Expression profile of mammalian target of rapamycin-related proteins in graft biopsy specimens: Significance for predicting interstitial fibrosis after kidney transplantation

Phosphorylation of S6RP in peritubular capillaries of kidney grafts and circulating HLA donor-specific antibodies

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) caused by donor-specific HLA-antibodies (DSA) is a mediator of allograft loss after kidney transplantation (KT). DSA can activate microvascular endothelium damage through the mTOR pathway. In this study we assessed the mTOR pathway activation by DSA in KT with ABMR (ABMR + DSA+) compared to controls (ABMR−DSA−), biopsies with ABMR changes without DSA (ABMR + DSA−) and DSA without ABMR changes (ABMR−DSA+), and the potential modulation by mTOR inhibitors (mTORi). We evaluated 97 biopsies: 31 ABMR + DSA+, 33 controls ABMR-DSA−, 16 ABMR + DSA−, and 17 ABMR-DSA+ cases. Regarding immunosuppression of full ABMR + DSA+ and controls, 21 biopsies were performed under mTORi treatment (11 of them ABMR + DSA+ cases) and 43 without mTORi (20 of them ABMR + DSA+) so as to explore its effect on the mTOR pathway. Biopsies were stained for C4d, Ki67, and phosphorylated (p) S6RP, ERK, and mTOR by immunohistochemistry. Labeling was graded according to peritubular capillary staining. ABMR biopsies showed significantly higher C4d, p-S6RP, and Ki67 staining in peritubular capillaries (PTC) compared to controls, and light differences in p-ERK or p-mTOR. mTORi treatment did not modify p-S6RP, p-mTOR, and p-ERK staining. Diffuse p-S6RP in PTC in the biopsies significantly associated with circulating HLA-DSA independently of graft rejection, and with worse death-censored graft survival. These findings suggest that activation of endothelium through the mTOR pathway evidence different mechanisms of damage in ABMR + DSA+ and ABMR + DSA− despite similar histological injury.

Suppression of Allograft Fibrosis by Regulation of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin-Related Protein Expression in Kidney-Transplanted Recipients Treated with Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus

Background

Although renoprotective effects of everolimus (EVR) in kidney transplantation (KTx) have been widely reported, its pathophysiological mechanism remains unclear.

Material/Methods

We compared changes in eGFR (ΔGFR, ml/min/1.73 m²) and the ratio of the fibrotic area in biopsy specimens (ΔFI,%) from 3 months to 3 years after KTx between the EVR+ group (EVR addition and Tac reduction early after KTx, n=32), and the EVR− group (normal Tac without EVR, n=28). We also immunohistochemically evaluated mTOR-related protein expression.

Results

ΔGFR and ΔFI in the EVR+ vs. EVR− groups were −0.27±6.8 vs. −9.8±12.8 (p<0.001) and 2.4±4.9 vs. 9.5±10.5 (p<0.001), respectively. Phosphorylated mTOR and phosphorylated 4EBP1 expression at 3 years in the EVR+ group was significantly lower than that in the EVR− group. Moreover, in the subgroup analysis comparing ΔGFR and ΔFI among groups stratified by immunosuppressive regimen and mTOR signal enhancement, the ΔFI in patients with EVR+ with decreased mTOR signal enhancement was significantly milder than that in other patients. In addition, in the multivariate analysis, EVR addition was the only independent predictor for allograft fibrosis, whereas the Tac C₀ concentration at neither 1 nor 3 years proved to be a risk factor.

Conclusions

These results suggested that EVR addition and Tac reduction may attenuate kidney allograft fibrosis, and that the suppression of mTOR signaling process may be involved in the anti-fibrotic effect of this immunosuppressive regimen. These results provide suggestions of how to utilize EVR for patients with KTx and improve graft function.

Preventive effect of early introduction of everolimus and reduced-exposure tacrolimus on renal interstitial fibrosis in de novo living-donor renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

To improve the long-term outcomes following renal transplantation, prevention of renal-allograft interstitial fibrosis (IF), mainly due to calcineurin inhibitors, is an important therapeutic target. Everolimus (EVR) was reported to have antifibrotic effects. We aimed to investigate the safety, efficacy, and IF of our modified immunosuppressive regimen, which includes early introduction of EVR and reduced-exposure tacrolimus (Tac) (EVR group), and compare it with the standard-exposure tacrolimus-based regimen (Tac group) in de novo living-donor renal recipients.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, we compared the 2-year clinical courses between the two groups according to intention to treat. Additionally, in patients in whom biopsies were obtained at 1 h, 3 months, and 12 months post-transplant, we compared IF between the groups using imaging analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 47 patients were included (EVR group, n = 22; Tac group, n = 25). There were no significant differences in renal function and incidences of rejection and viral infections between the groups at the 2-year post-transplant follow-up. However, pathologic imaging analysis (n = 34) revealed chronological progression of IF in the Tac group during the first year post-transplant and no changes in the EVR group (fibrosis rate at 3 months: 20.8 vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001; at 12 months: 24.7 vs. 14.7%, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our modified immunosuppressive regimen may have an antifibrotic effect on transplanted kidneys without loss of safety and efficacy.