Idiosyncratic reactions are the most common cause of abnormal liver function tests in patients with cystic fibrosis

Integration of Non-invasive Screening for Cystic Fibrosis Related Liver Disease in the Regular Follow-Up for Cystic Fibrosis

BACKGROUND

The reported prevalence of cystic fibrosis (CF)-related liver disease (CFLD) reaches up to 40% in some cohorts. CFLD is the 3rd leading cause of mortality among patients with CF. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of CFLD in a cohort followed at a tertiary university center, to define the types of liver involvement, and to determine how non-invasive screening methods can be optimally integrated into clinical practice.

METHODS

The files of patients followed at the CF clinic of the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) between 2020 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The NIH criteria were used to define CFLD through the presence of one major criterion (abnormal imaging) or two minor criteria (persistently abnormal laboratory values, hepatosplenomegaly, or transient elastography (TE) ≥ 7 kPa).

RESULTS

A total of 357 patients were included in this study. CFLD was observed in 46 patients (13%). Among these, major criteria led to diagnosis in 43 patients (with or without minor criteria). TE performed best in non-invasive assessment of CLFD (area under the curve (AUROC) 0.80 (0.68-0.92, p = 0.0007)). A nodular liver was detected in 27 patients (7%), and was associated with higher non-invasive markers of fibrosis. In addition, presence of a nodular liver was associated with significant short-term mortality (14.8% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Early recognition of CFLD in clinical care can potentially prevent complications of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. The use of abdominal imaging and TE seems promising for detecting CFLD.

Long-term safety and efficacy of tezacaftor-ivacaftor in individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 12 years or older who are homozygous or heterozygous for Phe508del CFTR (EXTEND): an open-label extension study

BACKGROUND

Tezacaftor-ivacaftor is an approved cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator shown to be efficacious and generally safe and well tolerated over 8-24 weeks in phase 3 clinical studies in participants aged 12 years or older with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the Phe508del CFTR mutation (F/F; study 661-106 [EVOLVE]) or heterozygous for the Phe508del CFTR mutation and a residual function mutation (F/RF; study 661-108 [EXPAND]). Longer-term (>24 weeks) safety and efficacy of tezacaftor-ivacaftor has not been assessed in clinical studies. Here, we present results of study 661-110 (EXTEND), a 96-week open-label extension study that assessed long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of tezacaftor-ivacaftor in participants aged 12 years or older with cystic fibrosis who were homozygous or heterozygous for the Phe508del CFTR mutation.

METHODS

Study 661-110 was a 96-week, phase 3, multicentre, open-label study at 170 clinical research sites in Australia, Europe, Israel, and North America. Participants were aged 12 years or older, had cystic fibrosis, were homozygous or heterozygous for Phe508del CFTR, and completed one of six parent studies of tezacaftor-ivacaftor: studies 661-103, 661-106, 661-107, 661-108, 661-109, and 661-111. Participants received oral tezacaftor 100 mg once daily and oral ivacaftor 150 mg once every 12 h for up to 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints were changes in lung function, nutritional parameters, and respiratory symptom scores; pulmonary exacerbations; and pharmacokinetic parameters. A post-hoc analysis assessed the rate of lung function decline in F/F participants who received up to 120 weeks of tezacaftor-ivacaftor in studies 661-106 (F/F) and/or 661-110 compared with a matched cohort of CFTR modulator-untreated historical F/F controls from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Primary safety analyses were done in all participants from all six parent studies who received at least one dose of study drug during this study. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02565914).

FINDINGS

Between Aug 31, 2015, to May 31, 2019, 1044 participants were enrolled in study 661-110 from the six parent studies of whom 1042 participants received at least one dose of study drug and were included in the safety set. 995 (95%) participants had at least one TEAE; 22 (2%) had TEAEs leading to discontinuation; and 351 (34%) had serious TEAEs. No deaths occurred during the treatment-emergent period; after the treatment-emergent period, two deaths occurred, which were both deemed unrelated to study drug. F/F (106/110; n=459) and F/RF (108/110; n=226) participants beginning tezacaftor-ivacaftor in study 661-110 had improvements in efficacy endpoints consistent with parent studies; improvements in lung function and nutritional parameters and reductions in pulmonary exacerbations observed in the tezacaftor-ivacaftor groups in the parent studies were generally maintained in study 661-110 for an additional 96 weeks. Pharmacokinetic parameters were also similar to those in the parent studies. The annualised rate of lung function decline was 61·5% (95% CI 35·8 to 86·1) lower in tezacaftor-ivacaftor-treated F/F participants versus untreated matched historical controls.

INTERPRETATION

Tezacaftor-ivacaftor was generally safe, well tolerated, and efficacious for up to 120 weeks, and the safety profile of tezacaftor-ivacaftor in study 661-110 was consistent with cystic fibrosis manifestations and with the safety profiles of the parent studies. The rate of lung function decline was significantly reduced in F/F participants, consistent with cystic fibrosis disease modification. Our results support the clinical benefit of long-term tezacaftor-ivacaftor treatment for people aged 12 years or older with cystic fibrosis with F/F or F/RF genotypes.

FUNDING

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.

Cystic fibrosis liver disease: A condition in need of structured transition and continuity of care

Liver disease affects one-third of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and it is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Historically considered a disease of childhood, its impact is now seen more often in adulthood. The heterogeneous pattern of CF liver disease and its rapid progression to cirrhosis remain a diagnostic challenge and new questions pertaining to the nature of liver involvement have recently been raised. Non-invasive measures to stratify the severity of liver involvement are increasingly used to predict clinical outcomes. A single treatment, ursodeoxycholic acid, has been used to slow progression of liver disease while recent advances in the field of CF treatments are promising. Management of portal hypertension remains challenging but outcomes after liver transplantation are encouraging. While many questions remain unanswered, a growing number of CF patients reach adulthood and will require care for CF liver disease.

Diagnosis, follow-up and treatment of cystic fibrosis-related liver disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an insight and overview of the challenges in the diagnosis, follow-up and treatment of cystic fibrosis-related liver disease (CFLD).

RECENT FINDINGS

The variable pathophysiology of CFLD complicates its diagnosis and treatment. A 'gold standard' for CFLD diagnosis is lacking. Over the past years, new techniques to diagnose features of CFLD, such as transient elastography, have been investigated. Although most of these tests confirm cystic fibrosis-related liver involvement (CFLI), they are, however, not suitable to distinguish various phenotypical presentations or predict progression to clinically relevant cirrhosis or portal hypertension. A combined initiative from the European and the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition has been started, aimed to obtain consensus on CFLD criteria and definitions. Currently, only ursodeoxycholic acid is used in CFLD treatment, although it has not been convincingly demonstrated to change the natural course of the disease. Drugs that directly target cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein dysfunction show promising results; however, more long-term follow-up and validation studies are needed.

SUMMARY

CFLD is an umbrella term referring to a wide variety of liver manifestations with variable clinical needs and consequences. CFLD with portal hypertension is the most severe form of CFLD due to its significant implications on morbidity and mortality. The clinical relevance of other CFLI is uncertain. Consensus on CFLD definitions is essential to validate new diagnostic tools and therapeutic outcome measures.

Current and emerging comorbidities in cystic fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is expressed ubiquitously throughout the body. Thus, while respiratory manifestations dominate much of cystic fibrosis (CF) care, there are prominent multi-organ manifestations and comorbidities. In the general population, the number of comorbidities increases with aging. Few illnesses have experienced such a dramatic improvement in survival as CF, which has been transformed from an illness of childhood death to one of adult survival. Hence, as longevity increases in CF, it is paralleled by an increasing number of patients with multicomplex comorbidities availing of care from adult CF multi-disciplinary teams. This review gives an overview of the traditional CF associated comorbidities and those emerging in an aging adult cohort. While historically the treatment of CF focused on the consequences of CFTR dysfunction, the recent advent of CFTR modulators with the potential to enhance CFTR function represents an opportunity to potentially reverse or delay the development of some of the comorbidities associated with CF. Where evidence is available for the impact of CFTR modulatory therapy, namely ivacaftor on comorbidities in CF, this is highlighted.