The effectiveness of self-management programme based on multilevel social resources utilization in diabetes mellitus patients: A randomized controlled study

Effect of Self-efficacy, Disease Perception, Social Support, Anxiety, and Depression on Self-management in Young Patients With Stroke

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Better self-management of chronic diseases may benefit patient functional status, medication effectiveness, lifestyle, and psychosocial health. Self-efficacy, disease perception, social support, anxiety, and depression are determinants of self-management behaviors in individuals with chronic illnesses. There remains a gap in the empirical exploration of the influence of these factors on self-management behaviors in young Chinese stroke survivors. This study examined how these factors affect specific self-management behaviors. METHODS: Validated instruments were used to evaluate patient self-efficacy, disease perception, social support, anxiety, and depression in a cross-sectional study. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the hypothesis. RESULTS: Self-efficacy and social support showed a positive correlation with self-management (0.421 and 0.446, respectively; P < .001). Disease perception, anxiety, and depression were negatively correlated with self-management (-0.158 and -0.336, respectively; P < .05). The structural equation model fit the data very well; social support had a direct positive effect on self-management ( t = 3.002, P < .05) and self-efficacy ( t = 5.773, P < .001). However, the presence of social support had a positive impact on reducing anxiety and depression ( t = -5.046, P < .001). Furthermore, self-efficacy positively affected self-management ( t = 1.226, P < .05), whereas anxiety and depression ( t = -1.190, P < .05) and disease perception ( t = -1.068, P < .05) had adverse effects on self-management. CONCLUSION: Medical staff and caregivers can improve patient self-management by helping them recognize the disease, reducing negative perceptions, communicating more for better understanding and care, intervening in anxiety and depression, and promoting mental health. This is especially important for young stroke patients.

Process Evaluations of Diabetes Self-Management Programs: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of process evaluations (PEs) of diabetes self-management programs (DSMPs).

DATA SOURCE

An electronic search using Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (Ensco), Academic Search (Ebsco), and APA PsycInfo (Ebsco).

STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Peer-reviewed, empirical quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method studies were included if they (1) were a traditional, group-based DSMP, (2) involved adults at least 18 years with T1DM or T2DM, (3) were a stand-alone or embedded PE, and (4) published in English.

DATA EXTRACTION

The following process evaluation outcomes were extracted: fidelity, dose delivered, dose received, reach, recruitment, retention, and context. Additional items were extracted, (eg, process evaluation type, data collection methods; theories; frameworks or conceptual models used to guide the process evaluation, and etc).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Due to heterogeneity across studies, studies were synthesized qualitatively (narratively).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight studies (k) in 78 articles (n) (k = 68; n = 78) were included. Most were mixed methods of low quality. Studies were typically integrated into outcome evaluations vs being stand-alone, lacked theoretical approaches to guide them, and incorporated limited outcomes such as dose received, reach, and retention.

CONCLUSION

Future research should 1) implement stand-alone theoretically grounded PE studies and 2) provide a shared understanding of standardized guidelines to conduct PEs. This will allow public health practitioners and researchers to assess and compare the quality of different programs to be implemented.