Chipping into the human genome: novel insights for transplantation

A Meta-analysis of the Significance of Granzyme B and Perforin in Noninvasive Diagnosis of Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported that granzyme B (GZMB) and perforin (PRF) could serve as noninvasive biomarkers in the diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) after kidney transplant. Yet, their noninvasive diagnostic value in clinical practice is still unknown.

METHODS

To assess the noninvasive diagnostic performance of GZMB and PRF for AR, we performed a systematic search. After reviewing published studies in which both GZMB and PRF were detected, data on the diagnostic accuracy of separate and combined evaluation of GZMB and PRF were pooled.

RESULTS

Across 16 studies (680 subjects), summary sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios, and negative likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. For overall GZMB analysis, the indices were 0.76 (0.71-0.81), 0.86 (0.82-0.89), 4.58 (3.36-6.25), and 0.32 (0.22-0.47), respectively. For overall PRF analysis, the indices were 0.83 (0.78-0.88), 0.86 (0.82-0.89), 4.82 (3.66-6.35), and 0.26 (0.18-0.37), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed similar results compared to overall study analyses. In analyses of combined evaluation of GZMB and PRF, the above indices were 0.65 (0.53-0.76), 0.96 (0.91-0.98), 12.66 (5.83-27.50), and 0.40 (0.23-0.69), respectively, when both markers were positive. The probability of developing AR in kidney transplant recipients increased from 15% to 73% when both GZMB and PRF tests were positive and was reduced to 2% if that were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, neither GZMB nor PRF, if evaluated alone, could be a convincing noninvasive diagnostic marker for AR in clinical practice. Combined use of PRF and GZMB post-kidney transplant may be a better choice in AR evaluation to direct allograft biopsy execution and earlier therapeutic intervention.

Insights from computational modeling in inflammation and acute rejection in limb transplantation

Acute skin rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is the major obstacle for wider adoption in clinical practice. This study utilized computational modeling to identify biomarkers for diagnosis and targets for treatment of skin rejection. Protein levels of 14 inflammatory mediators in skin and muscle biopsies from syngeneic grafts [n = 10], allogeneic transplants without immunosuppression [n = 10] and allografts treated with tacrolimus [n = 10] were assessed by multiplexed analysis technology. Hierarchical Clustering Analysis, Principal Component Analysis, Random Forest Classification and Multinomial Logistic Regression models were used to segregate experimental groups. Based on Random Forest Classification, Multinomial Logistic Regression and Hierarchical Clustering Analysis models, IL-4, TNF-α and IL-12p70 were the best predictors of skin rejection and identified rejection well in advance of histopathological alterations. TNF-α and IL-12p70 were the best predictors of muscle rejection and also preceded histopathological alterations. Principal Component Analysis identified IL-1α, IL-18, IL-1β, and IL-4 as principal drivers of transplant rejection. Thus, inflammatory patterns associated with rejection are specific for the individual tissue and may be superior for early detection and targeted treatment of rejection.

Update on the clinical pharmacogenomics of organ transplantation

Organ transplantation suffers from a static graft and patient survival rate, and a high incidence of serious adverse drug effects. The pharmacogenomics of organ transplantation has emerged only recently and is complementary to the immunogenetic information that has accumulated over the past decade. Gene polymorphism studies have focused on the genes that interact across the group of immunosuppressants, including ciclosporin, tacrolimus, sirolimus and corticosteroids. The polymorphisms that hold the most potential for use in a drug selection algorithm are in genes CYP3A5, ABCB1, IMPDH1 and IMPDH2, and cytokines and growth factors. Gene-expression arrays have led to gene-expression testing, such as the use of AlloMap((R)) with heart transplant patients. The expanded use of gene-expression assays, proteomics and drug selection algorithms in organ transplantation will progress slowly and may be outpaced by drug test co-development programs for new transplant drugs. In the future, clinical pharmacogenomics will be a routine part of patient care for organ transplant patients.

Late kidney allograft loss: what we know about it, and what we can do about it

Despite dramatic improvements in immunosuppression, late graft loss after kidney transplantation remains a common and difficult problem. Histologic evaluation may reveal changes related to BK polyomavirus infection, hypertension, or calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, which can help to guide therapy. The designation chronic allograft nephropathy should thus be reserved for biopsies with tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis without an apparent cause. Although the cause clearly includes both antigen-dependent and antigen-independent events, the approach remains largely to exclude immune mechanisms. Although this review discusses the potential contribution of antibody to chronic injury, it focuses on the basic elements of kidney injury, the role of parenchymal cells in promoting injury, and the proliferative and inflammatory responses that accompanying injury. Strategies to manage these recipients include close attention to accompanying hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia, as well as consideration for altering immunosuppression; however, therapies that limit epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition or directly block fibrosis pathways may reduce chronic allograft fibrosis and may prove to be useful. Understanding the basic pathogenesis sufficiently to allow early intervention may finally benefit patients who are at high risk for tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis and promote their long-term graft function.

Microarray analysis of microRNA expression in peripheral blood cells of systemic lupus erythematosus patients

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are noncoding RNA molecules of 21-24 nt that regulate the expression of target genes in a post-transcriptional manner. Evidence indicates that miRNAs play essential roles in embryogenesis, cell differentiation and pathogenesis of human diseases. This study describes a comparison between the miRNA profile of the systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and the controls to develop further understanding of the pathogenesis of SLE. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from blood samples of 23 SLE patients, 10 idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura patients and 10 healthy controls. The miRNA microarray chip analysis identified 16 miRNAs differentially expressed in SLE. The chip results were confirmed by northern blot analysis. This work indicates that miRNAs are potential diagnosis biomarkers and probable factors involved in the pathogenesis of SLE.

Diagnostic Tools for Monitoring Kidney Transplant Recipients

Recent advancements in immunobiology have introduced several new diagnostic tools for monitoring kidney transplant recipients. These have been added to more established tests that, although imperfect, remain important benchmarks of diagnostic utility. Both new and old tests can be characterized with regard to their practicality, and as to whether they detect aberrant function or define the cause of dysfunction. Unfortunately, no current test is both practical and specific to a particular disease entity. Accordingly, the diagnosis of graft dysfunction remains dependent on the proper use and interpretation of many studies. This article reviews the current assays that have been evaluated in the clinic for the diagnosis of renal allograft-related diseases. These are limited to assays based on routinely obtainable samples such as blood, biopsy tissue, and urine. Newer studies are presented, along with more mundane assays, to highlight the practical use of studies regardless of their degree of mechanistic sophistication.

Diagnosis of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection by Analyzing Whole Blood mRNA Expression of Lymphocyte Marker Molecules

BACKGROUND

Currently, the diagnosis of acute rejection after kidney transplantation is based on a kidney biopsy taken after clinical rejection suspicion. A robust, noninvasive diagnostic method would allow easier and more frequent monitoring of the patient and the graft. Potentially, a straightforward method would be the analysis of lymphocyte marker molecule expression from whole blood samples.

METHODS

Whole blood samples were collected prospectively in a single kidney transplantation center from 50 adult kidney recipients transplanted between 2001 and 2005. The mRNA expression of granzyme B, perforin, FasL, granulysin, CD154, ICOS, CTLA4 and PD-1 were analyzed with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

The expression of ICOS and CD154 were significantly lower in rejection patients than in control patients (P<0.001). Both genes gave statistically significant area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC; 0.87, 0.88) with 84% sensitivity and 100% specificity for CD154 and 76% and 86% for ICOS, respectively. In paired rejection and postrejection therapy samples, the expression of both genes significantly increased during rejection therapy (P<0.001). When rejection patients were compared to patients biopsied because of other reasons of graft dysfunction, both CD154 and ICOS were lower in rejection patients but only CD154 was statistically significant (P=0.028, AUC=0.740, sensitivity 52%, specificity 90%). The other studied genes gave no consistent statistically significant results.

CONCLUSIONS

The whole blood gene expression quantities of costimulatory molecules CD154 and ICOS reasonably robustly differentiated rejection patients from control patients. The clinical use of the analysis is limited by poor capability to differentiate patients with rejection from patients with other causes of graft dysfunction.