Mental health nurses' perspectives of people who self-harm

A description of risk associated with use of antipsychotics among community dwelling older adults: A descriptive cross-sectional study

The objective of this research was to analyze the risk of adverse effects in patients older than 65 years with dementia and in concomitant treatment with antidementia and antipsychotic drugs and who are cared for by community nurses. A retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out. A total of 332 patients who were cared for by primary care teams participated. Most of the patients were women, totally dependent for the basic activities of daily living and residing in the family home. They were polymedicated and there was poor therapeutic adherence. The risk of adverse effects was higher in polymedicated patients who had been taking antipsychotics for longer periods and in those who had a main caregiver. However, those patients who had been assessed by the community nurse were protected from suffering adverse effects. This study demonstrates how integrated and continuous nursing care can reduce adverse effects in this type of patient.

Mental health nurses' perception of self-harm among people receiving psychiatric care in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Mental health nurses (MHNs) play an important role in dealing with those receiving psychiatric care for self-harming behaviour. How nurses perceive this group of people is pivotal to timely prevention of such harmful behaviour. This project aimed to assess MHNs perception of self-harming behaviour among those receiving psychiatric care in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Descriptive research was conducted with 400 nurses at governmental hospitals affiliated to the Ministry of Health and Population (MOHP) in the KSA. Data were collected using an online survey and questionnaire: the survey was divided into two sections: one concerned with demographic characteristics of the participants, the second section focusing on their workplace characteristics. The Self-Harm Antipathy Scale-Swedish Revision (SHAS-SR) was used to assess perceptions of self-harm among MHNs. This scale included 19 items categorized into five subscales. Finding showed that more than half of nurses had a low perception of those who self-harmed. Additionally, there was a highly significant association between the nurses' total self-harm perception scores and their workplace characteristics. Promoting person-centred care to those who self-harm through the creation of a collaborative nurse-patient relationship, may improve insight and understanding of the behaviour. Continuous professional development for staff who provide care for those who self-harm would promote better understanding of the behaviour. In addition, workshops, presentations and modelling good practice, are all key for transferring information into real-world applications for MHNs to provide better care for those who self-harm.

Experiences of clinical staff who work with patients who self-harm by ligature: An exploratory survey of inpatient mental health service staff

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT

Self-harm by ligature is common within inpatient mental healthcare settings and is a dangerous method of self-harm. Most fatal and non-fatal suicidal behaviours in inpatient settings are a result of ligature use. There is a lack of research which has explored the experiences of staff members who work within inpatient settings where patients may self-harm by ligature.

WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE

Key issues related to self-harm by ligature reported by staff included (1) understaffing increasing risk of ligature incidents, (2) spreading of self-harm by ligature within inpatient settings and (3) negative attitudes of staff related to patients who self-harm by ligature. Working with self-harm by ligature can have negative impacts on staff's personal (e.g. fear of blame) and professional lives (e.g. increased cautiousness). Many staff members currently feel underprepared by training related to working with self-harm by ligature, and unsupported after responding to a ligature incident.

WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Training about self-harm by ligature needs to be improved and be accessible for all inpatient mental healthcare staff. Training should be coproduced, and could include practical components, education on potential reasons for self-harm, and acknowledgement of the emotional impact on staff. Support for staff members who respond to ligature incidents should be available for all staff members who respond to self-harm by ligature incidents. Stigma associated with accessing support should be challenged, alongside blame cultures within the workplace.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Self-harm by ligature is a common form of self-harm within inpatient mental health services in England, where most suicides within inpatient settings involve hanging or suffocation. However, little research has examined the experiences of staff members working with this method of self-harm.

AIM

We explored the experiences of clinical staff who work with patients who self-harm by ligature.

METHOD

A staff survey was developed and disseminated to clinical staff working in inpatient settings in England. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data using the framework approach. The study was STROBE checklist compliant.

RESULTS

275 staff members participated. Challenges most frequently reported about working with self-harm by ligature included understaffing (210, 76.6%), spreading of ligature incidents (198, 72.8%) and negative attitudes held by clinical staff towards such patients (185, 68.5%). Participants' responses indicated that this work could have significant impacts on their professional and personal lives. Staff often reported inadequate training and lack of preparedness, alongside insufficient support opportunities following ligature incidents.

DISCUSSION

Staff had a diverse range of professional and personal experiences and identified multiple challenges associated with working with patients who have self-harmed by ligature.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

There is a need to improve accessibility, format and content of training and support for staff working within inpatient settings where patients may self-harm by ligature.

An Integrative Model of In-Hospital and Out-of-Hospital Nursing Care for Non-Suicidal Self-Injury: A Narrative Review

Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) refers to the intentional and repeated physical trauma of an individual without explicit suicidal intent, which has negative effects on the physical and mental well-being of an individual, especially for adolescents. Timely and accessible nursing care may play an important role in the survival and rehabilitation process of NSSI. Methods: In this review, we systematically discuss the nursing care of NSSI behavior and provide recommendations based on an integrated nursing model for NSSI management. Results: As reported in previous studies, a variety of factors can contribute to NSSI behavior, such as personality traits, current psychological status, history of mental illnesses, as well as family and social factors. In-hospital care is the most necessary and effective care during acute episodes of NSSI behavior. To effectively manage inpatients with NSSI behaviors, nurses should first understand the motivation of NSSI, and provide comprehensive and multi-level care through nurse-patient communication, individualized psychological care, and multidisciplinary cooperation with other professionals. While the purpose of out-of-hospital nursing is to reduce the frequency of NSSI behaviors by screening high-risk individuals, providing psychological support, promoting health education, and improving self-awareness. Conclusions: An integrative model of in-hospital and out-of-hospital nursing care can help improve the clinical management and long-term prognosis of patients with NSSI and minimize the risk of suicidal ideation or suicidal behavior.

Evidence-Based vs Informal Suicide Training: Nurse Confidence and Comfort With Suicidal Patient Care

INTRODUCTION

Emergency nurses are on the front line of patient care for suicidal persons, yet many nurses report feeling unprepared to effectively manage suicidal patients owing to a lack of suicide-specific training. The purpose of this study was to examine the suicide-specific training experiences of emergency nurses and evaluate how training relates to burnout, confidence, and comfort working with suicidal patients.

METHODS

Emergency nurses at critical access and community hospitals completed an anonymous online survey during work hours. The survey included questions about training experiences, burnout, confidence, and comfort working with suicidal patients, perceptions of the quality and interactive nature of training, and desires for future suicide-specific intervention training.

RESULTS

Group comparisons among the 117 emergency nurses revealed that those who received evidence-based/expert-delivered training reported greater confidence, comfort, and perceived ability to treat suicidal patients and lower burnout than those who received informal or no training. Those with informal training reported greater confidence and ability to treat suicidal patients, but similar levels of comfort and burnout as those with no training. Mediation analyses showed that training was associated with greater comfort working with suicidal patients through its effect on increased confidence. A majority desired additional suicide-specific training.

DISCUSSION

Evidence-based/expert-delivered professional training in suicide intervention is associated with improved confidence, comfort, and perceived ability to care for suicidal patients and lower burnout. Providing evidence-based suicide intervention training may improve quality of care for suicidal patients by improving emergency nurse confidence and comfort for treating these high-risk patients.

Further Silencing the Voiceless: The Role of Gatekeepers in Accessing Information About Self-Injury

ABSTRACT

Gatekeepers play a pivotal role in protecting individuals under their care and are central to keeping people safe and away from harm. In the field of nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI), a range of gatekeepers exist, including those who protect access to vulnerable research participants, those who protect school children, those charged with making decisions about funding priorities, and those in charge of clinical care for people who self-injure. The aim of this commentary is to outline the roles these different gatekeepers have in protecting access to research participants, access to NSSI knowledge, and access to clinical care for individuals who self-injure. We provide examples in which gatekeepers may present barriers and offer solutions for how to work with gatekeepers for mutual benefit.

A Necessary Pain: A Literature Review of Young People's Experiences of Self-Harm

BACKGROUND

Self-harm is defined as intentional self-injury without the wish to die. People who self-harm report feeling poorly treated by healthcare professionals, and nurses wish to know how best to respond to and care for them. Increased understanding of the meaning of self-harm can help nurses collaborate with young people who self-harm to achieve positive healthcare outcomes for them.

AIM

This review aimed to synthesise qualitative research on young peoples' experiences of living with self-harm.

METHOD

A literature search in CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO resulted in the inclusion of 10 qualitative articles that were subjected to metasynthesis.

RESULTS

The results show that young people's experiences of living with self-harm are multifaceted and felt to be a necessary pain. They used self-harm to make life manageable, reporting it provided relief, security, and a way to control overwhelming feelings. They suffered from feeling addicted to self-harm and from shame, guilt, and self-punishment. They felt alienated, lonely, and judged by people around them, from whom they tried to hide their real feelings. Instead of words, they used their wounds and scars as a cry for help.

CONCLUSION

Young people who harm themselves view self-harm as a necessary pain; they suffer, but rarely get the help they need. Further research is necessary to learn how to offer these people the help they need.

Experiences of nursing care for patients who self-harm and suggestions for future practices: The perspectives of emergency care nurses

Self-harm is a major challenge in healthcare systems. Emergency department nurses provide care to numerous patients with self-harm injuries. Accordingly, nurse-patient interactions are vital to improve the physical and psychological outcomes of this complex patient group. Previous studies have proposed the establishment of improved teaching programs to increase the competence of emergency department nurses within mental health care; however, few studies have comprehensively investigated the experiences and suggestions for future nursing practices. Therefore, we gathered in-depth knowledge of Danish emergency department nurses' experiences caring for patients who self-harm and obtained their suggestions on future nursing practices. Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted to capture the nurses' individual perspectives. The scientific theory is based on phenomenology and hermeneutics. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used, and three themes were identified: (i) importance of having the competences to establish a relationship in the acute phase; (ii) acute care from a biomedical perspective; and (iii) highlighting ideas for improved future practices. The emergency department nurses were aware of the importance of mental health care but found their competence and motivation situated in medical care. The nurses felt that they lacked skills to undertake in-depth mental care for patients who self-harm and that the healthcare system failed to help this group of patients. Based on these findings, rather than aiming at improving nursing skills, we suggest a close collaboration between the emergency and psychiatric departments to improve the quality of care for patients who self-harm. We also recommend organizational changes within the emergency department, such as the introduction of a so-called 'social track'.