Treatment outcomes of rapid desensitisation protocols for chemotherapeutic agents and monoclonal antibodies following hypersensitivity reactions

Optimizing drug inhibition of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis in mice

BACKGROUND

Administering allergens in increasing doses can temporarily suppress IgE-mediated allergy and anaphylaxis by desensitizing mast cells and basophils; however, allergen administration during desensitization therapy can itself induce allergic responses. Several small molecule drugs and nutraceuticals have been used clinically and experimentally to suppress these allergic responses.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to optimize drug inhibition of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis.

METHODS

Several agents were tested individually and in combination for ability to suppress IgE-mediated anaphylaxis in conventional mice, FcεRIα-humanized mice, and reconstituted immunodeficient mice that have human mast cells and basophils. Hypothermia was the readout for anaphylaxis; therapeutic efficacy was measured by degree of inhibition of hypothermia. Serum mouse mast cell protease 1 level was used to measure extent of mast cell degranulation.

RESULTS

Histamine receptor 1 (HR1) antagonists, β-adrenergic agonists, and a spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) inhibitor were best at individually inhibiting IgE-mediated anaphylaxis. A Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, administered alone, only inhibited hypothermia when FcεRI signaling was suboptimal. Combinations of these agents could completely or nearly completely inhibit IgE-mediated hypothermia in these models. Both Syk and BTK inhibition decreased mast cell degranulation, but only Syk inhibition also blocked desensitization. Many other agents that are used clinically and experimentally had little or no beneficial effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Combinations of an HR1 antagonist, a β-adrenergic agonist, and a Syk or a BTK inhibitor protect best against IgE-mediated anaphylaxis, while an HR1 antagonist plus a β-adrenergic agonist ± a BTK antagonist is optimal for inhibiting IgE-mediated anaphylaxis without suppressing desensitization.

Desensitization to biological agents used in rheumatology

Biological agents such as monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins are widely used for the treatment of patients with various rheumatic disorders, influencing the quality of life, disability and even mortality in patients. However, biological agents can evoke adverse reactions of different grades of severity. Although drug avoidance remains a gold standard in the care of patients hypersensitive to medication, in certain clinical situations the culprit drug is the drug of choice and cannot be replaced by another equally effective compound. In such cases, desensitization can allow the patient to be treated within current guidelines and with the most effective treatment. The authors searched Medline and Scopus databases for English-language sources using the following key words: hypersensitivity, desensitization, biologicals, adalimumab, etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, rituximab, infliximab, ixekizumab, tocilizumab, anakinra and canakinumab. The aim of our review is to present the current knowledge about desensitization to biological agents and some guidelines according to patient inclusion, contraindications, procedures, and safety requirements. Drug desensitization is a new issue in rheumatology, and the solution to the problem of allergic reactions to biological drugs, which gives patients with rheumatic diseases the opportunity to extend and prolong their therapy. The present article is one of the first widely discussing this topic in the biological treatment of rheumatic diseases.

Breakthrough reactions during rapid drug desensitization: Clinical outcome and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Severe hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) interfere with the administration of necessary drugs for patients; drug desensitization can be a good alternative strategy. Although rapid drug desensitization (RDD) has been shown to be safe and effective, some patients still experience breakthrough reactions (BTRs) during desensitization.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to estimate clinical outcomes of RDD and to identify risk factors for BTR.

METHODS

From January 2015 to December 2017, retrospective analysis was done in cancer patients with HSRs to chemotherapy and monoclonal antibody who underwent 3-bag, 12-step RDD in Asan Medical Center.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients (42 females; mean age, 54.7 ± 11.0) underwent 234 desensitization procedures. The most common underlying malignancy was gynecologic cancer (n = 26, 44.8%), and platinum-based drugs were common target drugs (135 cases of 36 patients). Twenty-six of 58 patients (44.8%) experienced 56 BTRs, whereas 178 cases (76.1%) of total desensitization did not show any reactions. Among them, 12 patients (20.7%) had moderate BTRs requiring systemic steroids, and 3 (5.1%) experienced severe BTRs requiring epinephrine administration. Logistic regression analysis revealed more severe initial HSRs (OR = 17.94, 95% CI = 1.78-181.68, P = .015), drug allergy history (OR = 7.83, 95% CI = 1.48-41.44, P = .035), and frequency of exposure to the chemotherapeutic agents (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.01-1.28, P = .016) increased the risk of moderate to severe BTR.

CONCLUSION

The standardized 12-step protocol for RDD was effective and safe for most patients. Severity of initial HSR, history of drug allergy, and previous high exposure to the chemotherapeutic agent showed a positive correlation with BTR above moderate grade. Studies are needed to propose an individualized protocol according to patient-specific risk assessment.