Metastatic breast cancer in young women: a population-based cohort study to describe risk and prognosis

Comparative analysis of breast cancer characteristics in young premenopausal and postmenopausal women in Ghana

Breast cancer is increasingly common among young women in Ghana. BCa is heterogeneous with unique traits that impact causes, prognostic, and predictive outcomes of patients before and after menopause. However, limited evidence exists on differences between young premenopausal (YPM) and postmenopausal cases in Ghana. This study compared breast tumour characteristics between YPM women (under 35 years) and postmenopausal women. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study involving 140 BCa-diagnosed women at the Breast Care Clinic of Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH), Kumasi from November 2019 to June 2021. Thirty-one (22.1%) of participants were YPM and 109 (77.9%) were postmenopausal. The median ages for YPM and postmenopausal were 32.0 (range: 25.0-35.0) and 57.0 (48.0-86.0) respectively. Invasive carcinoma was the most common histological type (97.1%). Left tumour location was the most frequent in both groups (51.6% for YPM and 51.8% for postmenopausal). Lumps detected were frequently in the outer upper quadrant in both groups (61.3% and 56.0%). The majority of the YPM women (80.7%) and postmenopausal women (87.0%) had stage III and IV diseases. Most YPM (64.5%) and postmenopausal women (64.4%) exhibited triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Both YPM 13 (56.6%) and postmenopausal participants 40 (56.3%) exhibited a predominantly partial response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy but YPM women (21.7%) experienced disease progression than the postmenopausal women (12.7%). The study highlights consistent tumour characteristics and advanced clinical stages at diagnosis in both groups with a higher prevalence of TNBC. TNBC and HER2+ subtypes respond better to Anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Establishing Breast Care Clinics in district and regional hospitals for early detection is crucial and further studies are warranted to understand the higher TNBC prevalence in black Africans and re-evaluate breast education programs to address the persistently late presentations.

Metastasis, characteristic, and treatment of breast cancer in young women and older women: A study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registration database

BACKGROUND

Younger age is an independent risk factor for breast cancer (BC) prognosis, and BC in young women is often considered more aggressive. BC patients with different age and molecular subtypes have different metastasis patterns and survival. Herein, we aim to explore the metastasis patterns, characteristics and treatment methods of young patients with BC, and to compare them with older patients.

METHODS

Data of young patients (aged ≤40 years old) and older patients (aged >40 years old) with BC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registration database in 2010-2019 in this retrospective cohort study. Univariate and multivariate competing risk models and proportional hazard models were used to explore the association between different metastasis patterns and treatments and BC prognoses in young and older patients. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were drawn to reflect the survival probability of patients with BC who have different metastasis patterns. Also, we performed subgroup analysis of different metastasis patterns to explore the association between different treatments and overall survival (OS)/cancer specific survival (CSS) in patients with BC. The evaluation index was hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Totally, 5,984 patients died, and 92.56% of them died from BC. There were respectively 1,089 young patients and 9,105 older patients, and we found some differences of characteristics and metastasis patterns between them. After adjusting for covariates, young patients who had brain metastasis and multiple sites metastasis seemed to have high risk of both lower OS and CSS. Among older patients with BC, brain metastasis, liver metastasis, and multiple sites metastasis were all positively associated with both lower OS and CSS. In young and older patients, those who not receive radiotherapy or surgery, or received non-surgery combined with radiotherapy seemed to have high risk of both lower OS and CSS. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and surgery combined with radiotherapy were associated with higher OS and CSS in young patients, while only older patients received surgery combined with radiotherapy had higher OS and CSS. Results of subgroup analysis indicated that for patients with different metastasis patterns, developing a personalized treatment plan is necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristics of BC between young patients and older patients were different. Clinicians should focus on different metastasis sites and choose appropriate treatments in patients with different ages, which may improve the prognoses.

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Among Latin American Adolescents and Young Adults Compared to Middle-Aged and Elder Females: A Cohort Analysis Over 15 Years

Purpose: Outcomes of females with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are rarely explored in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). We compared clinical and survival outcomes of Latin American AYAs (≤39 years) with middle-aged (40-59 years) and older (≥60 years) females with TNBC by cancer stage. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study among treated females with cancer stages I-III diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 in Peru. We evaluated overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Time-to-event methods were used for analyses. Results: Of 1582 females with TNBC, 350 (22%) were AYAs, 887 (56%) were middle-aged, and 345 (22%) were older women. Tumor size >5 cm, histological grade III, and brain metastasis were more common features in AYAs. AYAs were treated more frequently with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 102 months, the 5-year OS/EFS for AYAs was 55%/53%, similar to middle-aged (54%/49%) and older females (56%/51%). AYAs were not at higher risk for decreased OS or EFS in the multivariable Cox analysis. Our findings remained consistent by cancer stage. Conclusion: Although Latin American AYAs with TNBC have more aggressive clinical features at diagnosis, survival outcomes were comparable with middle-aged and older women with TNBC, suggesting that age is not a risk factor for worse survival outcomes if treatment is given according to cancer stage. Our findings should be interpreted with caution given the lack of information on certain covariates such as comorbidities. Strategies for early detection in primary care and prompt referral for treatment initiation should be developed.

What Is Known about Breast Cancer in Young Women?

Breast cancer (BC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women under the age of 40 years worldwide. In addition, the incidence of breast cancer in young women (BCYW) has been rising. Young women are not the focus of screening programs and BC in younger women tends to be diagnosed in more advanced stages. Such patients have worse clinical outcomes and treatment complications compared to older patients. BCYW has been associated with distinct tumour biology that confers a worse prognosis, including poor tumour differentiation, increased Ki-67 expression, and more hormone-receptor negative tumours compared to women >50 years of age. Pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes such as BRCA1/2 are more common in early-onset BC compared to late-onset BC. Despite all these differences, BCYW remains poorly understood with a gap in research regarding the risk factors, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Age-specific clinical characteristics or outcomes data for young women are lacking, and most of the standard treatments used in this subpopulation currently are derived from older patients. More age-specific clinical data and treatment options are required. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, clinicopathologic characteristics, outcomes, treatments, and special considerations of breast cancer in young women. We also underline future directions and highlight areas that require more attention in future studies.

Metastasis patterns and prognosis in young breast cancer patients: A SEER database analysis

Background

There are few studies on young patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study aims to explore the metastasis pattern and prognosis of young patients with MBC.

Methods

A total of 6,336 MBC patients diagnosed in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015 were selected. They were divided into two age groups: the younger group (≤40 years old) and the older group (>40 years old). χ² test was used to compare clinicopathological characteristics. Survival differences were compared by Kaplan–Meier analysis. Cox regression models were used to determine the prognostic factors affecting survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the effects of baseline clinicopathological differences.

Results

Finally, 494 patients (7.8%) who are ≤40 years old and 5,842 patients (92.2%) who are >40 years old were included. In the younger group, the proportion of liver metastasis was significantly higher than that in the older group; the proportion of lung metastasis was significantly lower than that of the older group. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the younger group had the best prognosis and the older group had the worst. Youth is an independent protective factor for overall survival (OS). In the younger group, liver metastasis had the best prognosis among all metastatic sites, and the HER2-enriched subtype had the best prognosis among all subtypes.

Conclusions

The disease in young MBC patients is more aggressive but has a better prognosis, especially in liver metastases and the HER2-enriched subtypes.

Young-Onset Breast Cancer Outcomes by Time Since Recent Childbirth in Utah

IMPORTANCE

Breast cancer diagnosed within 5 to 10 years after childbirth, called postpartum breast cancer (PPBC), is associated with increased risk for metastasis and death. Whether a postpartum diagnosis is an independent risk factor or a surrogate marker of cancer features associated with poor outcomes remains understudied.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether diagnostic temporal proximity to childbirth is associated with features of breast cancer associated with poor outcomes, including tumor stage, estrogen receptor (ER) status, and risk for distant metastasis and breast cancer-specific mortality, using a population database from the state of Utah.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based cohort study using the Utah Population Database (UPDB) included individuals with stage I to III breast cancer diagnosed at age 45 years or younger between 1996 and 2017, followed-up until February 2020. Participant data were analyzed from November 2019 to August 2022.

EXPOSURE

The primary exposures were no prior childbirth or time between most recent childbirth and breast cancer diagnosis. Patients were grouped by diagnoses within less than 5 years, 5 to less than 10 years, or 10 years or more since recent childbirth.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The 2 primary outcomes were distant metastasis-free survival and breast cancer-specific death. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate associations between exposures and outcomes adjusting for diagnosis year, patient age, tumor stage, and estrogen receptor (ER) status.

RESULTS

Of 2970 individuals with breast cancer diagnosed at age 45 years or younger (mean [SD] age, 39.3 [5.0] years; 12 Black individuals [0.4%], 2679 White individuals [90.2%]), breast cancer diagnosis within 5 years of recent childbirth was independently associated with approximately 1.5-fold elevated risk for metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0) and breast cancer-specific death (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1) compared with nulliparous individuals. For cancers classically considered to have tumor features associated with good outcomes (ie, stage I or II and ER-positive), a postpartum diagnosis was a dominant feature associated with increased risk for metastasis and death (eg, for individuals with ER-positive disease diagnosed within <5 years of childbirth: age-adjusted metastasis HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; P = .01; age-adjusted death HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1; P = .04) compared with nulliparous individuals. Furthermore, liver metastases were specifically increased in the group with diagnosis within 5 years postpartum and with positive ER expression (38 of 83 patients [45.8%]) compared with the nulliparous (28 of 77 patients [36.4%]), although the difference was not statistically significant. Overall, these data implicate parity-associated breast and liver biology in the observed poor outcomes of PPBC.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of individuals with breast cancer diagnosed at age 45 years or younger, a postpartum breast cancer diagnosis was a risk factor associated with poor outcomes. Irrespective of ER status, clinical consideration of time between most recent childbirth and breast cancer diagnosis could increase accuracy of prognosis in patients with young-onset breast cancer.

Metastatic relapse of stage I-III breast cancer in New Zealand

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the factors that influence the risk of metastatic relapse in women presenting with stage I-III breast cancer in New Zealand.

METHODS

The study included women diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer. Cumulative incidence of distant metastatic relapse was examined with the Kaplan-Meier method by cancer stage and subtype. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio of developing recurrent metastatic breast cancer by cancer stage and biomarker subtype after adjustment for other factors.

RESULTS

A total of 17,543 eligible women were identified. The 5-year cumulative incidence of metastatic recurrence was 3.7% for stage I, 13.3% for stage II and 30.9% for stage III disease. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of stage II and stage III breast cancer developing metastatic disease were 2.07 and 4.82 compared to stage I. The adjusted risk of distant metastatic relapse was highest for luminal B HER2- cancers (adjusted HR: 1.59 compared to luminal A disease). Higher grade cancers were associated with a higher risk of metastases. After adjustment, women aged 60-69 years and Asian women had the lowest risk of distant metastatic relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of women with locally invasive breast cancer differs greatly with the chance of developing metastatic disease depending on the stage of disease at diagnosis and the subtype. Grade of disease at diagnosis was also important. Māori or Pacific ethnicity did not influence the risk of developing metastatic disease, although Asian women seemed less likely to develop metastases.

Optimizing care for younger women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

Treatment strategies for hormone receptor-positive (HR⁺ ), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2^- ) metastatic breast cancer in young women (<40 years at diagnosis) have traditionally been extrapolated from data obtained from trials conducted either exclusively or predominantly in the postmenopausal setting. These young patients are usually treated with ovarian function suppression (OFS) + endocrine therapy (ET) ± targeted therapy, except if there is a concern about endocrine resistance or a need to gain rapid disease control due to the onset of visceral crisis. This review examines evidence that supports the use of a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, in combination with OFS and ET, when treating premenopausal or perimenopausal women with HR⁺ /HER2^- metastatic breast cancer. This includes data from the MONALEESA-7 study (treating only premenopausal/perimenopausal women in the first-line setting), and the results of subgroup analyses from the PALOMA-3 and MONARCH-2 trials. We also consider a number of age-specific challenges that younger breast cancer patients can face, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to ongoing care.

Effects of Germline Pathogenic Variants, Cancer Subtypes, Tumor-related Characteristics, and Pregnancy-associated Diagnosis on Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Although breast cancer (BC) is uncommon in women age ≤ 35 years, women in this age group may have more aggressive cancer subtypes and high-risk pathogenic variants (HRPVs). Higher recurrence and mortality rates in young patients may be related to differences in tumor biology, pathologic mutation status, or treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate germline mutation status and other factors that affect recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in young women with BC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of women diagnosed with BC at age ≤ 35 years at Allina Health System from 2000 through 2017 (n = 306). Information was collected on germline mutation status, tumor characteristics (grade, hormone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), molecular subtype, pregnancy-associated cancers, and treatment. Survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier curves were conducted for RFS and OS.

RESULTS

With mean follow-up of 6.5 years, OS was 87.0% for invasive cancers, RFS was 84.7%; 69% obtained genetic testing, and 26.9% had HRPVs. There were no differences in RFS or OS between patients with HRPV versus unknown/low/moderate risk variants. Recurrence analysis showed increased recurrence rates in luminal B-like cancers followed by triple negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive cancers (P = .041). Pregnancy-associated BC diagnoses, angiolymphatic invasion, and tumor stage were associated with reduced OS. In spite of young age at diagnosis, nearly one-third of patients did not receive germline genetic testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar survival patterns were found between women with HRPV versus no known mutations. Luminal B-like subtype, pregnancy-associated BC, angiolymphatic invasion, and cancer stage were associated with reduced OS.

Prognosis in young women less than 40 years of age with brain metastasis from breast cancer

Background

Brain metastasis from breast cancer (bca) in young women is doubly devastating because both quality of life and life expectancy are significantly reduced. With new radiation technology and drugs that have emerged, survival is expected to increase for these young women.

Methods

Using the oacis and sardo patient databases, we identified 121 patients diagnosed with bca and brain metastasis between 2006 and 2016 at the University of Montreal Hospital Centre. Those patients were divided into Group A, patients who developed brain metastasis during the evolution of metastatic bca, and Group B, patients whose first metastasis was to the brain. For each group, we compared young patients (<40 years of age) with older patients (≥40 years of age).

Results

Among the 121 patients with brain metastasis, median overall survival (mos) was significantly longer for those less than 40 years of age than for those 40 or more years of age (18 months vs. 4 months, p < 0.001). With respect to the timing of brain metastasis, survival was significantly longer in Group B than in Group A (7 months vs. 4 months, p = 0.032). In Group A, mos was significantly longer for patients less than 40 years of age than for patients 40 or more years of age (18 months vs. 3 months, p = 0.0089). In Group B, the 2-year overall survival rate was 57% for patients less than 40 years of age and 12% for those 40 or more years of age (mos: not reached vs. 7 months; p = 0.259).

Conclusions

In our single-centre retrospective cohort of women with brain metastasis from bca, prognosis was better for young women (<40 years) than for older women (≥40 years). Survival was also longer for patients whose initial metastasis was to the brain than for patients whose brain metastasis developed later in the disease course. In patients who received systemic treatment, median survival remained significantly higher in women less than 40 years of age. Further studies are needed to validate those results.

Use of clinical nomograms for predicting survival outcomes in young women with breast cancer

Early-onset breast cancer (BC) has been recognized to be more aggressive compared with its later counterparts. Survival models of BC in young patients have rarely been reported in previous studies. The current study aimed to establish and validate prediction models with clinicopathological variables for visceral metastasis-free survival (VFS), disease-free-survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) time in young patients with BC. Clinicopathological data were obtained for 351 patients with primary breast tumors who were ≤40 years old. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed and nomograms were established to screen and illustrate the prognostic factors. Risk scores were calculated based on coefficients from the Cox regression analysis. Internal validation of the prediction models was conducted by predicting the prognosis of cases randomly sampled from the cohort used in the current study. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that N stage (P=0.004), molecular subtype (P=0.007) and age (P=0.005) were significant independent prognostic factors for VFS. Similarly, N stage (P=0.002) and molecular subtype (P=0.001) were significantly associated with DFS. In addition, N stage (P=0.006), molecular subtype (P=0.006) and the presence of an initially inoperable tumor (P=0.005) were significant independent prognostic factors for OS. According to the Cox regression analysis, nomograms were generated to illustrate the effect of independent prognostic factors on VFS, DFS and OS. Risk scores were calculated and internal validation demonstrated the reliability of the prediction models. In conclusion, N stage and molecular subtype were identified as predictors for VFS, DFS and OS in early-onset BC. Furthermore, an age of <35 years at diagnosis was revealed to be unfavorable for VFS and the presence of an initially inoperable tumor was identified to reduce OS time.

Evaluation of recurrence patterns and survival in modern series of young women with breast cancer

The data on oncologic outcomes in young women with breast cancer (BC) are dated as it relates to recurrences and mortality. Our goal was to assess these outcomes in a modern series of young women with BC. A retrospective chart review identified women ≤40 years old with stage I-III BC diagnosed from 2006 to 2013 at our institution. Demographics, tumor biology, type of operation, recurrence, and survival were analyzed. Overall, 322 women were identified. Most had ER+(70%) infiltrating ductal tumors (88%) with low stage (42% T1; 41% T2; 56% N0). Follow-up was 4.2 years with 5.6% local-regional recurrence (LRR), 15.2% metastatic recurrence (MR), and 8% mortality. There was no survival difference based on demographics, tumor biology, or type of operation. T3 tumors (P < .001) and node positivity (P < .001) were associated with worse disease-free survival. In this modern series of young women with BC, stage rather than tumor biology or surgical choice has more effect on recurrence-free survival. MR was more common than LRR, with most MR occurring within the first 2 years after surgery.

A tissue microRNA signature that predicts the prognosis of breast cancer in young women

Since breast cancers in young women are generally aggressive, young patients tend to be intensively treated with anti-cancer drugs. To optimize the strategy for treatment, particularly in young women, prognostic biomarkers are urgently required. The objective of this study was to identify a tissue microRNA (miRNA) signature that predicts prognosis in young breast cancer patients. Total RNA from 45 breast cancer patients aged <35 years was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues and analyzed using miRNA microarrays. Patients were categorized into two groups according to recurrence status within the 5 year period after surgery: recurrence (n = 11) and non-recurrent (n = 34). Histological parameters of hormone receptors and Ki-67 were statistically compared between the two groups. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified, and their associations with overall survival (OS) were evaluated by log-rank test. The median observation period was 5.8 years for the recurrent group, and 9.1 years for the non-recurrent group. Nine miRNAs were significantly differentially expressed between the recurrent and non-recurrent groups. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the identified miRNAs, and the resultant area under the curve was >0.7. Five of the miRNAs were validated by qRT-PCR, and the expression levels of three of those five (miR-183-5p, miR-194-5p, and miR-1285-5p), both alone and in combination, were associated with OS. In conclusion, we identified three candidate miRNAs that could be used separately or in combination as prognostic biomarkers in young breast cancer patients. This miRNA signature may enable selection of better treatment choices for young women with this disease.

Understanding the effects of socioeconomic status along the breast cancer continuum in Australian women: a systematic review of evidence

Background

Globally, the provision of equitable outcomes for women with breast cancer is a priority for governments. However, there is growing evidence that a socioeconomic status (SES) gradient exists in outcomes across the breast cancer continuum – namely incidence, diagnosis, treatment, survival and mortality. This systematic review describes this evidence and, because of the importance of place in defining SES, findings are limited to the Australian experience.

Methods

An on-line search of PubMed and the Web of Science identified 44 studies published since 1995 which examined the influence of SES along the continuum. The critique of studies included the study design, the types and scales of SES variable measured, and the results in terms of direction and significance of the relationships found. To aid in the interpretation of results, the findings were discussed in the context of a systems dynamic feedback diagram.

Results

We found 67 findings which reported 107 relationships between SES within outcomes along the continuum. Results suggest no differences in the participation in screening by SES. Higher incidence was reported in women with higher SES whereas a negative association was reported between SES and diagnosis. Associations with treatment choice were specific to the treatment choice undertaken. Some evidence was found towards greater survival for women with higher SES, however, the evidence for a SES relationship with mortality was less conclusive.

Conclusions

In a universal health system such as that in Australia, evidence of an SES gradient exists, however, the strength and direction of this relationship varies along the continuum. This is a complex relationship and the heterogeneity in study design, the SES indicator selected and its representative scale further complicates our understanding of its influence. More complex multilevel studies are needed to better understand these relationships, the interactions between predictors and to reduce biases introduced by methodological issues.

Ten-year survival in women with primary stage IV breast cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate breast cancer-specific survival at 10 years in patients who present with primary stage IV breast cancer, and to determine whether survival varies with age of diagnosis.

METHODS

We retrieved the records of 25,323 women diagnosed with primary stage IV breast cancer in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results 18 registries database from 1990 to 2012. For each case, we extracted information on age at diagnosis, tumour size, nodal status, oestrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, ethnicity, cause of death and date of death. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of death due to stage IV breast cancer, according to age group.

RESULTS

Among 25,323 women with stage IV breast cancer, 2542 (10.0 %) were diagnosed at age 40 or below, 5562 (22.0 %) were diagnosed between ages 41 and 50 and 17,219 (68.0 %) were diagnosed between ages 51 and 70. After a mean follow-up of 2.2 years, 16,387 (64.7 %) women died of breast cancer (median survival 2.3 years). The ten-year actuarial breast cancer-specific survival rate was 15.7 % for women ages 40 and below, 14.9 % for women ages 41-50 and 11.7 % for women ages 51 to 70 (p < 0.0001). In an adjusted analysis, the risk of death from breast cancer at 10 years was significantly lower for women ages 40 and below (HR 0.78; 95 % CI 0.74-0.82; p < 0.0001) and for women ages 41-50 (HR 0.82; 95 % CI 0.79-0.85; p < 0.0001), compared to women ages 51-70.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 13 % of women with primary stage IV breast cancer survive 10 years after diagnosis. Women diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer before age 50 have better survival at 10 years compared to older women.

Palliative systemic therapy for young women with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast cancer in young women age less than 40 years remains a relatively rare disease. Emerging data suggest that the biology of breast cancer in younger women may differ from that of older women. Although metastatic breast cancer remains incurable, it is definitely treatable; especially in this era of emerging novel therapeutics.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most women have hormone receptor-positive disease and strategies that interfere with proliferation and the PI3 kinase pathway are reporting exciting results. The prognosis of the metastatic HER2 subtype has been extended to a median survival of 56 months with dual HER2 targeting agents in the first-line setting. Finally, triple negative breast cancer has an enlarging range of therapeutic options including immunotherapy, antiangiogenesis therapy, and targeted therapies including agents that interfere with androgen receptor signaling.

SUMMARY

Combined palliative and holistic approaches are essential to help young women navigate the marathon of treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

The Modern Landscape of Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women with Breast Cancer

The optimal endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with early and advanced breast cancer still remains an important and controversial issue. For over 30 years, tamoxifen has been the gold standard in the adjuvant setting. New therapeutic options, such as the addition of ovarian function suppression to oral endocrine therapy (either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors), can improve outcomes over tamoxifen alone in well-selected patients. Treatment duration has also been revisited, and extended therapy is becoming a new standard of care, especially in high-risk patients. Endocrine therapy for advanced disease still represents a challenge and a research priority. New drugs and combinations able to overcome endocrine resistance are at the horizon, and their role in premenopausal women should be better elucidated. Side effects and quality of life (including family planning considerations) play an important role in treatment selection and in the patients' treatment adherence and should always be discussed before start of treatment. The paper will specifically focus on how to integrate all new treatment options in the current armamentarium of endocrine therapy of premenopausal women, with the aim of best fine-tuning treatment selections according to the individual risk/benefit evaluation.