An Update

Platelet dense-granules are small organelles specific to the platelet lineage that contain small molecules (calcium, adenyl nucleotides, serotonin) and are essential for the activation of blood platelets prior to their aggregation in the event of a vascular injury. Delta-storage pool diseases (δ-SPDs) are platelet pathologies leading to hemorrhagic syndromes of variable severity and related to a qualitative (content) or quantitative (numerical) deficiency in dense-granules. These pathologies appear in a syndromic or non-syndromic form. The syndromic forms (Chediak–Higashi disease, Hermansky–Pudlak syndromes), whose causative genes are known, associate immune deficiencies and/or oculocutaneous albinism with a platelet function disorder (PFD). The non-syndromic forms correspond to an isolated PFD, but the genes responsible for the pathology are not yet known. The diagnosis of these pathologies is complex and poorly standardized. It is based on orientation tests performed by light transmission aggregometry or flow cytometry, which are supplemented by complementary tests based on the quantification of platelet dense-granules by electron microscopy using the whole platelet mount technique and the direct determination of granule contents (ADP/ATP and serotonin). The objective of this review is to present the state of our knowledge concerning platelet dense-granules and the tools available for the diagnosis of different forms of δ-SPD.

Bleeding risks for uncharacterized platelet function disorders

BACKGROUND

The bleeding risks for nonsyndromic platelet function disorders (PFDs) that impair aggregation responses and/or cause dense granule deficiency (DGD) are uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to quantify bleeding risks for a cohort of consecutive cases with uncharacterized PFD.

METHODS

Sequential cases with uncharacterized PFDs that had reduced maximal aggregation (MA) with multiple agonists and/or nonsyndromic DGD were invited to participate along with additional family members to reduce bias. Index cases were further evaluated by exome sequencing, with analysis of RUNX1-dependent genes for cases with RUNX1 sequence variants. Bleeding assessment tools were used to estimate bleeding scores, with bleeding risks estimated as odds ratios (ORs) relative to general population controls. Relationships between symptoms and laboratory findings were also explored.

RESULTS

Participants with uncharacterized PFD (n = 37; 23 index cases) had impaired aggregation function (70%), nonsyndromic DGD (19%) or both (11%), unlike unaffected relatives. Probable pathogenic RUNX1 variants were found in 2 (9%) index cases/families, whereas others had PFD of unknown cause. Participants with PFD had increased bleeding scores compared to unaffected family members and general population controls, and increased risks for mucocutaneous (OR, 4-207) and challenge-related bleeding (OR, 12-43), and for receiving transfusions for bleeding (OR, 100). Reduced MA with collagen was associated with wound healing problems and bruising, and more severe DGD was associated with surgical bleeding (P < .04).

CONCLUSIONS

PFDs that impair MA and/or cause nonsyndromic DGD have significantly increased bleeding risks, and some symptoms are more common in those with more severe DGD or impaired collagen aggregation.

A Case of Chronic Thrombocytopenia in a 17-Year-Old Female

Storage pool deficiency (SPD) is a group of rare platelet disorders that result from deficiencies in α-granules, δ-granules, or both. One type of α-SPD is gray platelet syndrome (GPS), caused by mutations in the neurobeachin-like 2 (NBEAL2) gene that results in a bleeding diathesis, thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, and progressive myelofibrosis. Due to the lack of α-granules, platelets have a gray and degranulated appearance by light microscopy. However, definitive diagnosis of GPS requires confirmation of α-granule deficiency by electron microscopy. Treatment is nonspecific, with the conservative utilization of platelet transfusions being the most important form of therapy. We present a case of a 17-year-old female with a past medical history of thrombocytopenia, first identified at the age of five. Her clinical symptomatology included chronic fatigue, gingival bleeding, bruising, menorrhagia, and leg pain. This report will discuss both the clinical and the pathophysiologic aspects of this rare platelet disorder.

Update on diagnostic testing for platelet function disorders: What is practical and useful?

INTRODUCTION

Platelet function disorders (PFD) are an important group of bleeding disorders that require validated and practical laboratory strategies for diagnosis.

METHODS

This review summarizes the authors' experiences, current literature, and an international survey to evaluate the practices of diagnostic laboratories that offer tests for PFD.

RESULTS

Blood counts, blood film review, and aggregation tests are the most commonly performed investigations for PFD and help determine whether there is thrombocytopenia and/or defective platelet function due to a variety of causes. The performance characteristics of tests for PFD, and the level of evidence that these tests detect bleeding problems, are important issues to determine where tests are useful for diagnostic or correlative purposes, or research only uses. Platelet aggregation assays, and quantitative analysis of platelet dense granule numbers, are tests with good performance characteristics that detect abnormalities associated with increased bleeding in a significant proportion of individuals referred for PFD investigations. Lumiaggregometry estimates of platelet adenosine triphosphate release show greater variability which limits the diagnostic usefulness. Diagnostic laboratories report that fiscal and other constraints, including a lack of high-quality evidence, limit their ability to offer an expanded test menu for PFD.

CONCLUSION

PFD are clinically important bleeding disorders that remain challenging for diagnostic laboratories to investigate. While some PFD tests are well validated for diagnostic purposes, gaps in scientific evidence and resource limitations influence diagnostic laboratory decisions on which PFD tests to offer.

Diagnostic challenges of inherited mild bleeding disorders: a bait for poorly explored clinical and basic research

The best-known inherited mild bleeding disorders (MBDs), i.e. type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD), platelet function disorders (PFDs), and mild to moderate clotting factor deficiencies, are characterized clinically by mucocutaneous bleeding, and, although they are highly prevalent, still pose difficult diagnostic problems. These include establishing the pathological nature of bleeding, and the uncertainties surrounding the clinical relevance of laboratory results. Furthermore, the high frequency of bleeding symptoms in the normal population and the subjective appraisal of symptoms by patients or parents makes elucidating the pathological nature of bleeding difficult. Standardized bleeding assessment tools and semiquantitative bleeding scores (BSs) help to discriminate normal from abnormal bleeding. However, as most MBDs have similar bleeding patterns, for example, bleeding sites, frequency, and severity, BSs are of little help for diagnosing specific diseases. Global tests of primary hemostasis (bleeding time; PFA-100/200) lack sensitivity and, like BSs, are not disease-specific. Problems with the diagnosis of type 1 VWD and PFD include assay standardization, uncertain definition of von Willebrand factor cut-off levels, and the lack of universal diagnostic criteria for PFD. Regarding clotting factor deficiencies, the bleeding thresholds of some coagulation factors, such as factor VII and FXI, are highly variable, and may lead to misinterpretation of the clinical relevance of mild to moderate deficiencies. Remarkably, a large proportion of MBDs remain undiagnosed even after comprehensive and repeated laboratory testing. These are tentatively considered to represent bleeding of undefined cause, with clinical features indistinguishable from those of classical MBD; the pathogenesis of this is probably multifactorial, and unveiling these mechanisms should constitute a fertile source of translational research.

How I investigate for bleeding disorders

INTRODUCTION

Laboratory investigations for bleeding disorders are warranted when an individual has a personal and/or family history of bleeding, and/or laboratory findings that suggest the possibility of an inherited or acquired bleeding disorder.

METHODS

This review summarizes author's experience with ordering and reporting on diagnostic investigations for common and rare bleeding disorders, with consideration of recent articles on diagnosing bleeding disorders. An updated strategy is presented for investigating common and rare, congenital and acquired bleeding disorders.

RESULTS

An investigation of a suspected bleeding disorder requires a practical strategy that considers the clinical problem to be investigated, the pretest probability of true-positive and false-positive findings, the investigations can be performed locally or in a reference laboratory and limit the number of blood samples required to establish a diagnosis. It is often advantageous to simultaneously test for von Willebrand disease and platelet function disorders, and for coagulation defects, including fibrinogen disorders. An investigation for rarer bleeding disorders, including those affecting factor XIII, α₂ antiplasmin, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, is appropriate when faced with a severe congenital or acquired bleeding problem that cannot be explained by the initial diagnostic investigations.

CONCLUSION

An organized strategy for investigating bleeding disorders that consider important issues, confirms abnormal findings, encourages proper interpretation of the results, and provides a helpful framework for assessing both common and rare causes of bleeding.

Electron microscopy examination of platelet whole mount preparations to quantitate platelet dense granule numbers: Implications for diagnosing suspected platelet function disorders due to dense granule deficiency

INTRODUCTION

Dense granule (DG) deficiency (DGD) is a feature of some platelet function disorders (PFD) with a prevalence similar to von Willebrand disease. Most laboratories assess for DGD using whole mount platelet preparations and electron microscopy (EM). We evaluated our experiences with this test and associations between DGD and bleeding.

METHODS

Dense granule EM records for 2006-2017 were examined for patients and simultaneously tested controls, and for an overlapping PFD study cohort to evaluate findings and their relationship to bleeding.

RESULTS

More patient than control samples had reduced DG counts (6.5% vs 0.3%, P < .01). DG counts showed no relationship to age or mean platelet volume and had acceptable within-subject variability that was higher for DGD than control participants (28% vs 12%). Repeat tests confirmed DGD in all persons with initial DG counts <4.0/platelet, but not in those with less severe reductions (4.0-4.8 DG/platelet) or normal DG counts (≥4.9 DG/platelet). Aggregometry and adenosine triphosphate release tests, respectively, had only ~52% and 70% sensitivity for DGD. Confirmed DGD by EM was associated with higher bleeding scores and a bleeding disorder.

CONCLUSION

Whole mount EM is useful for the evaluation of suspected PFD due to DGD and detects abnormalities associated with bleeding.