The integration of Sysmex XN-9100' WPC channel reflex testing in the detection of reactive versus malignant blood samples

Performance evaluation of the new Sysmex XR-Series haematology analyser

Background

The new XR-Series haematology analyser from Sysmex provides increased throughput and automation, along with a new reagent in WDF channel for optimised WBC differential.

Methods

An analytical performance study for the XR analyser was conducted to evaluate the WDF channel parameters in comparison to the instrument specifications. Additionally, 7460 samples were measured on XR and XN analysers to compare selected parameters and flags, and 930 randomly selected samples were further evaluated with microscopy.

Results

All investigated aspects of the analytical performance study for the XR fell within the manufacturer specifications. The correlation coefficients between the two systems for the parameters tested were greater than 0.983 for the main CBC and DIFF parameters, greater than 0.909 for the Extended Inflammation Parameters, and greater than 0.932 for the parameters used in the workflow rulesets of the Extended IPU. Similarly high sensitivities for the detection of abnormal cells were observed for the 'Blasts/Abn Lympho?' flag (XN: 100%, XR: 99.0%) and WPC abnormal flags ('Blasts?' or 'Abn Lympho?') (XN: 97.0%, XR: 96.0%). XN with WPC channel had a 26% reduction of false positive smears compared to XR with 22% reduction, a statistically non-significant difference.

Conclusion

The XR analyser had very good analytical performance, and highly comparable results to the predecessor XN analyser in all investigated parameters, flags and workflow aspects.

Differential diagnosis of lymphocytosis in routine laboratory practice: Contribution of lymphocyte parameters using the Sysmex-XN9000 haematology analyzer

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates the potential contribution of structural and dispersion parameters, as well as alarms provided by Sysmex XN9000 haematology analyzer. The objective was to assess the need for a microscopic examination in the context of lymphocytosis. It also aims to contribute in differentiating rapidly lymphoproliferative disorders such as chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), non-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (NON-CLL) and non-infectious reactive lymphocytosis (REAC).

METHODS

We prospectively assessed lymphocyte parameters (Ly-X, Ly-Y, Ly-Z, Ly-WX, Ly-WY, Ly-WZ) provided by the Sysmex XN9000 analyzer; they were measured in the white blood cell differential (WDF) channel which also provides alarms via the precursor/pathological cellular channel (WPC). Blood samples from 71 subjects with CLL, NON-CLL lymphoproliferative and REAC non-infectious reactive lymphocytosis, as well as a control (NORM) group of 12 subjects without any abnormalities were analyzed.

RESULTS

The most discriminating parameters to distinguish the different groups were Ly-X, Ly-Z and Ly-WZ. The lymphoid structural parameters Ly-X and Ly-Z significantly discriminated the CLL group from the other groups (p < 0.001), and the CLL group from the REAC group (p < 0.01), respectively. The Ly-WZ parameter discriminated the CLL group from the NON-CLL, REAC (p < 0.001) and NORM (p < 0.01) groups. Alarms were higher in all study groups compared to the NORM group. An algorithm integrating these structural and alarm parameters is proposed.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that Ly-X, Ly-Z, and Ly-WZ lymphocyte parameters are useful for detecting morphological changes in lymphocytes; they provide useful information for the differential diagnosis of lymphocytosis, and this before the examination of the blood smear. An algorithm combining the WDF (parameters) and the WPC (alarms) makes it possible to decide whether or not to use a microscopic examination or flow cytometry immunophenotyping.