Sources and solutions for spurious test results in coagulation

Cost-Effective Use of the Protein S Algorithm in Thrombophilia Testing

Background

One of the most complex risk factors for the laboratory assessment of thrombophilia is Protein S (PS). The testing algorithm for PS employs the plasma-based assays of free PS antigen, total PS antigen, and PS activity creating a complex diagnostic scheme that can lead to misdiagnosis if incorrectly used, and a potential waste of resources and money.

Content

This paper compares the recently published evidence-based algorithm from the International Society for Hemostasis and Thrombosis (ISTH) with several commonly performed nonevidence-based testing schemes, to demonstrate the efficiency of the evidence-based algorithm for diagnostic efficiency with improved patient care and increased cost savings for the laboratory.

Summary

Significant savings (31%–60%) can be realized when the evidence-based algorithm is used in place of other testing modalities of initial PS activity testing (31%) or testing with all 3 assays simultaneously (60%). This study utilizing the PS testing evidence-based algorithm as part of a thrombophilia evaluation demonstrates that the appropriate testing methods can be used to limit wasteful practices while achieving the maximum level of information in this time of limited resources and need for increase monetary savings.

Hot topics in coagulation testing: Important considerations for testing children for bleeding/thrombotic disorders

The accurate use and interpretation of diagnostic investigations are essential for safe and effective patient care. Appropriate application and interpretation of coagulation testing can be challenging, and many controversies exist relating to the standardization of testing procedures, the application of relevant tests to different patient populations and the interpretation of test results. We present a list of the most prominent controversies in coagulation testing and have selected three specific examples (age-appropriate reference ranges, therapeutic anticoagulation monitoring and tests of thrombin generation) for closer discussion, highlighting examples with a paediatric framework. We discuss the limitations of discrete age-partitioned reference intervals, given the established principle of developmental haemostasis; the difficulties in establishing normative data across different laboratories; important pre-analytical variables affecting coagulation testing; the challenges in interpreting APTT and anti-Xa assays for monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy in different clinical situations; and the limitations in interpreting tests of thrombin generation due to current available thrombin-specific substrates and the complicating factor of variable alpha2-macroglobulin levels. These controversies are demonstrated using paediatric examples, but raise important implications for coagulation testing in patients of all ages and highlight the pressing need for further research in these areas.

Routine coagulation testing in Vacutainer® Citrate Plus tubes filled at minimum or optimal volume

Background Filling of citrate tubes with appropriate amount of blood is essential for obtaining reliable results of coagulation testing. This study aimed to verify whether results of routine coagulation tests are comparable when the new Becton Dickinson Vacutainer® Citrate Plus tubes are filled at minimum or optimal volume. Methods The study population consisted of 133 patients (40 on oral anticoagulant therapy), who had blood collected for routine coagulation testing. Two sequential Vacutainer® Citrate Plus tubes of the same type and lot were drawn. The first tube was collected after a butterfly needle was inserted into the vein, so that the air in the tubing was aspirated into the tube before blood (minimum fill volume), whilst the second was drawn at optimal fill volume. Experiments were repeated using 2.7-mL (n = 86) and 1.8-mL (n = 47) tubes. Results Prothrombin time (PT) and fibrinogen values were slightly but significantly decreased in tubes with minimum than in those with optimal fill volume. The activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was slightly prolonged in tubes with minimum than in those with optimal fill volume, but the difference was not statistically significant. An identical trend was noted in separate analyses for the 2.7-mL and 1.8-mL tubes. Spearman's correlations between the two fill volumes were always >0.94 and bias was always within the quality specifications. Conclusions Blood drawing into Vacutainer® Citrate Plus tubes at minimum fill volume does not clinically bias routine coagulation testing.