Nondigestive symptoms in non-erosive reflux disease: nature, prevalence and relation to acid reflux

Gastroesophageal reflux disease, functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome: common overlapping gastrointestinal disorders

Several studies have indicated an overlap between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and various functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). The overlapping conditions reported have mainly been functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The available literature is frequently based on symptomatic questionnaires or endoscopic procedures to diagnose GERD. Rarely, among patients with heartburn, pathophysiological evaluations have been considered to differentiate those with proven GERD from those without. Moreover, both GERD and IBS or FD showed enormous heterogeneity in terms of the criteria and diagnostic procedures used. The GERD-IBS overlap ranges from 3-79% in questionnaire-based studies and from 10-74% when GERD has been diagnosed endoscopically. The prevalence of functional dyspepsia (after normal upper endoscopy) is 12-15% and an overlap with GERD has been reported frequently. Only a few studies have considered a potential overlap between functional heartburn (FH) and IBS using a 24-h pH-metry or impedance-pH evaluation. Similar data has been reported for an overlap between FH and FD. Recently, a revision of the Rome criteria for esophageal FGIDs identified both FH and hypersensitive esophagus (HE) as potential functional esophageal disorders. This might increase the potential overlap between different FGIDs, with FH and HE rather than with GERD. The aim of the present review article was to appraise and discuss the current evidence supporting the possible concomitance of GERD with IBS and FD in the same patients and to evaluate how various GERD treatments could impact on the quality of life of these patients.

Overlap of functional heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease with irritable bowel syndrome

Several studies indicate a significant degree of overlap between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Likewise, both functional heartburn (FH) and IBS are functional digestive disorders that may occur in the same patients. However, data establishing a solid link between FH and IBS are lacking, mainly because the clinical definition of FH has undergone substantial changes over the years. The available literature on the overlap between GERD or FH and IBS highlights considerable heterogeneity in terms of the criteria and diagnostic procedures used to assess heartburn and IBS. In particular, several epidemiological studies included patients with concomitant IBS and GERD without any attempt to distinguish FH (as defined by the Rome III criteria) from GERD via pathophysiological investigations. Independent of these critical issues, there is preliminary evidence supporting a significant degree of FH-IBS overlap. This underscores the need for studies based on updated diagnostic criteria and accurate pathophysiological classifications, particularly to distinguish FH from GERD. This distinction would represent an essential starting point to achieving a better understanding of pathophysiology in the subclasses of patients with GERD and FH and properly assessing the different degrees of overlap between IBS and the subcategories of heartburn.The present review article intends to appraise and critically discuss current evidence supporting a possible concomitance of GERD or FH with IBS in the same patients and to highlight the pathophysiological relationships between these disorders.

Prevalence and co-occurrence of upper and lower functional gastrointestinal symptoms in patients eligible for bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Obesity is considered as a risk factor for many functional digestive disorders. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence and the association of functional digestive symptoms affecting the upper and the lower digestive tract in patients eligible for bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Before surgery, 120 consecutive patients with normal upper endoscopy (7.5% males, mean BMI 44 ± 6 m/kg(2)) have filled a standard questionnaire in order to evaluate the presence of depressive symptoms and functional digestive disorders according to the Rome criteria. The major symptoms (esophageal, gastroduodenal, anorectal, and abdominal pain) were coded as dichotomous variables. Data analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression with a backwards selection procedure adjusted only for the variables that were significant in univariate analysis (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Functional symptoms were present in 89% of the subjects (2.5 functional digestive symptoms/subject). Depression symptoms were found in 43% of the patients. Esophageal symptoms were independent predictors for the presence of gastric, bowel, and anorectal symptoms. Functional abdominal pain and bowel symptoms were present, respectively, in 19% and 84% of the patients. Approximately half of the patients have specific functional bowel disorders (28.6% constipation, 18% irritable bowel syndrome, 18% diarrhea, 1% bloating) and 35.7% have non-specific bowel disorders. Anorectal symptoms were found in 40% of the patients: difficult defecation in 32% and fecal incontinence in 9.8% of the patients. Depression was an independent predictor for anorectal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the high prevalence of functional bowel symptoms in patients complaining of morbid obesity.

Non-esophageal symptoms cannot differentiate between erosive reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease in a referred population

BACKGROUND

Non-esophageal symptoms are highly prevalent in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). However, their prevalence in erosive esophagitis (ErE) is unclear. The aims of this study were to compare patients with pH-positive NERD and ErE in terms of non-esophageal symptoms and to investigate whether such symptoms can differentiate between these two conditions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective observational study of ErE and pH-positive NERD patients matched for age and gender with a nested case-control analysis. Symptoms were scored on validated scales. The association between the scale scores and diagnosis was evaluated in a random group comprising 67% of the total (group A) and was validated on the rest (group B).

RESULTS

124 ErE and 248 pH-positive NERD patients were studied. In group A, pH-positive NERD patients scored higher than ErE patients on all symptom scales. Scores on chest, constipation, sleep and urinary symptoms scales were significantly associated with diagnosis. A composite weighted score on these scales was 41.5% sensitive and 86.0% specificity in the differentiation of ErE from pH-positive NERD patients. When applied to group B, the sensitivity and specificity of this score were 48.8% and 70.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Digestive and non-digestive symptoms occurred with a significant higher prevalence in pH-positive NERD compared with ErE patients. However a composite score on scales of constipation, chest, sleep and urinary symptoms was not enough sensitive and specific to differentiate these two conditions.

Overlap between gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional bowel diseases: an analysis of related factors

AIM: To investigate the overlap between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and functional bowel diseases and analyze the factors related to such overlap.

METHODS: A total of 232 consecutive outpatients treated at our hospital from July 2008 to December 2008 due to sour regurgitation, heartburn and retrosternal pain were included in the study. GERD was diagnosed when the score (Sc) of reflux diagnostic questionnaire (RDQ) was greater than or equal to 12. The patients were divided into two groups: GERD patients (Sc ≥ 12) and control ones (Sc < 12). The height, weight, smoking history and drinking history of these patients were recorded. The patients were screened for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional diarrhea (FD), functional constipation (FC) and functional bloating (FB) according to Rome III criteria. The overlap between GERD and these disorders as well as the related factors were analyzed by the t-test, chi square test and logistic regression.

RESULTS: The prevalences of IBS, FD, FC and FB in GERD patients were higher than those in control patients (29.1% vs 11.1%, 15.2% vs 3.7%, 10.6% vs 9.9% and 2.0% vs 1.2%, respectively). The prevalence of IBS in GERD patients was significant higher than that in control patients (P < 0.005) though no significant differences were observed in prevalences of FD, FC and FB between the two groups. GERD symptom score was significantly related with the overlap between GERD and functional bowel disease (P < 0.001), while body mass index (BMI), age, sex, smoking history and drinking history had no relation with the overlap.

CONCLUSION: IBS, FD, FC and FB in GERD patients are more prevalent than those in the general population, and the prevalence of IBS in GERD patients is significant higher than that in the general population. GERD symptom score has significant relation with the overlap between GERD and functional bowel diseases.