Epidemiology and Microbiology of Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Central Australia: A Retrospective Study

Respiratory carriage of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae by indigenous populations of Malaysia

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae that is classified by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as a Priority One ESKAPE pathogen. South and Southeast Asian countries are regions where both healthcare associated infections (HAI) and community acquired infections (CAI) due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKp) are of concern. As K. pneumoniae can also exist as a harmless commensal, the spread of resistance genotypes requires epidemiological vigilance. However there has been no significant study of carriage isolates from healthy individuals, particularly in Southeast Asia, and specially Malaysia. Here we describe the genomic analysis of respiratory isolates of K. pneumoniae obtained from Orang Ulu and Orang Asli communities in Malaysian Borneo and Peninsular Malaysia respectively. The majority of isolates were K. pneumoniae species complex (KpSC) 1 K. pneumoniae (n = 53, 89.8%). Four Klebsiella variicola subsp. variicola (KpSC3) and two Klebsiella quasipneumoniae subsp. similipneumoniae (KpSC4) were also found. It was discovered that 30.2% (n = 16) of the KpSC1 isolates were ST23, 11.3% (n = 6) were of ST65, 7.5% (n = 4) were ST13, and 13.2% (n = 7) were ST86. Only eight of the KpSC1 isolates encoded ESBL, but importantly not carbapenemase. Thirteen of the KpSC1 isolates carried yersiniabactin, colibactin and aerobactin, all of which harboured the rmpADC locus and are therefore characterised as hypervirulent. Co-carriage of multiple strains was minimal. In conclusion, most isolates were KpSC1, ST23, one of the most common sequence types and previously found in cases of K. pneumoniae infection. A proportion were hypervirulent (hvKp) however antibiotic resistance was low.

Validating a novel three-times-weekly post-hemodialysis ceftriaxone regimen in infected Indigenous Australian patients-a population pharmacokinetic study

OBJECTIVES

To describe the total and unbound population pharmacokinetics of a 2 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis ceftriaxone regimen in Indigenous Australian patients requiring hemodialysis.

METHODS

A pharmacokinetic study was carried out in the dialysis unit of a remote Australian hospital. Adult Indigenous patients on intermittent hemodialysis (using a high-flux dialyzer) and treated with a 2 g three-times-weekly ceftriaxone regimen were recruited. Plasma samples were serially collected over two dosing intervals and assayed using validated methodology. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were performed using Pmetrics in R. The probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment (unbound trough concentrations ≥1 mg/L) and toxicity [trough concentrations (total)  ≥100 mg/L] were simulated for various dosing strategies.

RESULTS

Total and unbound concentrations were measured in 122 plasma samples collected from 16 patients (13 female) with median age 57 years. A two-compartment model including protein-binding adequately described the data, with serum bilirubin concentrations associated (inversely) with ceftriaxone clearance. The 2 g three-times-weekly regimen achieved 98% probability to maintain unbound ceftriaxone concentrations ≥1 mg/L for a serum bilirubin of 5 µmol/L. Incremental accumulation of ceftriaxone was observed in those with bilirubin concentrations >5 µmol/L. Three-times-weekly regimens were less probable to achieve toxic exposures compared with once-daily regimens. Ceftriaxone clearance was increased by >10-fold during dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel 2 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis ceftriaxone regimen can be recommended for a bacterial infection with an MIC ≤1 mg/L. A 1 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis regimen is recommended for those with serum bilirubin ≥10 µmol/L. Administration of ceftriaxone during dialysis is not recommended.

Prediction accuracy of commonly used pneumonia severity scores in Aboriginal patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) is highly prevalent in the Aboriginal population. Few pneumonia severity scores are validated in this population.

AIMS

To assess the prediction accuracy of pneumonia severity scores in Aboriginal patients with SCAP and to identify risk factors for poor prognosis.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study examining Aboriginal patients admitted to the intensive care unit with confirmed SCAP between January 2011 and December 2014. Severity scores were calculated for SMARTCOP (systolic blood pressure, multi-lobar, albumin, respiratory rate, tachycardia, confusion, oxygenation and arterial pH), SMARTACOP (systolic blood pressure, multi-lobar, albumin, respiratory rate, tachycardia, Aboriginal status, confusion, oxygenation and arterial pH), CURB-65 (confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age ≥65 years), pneumonia severity index, Infectious Diseases Society of America and American Thoracic Society SCAP, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II/III using medical records. Prediction accuracy of 30-day mortality and requirement for intensive respiratory and/or vasoactive support (IRVS) were assessed using logistic regression and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Multivariate analysis was used to test associations between poor prognosis and demographic/clinical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 203 cases (49% women) was identified. Thirty-day mortality was 6.4% (n = 13), and 53% (n = 107) required IRVS. None of the tested pneumonia severity scores accurately predicted mortality. SMARTCOP and SMARTACOP predicted IRVS requirement with the highest diagnostic accuracy, but only achieved acceptable discrimination (P <0.001 and <0.001; AUROC = 0.74 and 0.75 respectively). APACHE II/III predicted both mortality (P = 0.003 and 0.001; AUROC = 0.74 and 0.73 respectively) and IRVS requirement (P <0.001 and <0.001; AUROC = 0.72 and 0.73 respectively). Multivariate analysis associated mortality with male gender, cirrhosis, immunosuppression and acidaemia, and IRVS requirement with multi-lobar pneumonia, hypotension and tachypnoea. Multivariate analysis for mortality and IRVS requirement achieved an AUROC of 0.93 and 0.87 respectively.

CONCLUSION

None of the pneumonia severity scores accurately predicted mortality. We recommend SMARTACOP to predict IRVS requirement in Aboriginal patients with SCAP. Given Aboriginal patients are over-represented in Australian intensive care units, a new score is warranted for this understudied population.