Utility of surgical lung biopsy in critically ill patients with diffuse pulmonary infiltrates: a retrospective review

The Management of Interstitial Lung Disease in the ICU: A Comprehensive Review

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses a diverse group of parenchymal lung diseases characterized by varying degrees of inflammation and/or fibrosis. Patients with ILD frequently require hospitalization, with many needing intensive care unit (ICU) admission, most often due to respiratory failure. The diagnosis and management of ILD in the ICU present unique challenges. Diagnosis primarily relies on chest CT imaging to identify fibrosis and inflammation. Acute exacerbations, whether in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or non-IPF ILD, require careful evaluation of potential triggers and differential diagnoses. Bronchoalveolar lavage may provide valuable information, such as the identification of infections, but carries risks of complications. Biopsies, whether transbronchial or surgical, can also be informative but pose significant procedural risks. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone of treatment for acute exacerbations of IPF, with higher doses potentially benefiting non-IPF ILD. Additional immunosuppressive agents may be used in cases with evidence of inflammation. Oxygen supplementation, particularly with high-flow nasal cannula, is often employed to manage severe hypoxemia, while noninvasive ventilation can be useful for worsening hypoxemia and/or hypercapnia. When mechanical ventilation is used, it is recommended to target low tidal volumes to minimize lung injury; high PEEP may be less effective and even associated with increased mortality. Prone positioning can improve oxygenation in severely hypoxemic patients. In addition to ventilatory strategies, careful fluid management and addressing concomitant pulmonary hypertension are essential components of care. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a high-risk intervention reserved for the most severe cases. Lung transplantation may be considered for end-stage ILD patients in the ICU, with outcomes dependent on the urgency of transplantation and the patient's overall condition. Managing ILD in the ICU requires a multidisciplinary approach, and despite recent advances, mortality remains high, emphasizing the need for continued research and individualized treatment strategies.

Complications of a lung biopsy for severe respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the complications of lung biopsy in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The primary outcomes were biopsy-related death, respiratory failure, cardiac complications, bleeding, and other major complications. We used the McMaster Quality Assessment Scale of Harms (McHarm) to evaluate the risk of bias. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled frequencies.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (consisting of 574 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Furthermore, most of the included studies had a high or unclear risk of bias in half of the items in McHarm. All included studies evaluated surgical lung biopsies. The median overall hospital mortality was 53% (range: 17%-90%). The pooled frequencies of biopsy-related death, respiratory failure, cardiac complication, bleeding, and other major complications were 0.00% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.00%-0.21%), 1.30% (95% CI: 0.00%-5.69%), 1.03% (95% CI: 0.00%-3.73%), 1.46% (95% CI: 0.16%-3.56%), and 4.26% (95% CI: 0.00%-13.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study will be valuable information in considering the indications of lung biopsy in patients with ARF, including ARDS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN 000040650).

Feasibility of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy in patients with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

Background

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is essential life support in patients with severe acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. However, biopsies should be considered for some patients with unknown aetiology. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) in such patients.

Methods

All patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure of unknown aetiology who underwent TBLC with VV-ECMO support were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' characteristics, ventilation settings, procedure parameters, complications, pathological diagnosis and survival were summarised and analysed.

Results

Eight female and five male patients with VV-ECMO support underwent TBLC. The median age was 58 (interquartile range (IQR) 38-67) years old. Concurrent diseases were present in 10 of the 13 patients, seven of which were immunosuppressed. The median time between biopsy and VV-ECMO establishment was 2.0 (IQR 0.5-6.5) days. No patient died from the procedure. Neither pneumothorax nor severe bleeding occurred in any of the patients. Five of the 13 patients experienced moderate bleeding, and all bleeding events were successfully controlled with prophylactic balloon blockers. Pathological diagnosis by TBLC was obtained in all patients, and the diagnosis of diffuse alveolar damage was made in nine of them.

Conclusions

In patients with VV-ECMO support, the TBLC procedure is generally safe when standardised bleeding prophylaxis is in place. TBLC contributes to identifying underlying aetiologies in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure of unknown aetiology.

Transbronchial lung biopsy versus transbronchial lung cryobiopsy in critically ill patients with undiagnosed acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure whose diagnosis is not established after initial evaluation, obtaining a histopathological diagnosis may improve the patients' prognosis. This study aims to compare the safety profile and diagnostic yields between transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) and transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) in these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was conducted in a 26-bed intensive care unit over a 5-year period. The consecutive patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure who underwent TBLB or TBLC were included to determine the potential etiology. Patients characteristics, procedure related complications, pathological and multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) diagnostic yields, treatment modification and 28-day survival were analyzed. Prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-five and 25 consecutive patients underwent TBLB and TBLC, respectively. The patients underwent TBLC were more critical. There was no significant difference in overall procedure related complications of patients underwent TBLB and TBLC [15.6% (7/45) vs 28.0% (7/25), p = 0.212]. The rate of pathological diagnostic yield [72.0% (18/25) vs 37.8% (17/45), p = 0.006], MDD diagnostic yield [84.0% (21/25) vs 55.6% (25/45), p = 0.016] and subsequent treatment modification [84.0% (21/25) vs 57.8% (26/45), p = 0.025] in patients underwent TBLC were significantly higher than those in patients underwent TBLB. Multivariate analysis revealed that MDD diagnosis [HR 0.193 (95% CI 0.047-0.792), p = 0.022] and treatment modification [HR 0.204 (95% CI 0.065-0.638), p = 0.006] may be prognostic protective factors.

CONCLUSIONS

TBLC can lead to an increased chance of establishing a diagnosis, which could significantly improve the patients' prognosis, with an acceptable safety profile.

Clinical Utility of Surgical Lung Biopsy for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical lung biopsy (SLB) is performed in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, its clinical utility remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

We categorized the pathological diagnoses and investigated the predictive value for short-term mortality.

METHOD

Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for the included studies. The QUADAS-2 was used to evaluate the risk of bias and its applicability. The types and populations of pathological diagnoses were investigated. The pooled sensitivity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were estimated at a fixed specificity. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies that enrolled 758 patients were included. The pathological diagnoses were as follows: diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) 29.9%; infection 24.7%; interstitial lung disease 17.2%; malignancy 3.6%; cardiovascular disease 3.6%; drug toxicity 2.3%; connective tissue disease 2.2%; allergic disease 1.1%; and nonspecific diagnosis 15.4%. To predict short-term mortality, 13 studies that enrolled 613 patients used DAD as an index test and recorded a mortality rate of 56.9% (349 of 613 patients). A total of 3 studies that used index tests other than DAD were excluded. The pooled sensitivity, fixed specificity, LR+, LR-, and DOR were 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.56), 0.69, 1.48 (95% CI: 0.92-1.81), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.63-1.03), and 1.90 (95% CI: 0.89-2.86), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SLB is unlikely to provide a specific diagnosis and should not be recommended for confirming DAD or predicting ARDS prognosis.

Transbronchial Forceps Biopsy in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A transbronchial forceps lung biopsy performed in mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory failure of unknown etiology has significant uncertainty of diagnostic yield and safety along with sparse literature. This study investigated the complication rate of transbronchial biopsies in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit and its ability to obtain a diagnosis and change current therapy.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were systematically searched for all publications of transbronchial lung biopsies in mechanically ventilated patients. We pooled the results of individual studies using random-effects meta-analysis models to achieve the summary proportions.

RESULTS

Of the identified 9 observational studies with a total of 232 patients undergoing a transbronchial biopsy, complications occurred in 67 patients [25.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 11.5%-42.0%; I2=70.0%]. Pneumothorax occurred in 24 patients (9.5%; 95% CI, 4.5%-16.2%; I2=15.9%) and bleeding in 18 patients (8.9%; 95% CI, 4.1%-15.3%; I2=0%). A diagnosis was given in 146 patients (62.9%; 95% CI, 56.0%-69.1%; I2=74.6%), with 103 of 210 patients (49.0%; 95% CI, 44.6%-55.1%; I2=74.9%) having a change in treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that a transbronchial forceps biopsy when performed in mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory failure of unclear etiology had a moderate complication rate. These biopsies resulted in varied diagnoses with a high rate of management change. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to identify the ideal patients to perform a transbronchial forceps biopsy on in the intensive care unit.

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lung Biopsy in Critically Ill Patients With Hematologic Malignancy and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Case Series Report

Pulmonary complications are prevalent among patients with hematologic malignancies, who are at high risk of developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although diffuse alveolar damage is considered the diagnostic hallmark of ARDS, there are plenty of other non-diffuse alveolar damage etiologies that can mimic ARDS and benefit from a specific therapy, therefore correcting the underlying cause. When the etiology remains unclarified despite noninvasive procedures, a surgical lung biopsy (either open via thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [VATS]) may be warranted. However, the role of surgical lung biopsy has not been extensively studied in patients with hematologic malignancy and ARDS and so doubt exists about the risk-benefit relationship of such procedures. In this article, we report a series of 8 critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies and ARDS, who underwent VATS lung biopsy, in a specialized institution in Cali, Colombia, from 2015 to 2019, with special emphasis on its diagnostic yield, modifications in treatment protocol, and safety. VATS lung biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that appears to be a relatively safe with few postoperative complications and minimal perioperative mortality. It has a high diagnostic yield, resulting in a modification of treatment in a nondepreciable percentage of patients. However, this subset of patients was critically ill, with a high risk of mortality, and the lung biopsy did not appear to affect in this aspect. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to further clarify this topic.