Ranitidine and cimetidine in the healing of duodenal ulcer: meta-analysis of comparative clinical trials

The efficacy, safety and tolerability of pantoprazole-based one-week triple therapy in H. pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer healing

OBJECTIVE

Recently, proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy has been recommended as a first line treatment in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. The aim of this open, multicentre trial was to investigate the efficacy, safety, tolerability and the ulcer healing rate of a triple regimen consisting of pantoprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily for 7 days, in the eradication of H. pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer in Turkey.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

H. pylori infection was assessed by histological examination and rapid urease test at baseline and 4 weeks after the completion of the therapy. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled, 5 were excluded due to various reasons and 72 completed the entire course of the trial.

RESULTS

H. pylori eradication was confirmed in 49 of these patients; the eradication rate was 68% by per-protocol analysis and 63.6% by intention-to-treat analysis. The ulcers were completely healed in 61 patients (85%) at the second endoscopic examination. Drug compliance was excellent (97.3%) and there were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Pantoprazole-based 1-week triple therapy was well tolerated and the ulcer healing rate was high (85%). Relatively low H. pylori eradication rates may be attributed to rising antibiotic resistance over recent years. A large scale, comparative study with other PPI-based regimens is warranted based on the results of this open study with the pantoprazole-based regimen.

Eradication of H. pylori with pantoprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole in duodenal ulcer patients: a head-to-head comparison between two regimens of different duration

BACKGROUND

The study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of two pantoprazole-based triple therapies of different length in the eradication of H. pylori.

METHODS

In this double-blind, multicenter parallel group comparison, H. pylori-positive patients were randomly assigned to either the PCM-7 group (7 days of pantoprazole 40 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg bid) or the PCM-14 m group (modified 14 day therapy of the same regimen with metronidazole only given for 10 days due to labeling reasons). H. pylori status was determined by urease test, histology, culture, and 13C-urea breath test. Treatment outcome was assessed 6 weeks after intake of the last study medication.

RESULTS

The following eradication rates were achieved: for PCM-7 in the MITT population 83% (89/107), in the PP population 84% (81/97); for PCM-14 m in MITT 87% (92/106), in PP 88% (91/104). Ulcer healing rates were: for PCM-7 in MITT population 99% (106/107), in the PP population 99% (96/97); for PCM-14 m in MITT 99% (105/106), in PP 99% (103/104). Gastrointestinal symptoms and gastritis scores decreased in both treatment groups. Equivalence of treatment regimens could be proven for all populations. In total, 64 patients reported adverse events. Five serious adverse events occurred, all unrelated to the study medication.

CONCLUSION

The two pantoprazole-based triple therapies tested in this study are equally effective in H. pylori eradication, ulcer healing and relief from ulcer pain. It is concluded that 7 days of triple therapy are generally sufficient.

Pantoprazole versus ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: a multicenter study in Brazil

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and tolerance of pantoprazole versus ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcers in the Brazilian population.

METHODS

A total of 222 patients with active duodenal ulcers (DU) were randomly allocated to a double dummy blind treatment, either with ranitidine (RAN) 300 mg (111, aged from 20-68 yr old, 56 female) or with pantoprazole (PANT) 40 mg (111 patients, 18-70 yr old, 45 female). After a 2-wk course of treatment, each patient was clinically and endoscopically assessed for ulcer healing. Failure to heal required a further 2-wk course of treatment and a new evaluation thereafter.

RESULTS

In all, 77 of the 103 patients in the PANT group (74.8%) and 42 of the 94 patients in the RAN group (44.7%) who completed the study had ulcer healing after one 2-wk treatment course, and an additional 23 in the PANT group (22.3%) and 28 in the RAN group (29.8%) after the second 2-wk treatment course, totaling 100 (97.1%) and 70 (74.5%), respectively. Therapeutic gain in favor of pantoprazole was significant both at the end of the first and the second 2-wk treatment course (p<0.001). At 2 wk, symptoms remission was significantly higher in the PANT group (97.6%) than with the RAN group (77.5%) (p<0.001). The Intention-to-treat analysis showed results statistically similar to those observed in the per-protocol analysis. Minor adverse events were reported by four patients in the PANT group and three in the RAN group. No relevant laboratory abnormalities were seen. No patient withdrew from the study due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that pantoprazole is more effective than ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer providing faster ulcer healing in most patients (97.1%), in 4 wk. Adverse events were rare and were similar in both groups, and had no influence on the therapeutic outcome.

The impact of Helicobacter pylori eradication on peptic ulcer healing

OBJECTIVE

Current literature was reviewed analyzing the outcome of peptic ulcer healing in relation to the results of the posttherapeutic Helicobacter pylori (HP) status.

METHODS

Literature was reviewed along with an analysis of 60 studies, comprising a total of 4329 patients.

RESULTS

Successful Helicobacter pylori eradication was found to induce a better response in peptic ulcer healing, regardless of diagnosis: gastric ulcer 88% vs 73% (odds ratio [OR] 2.7, p < 0.01), duodenal ulcer 95% vs 76% (OR 5.6, p < 0.0001), and peptic ulcer 95% vs 76% (OR 6.6, p < 0.0001), for patients having their HP infection successfully cured versus those remaining HP-positive, respectively (Fisher's exact test). For all evaluated time points (< or = 6, 7-8, and 10-12 wk after beginning treatment), HP-negative patients had higher healing rates than HP-positive patients (95% vs 82%, 94% vs 69%, and 96% vs 78% with corresponding OR of 4.2, 6.5, and 7.4, all p < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test). The use of concomitant acid suppression therapy during initial HP eradication provided a benefit on peptic ulcer healing only for patients with persistent HP infection (improved healing rates of 78% vs 67%; otherwise rates were 94-96%). Likewise, prolonged acid inhibition in HP treatment failures after the initial HP treatment phase resulted in 7-20% improved healing rates, whereas patients becoming HP-negative did not profit.

CONCLUSION

Successful HP eradication therapy accelerates peptic ulcer healing even without concomitant acid suppression.

Colloid bismuth versus famotidine in the treatment and prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse: results of a double-blind, double dummy randomized study

Fifty-three consecutive patients with active duodenal ulcer (DU) were randomly included in a double-blind, double-dummy study to test the healing and relapsing rate of two treatment regimens: famotidine 40 mg nocte for 4-8 weeks, followed by 20 mg for 12 months after healing of the ulcer and colloidal bismuth (CBS) (240 mg bid) for 4-8 weeks, followed by placebo maintenance treatment. The results of the short term period confirmed the efficacy of CBS in healing DU (24/25 in CBS group and 19/23 in famotidine group). However, the relapse rate in the CBS-treated group was higher (77.8% at 12 months) than in the famotidine group (35.7%) (p = 0.041). Only 7 patients (41.2%) were cleared from Helicobacter pylori (HP) after CBS treatment. In conclusion, the high relapse rate observed in CBS treated patients may be related to the high percentage of patients with HP infection in the tested group and support the hypothesis that lack of efficacy of CBS in preventing DU recurrence is related to its poor eradication of HP.

Triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and reduction of duodenal ulcer relapse: comparison of 1 week and 2 week regimens and recrudescence rates over 12 months

The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and the relapse of duodenal ulcer, and also to evaluate the differences in efficacy and side effects between 1 week and 2 week triple therapy. Sixty-two patients with active duodenal ulcer, which healed within 8 weeks of nizatidine treatment, were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Group 1 (n = 29) received no drugs, Group II (n = 33) received triple therapy for 1 week (IIa, n = 16) or 2 weeks (IIb, n = 17). Eleven patients whose ulcer did not heal after an 8 week nizatidine treatment period were randomly assigned into Group IIa (n = 5) and IIb (n = 6). Seven patients whose ulcer recurred after discontinuation of nizatidine were allocated to receive 2 weeks of triple therapy. All patients received endoscopy 6 weeks after entry, and again at 3, 6 and 12 months unless both ulcer recurrence and H. pylori infection were found. The frequency of ulcer relapse 6 weeks after the active duodenal ulcer had healed was 83% (24/29 in Group I, 13% in Group 11a and 14% in Group IIb. The cumulative rate of recurrence was significantly higher in Group I than in Group II (90 vs 30% at 12 months, P < 0.01). Ulcer relapse was associated with persistence of H. pylori infection (P < 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists in peptic ulcer disease. Efficacy in healing peptic ulcers

Duodenal ulcer healing depends on the degree and length of inhibition of gastric secretion and upon the duration of therapy, while gastric ulcer healing is dependent mainly on the duration of therapy. Currently marketed doses of the histamine H2-receptor antagonists heal between 77 and 92% of duodenal ulcers at 4 weeks, and adjuvant treatment to eradicate Helicobacter pylori increases this rate. Once-daily administration is as effective as more frequent dosing regimens and may even result in higher healing rates. Gastric ulcers heal more slowly, but 75 to 88% of ulcers heal after 8 weeks of treatment. While newer more potent acid suppressors such as omeprazole heal ulcers slightly more quickly, the H2-receptor antagonists have an unparalleled safety record of over 15 years. It is unlikely that the prostaglandin analogues can improve on the efficacy of the H2-receptor antagonists with as low an incidence of side effects.

Cure of duodenal ulcer associated with eradication of Helicobacter pylori

50 patients with intractable duodenal ulcer were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS) alone (26 patients) or with amoxicillin and metronidazole (24 patients). 5 patients (all on triple therapy) withdrew because of side-effects. In 17 of the 45 patients who completed the treatment, Helicobacter pylori was eradicated, and there was no ulcer relapse during the first 12 months of follow-up. The ulcer relapse rate was significantly higher (17 of 21 [89%]) among patients who remained positive for H pylori. 9 patients who remained positive for H pylori and had ulcer relapses within 6 months of treatment with CBS alone, were subsequently given triple therapy. 7 of the 9 showed H pylori eradication and no relapses within the next 12 months. The 2 patients still H pylori-positive after triple therapy had further ulcer relapses. H pylori eradication, without altering acid output, will become the mainstay of duodenal ulcer treatment because it cures the disease.

Can higher doses of an H2-receptor antagonist accelerate duodenal ulcer healing?

Drugs that inhibit gastric acid secretion heal duodenal ulcers at a rate that correlates with the ability of individual treatment regimens to decrease 24-h intragastric acidity. As current therapeutic regimens of ranitidine decrease 24-h intragastric acidity submaximally, higher dosages may expedite duodenal ulcer healing. To test this hypothesis a randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in 245 patients with duodenal ulcer to compare the effects of standard dose (300 mg nocte) and high-dose (300 mg q.d.s.) ranitidine. Patients were assessed after 2 weeks of treatment and, if unhealed, after a further 2 weeks of therapy. The therapeutic gain in ulcer healing at the 2-week endoscopy of the higher dose over the lower dose of ranitidine was 22% (68% vs 46%, P less than 0.001). The cumulative ulcer healing rates at the 4-week endoscopy were 88% and 92% for the standard and high-dose ranitidine groups, respectively (N.S.). By 2 weeks, 61% of patients treated with standard ranitidine therapy and 79% of those receiving 300 mg ranitidine q.d.s. were pain-free (P less than 0.01). A further 2 weeks of therapy enabled 88% and 97% of patients (N.S.) to become pain-free on these two regimens, respectively. The drug regimens were equally well tolerated. Thus higher-dose ranitidine can significantly accelerate the healing of duodenal ulcer with improvement in pain relief.

Sucralfate and ranitidine in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer. Healing and relapse. Ulcer Study Group

Healing and relapse of acute duodenal ulcer were investigated in an endoscopically controlled multicenter study using a double-blind design. Patients with acute uncomplicated duodenal ulcer were randomly assigned to treatment with sucralfate (1 g four times per day) or ranitidine (150 mg twice per day) for four to eight weeks. After healing, all anti-ulcer treatment was discontinued except for low-dose antacids needed for occasional upper abdominal pain, and the patients were observed for up to one year. Endoscopy was repeated after one year or at any time earlier if symptoms suggested ulcer relapse. Of the 83 patients who entered the study, 75 (sucralfate 40, ranitidine 35) underwent endoscopy after four weeks and could be fully evaluated. Healing rates after four and eight weeks were similar in the two groups (four- and eight-week healing rates after sucralfate and ranitidine: 78 and 74 percent, and 95 and 94 percent, respectively). Fifty-three patients with healed ulcers (sucralfate 29, ranitidine 24) were observed for up to one year. Duodenal ulcers occurred somewhat later after sucralfate than after ranitidine treatment, but life table analysis showed no significant difference. Thus, this study confirms a similar efficacy of sucralfate and ranitidine in healing of duodenal ulcer. A tendency to delayed relapse early after discontinuation of sucralfate failed to reach statistical significance.

Ranitidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases

Ranitidine, a histamine H2-receptor antagonist, is now well established as a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion effective in the treatment and prophylaxis of gastrointestinal lesions aggravated by gastric acid secretion. Therapeutic trials involving several thousands of patients with peptic ulcer disease confirm that ranitidine 300mg daily administered orally in single or divided doses is at least as effective as cimetidine 800 to 1000mg daily in increasing the rate of healing of duodenal and gastric ulcers. Similar dosages of ranitidine have been shown to relieve the symptoms of reflux oesophagitis and heal or prevent gastrointestinal damage caused by ulcerogenic drugs. Ranitidine 150mg orally at night maintains ulcer healing in the long term. Ranitidine has also demonstrated good results in the treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and in the prevention of aspiration pneumonitis when given prior to surgery and to pregnant women at full term. It may also have a place in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and in the prevention of stress ulcers in the intensive care setting, although these areas require further investigation. Ranitidine has been used safely in obstetric patients during labour, in children, the elderly, and in patients with renal impairment when given in appropriate dosages. The drug is very well tolerated and is only infrequently associated with serious adverse reactions or clinically significant drug interactions. Even at high dosages, ranitidine appears devoid of antiandrogenic effects. Ranitidine is clearly comparable or superior to most other antiulcer agents in the treatment and prevention of a variety of gastrointestinal disorders associated with gastric acid secretion. With its favourable efficacy and tolerability profiles, ranitidine must be considered a first-line agent when suppression of gastric acid secretion is indicated.

Colloidal bismuth in the treatment of duodenal ulceration: the benefit for the patient

Colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS) heals gastric and duodenal ulcers better than placebo and at rates similar to those observed with the commonly used H2-antagonists. Indeed, healing of duodenal ulcers may be more rapid than with cimetidine during the first month of treatment. When treatment is withdrawn, however, relapse is slower after CBS than after the H2-antagonists. The mechanism is uncertain but may be related to the ability of CBS to suppress Campylobacter pylori infection. The clinical implications of this difference in relapse rates are discussed. Preliminary data suggest that duodenal ulcer patients who are rendered C. pylori-negative for a prolonged period may be relatively immune to relapse. If confirmed, and if a suitably effective regimen can be found, this will transform the management of this difficult clinical problem.

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists

The first histamine H2-receptor antagonists were developed in the early 1970s, and they have a dominant role in today's management of peptic ulceration. The original regimens using either cimetidine or ranitidine attempted to control acidity across the 24 hours, but more 'modern' regimens use a large single dose of the H2-blocker in the evening, which produces a pulse of decreased intragastric acidity during the night with a normal acidity in the daytime. High-dose regimens using a new generation of extremely potent histamine H2-receptor antagonists may improve ulcer healing rates at 4 weeks, and may be particularly useful for the management of either severe oesophagitis or intractable duodenal ulceration.