Delays in lung cancer management pathways between rural and urban patients in North Queensland: a mixed methods study

Timeliness of Lung Cancer Care and Area-Level Determinants in Victoria: A Bayesian Spatiotemporal Analysis

BACKGROUND

The reports have stated that the timeliness of lung cancer care varies significantly across different regions. According to the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry report, the timeliness of lung cancer care in Victoria has changed over time. Therefore, we aimed to quantify the extent of these spatial inequalities over time and to identify area-level determinants contributing to these changes.

METHODS

The study analyzed lung cancer cases reported to the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry between 2011 and 2022. Bayesian spatiotemporal conditional autoregressive models were fitted, incorporating spatial random effects, temporal random effects, and spatiotemporal interactions. The best performing model was selected using the deviance information criterion. For the final best fit model, the adjusted RRs and their 95% credible intervals were reported.

RESULTS

More than half (51.24%) of patients with lung cancer experienced treatment delays, whereas approximately one third (30.98%) encountered diagnostic delays. Moderate spatiotemporal variations were observed in both delayed diagnosis and treatment. In the final best fit model for treatment delay, an increase in the percentage of smokers was significantly associated with a higher risk of treatment delay (RR = 2.13; 95% credible interval, 1.13-4.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying high-risk areas provides useful information for policymakers, helping in the reduction of delays in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment.

IMPACT

This study has revealed spatiotemporal inequalities in diagnostic and treatment delays, providing valuable insights for identifying areas that should be prioritized to ensure timely care for lung cancer.

Geographic variation in delay to surgical treatment among non-small cell lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

Delayed surgery is significantly associated with an increased risk of disease progression and adverse outcomes in lung cancer. Evidence is available on the variation in delayed surgical treatment among patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). However, the relative contribution of patient- and area-level risk factors to the geographic patterns of delayed surgery in patients with NSCLC is poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to explore the geographic variation in delay to surgical treatment among patients with NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study utilized data from the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry (VLCR) and the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). A total of 3,088 patients with NSCLC who had undergone surgery were included. We applied a Bayesian spatial multilevel model incorporating spatially structured and unstructured random effects to examine patient and area-level risk factors associated with delays to surgical treatment. Model comparison was conducted using the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC).

RESULTS

Over one-third (40.45 %) of NSCLC patients experienced delayed surgical treatment. Significant geographic variation in delayed surgical treatment among NSCLC patients across Local Government Areas (LGAs) was observed. Factors significantly associated with higher odds of delayed surgical treatment included clinical stage II (AOR = 1.56, 95 % CrI: 1.26-1.92), stage III (AOR = 1.90, 95 % CrI: 1.46-2.47), stage IV (AOR = 2.04, 95 % CrI: 1.15-3.61), treatment at inner regional hospitals (AOR = 2.86, 95 % CrI: 2.17-3.70), presence of comorbidities (AOR = 1.19, 95 % CrI: 1.02-1.40), and diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic (AOR = 1.32, 95 % CrI: 1.10-1.57).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the need to improve the treatment pathway for patients with NSCLC by reducing the time between diagnosis and surgery. Future targeted initiatives are essential to promote timely surgeries for NSCLC patients, especially in high-need areas.

A systematic review on the qualitative experiences of people living with lung cancer in rural areas

PURPOSE

To synthesize the qualitative literature exploring the experiences of people living with lung cancer in rural areas.

METHODS

Searches were performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Articles were screened independently by two reviewers against pre-determined eligibility criteria. Data were synthesized using Thomas and Harden's framework for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research. The CASP qualitative checklist was used for quality assessment and the review was reported in accordance with the ENTREQ and PRISMA checklists.

RESULTS

Nine articles were included, from which five themes were identified: (1) diagnosis and treatment pathways, (2) travel and financial burden, (3) communication and information, (4) experiences of interacting with healthcare professionals, (5) symptoms and health-seeking behaviors. Lung cancer diagnosis was unexpected for some with several reporting treatment delays and long wait times regarding diagnosis and treatment. Accessing treatment was perceived as challenging and time-consuming due to distance and financial stress. Inadequate communication of information from healthcare professionals was a common concern expressed by rural people living with lung cancer who also conveyed dissatisfaction with their healthcare professionals. Some were reluctant to seek help due to geographical distance and sociocultural factors whilst others found it challenging to identify symptoms due to comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides a deeper understanding of the challenges faced by people with lung cancer in rural settings, through which future researchers can begin to develop tailored support to address the existing disparities that affect this population.

Patient and carer experiences of lung cancer referral pathway in a regional health service: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer referral pathways aim to reduce delays and improve referral patterns of people with suspected lung cancer.

AIM

As part of implementing a lung cancer referral pathway at a regional Australian hospital, this study aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of people with lung cancer and their carers.

METHODS

In-depth interviews were used to elicit data for thematic analysis in this cross-sectional descriptive qualitative study. Patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer and their carers at a regional academic cancer centre were invited to participate in interviews. Five interviews were conducted face-to-face, and 14 interviews were conducted by telephone (as per interviewee preference). Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed and qualitatively analysed. Descriptive phrases were used to generate initial inductive codes and themes.

RESULTS

Nineteen participants approached agreed to take part in the study. Factors that positively impacted the care experience were good communication, timeliness and patient advocacy and support. Improper communication, long waiting times for investigations and appointments, uncertainty about the process and inconsistent advice from providers negatively impacted the care experience. Participants preferred face-to-face or video-linked consultations over telephone consultations.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the experiences of rural and regional patients and carers with the lung cancer referral pathway is important to improve quality of care. Implementing changes to the referral pathway to improve patient and carer experiences needs to be an ongoing quality improvement exercise.

Social determinants of health and lung cancer surgery: a qualitative study

Introduction

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are non-clinical factors that may affect the outcomes of cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the influence of SDOH factors on quality of life (QOL)-related outcomes for lung cancer surgery patients.

Methods

Thirteen patients enrolled in a randomized trial of a dyadic self-management intervention were invited and agreed to participate in semi-structured key informant interviews at study completion (3 months post-discharge). A conventional content analysis approach was used to identify codes and themes that were derived from the interviews. Independent investigators coded the qualitative data, which were subsequently confirmed by a second group of independent investigators. Themes were finalized, and discrepancies were reviewed and resolved.

Results

Six themes, each with several subthemes, emerged. Overall, most participants were knowledgeable about the concept of SDOH and perceived that provider awareness of SDOH information was important for the delivery of comprehensive care in surgery. Some participants described financial challenges during treatment that were exacerbated by their cancer diagnosis and resulted in stress and poor QOL. The perceived impact of education varied and included its importance in navigating the healthcare system, decision-making on health behaviors, and more economic mobility opportunities. Some participants experienced barriers to accessing healthcare due to insurance coverage, travel burden, and the fear of losing quality insurance coverage due to retirement. Neighborhood and built environment factors such as safety, air quality, access to green space, and other environmental factors were perceived as important to QOL. Social support through families/friends and spiritual/religious communities was perceived as important to postoperative recovery.

Discussion

Among lung cancer surgery patients, SDOH factors can impact QOL and the patient's survivorship journey. Importantly, SDOH should be assessed routinely to identify patients with unmet needs across the five domains. SDOH-driven interventions are needed to address these unmet needs and to improve the QOL and quality of care for lung cancer surgery patients.

Development of an Australia and New Zealand Lung Cancer Clinical Quality Registry: a protocol paper

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality, comprising the largest national cancer disease burden in Australia and New Zealand. Regional reports identify substantial evidence-practice gaps, unwarranted variation from best practice, and variation in processes and outcomes of care between treating centres. The Australia and New Zealand Lung Cancer Registry (ANZLCR) will be developed as a Clinical Quality Registry to monitor the safety, quality and effectiveness of lung cancer care in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Patient participants will include all adults >18 years of age with a new diagnosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), SCLC, thymoma or mesothelioma. The ANZLCR will register confirmed diagnoses using opt-out consent. Data will address key patient, disease, management processes and outcomes reported as clinical quality indicators. Electronic data collection facilitated by local data collectors and local, state and federal data linkage will enhance completeness and accuracy. Data will be stored and maintained in a secure web-based data platform overseen by registry management. Central governance with binational representation from consumers, patients and carers, governance, administration, health department, health policy bodies, university research and healthcare workers will provide project oversight.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The ANZLCR has received national ethics approval under the National Mutual Acceptance scheme. Data will be routinely reported to participating sites describing performance against measures of agreed best practice and nationally to stakeholders including federal, state and territory departments of health. Local, regional and (bi)national benchmarks, augmented with online dashboard indicator reporting will enable local targeting of quality improvement efforts.

Defining timeliness in care for patients with lung cancer: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Early diagnosis and reducing the time taken to achieve each step of lung cancer care is essential. This scoping review aimed to examine time points and intervals used to measure timeliness and to critically assess how they are defined by existing studies of the care seeking pathway for lung cancer.

METHODS

This scoping review was guided by the methodological framework for scoping reviews by Arksey and O'Malley. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO electronic databases were searched for articles published between 1999 and 2019. After duplicate removal, all publications went through title and abstract screening followed by full text review and inclusion of articles in the review against the selection criteria. A narrative synthesis describes the time points, intervals and measurement guidelines used by the included articles.

RESULTS

A total of 2113 articles were identified from the initial search. Finally, 68 articles were included for data charting process. Eight time points and 14 intervals were identified as the most common events researched by the articles. Eighteen different lung cancer care guidelines were used to benchmark intervals in the included articles; all were developed in Western countries. The British Thoracic Society guideline was the most frequently used guideline (20%). Western guidelines were used by the studies in Asian countries despite differences in the health system structure.

CONCLUSION

This review identified substantial variations in definitions of some of the intervals used to describe timeliness of care for lung cancer. The differences in healthcare delivery systems of Asian and Western countries, and between high-income countries and low-income-middle-income countries may suggest different sets of time points and intervals need to be developed.

Increase in the Length of Lung Cancer Patient Pathway Before First-Line Therapy: A 6-Year Nationwide Analysis From Hungary

Objective: This study aimed to examine the characteristics of the lung cancer (LC) patient pathway in Hungary during a 6-years period.

Methods: This nationwide, retrospective study included patients newly diagnosed with LC (ICD-10 C34) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016, using data from the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) of Hungary. The following patient pathway intervals were examined: system, diagnostic and treatment interval by age, gender, tumor type, study year and first-line LC therapy.

Results: During the 6-years study period, 17,386 patients had at least one type of imaging (X-ray or CT/MRI) prior to diagnosis, and 12,063 had records of both X-ray and CT/MRI. The median system interval was 64.5 days, and it was 5 days longer among women, than in men (68.0 vs. 63.0 days). The median system interval was significantly longer in patients with adenocarcinoma compared to those with squamous cell carcinoma or small cell lung cancer (70.4 vs. 64.0 vs. 48.0 days, respectively). Patients who received surgery as first-line treatment had significantly longer median system intervals compared to those receiving chemotherapy (81.4 vs. 62.0 days). The median system interval significantly increased from 62.0 to 66.0 days during the 6-years study period.

Conclusion: The LC patient pathway significantly increased in Hungary over the 6-years study period. There were no significant differences in the length of the whole LC patient pathway according to age, however, female sex, surgery as first-line treatment, and adenocarcinoma were associated with longer system intervals.

Optimal Care Pathways for People with Lung Cancer- a Scoping Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Much of the existing work around implementation of cancer optimal care pathways (OCP) has either focused exclusively on the clinical elements of care or has targeted individual stages in the cancer trajectory, rather than using a patient-centred or service delivery lens to inform the integration of care across the continuum. This review aimed to identify and summarise the available literature on lung cancer OCP.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted, with literature across multiple databases and grey literature searched. Articles were included if the OCP was being used to manage adult patients with lung cancer and reported on either the development process and outcomes and/or barriers and facilitators associated with optimal care pathway development and/or uptake.

RESULTS

Of the 381 references screened, 32 articles were included. The lung cancer pathways reviewed varied significantly. A number of themes were identified including the development and implementation of the OCP; the use of quality indicators to audit the OCP; and studies on outcomes of the OCP incorporating timeliness of care delivery, patient experiences and health care utilisation and costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited number of relevant articles found in this review may suggest that an OCP for lung cancer is still in its preliminary stages across the broader health systems.

Reconceptualising Rural Cancer Inequalities: Time for a New Research Agenda

Evidence has shown for over 20 years that patients residing in rural areas face poorer outcomes for cancer. The inequalities in survival that rural cancer patients face are observed throughout the developed world, yet this issue remains under-examined and unexplained. There is evidence to suggest that rural patients are more likely to be diagnosed as a result of an emergency presentation and that rural patients may take longer to seek help for symptoms. However, research to date has been predominantly epidemiological, providing us with an understanding of what is occurring in these populations, yet failing to explain why. In this paper we outline the problems inherent in current research approaches to rural cancer inequalities, namely how ‘cancer symptoms’ are conceived of and examined, and the propensity towards a reductionist approach to rural environments and populations, which fails to account for their heterogeneity. We advocate for a revised rural cancer inequalities research agenda, built upon in-depth, community-based examinations of rural patients’ experiences across the cancer pathway, which takes into account both the micro and macro factors which exert influence on these experiences, in order to develop meaningful interventions to improve cancer outcomes for rural populations.

Improving regional lung cancer optimal care pathway compliance through a rapid-access respiratory clinic

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in Australia and delays in diagnosis and management increase the potential for disease progression. Incidence and mortality from lung cancer in our region, Gippsland, are higher than the national average, yet there is no known standard referral pathway for diagnosis in the region.

AIM

To identify the current standard of care for lung cancer diagnosis and the impact a rapid access clinic, led by a respiratory physician, has on optimal care pathway (OCP) compliance.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of patients with lung cancer managed through our regional hospital between January and December 2018 (Standard Care group), and a prospective audit of a new rapid access, respiratory-physician led, lung lesion assessment clinic over the same period, were conducted. The primary outcomes were compliance with the OCP target for time from initial computed tomography scan identification of a lung lesion to tissue diagnosis and treatment commencement (target 42 days) when malignancy was confirmed.

RESULTS

There were 25 cases audited in the Standard Care group and 21 cases seen through the Rapid Access Clinic. The Standard Care group met the target for treatment commencement in 33.3% of cases whereas the Rapid Access Clinic group achieved this in 77%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our project highlights the disjointed and delayed lung cancer care in our region and the improvements a dedicated rapid access clinic can have on diagnosis and treatment commencement timeframes.