Acute hemodynamic effects of five beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents in man: the significance of selectivity and intrinsic sympathomimetic activity

An assessment of the partial agonist activity of Ro 31-1118, flusoxolol and pindolol in man

1. The effects of single oral doses of three beta-adrenoceptor partial agonists (Ro 31-1118, flusoxolol and pindolol), two beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (propranolol and atenolol), two beta-adrenoceptor agonists (salbutamol and prenalterol) and placebo on sleeping heart rate, quality of sleep, supine heart rate, exercise heart rate, blood pressure, forearm blood flow and finger tremor were studied in eight healthy male volunteers. 2. Sleeping heart rate was increased by Ro 31-1118, flusoxolol, pindolol, salbutamol and prenalterol and decreased by propranolol and atenolol. 3. None of the drugs studied affected quality of sleep. 4. Supine heart rate was increased by flusoxolol, prenalterol and salbutamol, unaffected by Ro 31-1118 and pindolol and reduced by propranolol and atenolol. 5. Exercise heart rate was reduced by both beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and the three partial agonists and unaffected by salbutamol and prenalterol. 6. Systolic blood pressure was increased by Ro 31-1118, flusoxolol, salbutamol and prenalterol, unaffected by pindolol and reduced by propranolol and atenolol. Diastolic blood pressure was reduced by salbutamol and prenalterol. 7. Forearm blood flow was increased by Ro 31-1118, salbutamol and prenalterol, unchanged by pindolol and flusoxolol and decreased by atenolol and propranolol. 8. Finger tremor was increased by Ro 31-1118, flusoxolol, pindolol, salbutamol, and prenalterol. 9. beta-adrenoceptor partial agonists have different effects on the cardiovascular system and finger tremor to beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. 10. While Ro 31-1118 and flusoxolol are antagonists mainly at the beta 1-adrenoceptor they have agonist activity at both beta 1- and beta 2 adrenoceptors. 11. While pindolol is a non-selective antagonist its agonist activity is mainly at the beta 2-adrenoceptor.

Comparison of the effect of pindolol and propranolol on heart rate after acute and chronic administration

1 The present study compared the effects in healthy volunteers of the acute and chronic administration of placebo, pindolol and propranolol to see if the partial agonist activity of pindolol was reduced by the beta-adrenoceptor blocking activity of pindolol on chronic administration. 2 Five subjects received in random order for 8 days placebo, propranolol 160 mg and pindolol 10 mg; on days 1 and 8 treatments were given twice at 0 and 2 h. Heart rate in supine position and at end of exercise was recorded before dosing and at 2 and 4 h post-dosing on days 1 and 8. 3 Propranolol and pindolol reduced exercise heart rate to the same extent on days 1 and 8. 4 Propranolol reduced supine heart rate more than pindolol on days 1 and 8 but the difference was only significant on day 8.

Comparison of beta-adrenoceptor blockers under maximal exercise (pindolol v metoprolol v atenolol)

1 The time-related, comparative beta-adrenoceptor blocking effect of metoprolol 150 mg twice daily, atenolol 100 mg once daily and pindolol 7.5 mg twice daily on heart rate, blood pressure, work performance, blood lactate, free fatty acids and plasma catecholamines was studied in ten males aged 19--25 years by means of repeated maximal bicycle exercise tests. 2 At steady state several differences in effects were noted among the drugs. These could be explained by differences in beta 1-selectivity, potency of the chosen drug-doses and intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA). 3 This study emphasizes the importance of including strong sympathetic stimuli in any model used for comparing beta-adrenoceptor blockers with and without ISA in order not to underrate the effects of beta-adrenoceptor blockers with ISA. 4 In the chosen doses pindolol was more effective, and atenolol less effective than metoprolol in suppressing heart rate and blood pressure responses to maximal exercise.

How intrinsic sympathomimetic activity modulates the haemodynamic responses to beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. A clue to the nature of their antihypertensive mechanism

1 A survey has been made of the literature on acute and long-term haemodynamic effects of ten different β-adrenoceptor antagonists.

The β-adrenoceptor blockers are: pindolol, practolol, alprenolol, oxprenolol, acebutolol, penbutolol, metoprolol, atenolol, propranolol and timolol. The total numbers of patients included in this review are 396 patients in 41 acute studies and 410 patients in 36 long-term studies.

2 The effects of β-adrenoceptor blockers on the concentrations of plasma noradrenaline have also been reviewed. Ten studies including 110 patients on non-ISA-β-adrenoceptor blockers and eight studies including 116 patients on pindolol are presented.

3 In the acute studies (i.e. 15-90 min) arterial pressure was lowered by 1-7% and in the long-term studies (i.e. 3 days-5 years) by 6-17%.

4 The degree of cardio-depression induced by the various β-adrenoceptor blockers was inversely correlated with their pharmacologically defined quantity of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) both in acute and in long-term studies.

5 In the acute studies the increments in peripheral vascular resistance were directly correlated with the degree of cardio-depression. This suggests that a fall in arterial pressure immediately after administration of a β-adrenoceptor blocker is prevented by increased vasoconstrictor nerve activity mediated through the arterial baroreflex.

6 The compensatory response of vascular resistance to cardio-depression was similar for β₁-selective and non-selective blockers, thereby indicating that extra-junctional vascular β-receptors are relatively unimportant for maintaining basal vascular tone.

7 In the long-term studies the correlation between changes in cardiac output and changes in vascular resistance was shifted to a lower level of vascular resistance. This means that the onset of blood pressure reduction during β-adrenoceptor blockade was associated with a fall in vascular resistance at any level of cardiac output. Thus vascular resistance was higher during treatment with a non-ISA-β-adrenoceptor blocker than during treatment with an ISA-β-adrenoceptor blocker.

8 The level of vascular resistance ultimately attained during treatment with the various β-adrenoceptor blockers appears to be inversely related to their effects on plasma renin activity.

9 The concentration of noradrenaline in plasma rose by approximately 30% during treatment with non-ISA-β-adrenoceptor blockers and fell by more than 30% after pindolol.

10 There is evidence that under propranolol, which reduces cardiac output and hepatic blood flow, the plasma noradrenaline clearance is diminished. Since noradrenaline is mainly cleared from the circulation by the lungs and by the liver, and since pindolol has no effect on cardiac output and hepatic blood flow, one may expect the plasma noradrenaline clearance not to be diminished by pindolol.

11 The reported effects of β-adrenoceptor blockers on plasma noradrenaline may indicate that the release of neurotransmitter is diminished, but in the case of non-ISA-β-adrenoceptor blockers this effect is not reflected by a decreased concentration of noradrenaline in plasma, because its clearance is also reduced.

12 The hypotensive effect of β-adrenoceptor blockers appears to be independent of blockade of postjunctional cardiac-β-receptors, juxtaglomerular-β-receptors and extrajunctional vascular β-receptors. This indicates that blockade of β-receptors at other sites (i.e. centrally and/or prejunctionally) is more important.